...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ethiopians, Somalis
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] ^ Right. It should be apparent by now that the 'Sub-Saharan vs. Eurasian' is a FALSE dialectic. Both Africa and Eurasia are too diverse to make such ridiculous reductionist assumptions. The idea that Eurasia means "caucasoid" features for example is hilarious considering that black skinned, spiral haired Andamanese are [i]more[/i] (pristine) Eurasians compared to African admixed Western Eurasians. Even the label Sub-Saharan is a misnomer since both Hadza and southernmost Khoisan also lack this marker most label as "Sub-Saharan". But as Lioness pointed out Ethiopians, and Eritreans especially have much higher percentages of actual Eurasian admixture than Somalis yet the former not only being lighter skinned have higher incidence of kinky hair while the latter while darker have loose wavy hair. Which again shows that such traits are not associated with one ancestry over another. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3