...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Why is the true Negro theory still being used in 2023 in population genetic studies?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [qb] @Lioness Pay attention, and pay attention closely. Let me just explain this for the folks reading. This is what i said: [QUOTE] I can show you [b]the *WORST* example[/b] actually published as recent as 3 months ago. [/QUOTE]-Yoruba are not an ideal example because African Ancestry into the Eastern Mediterranean and Southern Europe is likely not of Direct West Central African origin. -Mbuti pygmies would be worse because while Yoruba is bad Mbuti and Biaka pygmies are more basal Central African rainforest hunter gatherer groups who's ancestry likely didn't even reach that region through proxy or an intermediary. Thus they are even further removed from the type of ancestry that would leave into levant or leave north Africa and enter Southern Europe. -Ju_Hoan_North are at an even more basal position than Pygmies because they are the population that has the oldest divergence in the phylogeny of Homo Sapiens. From what we know of Demographic events in Africa, it's *extremely unlikely* that this ancient divergent ancestry that is concentrated in Hunter Gatherer/Pastoral populations at the opposite end of the continent would be characteristic of African variability that admixed into Soldiers in the Roman Army. Southern African and Rainforest huntergatgerer populations are extremely divergent in relation to Non-Africans. SO much in fact that they are too old to even be the parental ancestors of Non-Africans. Non-Africans are instead related to much later diverging genetic substructure from East and North Africa. It's about ascertainment bias. Samples matter. Samples are the difference between Abusir Mummies containing 6% African ancestry, 15% African ANcestry or 30% African ancestry. [/qb][/QUOTE][IMG]https://images2.imgbox.com/a2/0d/OOvW18Bk_o.png[/IMG] ^^ correct this please what groups to you think should be on this chart? The critique is only a theoretical talking point unless you can come up with something better > for all groups listed on this chart, not just the Africans [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3