I was going to bide my time in posting this until I realized it was on Youtube...and they like deleting videos...so I'm posting this now. It's on a program called Digging for the Truth that comes on the History channel, hosted by Josh Bernstein...they talk about alternative history topics (that usually aren't solved by the time the show is over). This program discusses the Lemba Israelites of South Africa. It's 5 parts long too...so it's lengthy. I haven't seen the whole thing yet though.
The Lemba are convert Jews that have nothing to do with Isrealites or anything in the Bible
Posted by yazid904 (Member # 7708) on :
Vida,
Au contraire, mon ami! It is just the opposite. The problem is at what stage/timepoint did these group diverge to form their respective present day record.
It seems that one group went south to the present day location of the Lemba, and the rest dispersed north and west. keepin in mind that modern day Israelis are mainly Ashkenazi (Germany at least from the 1500's). What group of people are you referencing when you talk about the Israelites? The Cohanim gene associated with the Lemba are as high as those in Israel but again, the problem of who is the real Isreali is a major problem.
This is a problem symptomatic of present day Israel, to wit, where the European Jews who claim to be Jewish are accepted without a problem but the African ones (Falasha and others) who say they are, ususlly go through the conversion ceremony! and other hoop tribulations! Go figure!
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
Well the problem with this question is that there are no such thing as Isrealites in history only in the bible so it is hard to answer. If you are a believer in the Bible it will be difficult for you to accept this.
I am aware that the Lemba have much Cohen in them, but there is no evidence of them ever being in the levant or being from Mesopotamia so maybe thats a good start to their Tom foolery and specious claims to the Bible stories.
Posted by yazid904 (Member # 7708) on :
Vida
quote:I am aware that the Lemba have much Cohen in them, but there is no evidence of them ever being in the levant or being from Mesopotamia so maybe thats a good start to their Tom foolery and specious claims to the Bible stories
Good point, Based on what you have stated, then the Cohanim gene only implies that both sides are equal in their representation of truth. The fact is that the Israeli side refused to believe the Lemba and that is what caused the scientific inquiry and said results! The sharing of the gene explicitely says to me at one time both groups had occupied the area called Palestine.
Remember that the present group came from Germany after WWII!!
Posted by King_Scorpion (Member # 4818) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*: Well the problem with this question is that there are no such thing as Isrealites in history only in the bible so it is hard to answer. If you are a believer in the Bible it will be difficult for you to accept this.
I am aware that the Lemba have much Cohen in them, but there is no evidence of them ever being in the levant or being from Mesopotamia so maybe thats a good start to their Tom foolery and specious claims to the Bible stories.
You're contradicting yourself. The genetic evidence proves they have a relation with those groups in the Levant...what are you talking about. The question you're probably thinking is, "have they always been Black"...I say yes.
Posted by King_Scorpion (Member # 4818) on :
Here's something from wikipedia about African Jews...take it for what it's worth.
I actually read up on that, pretty intrusting stuff, especially about the Nigerian Jews, I thought pre-colonial, especially southern, Nigeria was pretty isolated from the mediterranean world, at least with regards to religion. Guess I was wrong, lol....... Oh and my opinion on the Lemba? Original Zimbabweans who were knocked up by Jewish merchants Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by King_Scorpion:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*: Well the problem with this question is that there are no such thing as Isrealites in history only in the bible so it is hard to answer. If you are a believer in the Bible it will be difficult for you to accept this.
I am aware that the Lemba have much Cohen in them, but there is no evidence of them ever being in the levant or being from Mesopotamia so maybe thats a good start to their Tom foolery and specious claims to the Bible stories.
You're contradicting yourself. The genetic evidence proves they have a relation with those groups in the Levant...what are you talking about. The question you're probably thinking is, "have they always been Black"...I say yes.
No the cohen haplotypes come from Middle eastern arab type people and there is no evidence of the Lemba being in the Levant.
They probably received these genes during Phonecian period and involvement in South Africa and thier gold mines. Remember the Lemba practiced inbreeding for quite a while hence the high frequency of cohen in black South Africans.
Posted by yazid904 (Member # 7708) on :
quote:Originally posted by Obelisk_18: Oh and my opinion on the Lemba? Original Zimbabweans who were knocked up by Jewish merchants
Yes indeed. Big Pimping, in a medieval sort of way! haha
Vida, You got the era mixed up. Mining in South Africa is a recent event and the Phoenicians, the stuff is off the map! What do Phoenicians have to do with Cohanim unless of course they possess the same gene in Southern Africa!!!!
you said
quote:the cohen haplotypes come from Middle eastern arab type people and there is no evidence of the Lemba being in the Levant
my alternate hypothesis is that the cohanim gene begain in Southern Africa and was transported to the Levant so that explains why it exists there today!
Posted by Tyrannosaurus (Member # 3735) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*: The Lemba are convert Jews that have nothing to do with Isrealites or anything in the Bible
The same could be said of ALL Jews outside of the Levant. Most of the only people who are Israelite by ancestry are now Arabic-speaking Muslims.
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
^ Not necessarily true. There are still some Jews in the Middle-East that haven't left the area or converted to Islam. In fact, it reminds me of a genetic study done that was considered "controversial" for simply pointing out the fact that Palestinian Jews and Arabs are so closely related they are actually one people-- despite the animosity that exists between them both.
Posted by igbogoddess (Member # 12132) on :
Are the Lemba original Israelites? Yes,indeed BECAUSE THEY SAY SO, and the history supports what they say. I don't understand why people won't believe what they say. They don't have a reason to lie about who they are. They are not the ones known for stealing identities and faking archeological information. Plus, they have a higher percentage of the Cohen gene than Ashkenazi Jews. Not every group of people are into misleading others with lies.
Posted by King_Scorpion (Member # 4818) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by King_Scorpion:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*: Well the problem with this question is that there are no such thing as Isrealites in history only in the bible so it is hard to answer. If you are a believer in the Bible it will be difficult for you to accept this.
I am aware that the Lemba have much Cohen in them, but there is no evidence of them ever being in the levant or being from Mesopotamia so maybe thats a good start to their Tom foolery and specious claims to the Bible stories.
You're contradicting yourself. The genetic evidence proves they have a relation with those groups in the Levant...what are you talking about. The question you're probably thinking is, "have they always been Black"...I say yes.
No the cohen haplotypes come from Middle eastern arab type people and there is no evidence of the Lemba being in the Levant.
They probably received these genes during Phonecian period and involvement in South Africa and thier gold mines. Remember the Lemba practiced inbreeding for quite a while hence the high frequency of cohen in black South Africans.
I know the story of the Pheonicians possible circumnavigating Africa...but what evidence is there that they settled for an extended period in South Africa. Besides, Lemba is not a Hebrew word anyway I don't think. Also keep in mind that "Jew" is not a race. And what evidence to you have that the Lemba practiced inbreeding for a time? Would you imply that the Ashkenazi Jews were originally Arab when they also carry the Cohen haplotype?
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
quote:Originally posted by yazid904:
quote:Originally posted by Obelisk_18: Oh and my opinion on the Lemba? Original Zimbabweans who were knocked up by Jewish merchants
Yes indeed. Big Pimping, in a medieval sort of way! haha
Vida, You got the era mixed up. Mining in South Africa is a recent event and the Phoenicians, the stuff is off the map! What do Phoenicians have to do with Cohanim unless of course they possess the same gene in Southern Africa!!!!
Indeed.
Certainly, the one's with the J haplotypes in question have a case to make, about their extra-African ancestry, which Vida denies them in this occasion, but likes to look for extra-Africans in ancient Egyptians.
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
No the cohen haplotypes come from Middle eastern arab type people and there is no evidence of the Lemba being in the Levant.
What did you think the Lemba Buba clan were referring to, if not ancestry from "southwest Asia"? They are talking about their 'ancestry', not themselves.
BTW, can you tell us about how the Lemba came to adopt their "Jewish" traditions.
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
This reminded me of the piece they did on the Ark of the covenant in Ethiopia.. Very interesting, definitely something to think about that shouldn't just be simplified and thrown by the way-side..
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Solver:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
No the cohen haplotypes come from Middle eastern arab type people and there is no evidence of the Lemba being in the Levant.
What did you think the Lemba Buba clan were referring to, if not ancestry from "southwest Asia"? They are talking about their 'ancestry', not themselves.
BTW, can you tell us about how the Lemba came to adopt their "Jewish" traditions.
Ok, so why don't African Americans CLAIM their Scottish, Welsh and Irish ancestory and then go all the way to say Scotts, Welsh and Irish people are black lol?
The original people with this Cohen weren't black so for Lemba to claim they are from the original Isrealites is rediculous.
But I don't know; African Americans have always loved to claim how "mixed" they are and their non African ancestory so I guess loser negros don't just exist in the Americas and East Africa, but now South Africa too
It is not looking to good for the black race..oops I mean people *sniff*.
Not only that; these people seperate themselves from other AFricans and claim they built everything in southern Africa which is a LIE and they say their noses is different than other Africans and would only mix with Asians and not other blacks. So **** these piece of **** Lembas.
The only reason African Americans even care about these people is because they believe in this silly Bible and want this fake spook God to exist and grant certain people privelages, yet these Lemba are discriminated by the other Jews LMAO go figure. Where is your GOD now!! Posted by igbogoddess (Member # 12132) on :
Vida, Are you chemically dependent? Where are you sources for the statements that you made? You just ramble on about nothing and seem to be interested in topics but then go off on a tangent about God-knows-what? DNA doesn't lie. You seem to be a proponent of this White supremacy nonsense thinking that Black people have this innate desire to align themselves somehow with White/lighter-skinned people. As if this is the ultimate form of validation. If you were truly a native Black African, you would have no desire to do this. The Lemba are Hebrews not Jews. Furthermore, if you were truly African, you would know that we are identified by our family groups/tribes (I hate that word). It was never about skin color. Before you post, please THINK about what it is you want to say, noting that sometimes it is better not to say anything at all and just READ. Stop trying to make this very intellectual message board a freak show.
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
1. You need to address what I said and or refute it.
2. I don't understand what you mean about DNA doesn't lie because I never said it did.
3. I am not a native African I am third generation African American, all of my grand parents came to this country in the 40's. I am as American as an African can get and I know African American pseudo culture and history to a TEE. I don't look nor seem any differen't than them for survival purposes and I speak 6 dialects of jive lmao!!!!!!!!!
4. There are not such thing as Hebrews or Isrealites in history.
5. You need to think before you speak "sista guurl"
Posted by igbogoddess (Member # 12132) on :
You speak jive indeed!!!! I never said that you said DNA testing was a lie. The reason that I brought up DNA is because there has been genetic testing done to prove/back up what the Lemba say about being Hebrews/Israelites. There is no such thing as Jews in history. Remember the letter 'J' doesn't show up in the Torah. So those groups of people didn't consider themselves 'Jewish'. Did you even watch the video at the beginning of the thread? Until you do, then we can talk.
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
Yes I watched it and I saw how they tried to sabatoge the building that EVERYONE knows the Shona did by themselves.
There are no such thing as Hebrews or Isrealites in history.
Their dna shows that they have middle eastern "cohen" haplotype which is only 15,000 years old and is definetly not of black people.
So at best all they are doing is connecting themsevles to Western Asian/Middle Eastern people...big deal!
Do you African Americans make a big deal about being connected to British peoples other then when purporting to have "good hair" lol?
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
Do you African Americans make a big deal about being connected to British peoples other then when purporting to have "good hair" lol? [/QB]
No, because African-Americans don't sincerely believe that they were the original British colonists who settled the Americas, you can't turn this on its head and make it a case about the self-esteem of the Lemba. You're simplifying an issue that you have no answers for, only dismissive and hateful rhetoric, with pre-conceived assumptions based on your self-hatred of black people(or just hatred, since there's a good chance that you're not black).. This is why you spend 75% of your time here obsessing over African-Americans(when this site isn't dedicated to A,.A.s), and the other 25% doubting that the Egyptians were Black, which you have recently feigned coming to terms with, but given your psychological instability, you're due to backslide anyways.
Posted by Yonis (Member # 7684) on :
quote:yet these Lemba are discriminated by the other Jews LMAO go figure. Where is your GOD now!!
The Ashkenazi jews discriminate against all Jews who are not Ashkenazi, have you ever heard about the Israeli Black Panthers (Mizrahi)? http://www.marxist.com/MiddleEast/israeli_black_panthers.html And also the Beta israelis are constantly discriminated againt in israel, so for sure they will also discriminate against the Lemba jews.
Posted by Yonis (Member # 7684) on :
quote:3. I am not a native African I am third generation African American, all of my grand parents came to this country in the 40's. I am as American as an African can get and I know African American pseudo culture and history to a TEE. I don't look nor seem any differen't than them for survival purposes and I speak 6 dialects of jive lmao!!!!!!!!!
LMAO the only reason you suddenly say that you're not born in Nigerian is because you know that igbogoddes might ask you something in igbo or yoruba, that's why you have shifted to call yourself a third generation American, lol your busted.
Posted by King_Scorpion (Member # 4818) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida 4. There are not such thing as Hebrews or Isrealites in history.[/QB]
WTF?
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by Yonis:
quote:3. I am not a native African I am third generation African American, all of my grand parents came to this country in the 40's. I am as American as an African can get and I know African American pseudo culture and history to a TEE. I don't look nor seem any differen't than them for survival purposes and I speak 6 dialects of jive lmao!!!!!!!!!
LMAO the only reason you suddenly say that you're not born in Nigerian is because you know that igbogoddes might ask you something in igbo or yoruba, that's why you have shifted to call yourself a third generation American, lol your busted.
I'm not NIgerian I just use them as an example of the true negro phenotype
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by Sundiata:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
Do you African Americans make a big deal about being connected to British peoples other then when purporting to have "good hair" lol?
