...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Response Against Great Zimbabwe Being Black
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Antalas: [qb] funny because you acknowledge the fact they were craniometrically distinct from 90% of Sub-saharan Africa,..[/qb][/QUOTE]When and where?? You have a horrible habit of claiming I said things I never did. I've always maintained that Egyptians as North Africans are no more distinct in certain features from Sub-Saharans as they were to Eurasians. Which is why metrically they are intermediate between the two. Nonmetrically however, they group entirely with Sub-Saharans. [QUOTE][qb]you don't have their genetic results except the abusir samples and two samples found in lebanon and yet you imply they were "black". May I ask you based on what are you claiming this? [/qb][/QUOTE]The Late Period Abusir samples from an area of Egypt known to have immigrant communities are far from accepted as being typical of indigenous Egyptians. That Egyptians [i]are[/i] black is based on melanin dosages likening them to Sub-Saharans in terms of complexion. Not to mention again certain cranial traits traits as well body skeletal structure, HLA, HBS, paternal lineages and maternal lineages. What else is there? [b]LOL[/b] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3