...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
A-Group Nubians Caucasoid?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by LoStranger: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] Brandon posted the Irish non-metric study. See the link in his post to Antalas. http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=010803;p=2#000058 [/qb][/QUOTE]Fantastic thank you so much. You're an absolute star mate. :D Anyway for any newbies like me reading. This data from the Irish 2021 study basically shows how Nile Valley populations cluster with one another and how there has been population continuity between Nile Valley populations all the way from the Paleoithic 12th Millennium BCE (Al Khiday) to other Nile Valley populations such as Bronze Age Kerma (1750-1500 BCE) and Bronze Age A Group Nubians (3800-2900 BCE) which in turn has been shown to cluster with Pre-Dynastic Badari and Naqada Egyptians (4500-3000 BCE) [b]Note: The only outlier is the reamins at Jebel Sahaba (GSA) and this was due largely to their "West African" like affinities.[/b] [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/SAD8KFLl.png[/IMG] [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/hNCEcETl.png[/IMG] [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/nzldtBZl.png[/IMG] [/qb][/QUOTE]You have this misinterpreted. I suggest you change the way you think about population affinity regarding Africans in general. Through out this thread it has been clear that there is a temporal gap that exaggerates affinity (or lack there of) of populations between varying time periods. Antalas posted the Irish 2010 figure in this very thread a page ago. Modern pooled Equatorial Africans are closer to the centroid including Horners and Predynastics than Jebel Sahaba(JSA) . It is not "West-African" like Affinities that draws JSA away, JSA isn't West African. It is extinct metrics including traits such as robusticity associated with an entirely different population history than the Paleolithic samples in question (Al-Khiday) which drew it away. The inclusion of JSA-like or related ancestry (or continuity) in modern African populations draws them away form biological North Africans. The other samples in this analyses all directly have ancestry from a source related to the Paleolithic NE Africans in question. Also you can see evidence of the homogenization in the 3D pca as well. Examine the positioning of the older samples; Gebel Ramleh and Al-Khiday, who both hold outlying positions. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3