No, because African-Americans don't sincerely believe that they were the original British colonists who settled the Americas, you can't turn this on its head and make it a case about the self-esteem of the Lemba. You're simplifying an issue that you have no answers for, only dismissive and hateful rhetoric, with pre-conceived assumptions based on your self-hatred of black people(or just hatred, since there's a good chance that you're not black).. This is why you spend 75% of your time here obsessing over African-Americans(when this site isn't dedicated to A,.A.s), and the other 25% doubting that the Egyptians were Black, which you have recently feigned coming to terms with, but given your psychological instability, you're due to backslide anyways. [/QB]
Idiot my "deduction" was quite sound. Lemba can't claim being Jews/Isrealites/Hebrews because of their J and J2 haplogroups those haplogroups are not African nor black what part of that do you not understand?!?!?
Here is SELF HATE right here from your beloved Lemba: What is certain is that the Lemba are emphatic about being Jewish. "I love my people," a Lemba woman told Parfitt, "we came from the Israelites, we came from Sena, we crossed the sea . . . We were so beautiful with beautiful long, Jewish noses and so proud of our facial structure .
We no way wanted to spoil our structure by carelessness, eating pig or marrying non-Lemba gentiles
Though non-Lemba women are allowed to marry into the tribe, Lemba men face expulsion if they marry gentiles.
And you call me self hating Mwahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!! Posted by igbogoddess (Member # 12132) on :
Another example that you don't know what your are talking about, Vida. I have relatives with very light skin to olive complexioned skin(meaning black) with varying facial features. But as I said before, it wasn't about skin color with us until very recently. It was about familial group(tribal) identity/connections. You are a prime example, Vida , that racism is a cancerous tumor bent on poisoning the beauty and diversity that has always been in Africa. Please, do not further spoil this thread with your ignorance. If you have something informative to say about the Lemba, then please do so. If not, please remain silent.
Posted by igbogoddess (Member # 12132) on :
*sighs* Vida, Again, skin color is not indicative of what family group you are from. There is another good thread on here about the genotype of famous Brazilians. In it, it states this fact. There were dark/black people that genetically had more European in them than African. The Lemba ARE NOT indigenously African. They are Black. And they are Hebrew/Israelite. I just don't see why this concept is so hard for you to understand. Oh, and please don't go into the Brazilian thread with this foolishness.
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess: Another example that you don't know what your are talking about, Vida. I have relatives with very light skin to olive complexioned skin(meaning black) with varying facial features. But as I said before, it wasn't about skin color with us until very recently. It was about familial group(tribal) identity/connections. You are a prime example, Vida , that racism is a cancerous tumor bent on poisoning the beauty and diversity that has always been in Africa. Please, do not further spoil this thread with your ignorance. If you have something informative to say about the Lemba, then please do so. If not, please remain silent.
Do you know how to use the quote function? Because I have no idea what you are refering to honestly.
Please use the quote function to respond to direct things that I say.
I DID post things about the Lemba can you read?!?!
Posted by igbogoddess (Member # 12132) on :
I see this is futile. You can't understand. Why do I need to use the quote button for something that YOU recently said in the post just above mine. Did you forget already? You waste my time with childish babble. I will not be responding to you again. Good day.
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess: *sighs* Vida, Again, skin color is not indicative of what family group you are from. There is another good thread on here about the genotype of famous Brazilians. In it, it states this fact. There were dark/black people that genetically had more European in them than African. The Lemba ARE NOT indigenously African. They are Black. And they are Hebrew/Israelite. I just don't see why this concept is so hard for you to understand. Oh, and please don't go into the Brazilian thread with this foolishness.
What does this have to do with skin color?!?!?
The Lembas are not just J and J2 haplogroups they have mostly African haplogroups they are just mixed with this ancestory. Did you think they were ALL J and J2 maybe?
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
Igbo Goddess
What's your view on the claim many of your particular ethny make of being Israel?
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
Yeah I have heard about the Igbo claiming the word comes from "eber" it's just as rediculous as the Lemba claims.
Isrealite fever is just baised on lack of knowledge of self and culture.
Posted by songhai (Member # 13721) on :
quote:Originally posted by Obelisk_18:
quote:Originally posted by King_Scorpion: Here's something from wikipedia about African Jews...take it for what it's worth.
I actually read up on that, pretty intrusting stuff, especially about the Nigerian Jews, I thought pre-colonial, especially southern, Nigeria was pretty isolated from the mediterranean world, at least with regards to religion. Guess I was wrong, lol....... Oh and my opinion on the Lemba? Original Zimbabweans who were knocked up by Jewish merchants
The Yoruba have an origin myth that specifies Mecca, Arabia as the source of one of its tribal founders. So this is another blow to that presumption of subsaharan Africa isolation.
Posted by igbogoddess (Member # 12132) on :
alTukruri,
I believe that they are Hebrew/Israelite. Again, they have no reason to lie. I believe DNA testing will prove what they already know. Do you know of any genetic testing being done on Hebrew (Jewish) Igbo?
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Solver:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
No the cohen haplotypes come from Middle eastern arab type people and there is no evidence of the Lemba being in the Levant.
What did you think the Lemba Buba clan were referring to, if not ancestry from "southwest Asia"? They are talking about their 'ancestry', not themselves.
BTW, can you tell us about how the Lemba came to adopt their "Jewish" traditions.
Ok, so why don't African Americans CLAIM their Scottish, Welsh and Irish ancestory and then go all the way to say Scotts, Welsh and Irish people are black lol?
What African Americans choose or not choose to do, has what bearings on Lemba claims of their heritage, anymore than it has on yourself?
quote:Vidadavida:
The original people with this Cohen weren't black so for Lemba to claim they are from the original Isrealites is rediculous.
And you know this based on...? And even if they weren't "black", how does that illegitimize Lemba ancestry from them?
quote:Vidadavida:
But I don't know; African Americans have always loved to claim how "mixed" they are and their non African ancestory so I guess loser negros don't just exist in the Americas and East Africa, but now South Africa too
In what way does acknowledging their ancestry, make Lemba "losers", any more than you claiming your own ancestry?
quote:Vidadavida:
It is not looking to good for the black race..oops I mean people *sniff*.
Relevancy?
quote:Vidadavida:
Not only that; these people seperate themselves from other AFricans and claim they built everything in southern Africa which is a LIE and they say their noses is different than other Africans and would only mix with Asians and not other blacks. So **** these piece of **** Lembas.
Which Lemba figure did you gather this from; citation with links!
^And even if such claim is made, how does this change the fact of ancestry?
quote:Vidadavida:
The only reason African Americans even care about these people is because they believe in this silly Bible and want this fake spook God to exist and grant certain people privelages, yet these Lemba are discriminated by the other Jews LMAO go figure. Where is your GOD now!!
And how does this answer any of the questions you cited me on?
In fact, not a single part of the question and request you cited has been delivered. You can't be insinuating that the questions were too difficult, or are you?
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
Igbogoddess said it all.
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess: Vida, are you chemically dependent? Where are you sources for the statements that you made? You just ramble on about nothing and seem to be interested in topics but then go off on a tangent about God-knows-what? DNA doesn't lie. You seem to be a proponent of this White supremacy nonsense thinking that Black people have this innate desire to align themselves somehow with White/lighter-skinned people. As if this is the ultimate form of validation. If you were truly a native Black African, you would have no desire to do this. The Lemba are Hebrews not Jews. Furthermore, if you were truly African, you would know that we are identified by our family groups/tribes (I hate that word). It was never about skin color. Before you post, please THINK about what it is you want to say, noting that sometimes it is better not to say anything at all and just READ. Stop trying to make this very intellectual message board a freak show.
Don't forget, the guy even espouses the old "true negro" faux, that even white people don't believe in anymore. A Somali is just as black as a Nigerian.
By the way Yonis, you hit the nail about his admission. LOL To be honest, I don't think the guy is even 'black' from the way he talks. He sounds like one of those white racist losers who visit mootstorm front and try to "make sense" of their racism! Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess: *sighs* Vida,
The Lemba ARE NOT indigenously African.
Actually, they are.
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by songhai:
quote:Originally posted by Obelisk_18:
quote:Originally posted by King_Scorpion: Here's something from wikipedia about African Jews...take it for what it's worth.
I actually read up on that, pretty intrusting stuff, especially about the Nigerian Jews, I thought pre-colonial, especially southern, Nigeria was pretty isolated from the mediterranean world, at least with regards to religion. Guess I was wrong, lol....... Oh and my opinion on the Lemba? Original Zimbabweans who were knocked up by Jewish merchants
The Yoruba have an origin myth that specifies Mecca, Arabia as the source of one of its tribal founders. So this is another blow to that presumption of subsaharan Africa isolation.
Yes and that is a Hausa lie because they are brainwashed Muslims. You have to watch out for many traditional African mythos because they have been obfuscated by the evil Jews/Muslims/Christians.
Again the best way to destroy a person is take their spirit and mind away and giving them foreign Gods that do nothing for them and religions and philosophies and destroying their culture by changing their own stories is the best way to kill an African
Slavery and Imperialization or just small potatoes to this unfortunately. Jesus/Yahweh(Hashem)/Allah are the killer of blacks not Europeans/Jews/Arabs.
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Solver:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Solver:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
No the cohen haplotypes come from Middle eastern arab type people and there is no evidence of the Lemba being in the Levant.
What did you think the Lemba Buba clan were referring to, if not ancestry from "southwest Asia"? They are talking about their 'ancestry', not themselves.
BTW, can you tell us about how the Lemba came to adopt their "Jewish" traditions.
Ok, so why don't African Americans CLAIM their Scottish, Welsh and Irish ancestory and then go all the way to say Scotts, Welsh and Irish people are black lol?
What African Americans choose or not choose to do, has what bearings on Lemba claims of their heritage, anymore than it has on yourself?
quote:Vidadavida:
The original people with this Cohen weren't black so for Lemba to claim they are from the original Isrealites is rediculous.
And you know this based on...? And even if they weren't "black", how does that illegitimize Lemba ancestry from them?
quote:Vidadavida:
But I don't know; African Americans have always loved to claim how "mixed" they are and their non African ancestory so I guess loser negros don't just exist in the Americas and East Africa, but now South Africa too
In what way does acknowledging their ancestry, make Lemba "losers", any more than you claiming your own ancestry?
quote:Vidadavida:
It is not looking to good for the black race..oops I mean people *sniff*.
Relevancy?
quote:Vidadavida:
Not only that; these people seperate themselves from other AFricans and claim they built everything in southern Africa which is a LIE and they say their noses is different than other Africans and would only mix with Asians and not other blacks. So **** these piece of **** Lembas.
Which Lemba figure did you gather this from; citation with links!
^And even if such claim is made, how does this change the fact of ancestry?
quote:Vidadavida:
The only reason African Americans even care about these people is because they believe in this silly Bible and want this fake spook God to exist and grant certain people privelages, yet these Lemba are discriminated by the other Jews LMAO go figure. Where is your GOD now!!
And how does this answer any of the questions you cited me on?
In fact, not a single part of the question and request you cited has been delivered. You can't be insinuating that the questions were too difficult, or are you?
quote:What African Americans choose or not choose to do, has what bearings on Lemba claims of their heritage, anymore than it has on yourself?
You are one of the inteligent ones on this site Mystery so I am surprised that you don't understand this simple deduction and perfect rationale.
If Lemba say they are so cool because they have Hebrew/Western Asian ancestory and this is supposed to mean something; then why aren't African Americans claiming to be descendants from British royalty? And if they did, would they be taken as seriously just because the WHOLE world is miffed by this Israel and Isrealite myth and Bible bullshiit?
quote:And you know this based on...? And even if they weren't "black", how does that illegitimize Lemba ancestry from them?
This site has already gone through the fact that J and J2 aren't African or Tropically Adapted or black whatever you want to call it lol haplogroups. I never said it illegitimizes their ancestory because their ancestory is factual. The ASSOCIATION is what is hogwash because the Lemba are mostly African and black and these so called Israelites arne't.
quote:In what way does acknowledging their ancestry, make Lemba "losers", any more than you claiming your own ancestry?
Why would someone claim ancestory that doesn't make up most of their DNA?!?! Especially when these ancestors didn't like the ethnic group that they are currently today. I know this HAS to be a rhetorical question considering you and other always talk about the travesty of rape by oppressors Mystery, but I will "play" along ho hum.
It is not looking to good for the black race..oops I mean people *sniff*. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Relevancy?
Self hatred like the Lembas are excersicing is never a good sign for black progress.
quote:Which Lemba figure did you gather this from; citation with links!
^And even if such claim is made, how does this change the fact of ancestry?
Here is SELF HATE right here from your beloved Lemba: What is certain is that the Lemba are emphatic about being Jewish. "I love my people," a Lemba woman told Parfitt, "we came from the Israelites, we came from Sena, we crossed the sea . . . We were so beautiful with beautiful long, Jewish noses and so proud of our facial structure .
We no way wanted to spoil our structure by carelessness, eating pig or marrying non-Lemba gentiles
Though non-Lemba women are allowed to marry into the tribe, Lemba men face expulsion if they marry gentiles.
It doesn't change their ancestory and never said it did.
quote:quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by igbogoddess: *sighs* Vida,
The Lemba ARE NOT indigenously African. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually, they are.
^^^Thank you...this dumb muddacunt is trying to debate me and doesn't know what the hell she is talking about. She thinks the Lemba are ALL J and J2 on their paternal site and just HAPPENED to turn black because they live in Africa lmao!!!!!!!!
quote: And how does this answer any of the questions you cited me on?
In fact, not a single part of the question and request you cited has been delivered. You can't be insinuating that the questions were too difficult, or are you?
I know that they have Western Asian ancestory and by asking how they have Jewish heritage..hell the same way Africans have Christian and Muslim rituals/custumes.
