...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
New comment on Human phenotypes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Antalas: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by SlimJim: That Hanihara study is a metric dental analysis, this is how I know you haven't read that paper, also, it doesn't mean anything in regards to their phenotype and it doesn't mean much when it comes to genetics, I can tell you haven't read that Brace study either, look at the dendrograms, when Brace says Sub Saharan he's referring to his Haya, Gabon, Dahomey and Zanzibar sample, not the Somali sample. When have I claimed to be Egyptian? [/QB][/QUOTE]??? I knew it was dental but haven't you mentionned "metric" datas ? and yes It means a lot when it comes to genetics, here from the same source : [QUOTE]Fourth, [b]the patterning of dental variation among major geographic populations is more or less consistent with those obtained from genetic and craniometric data.[/b] Fifth, once differences in population size between sub-Saharan Africa, Europe, South/West Asia, Australia, and Far East, and genetic drift are taken into consideration, [b]the pattern of sub-Saharan African distinctiveness becomes more or less comparable to that based on genetic and craniometric data[/b] [/QUOTE]As for Brace what are you talking about ? : [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/OoLzdMo.jpg[/IMG] Ancient egyptians certainly didn't look like modern horners since horners have obvious SSA traits which the ancient egyptian remains lack + it's quite obvious when we look at their iconography but yes I suppose that's "subjective" "cherrypicked" "foreigners" [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3