...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Keita's coastal North African type
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [quot]Originally posted by the lioness,: Doug must have me on ignore and literally can't see my posts. He talks about tropical people sometimes. Here we have hard physical data and he keeps ignoring it [b]Iberomausrians at the extreme opposite of tropical limb ratios.[/b] They were probably refugees from Ice age conditions[/quote] I was going to PM this, but since Antalas is duping people here by not admitting to some of the nuances I'm about to speak on, I might as well post it, in the interest of leveing the playing field. Lioness. Do yourself a favor and read the Holiday 2013 paper you just posted. As was already discussed before (I believe DJ also explained this to you), the Afalou sample's affinities in Holiday do not speak for all Iberomaurusans. As an example, there is an Afalou skeleton (nr 28) at a deeper layer at that site, that is thought (e.g. by Coon and Holiday hints at it) to be of a different ancestry (e.g. shorter stature, head shape out of the Afalou head shape range and different body shape). So, you can't generalize that Afalou bodyplan as representative for older Iberomaurusians. Same applies to the newly excavated Loosdrecht Taforalt sample (it's not the same as the Taforalt sample in use since the 1950s, that was largely Eurasian according to Kefi). Antalas, don't bother replying to this (I know, something along the lines of "#28 wasn't black, but perfectly Caucasoid"), because this is all I have to say on this. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3