Now what I don't understand is this Mystery; if the people on this board get so mad when people say East and north and northeast Africans are mixed, then why are you so animate about the proving the Lemba to being mixed? I don't get you people Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
^ Such ignorance. *sigh* Posted by Kemson (Member # 12850) on :
The Lemba are indigenously Black Africans and their not Jews. These people are being played and they have no idea what they're in for. This is what happen when there is little or lack of defensive intellectual tribal elites who challenge outside perceptions and classification of their tribe(s). It's really quite sad.
This is maybe not the best example, but the most important point is this:
"A geneticist from Oxford University in London, England (1998) has proven through a DNA sequence that the African Bantu-speaking Lemba Tribe of South Africa and Zimbabwe carry the same Y chromosome that is distinctive to the Cohanim, a hereditary set of Jewish priests scattered throughout Europe and America. Reports carry the headlines “DNA COULD PROVE JEWISH ANCESTRY OF AFRICAN TRIBE.” While reading the article, it struck me as a “Freudian Slip” presented in the “European Slip/Slap Origin.” The title should have read: DNA PROVES AFRICAN ANCESTRY OF BIBLICAL HEBREWS. The most thorough analysis yet of the divergence of sequences in human mitochondrial DNA has been carried out. The results support the view that modern humans originated in Africa. (Hedges, Blair S. “Human Evolution: A Start for Population Genomics,” Nature 408, 652-653 7 December 2000)."
You can't prove anything I said wrong, but I told you in another thread stop responding to my posts and I wont to yours so there will be peace.
No they have it right dude it is "dna evidence prove Jewish Ancestry of African Tribe"
There are no historical hebrews or Israelites and Africa has nothing to do with these people's in the Biblical context.
Posted by igbogoddess (Member # 12132) on :
You are correct, Kemson. The Lemba are not Jews. They are Hebrew/Israelite. When I said that the Lemba were not indigenously African, I meant that they originated in what is now known as the Middle East (which geographically is Africa) *shrugs*. So I guess it would be more correct to say that the Hebrews/Israelites are of African descent. Maybe this information is what the Jews are trying to squelch. Yes?
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
^^^wrong again!!!!!!! You don't get it the Lemba ARE AFRICANS mixed WITH A WESTERN ASIAN LINEAGE!!!!
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
You are one of the inteligent ones on this site Mystery so I am surprised that you don't understand this simple deduction and perfect rationale.
I'm amazed that you can't answer elementary questions. What you call 'simple & perfect rationale' is akin to someone asking you for the answer of 2+2, only to have you come up with "African Americans do this or that" for an answer. You tell me; what gives?
quote:Vidadavida:
If Lemba say they are so cool because they have Hebrew/Western Asian ancestory and this is supposed to mean something..
Even if true, how does this affect the facts about extra-African ancestry in them?
quote:Vidadavida:
then why aren't African Americans claiming to be descendants from British royalty?
What specifically does African Americans have anything to do with the issue at hand; does African American claims on ancestry have any bearing on whom you claim as your ancestors?
quote:Vidadavida:
And if they did, would they be taken as seriously just because the WHOLE world is miffed by this Israel and Isrealite myth and Bible bullshiit?
See question above; try hard not to fall short on relevant answers again.
And...
Are you denying extra-African ancestry in the Lemba Buba clan? If not, then what is your point?
quote:Vidadavida:
quote:Mystery Solver:
And you know this based on...? And even if they weren't "black", how does that illegitimize Lemba ancestry from them?
This site has already gone through the fact that J and J2 aren't African or Tropically Adapted or black whatever you want to call it lol haplogroups.
Citations?
quote:Vidadavida:
I never said it illegitimizes their ancestory because their ancestory is factual. The ASSOCIATION is what is hogwash because the Lemba are mostly African and black and these so called Israelites arne't.
Well, if "ancestry" doesn't associate them with the region that they proclaim their ancestors came from, then what does it represent? See post above, concerning this "black" issue.
quote:Vidadavida:
quote:In what way does acknowledging their ancestry, make Lemba "losers", any more than you claiming your own ancestry?
Why would someone claim ancestory that doesn't make up most of their DNA?!?!
What specifically makes up most of their DNA? And why shouldn't they claim ancestry that does exist?
quote:Vidadavida:
Especially when these ancestors didn't like the ethnic group that they are currently today.
Objective documentations? And even if so, again, how does this affect the facts about extra-African ancestry in them?
quote:Vidadavida:
I know this HAS to be a rhetorical question considering you and other always talk about the travesty of rape by oppressors Mystery, but I will "play" along ho hum.
If you think this is game, then it doesn't seem that you are up to speed yet.
quote:Vidadavida:
Self hatred like the Lembas are excersicing is never a good sign for black progress.
How does the facts about extra-African ancestry in them, show self-hatred?
Here is SELF HATE right here from your beloved Lemba: What is certain is that the Lemba are emphatic about being Jewish. "I love my people," a Lemba woman told Parfitt, "we came from the Israelites, we came from Sena, we crossed the sea . . . We were so beautiful with beautiful long, Jewish noses and so proud of our facial structure .
We no way wanted to spoil our structure by carelessness, eating pig or marrying non-Lemba gentiles
Though non-Lemba women are allowed to marry into the tribe, Lemba men face expulsion if they marry gentiles.
It doesn't change their ancestory and never said it did.
Presuming that the above is true, let's come back to the question that followed:
^And even if such claim is made, how does this change the fact of ancestry?
quote:Vidadavida:
quote: And how does this answer any of the questions you cited me on?
In fact, not a single part of the question and request you cited has been delivered. You can't be insinuating that the questions were too difficult, or are you?
I know that they have Western Asian ancestory and by asking how they have Jewish heritage..hell the same way Africans have Christian and Muslim rituals/custumes.
This "same way" would be how specifically, considering that you proclaimed that the Cohen modal haplotypes in the Lemba males were of "Phoenician" extraction?
quote:Vidadavida:
Now what I don't understand is this Mystery; if the people on this board get so mad when people say East and north and northeast Africans are mixed,
Based on what citations and context? And if so, what does that have to do with me?
quote:Vidadavida:
then why are you so animate about the proving the Lemba to being mixed? I don't get you people
Actually, I'm trying to figure out your hypocrisy in approaching Lemba vs. the Nile Valley, whereby you often choose to see extra-African ancestry in the Nile Valley inhabitants, and yet, deny it in the Lemba. The ball is actually on your court, if you know what I mean , to explain yourself.
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess:
You are correct, Kemson. The Lemba are not Jews. They are Hebrew/Israelite.
As far as being 'Jewish', I guess that would be open to interpretation in the Jewish ideology of what constitutes 'Jewish ancestry', and if the Cohen modal haplotype falls into this, then I guess that would make them Jewish by default. Then, there is also the question of the Jewish faith; as far as I know, the sort of faith practiced by the Lemba, is actually indigenous in character, even though it does bear some similarities with Judaism. So, this may or may not be seen as Judaism proper, particularly by 'orthodox' Jewish followers. Naturally, the similarities would likely have come from contact with people who practiced Jewish faith, and fused with indigenous traditions.
It is essentially a misnomer by outsiders to assume that many Africans passively adopted foreign derivatives of religious faith; for instance, there is ignorance of the fact [by outsiders] that there are many west African groups whom while practicing 'Islam', do so in the form, whereby the basic religion had been fused with local & indigenous traditions not known anywhere else.
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess:
When I said that the Lemba were not indigenously African, I meant that they originated in what is now known as the Middle East (which geographically is Africa) *shrugs*. So I guess it would be more correct to say that the Hebrews/Israelites are of African descent. Maybe this information is what the Jews are trying to squelch. Yes?
I agree, precisely speaking, that much of what is referred to as "Middle East", is actually a geographical extension of the African continent, which would really make the so-called "southwest Asians" Africans. Indeed, the area shares much else with Africans, in terms of MRCAs, language families, and aspects of culture. This is why I'm trying to get myself into the habbit of putting the terms 'southwest Asia' in quotation marks, as it pertains to "Middle Easterners" of the Great Rift Valley, in association with the term 'extra-African' in quotation marks as well, in the event that I use it for easy understanding by those who are yet to be acquainted with the geographical reality, as opposed to subjective geopolitics.
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
^^^wrong again!!!!!!! You don't get it the Lemba ARE AFRICANS mixed WITH A WESTERN ASIAN LINEAGE!!!!
Would you say the same for just about any other 'indigenous' African social groups who bear some lineages deemed "extra-African", i.e. as being first and foremost, "indigenous Africans", including Egyptians?
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
I don't know of any DNA tests on Igbo. In any event DNA is not evidence of "Jewishness" to rabbinical legal decisors.
For instance, most population geneticists posit the Beta Israel aren't "Mid-Easterners." Yet the former Chief Sepharade Rabbi Obadia Yossef ruled back in 1973 that not only are the Ethiopian Jews in fact Jews, but by examination of Hebrew holy writ and later Jewish writings, they are predominantly of the seed of the Tribe of Dan.
quote: "I have therefore reached the conclusion that the Falashas are descendants of Israelite tribes which migrated southward to Ethiopia. The aforementioned authorities who determined that they are of the Tribe of Dan undoubtedly investigated the matter thoroughly and came to this conclusion according to the most reliable testimony and evidence."
The "aforementioned authorities" include
Rabbi Ya`aqob Castro "... the Abyssinian Jews ... are of the tribe of Dan ..." .
Rabbi Dawiyd ben-Zimra of Egypt "... she was Jewish, a member of the tribe of Dan ..." "... among the kings of Kush, where there are three kingdoms ... one of Israelites of the tribe of Dan." "... the Kushites are undoubtedly of the tribe of Dan." .
Rabbi Obadyah of Bertinoro of Italy "They are somewhat black... They claim descent from the tribe of Dan...". .
Rabbi Eliyahu of Ferrara Italy .
Rabban Simhha .
Rabban Yisshaq ben Mar .
haGaon Rabbi Zemahh .
Karaite Rabbi Y*hudah haDassi .
Rabbi Y*hudah ben Qorash .
Rabbi Hhisdai ibn Shapruth
In the case of the Igbo, I know of one Igbo man who's made aliyah and is recognized as a member of the Tribes of Israel by the Libyan Jewish community in the state of Israel among whom he has affiliated.
I find it unfortunate that the masses of Igbo who claim Hebrew descent, and also other inner African peoples who are either of Israel or who have within the last hundred years chosen to profess Judaism, are acquiring Ashkenazi Judaism instead of relying on the Sepharadiym who have always recognized their Jewishness and are geographically, physically, culturally, and otherwise more closely related to them.
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess: alTukruri,
I believe that they are Hebrew/Israelite. Again, they have no reason to lie. I believe DNA testing will prove what they already know. Do you know of any genetic testing being done on Hebrew (Jewish) Igbo?
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
If Lemba say they are so cool because they have Hebrew/Western Asian ancestory and this is supposed to mean something.. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Even if true, how does this affect the facts about extra-African ancestry in them?
It doesn't because they DO have extra-African ancestory and this isn't the point of contention.
The point of contention is why do they say "we" came from Israel or out of Africa if now they are phenotypically black and mostly have African ancestory and the people that came from Israel and out of Africa with these J and J2 lineages are not. This is why I used to the African American rationale. I never hear them say "we" in refering to European, they are refering to Africans which is logically sound to do considering they are mostly comprised of African DNA and are called African Americans and NOT European Americans.
This site has already gone through the fact that J and J2 aren't African or Tropically Adapted or black whatever you want to call it lol haplogroups. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citations?
There was a thread on this board about J haplogroup, but I can't find it. Hope this helps..
The patriarch of Haplogroup J was born around 15,000 years ago somewhere in the Fertile Crescent, a region that today includes Israel, the West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq. The early farming successes of the J lineages spawned population booms and encouraged migration throughout much of the Mediterranean region. Both Haplogroup J and its subgroup J2 are found at a combined frequency of around 30 percent among the Jewish population. The Cohen modal lineage is found in Haplogroup J* Today the M304 marker appears at its highest frequencies in the Middle East, North Africa and Ethiopia. In Europe M304 is seen only in the Mediterranean region.
How does the facts about extra-African ancestry in them, show self-hatred?
Because they are attaching themselves only to the extra-African ancestory being proud of long Jewish noses and hair and facial structure(which obviously means non black facial structure) when they do not have these features. This is "self hating" because how is it that a Western Asian phenotype is beautiful, but an African one isn't which is what they are?
Do you hear African Americans saying how beautiful they were in Europe(based on minimal European ancestory)? If no, then why do the Lemba say that?
Here is SELF HATE right here from your beloved Lemba: What is certain is that the Lemba are emphatic about being Jewish. "I love my people," a Lemba woman told Parfitt, "we came from the Israelites, we came from Sena, we crossed the sea . . . We were so beautiful with beautiful long, Jewish noses and so proud of our facial structure .
We no way wanted to spoil our structure by carelessness, eating pig or marrying non-Lemba gentiles
Though non-Lemba women are allowed to marry into the tribe, Lemba men face expulsion if they marry gentiles.
It doesn't change their ancestory and never said it did. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Presuming that the above is true, let's come back to the question that followed:
^And even if such claim is made, how does this change the fact of ancestry?
quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- And how does this answer any of the questions you cited me on?
In fact, not a single part of the question and request you cited has been delivered. You can't be insinuating that the questions were too difficult, or are you?
I know that they have Western Asian ancestory and by asking how they have Jewish heritage..hell the same way Africans have Christian and Muslim rituals/custumes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This "same way" would be how specifically, considering that you proclaimed that the Cohen modal haplotypes in the Lemba males were of "Phoenician" extraction?
Ok, can you tell me how the Lemba have Jewish custums in South Africa and also can you tell me how Hausa have Islamic custums in Nigeria?
then why are you so animate about the proving the Lemba to being mixed? I don't get you people --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually, I'm trying to figure out your hypocrisy in approaching Lemba vs. the Nile Valley, whereby you often choose to see extra-African ancestry in the Nile Valley inhabitants, and yet, deny it in the Lemba. The ball is actually on your court, if you know what I mean , to explain yourself.
