...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
A-Group Nubians Caucasoid?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] Antalas, you're writing words but you're not saying anything, but somehow you still think you're backing me in a corner by holding me to my acknowledgement of Eurasian ancestry in Africa. Eurasians did bring U6, and so on. One example of a Euro U6 carrier is Peştera Muierii 1. So how are you going to get me in trouble by using my statement against me, when you can't even explain how you go from Peştera Muierii 1 to NE Africans? Alkhiday pushes back predynastics from a purely holocene population, to a palaeolithic population, and so you can't point to holocene Eurasian populations to explain predynastics. But then you can't point to Palaeolithic MENA and European populations either because the populations from that era don't even resemble the modern people who live there today (do I need to post the Natufian morphometric presentation slide again?). So you have a problem in that the holocene Eurasians are younger than alKhiday, while the Paleolithic West Eurasians populations are a dead end or absorbed into modern populations. Either way, modern West Eurasians being near NE Africans in your Irish graph doesn't bode well for your positions because their palaeolithic predecessors are much more distant. Or maybe I give you too much credit in thinking you can figure out yourself what it means that your Irish graph has modern West Eurasians are closer to Africans than palaeolithic West Eurasians are to Africans. You can't figure out what that means? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3