...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
what do you think of these Amarna pop affiliator results by Keita et al. ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elijah The Tishbite: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Elijah The Tishbite: [qb] "Back migrations" is simply another term for "mixture." Some of yall think "back migrations" means a group of Eurasians en masse got up and walked all through Africa which is not the case. Mixture can enter Africa in North or Northeast and be spread by other Africans who interact with each other, it's not a case of a "pure" group of Eurasians migrating all throughout Africa. If an African American with significant European mixture moved to Africa and started a family with an African woman, their children would have some of that European mixture. If someone took DNA samples of their kids 3000 years later and found "European" ancestry in their remains, does that mean "Europeans" migrated into Africa and brought that mixture? No! [/qb][/QUOTE]So you're saying Eurasians never settled in the Maghreb or Egypt Instead Africans left Africa, mixed with Eurasians (but not too much) and then went back into Africa [/qb][/QUOTE]Why do you assume North Africa was uninhabited until "Eurasians" migrated there? North Africa has evidence of being inhabited longer than modern humans were in Eurasia. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3