No you have this backwards. The people on this board try to ignore the extra-African ancestory of Somali, Eritrean, Egyptian, Ethiopian and Sudanese and focus on the African ancestory protecting the Africaness of these people from white nationalists and Eurocentrics yet now they and you are doing the opposite with the Lemba.
The reason is the world wide sub conscious conditioning of the Bible and its importance to people and the so called Isrealites being the people of this Biblical God. You just aren't aware of how this is affecting you in this discussion. If non African ancestory isn't important or significant in Egyptians, Somali, Sudanese, Ethiopians than why is it so important in the Lemba now?
quote:quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
^^^wrong again!!!!!!! You don't get it the Lemba ARE AFRICANS mixed WITH A WESTERN ASIAN LINEAGE!!!! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you say the same for just about any other 'indigenous' African social groups who bear some lineages deemed "extra-African", i.e. as being first and foremost, "indigenous Africans", including Egyptians?
As far as Egyptians NO because they are mostly comprised of NON African lineages. As far as Somali and Sudanese and Ethiopians I would say yes.
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
It doesn't because they DO have extra-African ancestory and this isn't the point of contention.
Then, case closed. They have a case to make about ancestry from a region where these haplotypes are frequently found.
quote:Vidadavida:
The point of contention is why do they say "we" came from Israel or out of Africa if now they are phenotypically black and mostly have African ancestory and the people that came from Israel and out of Africa with these J and J2 lineages are not.
I've come across claims about ancestry in Sena; if Sena happens to be in Yemen, Israel or somewhere in "southwest Asia", then so be it. Unless you are denying that the Cohen haplotype is somewhat frequent in Isreal, then what case do you have? None, that is obvious.
Re: What's your evidence that the original carriers of J haplotypes weren't 'black'. You dodged this question like four times now; is it too hard of a question?
^And...
...regardless of what skin hue the original J bearers had, doesn't the fact that the Cohen modal haplotype is 'substantially' frequent in Lemba Buba clan males, discredit you, when you reject their claims about tracing ancestry to a region that just so happens to also have noticeable frequencies of these lineages?
quote:Vidadavida:
This is why I used to the African American rationale.
In what way - specifics?
quote:Vidadavida:
I never hear them say "we" in refering to European, they are refering to Africans which is logically sound to do considering they are mostly comprised of African DNA and are called African Americans and NOT European Americans.
Re: what does this have to do with Lemba ancestry?
quote:Vidadavida:
There was a thread on this board about J haplogroup, but I can't find it. Hope this helps...
Anything short of directly citing people you're accusing, doesn't help you.
The patriarch of Haplogroup J was born around 15,000 years ago somewhere in the Fertile Crescent, a region that today includes Israel, the West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq. The early farming successes of the J lineages spawned population booms and encouraged migration throughout much of the Mediterranean region. Both Haplogroup J and its subgroup J2 are found at a combined frequency of around 30 percent among the Jewish population. The Cohen modal lineage is found in Haplogroup J* Today the M304 marker appears at its highest frequencies in the Middle East, North Africa and Ethiopia. In Europe M304 is seen only in the Mediterranean region.
And...?
quote:Vidadavida:
Because they are attaching themselves only to the extra-African ancestory being proud of long Jewish noses and hair and facial structure(which obviously means non black facial structure) when they do not have these features.
Do you know whether the Lemba practice local traditions? Why do you suppose they do that, and remain in Africa, if they didn't feel that they were Africans at all?
quote:Vidadavida:
This is "self hating" because how is it that a Western Asian phenotype is beautiful, but an African one isn't which is what they are?
Was it mentioned somewhere in Lemba texts, that their "Lemba" phenotype wasn't considered beautiful. Doesn't the fact that they perform marriages mostly within the Lemba community, refute that idea? That's the only way you can have a case about self-hate, if you can produce such.
quote:Vidadavida:
Do you hear African Americans saying how beautiful they were in Europe(based on minimal European ancestory)? If no, then why do the Lemba say that?
Well, if you fail to see connections between what Lemba say or do and what African Americans say or do, then how do you expect me to see one, when I've been the one asking you for ages to produce the relevancy of your comparing them?
quote:Vidadavida:
Ok, can you tell me how the Lemba have Jewish custums in South Africa and also can you tell me how Hausa have Islamic custums in Nigeria?
I suspect they were exposed to elements of Jewish traditions, precisely because at some point in history, there was contact between the base African population of the Lemba and people who practiced the said traditions. The fact that J haplotypes are frequent in male Buba members, buttresses this. I won't tell you anything about the Hausa, because it is irrelevant. Now, let's have your answers the questions you just posed!
quote:Vidadavida:
No you have this backwards. The people on this board try to ignore the extra-African ancestory of Somali, Eritrean, Egyptian, Ethiopian and Sudanese and focus on the African ancestory protecting the Africaness of these people from white nationalists and Eurocentrics yet now they and you are doing the opposite with the Lemba.
Citations?
quote:Vidadavida:
The reason is the world wide sub conscious conditioning of the Bible and its importance to people and the so called Isrealites being the people of this Biblical God. You just aren't aware of how this is affecting you in this discussion.
...and you just don't know how irrelevant this jibberish is, do you?
quote:Vidadavida:
If non African ancestory isn't important or significant in Egyptians, Somali, Sudanese, Ethiopians than why is it so important in the Lemba now?
I fail to see how your question has any relevance to me, personally; rather the question should be, in your case: if non African ancestry is significant in Egyptians et al., why isn't it in the Lemba now?
quote:Vidadavida:
As far as Egyptians NO because they are mostly comprised of NON African lineages.
Based on what DNA study?
And...
As far as Lemba Buba Clan males are concerned, studies have shown them to be predominantly of the Cohen modal haplotype. Why do you feel that this noticeable frequency should be dismissed, when you don't apply that to Egyptians?
quote:Vidadavida:
As far as Somali and Sudanese and Ethiopians I would say yes.
That's what I'm trying to get to the bottom of; what is your specific 'scientific' measuring bar for neglecting "non African" ancestry in some 'indigenous' African groups, and pronouncing it in others?
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote: Re: What's your evidence that the original carriers of J haplotypes weren't 'black'. You dodged this question like four times now; is it too hard of a question?
I see no evidence of the J haplotype carriers being tropically adapted. Do you have evidence that says the original carriers of this haplotype ARE?
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
I never hear them say "we" in refering to European, they are refering to Africans which is logically sound to do considering they are mostly comprised of African DNA and are called African Americans and NOT European Americans.
Re: what does this have to do with Lemba ancestry?
Ok, in a discussion or debate Mystery when one or more sides do not understand either's position, it shows intelligence for one of the arguers to be obsequious in fascilitating the intelligability of their argument to the other.
In this case I present "reason" in which one uses logic and rationale in demonstrating how they come to a conclusion based on the knowledge or information they have obtained.
Rationale:
*Lemba are African(black) people with mixed ancestory
*African-Americans(black) people with mixed ancestory
This is a perfect example of the rationale of my argument that Lemba Jews are intellectually bankrupt in claiming they came from Israel as well as being self hating individuals and should not be embraced by Africanists or black Africans.
The patriarch of Haplogroup J was born around 15,000 years ago somewhere in the Fertile Crescent, a region that today includes Israel, the West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq. The early farming successes of the J lineages spawned population booms and encouraged migration throughout much of the Mediterranean region. Both Haplogroup J and its subgroup J2 are found at a combined frequency of around 30 percent among the Jewish population. The Cohen modal lineage is found in Haplogroup J* Today the M304 marker appears at its highest frequencies in the Middle East, North Africa and Ethiopia. In Europe M304 is seen only in the Mediterranean region.
And...?
If you can't show me that the original carriers of J haplotype were black then why do you pass the said citation with an "and...?" comment?
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
Because they are attaching themselves only to the extra-African ancestory being proud of long Jewish noses and hair and facial structure(which obviously means non black facial structure) when they do not have these features.
Do you know whether the Lemba practice local traditions? Why do you suppose they do that, and remain in Africa, if they didn't feel that they were Africans at all?
Because they seperate themselves from other black Africans by saying they are not originally African. Arabs in African don't consider themselves black or African, that doens't keep them from living there or saying that they live there now----this was an odd question lol.
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
This is "self hating" because how is it that a Western Asian phenotype is beautiful, but an African one isn't which is what they are?
Was it mentioned somewhere in Lemba texts, that their "Lemba" phenotype wasn't considered beautiful. Doesn't the fact that they perform marriages mostly within the Lemba community, refute that idea? That's the only way you can have a case about self-hate, if you can produce such.
Well if you are going to look at the epithet "self-hate" prima facie then you would be correct considering it would be very hard to "hate ones own person".
When this term is used it denotes someone hates their own phenotype distinction(since I can't use the word race on here ) in the case of the Lemba this distinction would be "black". If the Lemba do not marry any other "blacks", but would marry "whites" and "whatever the color distinction is with arabs/western asian Jews" then this would be called self hate.
Self hate is not a cultural epithet, but rather a color/racial/appearance one.
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
Do you hear African Americans saying how beautiful they were in Europe(based on minimal European ancestory)? If no, then why do the Lemba say that?
Well, if you fail to see connections between what Lemba say or do and what African Americans say or do, then how do you expect me to see one, when I've been the one asking you for ages to produce the relevancy of your comparing them?
Stated above.
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
Ok, can you tell me how the Lemba have Jewish custums in South Africa and also can you tell me how Hausa have Islamic custums in Nigeria?
I suspect they were exposed to elements of Jewish traditions, precisely because at some point in history, there was contact between the base African population of the Lemba and people who practiced the said traditions. The fact that J haplotypes are frequent in male Buba members, buttresses this. I won't tell you anything about the Hausa, because it is irrelevant. Now, let's have your answers the questions you just posed!
I suspect they were enslaved by carriers of this haplotype and were relocated. Now since both of us are just speculating and the Lemba are saying they came from Israel which we know isn't true then the answer is "who knows" as of yet.
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
No you have this backwards. The people on this board try to ignore the extra-African ancestory of Somali, Eritrean, Egyptian, Ethiopian and Sudanese and focus on the African ancestory protecting the Africaness of these people from white nationalists and Eurocentrics yet now they and you are doing the opposite with the Lemba.
Citations?
Please!!!!
quote: quote:
Vidadavida:
The reason is the world wide sub conscious conditioning of the Bible and its importance to people and the so called Isrealites being the people of this Biblical God. You just aren't aware of how this is affecting you in this discussion.
...and you just don't know how irrelevant this jibberish is, do you?
Sure it is considering the original posts on this thread as well as the videos are all about the possibility of blacks being descendants of the Biblical Israelites? Now why is this issue "isolated" or of substantial discernment any more than descendants of the original NOK culture in Nigeria being blacks lol? It is because of the world wide fascination and belief in the Bible and these so called "lost" tribes. The World could care less about NOK culture in Nigeria.
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
If non African ancestory isn't important or significant in Egyptians, Somali, Sudanese, Ethiopians than why is it so important in the Lemba now?
I fail to see how your question has any relevance to me, personally; rather the question should be, in your case: if non African ancestry is significant in Egyptians et al., why isn't it in the Lemba now?
Because Lemba are mostly African and Egyptians mostly aren't.
quote:As far as Lemba Buba Clan males are concerned, studies have shown them to be predominantly of the Cohen modal haplotype
May I have a study that says Lemba males have more J haplotype in them than African lineages? Because the video said other wise.
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
As far as Somali and Sudanese and Ethiopians I would say yes.
That's what I'm trying to get to the bottom of; what is your specific 'scientific' measuring bar for neglecting "non African" ancestry in some 'indigenous' African groups, and pronouncing it in others?
I base it on the amount of ancestory. If less than 15% of the ancestory of Ethiopians is non African how come that isn't pronounced by you and others on this board, but it is with the Lemba?
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
USING HAPLOTYPE TREES FOR PHYLOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSES
Thomas et al. (2000) showed that about two-thirds of the Lemba Y chromosomes have a Middle Eastern origin, and one-third a Bantu origin. Moreover, one particular Y-chromosomal haplotype is found in frequencies ranging from 0.100 – 0.231 in various Jewish populations, but is very rare or absent from most other human populations.
Yet the frequency of this newly arisen, globally rare haplotype is 0.088 in the Lemba of southern Africa, consistent with a genetic interconnection between the Lemba and Jews of Middle Eastern origin. In contrast to the Y haplotypes, there is no evidence of Semitic admixture with the maternally inherited mtDNA (Soodyall 1993), a pattern also consistent with the oral traditions of the Lemba that the original admixture involved Jewish men and Bantu women.
These studies illustrate the richness of detailed inference that studies on newly arisen haplotypes can provide about recent movements of individuals and populations through space.
. . . .
First, mtDNA is incapable biologically of completely reflecting a population’s evolutionary history and of rejecting the hypothesis of admixture. MtDNA is sensitive to only female-mediated gene flow, and can totally miss even extensive interbreeding mediated through males.
Alan R. Templeton Haplotype Trees and Modern Human Origins
quote:Originally posted by Vidadavida: May I have a study that says Lemba males have more J haplotype in them than African lineages? Because the video said other wise.
Posted by Kemson (Member # 12850) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*: ^^^wrong again!!!!!!! You don't get it the Lemba ARE AFRICANS mixed WITH A WESTERN ASIAN LINEAGE!!!!
Whatever dude, keep dreaming!!!
Posted by Kemson (Member # 12850) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Solver:
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess:
You are correct, Kemson. The Lemba are not Jews. They are Hebrew/Israelite.
As far as being 'Jewish', I guess that would be open to interpretation in the Jewish ideology of what constitutes 'Jewish ancestry', and if the Cohen modal haplotype falls into this, then I guess that would make them Jewish by default...
Nonsense!
No one knows where the hell this "Cohen modal haplotype" is sampled from. Which people is this "Cohen modal haplotype" modeled from?
