...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
what do you think of these Amarna pop affiliator results by Keita et al. ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BrandonP: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Itoli: [qb]Well, bi-directional is a vague statement itself. Of course the movement was bi-directional because if you can go one way at least some will go the other way as a matter of chance so it doesn't say much about the genetic landscape. I'm basically asking for the statement to be expounded on. For example, which population had the most environmental incentives to move in either direction? The discussion goes nowhere if we keep throwing open ended claims at each other. [/qb][/QUOTE]Could not the Sahara's various "humid" phrases have allowed peoples indigenous to North Africa (as well as further south in the continent) to spread across the region and into western Asia? I don't think it's a coincidence that the spread of Afroasiatic from wherever its homeland was throughout the Sahara and adjacent regions coincides with the last Green Sahara (or maybe the "Wild Nile" period before that). [IMG]https://i0.wp.com/cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/600/1*oJSmwRHBv-y9_iOI6kDuUA.jpeg?w=525&ssl=1[/IMG] Though, admittedly, those same humid periods could theoretically have allowed movements in the other direction as well. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3