...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Amenophis III source of Tut's Y haplogroup
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] [b] [CODE] YEAR GENERATION 1950 Ego/Ega O | 1920 1 m = f | | 1890 2 m = Y X = f | | | | 1860 3 m = Y X = Y X = Y X = f | | | | | | | | 1830 4 m = Y X = Y X = Y X = Y X = Y X = Y X = Y X = f | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1800 5 M=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=F[/CODE][/b] http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=005037;p=3#000103 [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [qb] Lemme see if I can find one o dem 4 generation charts showing how much ethnic information is lost following the two narrow uniparental paths no matter how far back you go. [/qb][/QUOTE]Originally posted April 25, 2007: Let's take a 54 year old subject today and go back five generations to that persons great-great-great- grandparents of 200 years ago in the days of slavery. The [b]O[/b] represents the subject. The [b]M[/b] is the woman five generations ago whose mtDNA showed up on the test. Let's say she was Cherokee. The [b]F[/b] is the ancestral man as explained above except the genetic tests were done on the Y chromosome. Let's say he was Scotch Irish. The mtDNA and Y chromosome tests only show the matrilineal ancestry through the Cherokee woman's [b]m[/b] 's and the patrilineal ancestry through the Scotch Irishman's [b]f[/b] 's. Five generations ago in 1800, unless there was incest, or cousin matings, the subject has 32 ancestors. Let's say 30 of them were all Fons from Dahomey (modern Benin). [b]They're all those X 's and Y 's the DNA tests miss! [i] They contribute 93.75% to the ancestral make up of the subject. Literally, they make him (or her) what he (or she) is.[/b][/i] The 1 out of 32 Cherokee ancestress and the 1 out of 32 Scotch Irish ancestor do not make the subject 50% Indian and 50% European. Together they only come to 6.25%. All those Dahomey Fons make the subject African. Why wouldn't a responsible tester or company tell their client about this kind of test limitation? Why don't these docudrama writers on the cable tv narrate the truth about what these tests really tell? [CODE] YEAR GENERATION 1950 Ego/Ega O | 1920 1 m = f | | 1890 2 m = Y X = f | | | | 1860 3 m = Y X = Y X = Y X = f | | | | | | | | 1830 4 m = Y X = Y X = Y X = Y X = Y X = Y X = Y X = f | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1800 5 M=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=Y X=F[/CODE]Jumping to DNA conclusions can breed false historic or personal notions, like Skippy being 50% white and having 50 out of 100 European progenitors. Beware of unsupplemented DNA conclusions. At least in Skippy's case somebody finally went used other genetic evidence. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3