My view is quite simple: If any of these basic questions are answered with suggestions, even slightly indicating some European Caucasian bases for the ancient origin of a Black African people, then we can say without any confusion that such indicated suggestion is erroneously flawed.
Jewish people should be publishing correct information about people in Africa of Ancient Hebrew descendant indigenous to Africa and how its cultural, way of life and/or biological influences may have played a role in contributing to other peoples cultures/way of life outside of Africa, as opposed to any illogical suggestions leaning towards a false European origin of any Black African people. Views like this will not stand against pure intellectual scrutiny and at best, is a frustrating annoyance; at worst, of wicked motives and absolutely absurd from all angles.
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
I take it you mean that you Kemson are clueless as to who on earth provided the CMH samples. Go read the geneticists' reports and see that many peoples have it, some of whom make no claim to being Jews.
Besides being in the dark about CMH you're also fabricating disinformation about European origins for African peoples that you haven't read anywhere in any publication by Jews or non-Jews.
Just who is it now with the wicked motive frustratingly lacking intelligent operation annoying in its absurdity?
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
^ Well he isn't the only one.
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Solver: I'm amazed that you can't answer elementary questions. What you call 'simple & perfect rationale' is akin to someone asking you for the answer of 2+2, only to have you come up with "African Americans do this or that" for an answer. You tell me; what gives?
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:First, mtDNA is incapable biologically of completely reflecting a population’s evolutionary history and of rejecting the hypothesis of admixture. MtDNA is sensitive to only female-mediated gene flow, and can totally miss even extensive interbreeding mediated through males.
For example, Figure 9 shows a cross-validated expansion out of-Asia that occurred after the most recent out-of-Africa event. This expansion event is marked by autosomal DNA and Y-DNA (Templeton, 2002). This expansion event was not detected by mtDNA, even though the largest samples, the best geographical coverage, and the greatest genetic resolution existed for mtDNA. This implies that this expansion event was primarily mediated by males coming out of Asia and was invisible to mtDNA.
The Lemba, as discussed earlier, provide a more recent example. In this case, Y-DNA provides evidence for extensive interbreeding between Jewish and Bantu populations, but mtDNA indicates that there was no interbreeding at all, a pattern consistent with their oral history (Soodyall, 1993; Thomas et al., 2000; Wilson and Goldstein, 2000). Thus, mtDNA alone is biologically incapable of detecting all admixture events, even those such as the Lemba in which the degree of admixture was 100% (given that their origin was due to Jewish men mating with Bantu women).
So you posted this to prove that Lemba are mixed? I don't understand the relevance?
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
Obtuse! With the attention span of a music video watcher. Referencing a video for genetic data??? Cracka please!!!
You asked:
quote:May I have a study that says Lemba males have more J haplotype in them than African lineages? Because the video said other wise.
I answered:
quote:Thomas et al. (2000) showed that about two-thirds of the Lemba Y chromosomes have a Middle Eastern origin,
Can you get it, now that I dumbed it down to a single phrase?
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:First, mtDNA is incapable biologically of completely reflecting a population’s evolutionary history and of rejecting the hypothesis of admixture. MtDNA is sensitive to only female-mediated gene flow, and can totally miss even extensive interbreeding mediated through males.
For example, Figure 9 shows a cross-validated expansion out of-Asia that occurred after the most recent out-of-Africa event. This expansion event is marked by autosomal DNA and Y-DNA (Templeton, 2002). This expansion event was not detected by mtDNA, even though the largest samples, the best geographical coverage, and the greatest genetic resolution existed for mtDNA. This implies that this expansion event was primarily mediated by males coming out of Asia and was invisible to mtDNA.
The Lemba, as discussed earlier, provide a more recent example. In this case, Y-DNA provides evidence for extensive interbreeding between Jewish and Bantu populations, but mtDNA indicates that there was no interbreeding at all, a pattern consistent with their oral history (Soodyall, 1993; Thomas et al., 2000; Wilson and Goldstein, 2000). Thus, mtDNA alone is biologically incapable of detecting all admixture events, even those such as the Lemba in which the degree of admixture was 100% (given that their origin was due to Jewish men mating with Bantu women).
So you posted this to prove that Lemba are mixed? I don't understand the relevance?
Posted by songhai (Member # 13721) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by songhai:
quote:Originally posted by Obelisk_18:
quote:Originally posted by King_Scorpion: Here's something from wikipedia about African Jews...take it for what it's worth.
I actually read up on that, pretty intrusting stuff, especially about the Nigerian Jews, I thought pre-colonial, especially southern, Nigeria was pretty isolated from the mediterranean world, at least with regards to religion. Guess I was wrong, lol....... Oh and my opinion on the Lemba? Original Zimbabweans who were knocked up by Jewish merchants
The Yoruba have an origin myth that specifies Mecca, Arabia as the source of one of its tribal founders. So this is another blow to that presumption of subsaharan Africa isolation.
Yes and that is a Hausa lie because they are brainwashed Muslims. You have to watch out for many traditional African mythos because they have been obfuscated by the evil Jews/Muslims/Christians.
Again the best way to destroy a person is take their spirit and mind away and giving them foreign Gods that do nothing for them and religions and philosophies and destroying their culture by changing their own stories is the best way to kill an African
Slavery and Imperialization or just small potatoes to this unfortunately. Jesus/Yahweh(Hashem)/Allah are the killer of blacks not Europeans/Jews/Arabs.
Huh?
How do you get from an origin myth that undermines the myth of subsaharan isolation to Hausa lies and Jewish/Christian/Islamic imperialism? Nevermind . . .
Of course, myths are stories that should not be taken at face value. That's a given. But Africanist scholars tend to agree that all West African peoples migrated West from East and North. The Yoruba myth about Mecca must be understood in that context.
Stop looking for an argument where none exist.
Posted by Neith-Athena (Member # 10040) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Solver:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
You are one of the inteligent ones on this site Mystery so I am surprised that you don't understand this simple deduction and perfect rationale.
I'm amazed that you can't answer elementary questions. What you call 'simple & perfect rationale' is akin to someone asking you for the answer of 2+2, only to have you come up with "African Americans do this or that" for an answer. You tell me; what gives?
quote:Vidadavida:
If Lemba say they are so cool because they have Hebrew/Western Asian ancestory and this is supposed to mean something..
Even if true, how does this affect the facts about extra-African ancestry in them?
quote:Vidadavida:
then why aren't African Americans claiming to be descendants from British royalty?
What specifically does African Americans have anything to do with the issue at hand; does African American claims on ancestry have any bearing on whom you claim as your ancestors?
quote:Vidadavida:
And if they did, would they be taken as seriously just because the WHOLE world is miffed by this Israel and Isrealite myth and Bible bullshiit?
See question above; try hard not to fall short on relevant answers again.
And...
Are you denying extra-African ancestry in the Lemba Buba clan? If not, then what is your point?
quote:Vidadavida:
quote:Mystery Solver:
And you know this based on...? And even if they weren't "black", how does that illegitimize Lemba ancestry from them?
This site has already gone through the fact that J and J2 aren't African or Tropically Adapted or black whatever you want to call it lol haplogroups.
Citations?
quote:Vidadavida:
I never said it illegitimizes their ancestory because their ancestory is factual. The ASSOCIATION is what is hogwash because the Lemba are mostly African and black and these so called Israelites arne't.
Well, if "ancestry" doesn't associate them with the region that they proclaim their ancestors came from, then what does it represent? See post above, concerning this "black" issue.
quote:Vidadavida:
quote:In what way does acknowledging their ancestry, make Lemba "losers", any more than you claiming your own ancestry?
Why would someone claim ancestory that doesn't make up most of their DNA?!?!
What specifically makes up most of their DNA? And why shouldn't they claim ancestry that does exist?
quote:Vidadavida:
Especially when these ancestors didn't like the ethnic group that they are currently today.
Objective documentations? And even if so, again, how does this affect the facts about extra-African ancestry in them?
quote:Vidadavida:
I know this HAS to be a rhetorical question considering you and other always talk about the travesty of rape by oppressors Mystery, but I will "play" along ho hum.
If you think this is game, then it doesn't seem that you are up to speed yet.
quote:Vidadavida:
Self hatred like the Lembas are excersicing is never a good sign for black progress.
How does the facts about extra-African ancestry in them, show self-hatred?
Here is SELF HATE right here from your beloved Lemba: What is certain is that the Lemba are emphatic about being Jewish. "I love my people," a Lemba woman told Parfitt, "we came from the Israelites, we came from Sena, we crossed the sea . . . We were so beautiful with beautiful long, Jewish noses and so proud of our facial structure .
We no way wanted to spoil our structure by carelessness, eating pig or marrying non-Lemba gentiles
Though non-Lemba women are allowed to marry into the tribe, Lemba men face expulsion if they marry gentiles.
It doesn't change their ancestory and never said it did.
Presuming that the above is true, let's come back to the question that followed:
^And even if such claim is made, how does this change the fact of ancestry?
quote:Vidadavida:
quote: And how does this answer any of the questions you cited me on?
In fact, not a single part of the question and request you cited has been delivered. You can't be insinuating that the questions were too difficult, or are you?
I know that they have Western Asian ancestory and by asking how they have Jewish heritage..hell the same way Africans have Christian and Muslim rituals/custumes.
This "same way" would be how specifically, considering that you proclaimed that the Cohen modal haplotypes in the Lemba males were of "Phoenician" extraction?
quote:Vidadavida:
Now what I don't understand is this Mystery; if the people on this board get so mad when people say East and north and northeast Africans are mixed,
Based on what citations and context? And if so, what does that have to do with me?
quote:Vidadavida:
then why are you so animate about the proving the Lemba to being mixed? I don't get you people
Actually, I'm trying to figure out your hypocrisy in approaching Lemba vs. the Nile Valley, whereby you often choose to see extra-African ancestry in the Nile Valley inhabitants, and yet, deny it in the Lemba. The ball is actually on your court, if you know what I mean , to explain yourself.
What is this about extra-African ancestry in Northeast Africa/the Horn region? I know there is some, but is it overemphasized and assumed when ethnicities have thin noses and other stereotypically "Caucasian" features but no Eurasian ancestry? Could someone please provide links to othe discussions on the forum? I am tired of people's trying to link any groups that they consider "civilized" or "advanced" in Africa to extra-African extraction, just because we somehow need others to lift us up from degradation.
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
It took you a while to reply even though you were online when I replied you, but nonetheless...
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
I see no evidence of the J haplotype carriers being tropically adapted.
And? The issue at hand, is your 'requirement' to back up the claim about original J bearers not having been 'black'. Where do you come of making a statement like that, without evidence?
quote:Vidadavida:
Do you have evidence that says the original carriers of this haplotype ARE?
I'm not obligated to produce anything. You made a claim, and need to back it up.
quote: Vidadavida:
Ok, in a discussion or debate Mystery when one or more sides do not understand either's position, it shows intelligence for one of the arguers to be obsequious in fascilitating the intelligability of their argument to the other.
Then you must be the said short-changed 'arguer', because I do have 'an' idea about what you've been driveling on about for ages, but I simply don't buy it; much of what you drivel on about not only falls short in coherency, but also severely lacks substance.
quote:Vidadavida:
In this case I present "reason" in which one uses logic and rationale in demonstrating how they come to a conclusion based on the knowledge or information they have obtained.
Rationale:
*Lemba are African(black) people with mixed ancestory
*African-Americans(black) people with mixed ancestory
This is a perfect example of the rationale of my argument that Lemba Jews are intellectually bankrupt in claiming they came from Israel as well as being self hating individuals and should not be embraced by Africanists or black Africans.
Actually, this is an example of an irrationale presentation of thought. Please amuse me, in making it 'rationale'.
-----
Ps- Let me give you an example of 'rationalizing' your intellectually disorganized but so-called 'ratonale':
Vidadada writes:
Rationale:
*Lemba are African(black) people with mixed ancestory
*African-Americans(black) people with mixed ancestory
^And I can just as well say, using the unique Vidadavida 'rationale', that the Lemba are African, and AA are Americans. The AA would be intellectually bankrupt for claiming to have ancestry from Africa, because clearly they are Americans. This would be self-hate, and shouldn't be embraced by Africanists and black Africans. Well Vida, what now?
quote:Vidadavida:
If you can't show me that the original carriers of J haplotype were black then why do you pass the said citation with an "and...?" comment?
It should be a no brainer, Vida; but apparently not so in your case. "And...?" would mean, and what's your point? Of course, this renders your question intellectually bankrupt.
quote:Vidadavida:
Because they seperate themselves from other black Africans by saying they are not originally African.
They claim ancestry from 'Sena', presumably somewhere in "southwest Asia", which you agreed with. Do all Africans share this lineage? If not, then where do you come of accusing them of what you just did, simply because they claim the said 'real' ancestry?
quote:Vidadavida:
Arabs in African don't consider themselves black or African, that doens't keep them from living there or saying that they live there now----this was an odd question lol.
Do you have an official text of "Arabized" Africans, citing that they don't see themselves as "Africans"? If not, doesn't that make your answer odd?
quote:Vidadavida:
Well if you are going to look at the epithet "self-hate" prima facie then you would be correct considering it would be very hard to "hate ones own person".
No brainer. Your claims about self-hate is obviously bunk, given that they are quite conservative, promoting intra-communal marriage.
quote:Vidadavida:
When this term is used it denotes someone hates their own phenotype distinction(since I can't use the word race on here ) in the case of the Lemba this distinction would be "black".
Vida, how can say that, when Lemba first and foremost promote intra-communal marriages, which would entail two Lemba individuals whom by and large, share a similar general phenotype? And yes, this would be their 'black' Lemba phenotype. Do you not see through your illogic?
quote:Vidadavida:
If the Lemba do not marry any other "blacks", but would marry "whites" and "whatever the color distinction is with arabs/western asian Jews" then this would be called self hate.
