...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
A-Group Nubians Caucasoid?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by LoStranger: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [qb] ^ Yes, but as I explained to Antalas, even ANA was originally thought to be "Eurasian" until it was discovered it wasn't. Do you remember that even haplogroup E was originally labeled as "Eurasian" as well. My point is that ENF is the last hope these Euronuts have, but that hope could very well fade as Swenet points out. And what about the HBS (sickle cell)? [IMG]https://www.nature.com/scitable/content/ne0000/ne0000/ne0000/ne0000/8779497/sickle-cell-haplotype-map-resized.jpg[/IMG] There is evidence that Natufians and even Neolithic Iranians had it. [/qb][/QUOTE]Yeah I have to agree with everything you said there. I do remember the days when Euronuts kept trying to Eurasianize Haplogroup E especially E1b1b (E3b). My only concern going forward is euronuts and their African lapdogs using genetic distance as an argument. For example saying Basal Eurasian or ANA is closer to Eurasian or is more "Eurasian shifted" compared to West Africans. In a matter of fact I had this very same thing said to me personally by a Nigerian Fulani who I was discussing on whether Ancient Nubians were a mostly genetically indigenous population or heavily genetically Eurasian admixed population. This is what he wrote to me in a series of replies: [QUOTE][b]Genetic and linguistic studies have demonstrated that Nubian people in Northern Sudan and Southern Egypt are an admixed group that started off as a population closely related to Nilotic people.This population later received significant gene flow from west Asia and other east africans[/b] [/QUOTE] [QUOTE][b]"Even if it is African (ANA or Basal Eurasian) they were still shifted towards Eurasian and far distinct from ghanians and people in the Congo"[/b][/QUOTE] [QUOTE][b]You simply don’t want to accept it, either way the picture is clear. Later middle Stone Age North Africans especially in the Paleolithic was already shifted towards Eurasians and some segments did drift back. The picture is clear and obvious. Africa is a continent with differences[/b] [/QUOTE][/qb][/QUOTE]Just ask him if Natufians are more SSA than Taforalt. The former is more shifted towards Yoruba. I don't get how any of his replies answer whether or not Nubians were indigenous though. Reiterating genetic distance is not particularly forthcoming at all. This is especially useless once you realize he's stating the parent component is "shifted towards" the child. That's like saying [URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982217311958]TianYuan man[/URL] is more Native American than he is Eurasian. Also, which "Nubians" were you guys talking about? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3