...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
what do you think of these Amarna pop affiliator results by Keita et al. ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Askia_The_Great: [QB] [b]@Antalas[/b] You nor the data you posted are still not explaining why the descendants of Natufians(Levant_Chl) are showing very little of this component. The studies you posted are not addressing the real issues. They are only referencing the same position that we already know. However, let's say that this component is some ancient Eurasian component, at the end of the day it would've been absorbed by the local populations in Northeast Africa. [QUOTE]Our high-resolution phylogenetic dissection of both haplogroups and coalescent time assessments suggest that the extant main branching pattern of both haplogroups arose and diversified in the mid-later Upper Palaeolithic, with some sub-clades concomitantly with the expansion of the Iberomaurusian industry. [b]Carriers of these maternal lineages have been later absorbed into and diversified further during the spread of Afro-Asiatic languages in North and East Africa.[/b][/QUOTE][URL=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3582464/]Divoricing the Late Upper Palaeolithic demographic histories of mtDNA haplogroups M1 and U6 in Africa[/URL] So, what is the point in really bringing up 35k year old supposed Eurasian ancestry(not denying Eurasian ancestry entered Africa around that time), when it was most likely absorbed by the time of the Neolithic period? As for Neanderthal ancestry? Okay, IAM most likely absorbed Neanderthal ancestry from southern Europe most likely. Yet what about Northeast Africa? Which if I remember correctly almost show NO Neanderthal ancestry if at all... Especially Horn of Africans.. The dark green component almost peaks in Horners, if this is the case why don't Horners show Neanderthal like ancestry? Same with Egyptians/Sudanese? I agree with certain posters(don't want to say their names in case of misrepresenting their position) that in the future we will see a split in Northeast and Northwest African indigenous ancestry, but that's a story for another time. All in all, you are not focusing on the big elephant in the room in that Israel_C profile is not showing very LITTLE of this dark green component. The same Israel_C profile which would more than likely be the descendant of the Natufians. If this component in fact came from Eurasia, then it would've easily peaked in the Israel profile. Instead, we are not seeing that. [QUOTE]Originally posted by -Just Call Me Jari-: Yeah that's what I feel like as well, the chart plus all the info coming out seems to be pointing to a genetic "unity" as you put it with the Afro-Asiatic populations...plus even more interesting, it extends to the Pastoralists in Kenya and Tanzania, [b]who that made it as far as Kerma according to one DNA study...[/b] [/QUOTE]What DNA study? It would've been the other way around with more northern populations migrating south. These Kenyan and Tanzanian pastoralists would've received this component most likely from the Horn, and the latter most likely from Egypt/Sudan region. Heck pastoralism comes from North Africa if I'm not mistaken. Either way this component based on what I am seeing is most likely indignous to Africa. And yea I see it as a indignous component mostly found in Afro-Asiatic speakers. When Afro-Asiatic is eventually confirmed to originated around Egypt/Sudan area then everything will be tied together. Now... If its confirmed to be found in "another" location then things get a bit interesting. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3