Do you have evidence that they promote marriages outside the Lemba clan? If not, doesn't that render your claim intellectually void?
quote:Vidadavida:
Self hate is not a cultural epithet, but rather a color/racial/appearance one.
???
quote: Vidadavida:
Do you hear African Americans saying how beautiful they were in Europe(based on minimal European ancestory)? If no, then why do the Lemba say that?
Are African Americans "Lemba"? If not, doesn't that render your question stupid?
quote:Vidadavida:
quote: Well, if you fail to see connections between what Lemba say or do and what African Americans say or do, then how do you expect me to see one, when I've been the one asking you for ages to produce the relevancy of your comparing them?
Stated above.
In which case, the question you cited above remains unanswered.
quote:Vidadavida:
I suspect they were enslaved by carriers of this haplotype and were relocated. Now since both of us are just speculating and the Lemba are saying they came from Israel which we know isn't true then the answer is "who knows" as of yet.
Since, you've acknowledged their ancestry as being from "southwest Asia", and that this essentially vindicates Lemba claims of ancestry, then your 'speculation' is reduced to nothing; rather, it is just a spooky knee-jerk reaction to my logical deduction. Furthermore, do you know of any group that proudly claims ancestry from the very people who 'enslaved' them?
quote:Vidadavida:
quote:Vidadavida:
No you have this backwards. The people on this board try to ignore the extra-African ancestory of Somali, Eritrean, Egyptian, Ethiopian and Sudanese and focus on the African ancestory protecting the Africaness of these people from white nationalists and Eurocentrics yet now they and you are doing the opposite with the Lemba.
quote:Mystery Solver:
Citations?
Please!!!!
No citations, no case. That simple.
quote:Vidadavida:
quote: Vidadavida:
The reason is the world wide sub conscious conditioning of the Bible and its importance to people and the so called Isrealites being the people of this Biblical God. You just aren't aware of how this is affecting you in this discussion.
quote:Mystery Solver:
...and you just don't know how irrelevant this jibberish is, do you?
Sure it is considering the original posts on this thread as well as the videos are all about the possibility of blacks being descendants of the Biblical Israelites? Now why is this issue "isolated" or of substantial discernment any more than descendants of the original NOK culture in Nigeria being blacks lol? It is because of the world wide fascination and belief in the Bible and these so called "lost" tribes. The World could care less about NOK culture in Nigeria.
The jibberish I'm referring to, Vida, is the idea that some unsubstantive drivel somehow affects me, rather than a reflection of the falling short of intellegence by the person droning on. This latest reply is also void of intellectual merit.
quote:Vidadavida:
Because Lemba are mostly African and Egyptians mostly aren't.
And where's the requested genetic evidence on this?
quote:Vidadavida:
May I have a study that says Lemba males have more J haplotype in them than African lineages?
Sure:
From Thomas et al.:
"Of particular interest is the Buba clan, since membership of this clan and possession of the CMH are significantly associated (P < .0001). Seven of the 11 clan-designated Lemba CMH Y chromosomes came from members of this clan, whereas 7 (Northern Province, 4/4; and Sekhukuneland, 3/9) of the 13 Buba have the CMH."
F. C. Raulinga Hamisi, a Lemba elder, in a speech at the burial of Maanda William Mawela Ratshilingana Mhani, in July 1996 (before the current research was undertaken), said that "the Senas left Judea under the leadership of Buba and settled in Yemen where they built their city of Sena, hence Senas," reflecting the belief of at least one elder that Buba led the Lemba out of Judea. On the other hand, the Encyclopedia Judaica (1972) makes no mention of a Buba in Jewish history. In a book published privately in 1992, another Lemba elder wrote that "the Bhuba lineage came down from Judea as the leading lineage of the Basena when they left Judea in their early migration to the Yemen where they settled and built the city of Sena. They ruled over all the lineages in good manner"
"The results...suggest a genetic history of the Lemba that is not incompatible with their oral tradition. Clearly, there has been a Semitic genetic contribution, including, quite probably, one from Arabs, given the Lembas' presence on the eastern coast of Africa, where Arabs have settled for centuries (Mathew 1963). Both Ashkenazic and Sephardic Israelites are geographically far removed from the Lemba, and, were it not for the Y-chromosome sharing between the Yemeni and Jewish populations, the occurrence of Jewish haplotypes in the Lemba population would be highly suggestive of gene flow between the two groups. However, given the extent of Y-chromosome sharing between the Yemeni and Jewish groups, the presence of such haplotypes because of gene flow from Arab sources cannot be discounted. Support for a Jewish contribution to the Lemba gene pool is, nevertheless, found in the presence, at high frequency in the Lemba, of the CMH (.088 of the entire population and .135 of UEP group 1); the CMH is also observed at moderate frequency in Ashkenazic Israelites (.150 and .231) and Sephardic Israelites (.100 and .161), but it was observed in only a single Yemeni (.020 and .028). Furthermore, in an unpublished study of Palestinian Arabs (A. Nebel, D. Filon, M. Faerman, A. Oppenheim, personal communication), the CMH was present at only very low frequency (<.025).
The CMH has been suggested as a signature haplotype for the ancient Hebrew population, and it may be performing that function in this study (Thomas et al. 1998). Further support for Lemba oral history comes from the Buba/CMH association. However, it is possible that the Lemba CMH Y chromosomes are a consequence of a relatively recent event that, in Lemba oral tradition, has acquired a patina of antiquity...
^As you can see, the Lemba Buba clan males, who proclaim ancestry from 'Sena', presumably in "southwest Asia", are predominantly of the J haplotype in question.
Now, let's have your evidence that Egyptians are "mostly" non-African vis-a-vis their African TMRCAs.
quote:Vidadavida:
Because the video said other wise.
Video isn't genetic evidence.
quote:Vidadavida:
I base it on the amount of ancestory. If less than 15% of the ancestory of Ethiopians is non African how come that isn't pronounced by you and others on this board, but it is with the Lemba?
Citations?
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
quote:Originally posted by Kemson:
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Solver:
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess:
You are correct, Kemson. The Lemba are not Jews. They are Hebrew/Israelite.
As far as being 'Jewish', I guess that would be open to interpretation in the Jewish ideology of what constitutes 'Jewish ancestry', and **if** the Cohen modal haplotype falls into this, then I guess that would make them Jewish by default...
Nonsense!
No one knows where the hell this "Cohen modal haplotype" is sampled from. Which people is this "Cohen modal haplotype" modeled from?
The nonsense, is your incapacity to read. What is specifically said in what you cited? Let me help you: It is a 'qualifier' statement, saying that if the Jewish 'ideology' presumes so and so, then the answer would be so and so. I'm not Jewish, and not an expert on their traditions, and hence, the qualifier statement.
quote:Kemson:
My view is quite simple: If any of these basic questions are answered with suggestions, even slightly indicating some European Caucasian bases for the ancient origin of a Black African people, then we can say without any confusion that such indicated suggestion is erroneously flawed.
Jewish people should be publishing correct information about people in Africa of Ancient Hebrew descendant indigenous to Africa and how its cultural, way of life and/or biological influences may have played a role in contributing to other peoples cultures/way of life outside of Africa, as opposed to any illogical suggestions leaning towards a false European origin of any Black African people. Views like this will not stand against pure intellectual scrutiny and at best, is a frustrating annoyance; at worst, of wicked motives and absolutely absurd from all angles.
Red herring.
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by songhai:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by songhai:
quote:Originally posted by Obelisk_18:
quote:Originally posted by King_Scorpion: Here's something from wikipedia about African Jews...take it for what it's worth.
I actually read up on that, pretty intrusting stuff, especially about the Nigerian Jews, I thought pre-colonial, especially southern, Nigeria was pretty isolated from the mediterranean world, at least with regards to religion. Guess I was wrong, lol....... Oh and my opinion on the Lemba? Original Zimbabweans who were knocked up by Jewish merchants
The Yoruba have an origin myth that specifies Mecca, Arabia as the source of one of its tribal founders. So this is another blow to that presumption of subsaharan Africa isolation.
Yes and that is a Hausa lie because they are brainwashed Muslims. You have to watch out for many traditional African mythos because they have been obfuscated by the evil Jews/Muslims/Christians.
Again the best way to destroy a person is take their spirit and mind away and giving them foreign Gods that do nothing for them and religions and philosophies and destroying their culture by changing their own stories is the best way to kill an African
Slavery and Imperialization or just small potatoes to this unfortunately. Jesus/Yahweh(Hashem)/Allah are the killer of blacks not Europeans/Jews/Arabs.
Huh?
How do you get from an origin myth that undermines the myth of subsaharan isolation to Hausa lies and Jewish/Christian/Islamic imperialism? Nevermind . . .
Of course, myths are stories that should not be taken at face value. That's a given. But Africanist scholars tend to agree that all West African peoples migrated West from East and North. The Yoruba myth about Mecca must be understood in that context.
Stop looking for an argument where none exist.
No, I am refering to this:
quote:The Yoruba have an origin myth that specifies Mecca, Arabia as the source of one of its tribal founders. So this is another blow to that presumption of subsaharan Africa isolation.
This is talking about Oduduwa and the Hausa have been brain washed by Muslims to say he came from Mecca around the 7th to 8th century AD. So this really has nothing to do with what you are talking about. And you are perpetuating MORE extra-African influence in Africa as most self hating negros have no idea that they are doing and killing African history. All the Yoruba said before the Muslims changed their story is that Oduduwa came from the North East..THATS IT!! Nothing about no damn Mecca.
Posted by songhai (Member # 13721) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by songhai:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by songhai:
quote:Originally posted by Obelisk_18:
quote:Originally posted by King_Scorpion: Here's something from wikipedia about African Jews...take it for what it's worth.
I actually read up on that, pretty intrusting stuff, especially about the Nigerian Jews, I thought pre-colonial, especially southern, Nigeria was pretty isolated from the mediterranean world, at least with regards to religion. Guess I was wrong, lol....... Oh and my opinion on the Lemba? Original Zimbabweans who were knocked up by Jewish merchants
The Yoruba have an origin myth that specifies Mecca, Arabia as the source of one of its tribal founders. So this is another blow to that presumption of subsaharan Africa isolation.
Yes and that is a Hausa lie because they are brainwashed Muslims. You have to watch out for many traditional African mythos because they have been obfuscated by the evil Jews/Muslims/Christians.
Again the best way to destroy a person is take their spirit and mind away and giving them foreign Gods that do nothing for them and religions and philosophies and destroying their culture by changing their own stories is the best way to kill an African
Slavery and Imperialization or just small potatoes to this unfortunately. Jesus/Yahweh(Hashem)/Allah are the killer of blacks not Europeans/Jews/Arabs.
Huh?
How do you get from an origin myth that undermines the myth of subsaharan isolation to Hausa lies and Jewish/Christian/Islamic imperialism? Nevermind . . .
Of course, myths are stories that should not be taken at face value. That's a given. But Africanist scholars tend to agree that all West African peoples migrated West from East and North. The Yoruba myth about Mecca must be understood in that context.
Stop looking for an argument where none exist.
No, I am refering to this:
quote:The Yoruba have an origin myth that specifies Mecca, Arabia as the source of one of its tribal founders. So this is another blow to that presumption of subsaharan Africa isolation.
This is talking about Oduduwa and the Hausa have been brain washed by Muslims to say he came from Mecca around the 7th to 8th century AD. So this really has nothing to do with what you are talking about. And you are perpetuating MORE extra-African influence in Africa as most self hating negros have no idea that they are doing and killing African history. All the Yoruba said before the Muslims changed their story is that Oduduwa came from the North East..THATS IT!! Nothing about no damn Mecca.
Regarding this . . .
quote:This is talking about Oduduwa and the Hausa have been brain washed by Muslims to say he came from Mecca around the 7th to 8th century AD.
First, where is your evidence that this Yoruba mythology was tampered with by the Hausa? Source?
Second, where in the Yoruba origin myth does it specify the time period, let alone the 7th or 8th century? Source?
Posted by songhai (Member # 13721) on :
All-
Does anyone have full access to the following JSTOR article? If so, can you please post it here or email it to me?
The Dual Memory: Genetic and Factual Ali A. Mazrui Transition, No. 57 (1992), pp. 134-146 This article consists of 13 page(s).
JSTOR:Transition Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:I am tired of people's trying to link any groups that they consider "civilized" or "advanced" in Africa to extra-African extraction, just because we somehow need others to lift us up from degradation.
This is my point exactly and mostly the point of the people on this board when it comes to north African and the horn BUT when it comes to the Lemba now they seem to BEG for extra-African extraction....'tis very strange.
quote:It took you a while to reply even though you were online when I replied you, but nonetheless...
I keep my computer logged on even if I am not here.
quote:quote:
Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
I see no evidence of the J haplotype carriers being tropically adapted.
And? The issue at hand, is your 'requirement' to back up the claim about original J bearers not having been 'black'. Where do you come of making a statement like that, without evidence?
No it isn't and you know it Mystery considering J was never purported to be tropically adapted and originated in the Middle East. You would need to provide evidence for these original carriers to be black.
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
Do you have evidence that says the original carriers of this haplotype ARE?
I'm not obligated to produce anything. You made a claim, and need to back it up.
Yes you are
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
Ok, in a discussion or debate Mystery when one or more sides do not understand either's position, it shows intelligence for one of the arguers to be obsequious in fascilitating the intelligability of their argument to the other.
Then you must be the said short-changed 'arguer', because I do have 'an' idea about what you've been driveling on about for ages, but I simply don't buy it; much of what you drivel on about not only falls short in coherency, but also severely lacks substance.
If that is your "opinion" than I can respect that.
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
In this case I present "reason" in which one uses logic and rationale in demonstrating how they come to a conclusion based on the knowledge or information they have obtained.
Rationale:
*Lemba are African black people with mixed ancestory
*African-Americans black people with mixed ancestory
This is a perfect example of the rationale of my argument that Lemba Jews are intellectually bankrupt in claiming they came from Israel as well as being self hating individuals and should not be embraced by Africanists or black Africans.
Actually, this is an example of an irrationale presentation of thought. Please amuse me, in making it 'rationale'. Ps- Let me give you an example of 'rationalizing' your intellectually disorganized but so-called 'ratonale':
Vidadada writes:
Rationale:
*Lemba are African black people with mixed ancestory
*African-Americans black people with mixed ancestory
^And I can just as well say, using the unique Vidadavida 'rationale', that the Lemba are African, and AA are Americans. The AA would be intellectually bankrupt for claiming to have ancestry from Africa, because clearly they are Americans. This would be self-hate, and shouldn't be embraced by Africanists and black Africans. Well Vida, what now?
LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!! You have just shown me that you don't know much about rationale or deductive reasoning..WOW . Both propositions have African and black in parenthesis so your deduction of using just "america" for your rationale is very poor I must admit I am a little shocked at your lack of intelligence or maybe you just want to argue you can't reduce only "American" out of "African-American" LOL hmmmm. Now if I said the Lemba have mixed ancestory and Americans have mixed ancestory then your rationale would be better.
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
Because they seperate themselves from other black Africans by saying they are not originally African.
They claim ancestry from 'Sena', presumably somewhere in "southwest Asia", which you agreed with. Do all Africans share this lineage? If not, then where do you come of accusing them of what you just did, simply because they claim the said 'real' ancestry?
I accuse them of self hate because they see themselves as BETTER than other Africans because of non-black extra-African ancestory.
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
Well if you are going to look at the epithet "self-hate" prima facie then you would be correct considering it would be very hard to "hate ones own person".
No brainer. Your claims about self-hate is obviously bunk, given that they are quite conservative, promoting intra-communal marriage.
No it isn't you just either don't understand or just want to be stubborn..which is fine it doesnt' bother me.
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
If the Lemba do not marry any other "blacks", but would marry "whites" and "whatever the color distinction is with arabs/western asian Jews" then this would be called self hate.
Do you have evidence that they promote marriages outside the Lemba clan? If not, doesn't that render your claim intellectually void?
Please read about Lemba supporting marrying White and Arab Jews, their own Lemba Jews and NOT gentile black Africans *sigh*.
Well, if you fail to see connections between what Lemba say or do and what African Americans say or do, then how do you expect me to see one, when I've been the one asking you for ages to produce the relevancy of your comparing them?
Stated above.
In which case, the question you cited above remains unanswered
I have shown the rationale if you don't want to accept it then that is fine I am sure others can see it
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
I suspect they were enslaved by carriers of this haplotype and were relocated. Now since both of us are just speculating and the Lemba are saying they came from Israel which we know isn't true then the answer is "who knows" as of yet.
Since, you've acknowledged their ancestry as being from "southwest Asia", and that this essentially vindicates Lemba claims of ancestry, then your 'speculation' is reduced to nothing; rather, it is just a spooky knee-jerk reaction to my logical deduction. Furthermore, do you know of any group that proudly claims ancestry from the very people who 'enslaved' them?
Sure almost all of the black Muslims in Africa lmao...Ethiopians, Somalians, Sudanese and Oromo that came from Kilwa are proud to be muslims and were enslaved by Arabs. Black Tuaregs and some Wolof unfortunatly claim descendants from Arabs that enslaved them. African Americans always spoke of how much Irish and/or native American they had in them to seem BETTER than other blacks.
I know you know this Mystery you are more educated in Africa than I am so why are you doing this just for "debate" purposes? This is what I call "self hate" being proud of being descendants of people that either enslaved you and/or raped you.
Now, conversely the Darienito and Cirrarmone HATE the Jews that enslaved them so I would NOT call them self hating.
quote: Vidadavida:
The reason is the world wide sub conscious conditioning of the Bible and its importance to people and the so called Isrealites being the people of this Biblical God. You just aren't aware of how this is affecting you in this discussion.
quote:
Mystery Solver:
...and you just don't know how irrelevant this jibberish is, do you?
Sure it is considering the original posts on this thread as well as the videos are all about the possibility of blacks being descendants of the Biblical Israelites? Now why is this issue "isolated" or of substantial discernment any more than descendants of the original NOK culture in Nigeria being blacks lol? It is because of the world wide fascination and belief in the Bible and these so called "lost" tribes. The World could care less about NOK culture in Nigeria.
The jibberish I'm referring to, Vida, is the idea that some unsubstantive drivel somehow affects me, rather than a reflection of the falling short of intellegence by the person droning on. This latest reply is also void of intellectual merit.
If it doesn't then why are you so animate about proving non African ancestory in Lemba, but not about non African ancestory in Horn Africans? It matters to you because they are supposed to be "special" because they claim descendancy from Isrealites.
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
Because Lemba are mostly African and Egyptians mostly aren't.
And where's the requested genetic evidence on this?
May I have a study that says Lemba males have more J haplotype in them than African lineages?
Sure:
From Thomas et al.:
"Of particular interest is the Buba clan, since membership of this clan and possession of the CMH are significantly associated P < .0001. Seven of the 11 clan-designated Lemba CMH Y chromosomes came from members of this clan, whereas 7 Northern Province, 4/4; and Sekhukuneland, 3/9 of the 13 Buba have the CMH."
F. C. Raulinga Hamisi, a Lemba elder, in a speech at the burial of Maanda William Mawela Ratshilingana Mhani, in July 1996 before the current research was undertaken, said that "the Senas left Judea under the leadership of Buba and settled in Yemen where they built their city of Sena, hence Senas," reflecting the belief of at least one elder that Buba led the Lemba out of Judea. On the other hand, the Encyclopedia Judaica 1972 makes no mention of a Buba in Jewish history. In a book published privately in 1992, another Lemba elder wrote that "the Bhuba lineage came down from Judea as the leading lineage of the Basena when they left Judea in their early migration to the Yemen where they settled and built the city of Sena. They ruled over all the lineages in good manner"
"The results...suggest a genetic history of the Lemba that is not incompatible with their oral tradition. Clearly, there has been a Semitic genetic contribution, including, quite probably, one from Arabs, given the Lembas' presence on the eastern coast of Africa, where Arabs have settled for centuries Mathew 1963. Both Ashkenazic and Sephardic Israelites are geographically far removed from the Lemba, and, were it not for the Y-chromosome sharing between the Yemeni and Jewish populations, the occurrence of Jewish haplotypes in the Lemba population would be highly suggestive of gene flow between the two groups. However, given the extent of Y-chromosome sharing between the Yemeni and Jewish groups, the presence of such haplotypes because of gene flow from Arab sources cannot be discounted. Support for a Jewish contribution to the Lemba gene pool is, nevertheless, found in the presence, at high frequency in the Lemba, of the CMH .088 of the entire population and .135 of UEP group 1; the CMH is also observed at moderate frequency in Ashkenazic Israelites .150 and .231 and Sephardic Israelites .100 and .161, but it was observed in only a single Yemeni .020 and .028. Furthermore, in an unpublished study of Palestinian Arabs A. Nebel, D. Filon, M. Faerman, A. Oppenheim, personal communication, the CMH was present at only very low frequency <.025.
The CMH has been suggested as a signature haplotype for the ancient Hebrew population, and it may be performing that function in this study Thomas et al. 1998. Further support for Lemba oral history comes from the Buba/CMH association. However, it is possible that the Lemba CMH Y chromosomes are a consequence of a relatively recent event that, in Lemba oral tradition, has acquired a patina of antiquity...
^As you can see, the Lemba Buba clan males, who proclaim ancestry from 'Sena', presumably in "southwest Asia", are predominantly of the J haplotype in question.
Was also discussed here: OT The Lemba: Indigenous or Not?
So this study says that 7 out of 13 Y chromosomes in Buba males have CMH so that is a tad over half of the males DNA make up plus the ALL African Mtdna = "mostly western Asian"?!?!?!
quote: Now, let's have your evidence that Egyptians are "mostly" non-African vis-a-vis their African TMRCAs.
Whoa you act as if you don't want Egyptians to have non-African ancestory hmmmm odd considering you seem to WANT the Lemba to. Why is this? *scratching my head*
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by songhai:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by songhai:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by songhai:
quote:Originally posted by Obelisk_18:
quote:Originally posted by King_Scorpion: Here's something from wikipedia about African Jews...take it for what it's worth.
I actually read up on that, pretty intrusting stuff, especially about the Nigerian Jews, I thought pre-colonial, especially southern, Nigeria was pretty isolated from the mediterranean world, at least with regards to religion. Guess I was wrong, lol....... Oh and my opinion on the Lemba? Original Zimbabweans who were knocked up by Jewish merchants
The Yoruba have an origin myth that specifies Mecca, Arabia as the source of one of its tribal founders. So this is another blow to that presumption of subsaharan Africa isolation.
Yes and that is a Hausa lie because they are brainwashed Muslims. You have to watch out for many traditional African mythos because they have been obfuscated by the evil Jews/Muslims/Christians.
Again the best way to destroy a person is take their spirit and mind away and giving them foreign Gods that do nothing for them and religions and philosophies and destroying their culture by changing their own stories is the best way to kill an African
Slavery and Imperialization or just small potatoes to this unfortunately. Jesus/Yahweh(Hashem)/Allah are the killer of blacks not Europeans/Jews/Arabs.
Huh?
How do you get from an origin myth that undermines the myth of subsaharan isolation to Hausa lies and Jewish/Christian/Islamic imperialism? Nevermind . . .
Of course, myths are stories that should not be taken at face value. That's a given. But Africanist scholars tend to agree that all West African peoples migrated West from East and North. The Yoruba myth about Mecca must be understood in that context.
Stop looking for an argument where none exist.
No, I am refering to this:
quote:The Yoruba have an origin myth that specifies Mecca, Arabia as the source of one of its tribal founders. So this is another blow to that presumption of subsaharan Africa isolation.
This is talking about Oduduwa and the Hausa have been brain washed by Muslims to say he came from Mecca around the 7th to 8th century AD. So this really has nothing to do with what you are talking about. And you are perpetuating MORE extra-African influence in Africa as most self hating negros have no idea that they are doing and killing African history. All the Yoruba said before the Muslims changed their story is that Oduduwa came from the North East..THATS IT!! Nothing about no damn Mecca.
Regarding this . . .
quote:This is talking about Oduduwa and the Hausa have been brain washed by Muslims to say he came from Mecca around the 7th to 8th century AD.
First, where is your evidence that this Yoruba mythology was tampered with by the Hausa? Source?
Second, where in the Yoruba origin myth does it specify the time period, let alone the 7th or 8th century? Source?
It is sad that I am even answering this because you are basically WANTING Africans to have non-African ancestory based on your skepticism smh very sad . No wonder negros suffer is because they hate themselves, but here you go:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:I am tired of people's trying to link any groups that they consider "civilized" or "advanced" in Africa to extra-African extraction, just because we somehow need others to lift us up from degradation.
This is my point exactly and mostly the point of the people on this board when it comes to north African and the horn BUT when it comes to the Lemba now they seem to BEG for extra-African extraction....'tis very strange.
Actually, the person you're citing, is referring to behavior meted out by people like yourself, with respect to ancient Egypt.
quote:Vidadavida:
quote:It took you a while to reply even though you were online when I replied you, but nonetheless...
I keep my computer logged on even if I am not here.
I replied 'shortly' after your reply, and you even went onto reply in another thread right of my reply.
quote:Vidadavida:
No it isn't and you know it Mystery considering J was never purported to be tropically adapted and originated in the Middle East.
Nope, I don't know it. I need your scientific evidence for this claim.
quote:Vidadavida:
You would need to provide evidence for these original carriers to be black.
I don't need to.
quote:Vidadavida:
quote: Mystery Solver:
quote:Vidadavida:
Do you have evidence that says the original carriers of this haplotype ARE?
I'm not obligated to produce anything. You made a claim, and need to back it up.
Yes you are
Why?
quote:Vidadavida:
If that is your "opinion" than I can respect that.
You can respect it, because I've demonstrated it as a fact.
quote:Vidadavida:
quote:Mystery Solver:
Actually, this is an example of an irrationale presentation of thought. Please amuse me, in making it 'rationale'. Ps- Let me give you an example of 'rationalizing' your intellectually disorganized but so-called 'ratonale':
Vidadada writes:
Rationale:
*Lemba are African black people with mixed ancestory
*African-Americans black people with mixed ancestory
^And I can just as well say, using the unique Vidadavida 'rationale', that the Lemba are African, and AA are Americans. The AA would be intellectually bankrupt for claiming to have ancestry from Africa, because clearly they are Americans. This would be self-hate, and shouldn't be embraced by Africanists and black Africans. Well Vida, what now?
LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!! You have just shown me that you don't know much about rationale or deductive reasoning..WOW
How, when I've just demonstrated how "irrational" your rationale is?
quote:Vidadavida:
Both propositions have African and black in parenthesis so your deduction of using just "america" for your rationale is very poor I must admit I am a little shocked at your lack of intelligence or maybe you just want to argue you can't reduce only "American" out of "African-American" LOL hmmmm.
Actually, I've shown how intellectually void you are; you are comparing Lemba with African Americans, when neither has anything to do with the other. You proclaim to be using 'black' as some sort of premise, while I could just as well bring Melanesians, some east Indians, and Australians into the discussion with that 'rationale'. 'African' in "African-Americans" no more alludes to recent ancestry ultimately from Africa than the Lemba claiming their "Sena" ancestry. AAs don't live in Africa, in case you didn't know.
quote:Vidadavida:
Now if I said the Lemba have mixed ancestory and Americans have mixed ancestory then your rationale would be better.
You don't get my post, because you are too dense to do so. Otherwise, it would have already been 'better'.
quote:Vidadavida:
I accuse them of self hate because they see themselves as BETTER than other Africans because of non-black extra-African ancestory.
Actually, if they thought of themselves better than other Africans, for which you present no evidence, then that would imply a sense of 'superiority' complex, not self-hatred. Do you have official Lemba texts as evidence that the Lemba aren't aware of their African lineage, or that they denounce it? If not, where do you come of with the unfounded accusation?
quote:Vidadavida:
quote:Mystery Solver:
No brainer. Your claims about self-hate is obviously bunk, given that they are quite conservative, promoting intra-communal marriage.
No it isn't you just either don't understand or just want to be stubborn..which is fine it doesnt' bother me.
What "isn't"? Unless, you can show that Lemba aren't a conservative bunch, who promote intra-communal marriage, you aren't making sense. If your not making sense doesn't bother you, then why should anyone else be bothered by it?
quote:Vidadavida:
Please read about Lemba supporting marrying White and Arab Jews, their own Lemba Jews and NOT gentile black Africans *sigh*.
Where? I've read the link, it says nothing about Lemba supporting marriages with White and Arab Jews, but not Black Jews.
I saw this in one link:
"Though non-Lemba women are allowed to marry into the tribe, Lemba men face expulsion if they marry gentiles."
^Attests to the conservative nature of the Lemba community.
The other link provides nothing but an 'index'.
quote:Vidadavida:
I have shown the rationale if you don't want to accept it then that is fine I am sure others can see it
I've seen your 'rationale', and I don't accept it, because quite simply, it doesn't make sense. I challenge you to find anyone here, who says it makes sense.
quote:Vidadavida:
Sure almost all of the black Muslims in Africa lmao...Ethiopians, Somalians, Sudanese and Oromo that came from Kilwa are proud to be muslims and were enslaved by Arabs.
Really, where do these folks proclaim to descend from their "slave masters", who are ethnically distinct? Provide the necessary documentations of 'slavery' in each case, genetic links, and the official claims of association-by-ancestry by the said peoples so named.
quote:Vidadavida:
Black Tuaregs and some Wolof unfortunatly claim descendants from Arabs that enslaved them.
Official texts of both the claims and slavery, a long with the necessary genetic link legitimizing it?
quote:Vidadavida:
African Americans always spoke of how much Irish and/or native American they had in them to seem BETTER than other blacks.
Immaterial.
quote:Vidadavida:
I know you know this Mystery you are more educated in Africa than I am so why are you doing this just for "debate" purposes?
I don't know any of the things you just spewed, which you were asked to substantiate, including the ones you failed to deliver on so far.
quote:Vidadavida:
This is what I call "self hate" being proud of being descendants of people that either enslaved you and/or raped you.
Evidence and relevancy to the Lemba case?
quote:Vidadavida:
Now, conversely the Darienito and Cirrarmone HATE the Jews that enslaved them so I would NOT call them self hating.
Relevancy to the [Lemba] issue at hand?
quote: Vidadavida:
If it doesn't then why are you so animate about proving non African ancestory in Lemba, but not about non African ancestory in Horn Africans?
Don't have the slightest clue what you're propagating, but I can tell you this: Lemba have what you call "non-African" ancestry, in the form of J haplotypes. You proclaimed to acknowledge this; then what else is there for me to prove, other than that you are making some unsubstantiated fuss about Lemba desire to claim this ancestry?
quote:... but not about non African ancestory in Horn Africans?
Citations?
quote:Vidadavida:
It matters to you because they are supposed to be "special" because they claim descendancy from Isrealites.
Lie. It matters to me because it's been demonstrated as "fact" that they have the said ancestry. You disagree, then prove that they don't have the said ancestry, and be done with it, instead of flip flopping.
quote:Vidadavida:
quote:Mystery Solver:
quote: Vidadavida:
Because Lemba are mostly African and Egyptians mostly aren't.
And where's the requested genetic evidence on this?
Point out the evidence; I've gone through your pdf maps, and nothing therein supports your outlandish claim.
quote:quote:
Vidadavida:
So this study says that 7 out of 13 Y chromosomes in Buba males have CMH so that is a tad over half of the males DNA make up plus the ALL African Mtdna = "mostly western Asian"?!?!?!
Let me unconfuse you:
It is essentially saying that the J haplotype in question 'predominates' in the Buba clan. The maternal line on the other hand, has been predominantly the African base lineages. So, the study justifies the Lemba claim to this predominant paternal ancestry, and refutes your unfounded bickerings.
quote:Vidadavida:
quote: Now, let's have your evidence that Egyptians are "mostly" non-African vis-a-vis their African TMRCAs.
Whoa you act as if you don't want Egyptians to have non-African ancestory hmmmm odd considering you seem to WANT the Lemba to. Why is this? *scratching my head*
The question is: Whatever made you jump to such a weird conclusion; citations?
Posted by yazid904 (Member # 7708) on :
Vida said
quote:Because Lemba are mostly African and Egyptians mostly aren't
What kind of foolishness is this? Both Lemba and Egyptians are African! If you are injecting colour, then you are truly embodying a Anglo-Saxon bias in your pronouncement!
Posted by songhai (Member # 13721) on :
Vida writes:
quote: It is sad that I am even answering this because you are basically WANTING Africans to have non-African ancestory based on your skepticism smh very sad [Frown] . No wonder negros suffer is because they hate themselves, but here you go:
It is sad that you can't cite your source with any more precision than a homepage without driveling on about untruths and irrelevancies. Am I supposed to fish through this entire sight looking for an article on Yoruba mythology when you can tell me the exact title of the article--at least--and the subject/topic title it falls under?
Are you trying to hide something?
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by yazid904: Vida said
quote:Because Lemba are mostly African and Egyptians mostly aren't
What kind of foolishness is this? Both Lemba and Egyptians are African! If you are injecting colour, then you are truly embodying a Anglo-Saxon bias in your pronouncement!
I am talking about current Egyptians dude calm down lol.
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by yazid904:
Vida said
quote:Because Lemba are mostly African and Egyptians mostly aren't
What kind of foolishness is this? Both Lemba and Egyptians are African! If you are injecting colour, then you are truly embodying a Anglo-Saxon bias in your pronouncement!
I am talking about current Egyptians dude calm down lol.
It isn't a matter of calming down, it is a matter of your producing past due evidence for this funny claim. We've been overly patient with you, Vida.
Posted by songhai (Member # 13721) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Solver:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by yazid904:
Vida said
quote:Because Lemba are mostly African and Egyptians mostly aren't
What kind of foolishness is this? Both Lemba and Egyptians are African! If you are injecting colour, then you are truly embodying a Anglo-Saxon bias in your pronouncement!
I am talking about current Egyptians dude calm down lol.
It isn't a matter of calming down, it is a matter of your producing past due evidence for this funny claim. We've been overly patient with you, Vida.
Good luck, Mystery. I also have a request pending for evidence. If his first attempt at providing me evidence is any indication, brace yourself for disappointment. I've received better service at my local DMV. Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Solver:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by yazid904:
Vida said
quote:Because Lemba are mostly African and Egyptians mostly aren't
What kind of foolishness is this? Both Lemba and Egyptians are African! If you are injecting colour, then you are truly embodying a Anglo-Saxon bias in your pronouncement!
I am talking about current Egyptians dude calm down lol.
It isn't a matter of calming down, it is a matter of your producing past due evidence for this funny claim. We've been overly patient with you, Vida.
I don't have all day to sit at home arguing with people about Ancient Egypt. When I post something I post something.
I don't do the gang up good ol' boy routine crap. I am talking to you about the Lemba being self hating ni ggers and not to be focused on by Afrocentrics, Africanists or other black people.
And that they aren't descendants of Israelites in the Bible.
You say original carriers of J haplotype are black so that killed the whole argument, that is why I stopped because it says you just want to argue without getting anywhere.
As soon as you didn't acknowledge self hatred in the quoted Lembas about them not marrying any other blacks but WOULD marry whites and Asians and Lemba women saying they had beautiful noses and hair and facial structure that also ended the discussion.
When it is shown that 100% of mtdna in Lembas is African and 45% of their Y chromosomes are African and adding them up equals more African than Western Asian and you deny this that also ends the discussion.
When you don't admit that you caring about Lemba Jews because of the BIble popularity that also ends the discussion.
When you act like Africans and the diaspora haven't claim descendancy from the people that enslaved them, that ends the debate.
Debating is for learning not just debating; that is female like. What we have learned in this debate is
1. Original Carriers of J haplotype were "black"
2. Africans have never been enslaved by anyone nor claimed descendancy or culture/religion from anyone that enslaved them ]
3 Africans(blacks) loving Middle eastern features and people more than Africans(blacks) isn't self hating.
4. Over 70% of a person's dna = the minority of what their ancestory is
5. Having a certain lineage means that you descend from fictional characters in a mythological religious book .
Thanks Mystery I have really learned alot you are the greatest Posted by Kemson (Member # 12850) on :
I believe that the entire CMH, haplotype/haplogroup classification system is a theoretical sham designed to wrongfully and systematically divide people while , in a slithering snake like fashion, award certain people(s) bogus genetic claims.
Classification systems of this kind inherit inconsistency the warrants dropping the entire idea. But of cause, this would be a hard sell so debunking the system is necessary and people should do this more rather than adopting it as some valid for of human genetic measuring tool.
Posted by Tyrannosaurus (Member # 3735) on :
quote:Because they are attaching themselves only to the extra-African ancestory being proud of long Jewish noses and hair and facial structure(which obviously means non black facial structure) when they do not have these features.
Those aren't "Jewish" features, those are features common among Southwest Asians. While the original Hebrew and Aramaic Jews, as Southwest Asians, would have certainly had such features, the Jewish religion does not affect your phenotype.
What is with this bullshit belief that being a Jew necessarily makes you a descendent of the Hebrews, when in fact the only people descended from Hebrews are most likely modern Palestinians (Arabization notwithstanding)? This delusion seems most common among white Ashkenazi Jews (descendents of Germanic northern Europeans who converted to Judaism), but it now seems that Africans believe it, too!
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
^^^My point exactly and it's all because of that filthy Bible.
Posted by Tyrannosaurus (Member # 3735) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*: ^^^My point exactly and it's all because of that filthy Bible.
IIRC, the Bible doesn't make any claims about whether white Germanic Jews like Ashkenazis or black Bantu Jews like Lemba are descended from Hebrews. Matter of fact, the Hebrews who wrote the various books compiled into the Bible probably didn't even know what Lemba and Ashkenazis (or rather their "infidel" ancestors living in southern Africa and northern Europe respectively at the time) looked like!
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
If you can answer these questions you will have bested every old school physical anthropologist, because that discipline was never able to define a set of physical features possessed by all Jews, and least of all the ancient Israelites and their Hebrew ancestors.
What is a Jewish nose? What is Jewish hair? What is a Jewish facial structure?
Why are said characteristics not "black" (which means you must also define "black").
How, and with what, have you come to the conclusion as to just what is or is not a Jewish physical feature, and that such features are common among "southwest Asians" (just where precisely, and of what time period(s))?
And for the information of those so intolerant of others' beliefs (but expectant of the patience of understanding for their own beliefs, even the Jews of Kaifeng Fu claim Hebrew descent and proudly say: "Think on this. To us you don't look Jewish too!"
What is with this bullshit belief that being a Jew necessarily makes you a descendent of the Hebrews, when in fact the only people descended from Hebrews are most likely modern Palestinians (Arabization notwithstanding)? This delusion seems most common among white Ashkenazi Jews (descendents of Germanic northern Europeans who converted to Judaism), but it now seems that Africans believe it, too!
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
And off the back of what cereal box do you get your facts?
quote:Originally posted by Tyrannosaurus: ... in fact the only people descended from Hebrews are most likely modern Palestinians (Arabization notwithstanding)?
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
Who converted the Ashkenazim? When did they do it? For that matter, when and who converted all the other kinds of Jews Hodi, Teymani, Itiopi, Mizrahhi, Mashreqi, Maghrebi, Sepharadi?
quote:Originally posted by Tyrannosaurus:
... white Ashkenazi Jews (descendents of Germanic northern Europeans who converted to Judaism),
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
I don't have all day to sit at home arguing with people about Ancient Egypt. When I post something I post something.
You were here yesterday posting stuff all day, and you failed to report on pending evidence. If your underachievements don't bother you, then I'm sure it doesn't bother others.
quote:Vidadavida:
I don't do the gang up good ol' boy routine crap. I am talking to you about the Lemba being self hating ni ggers and not to be focused on by Afrocentrics, Africanists or other black people.
And I'm telling you, that you spew B.S., pending evidence.
quote:Vidadavida:
And that they aren't descendants of Israelites in the Bible.
Forget the 'Bible'. Do you have counter evidence to Lemba proclamations about ancestry from the Levantine groups?
quote:Vidadavida:
You say original carriers of J haplotype are black
Citation?
quote:Vidadavida:
so that killed the whole argument, that is why I stopped because it says you just want to argue without getting anywhere.
You stopped, because you lack any case, reducing you to latch onto self-fabricated [phantom] citations of other discussants.
quote:Vidadavida:
As soon as you didn't acknowledge self hatred in the quoted Lembas about them not marrying any other blacks but WOULD marry whites and Asians and Lemba women saying they had beautiful noses and hair and facial structure that also ended the discussion.
Evidence?
quote:Vidadavida:
When it is shown that 100% of mtdna in Lembas is African and 45% of their Y chromosomes are African and adding them up equals more African than Western Asian and you deny this that also ends the discussion.
The Lemba Buba claim that they have ancestry from the Levant, and sure enough, DNA test supported this, with J haplotypes predominating in the patrilineal test. The Lemba also say that these Levantine ancestors married with African locals, giving rise to well, their contemporary Lemba community. Sure enough, DNA tests also attest to this, with the base African female line predominating. While you baselessly reject all this, DNA tests actually reject YOU and affirm the Lemba saying.
quote:Vidadavida:
When you don't admit that you caring about Lemba Jews because of the BIble popularity that also ends the discussion.
Vida, I just don't make case-less posters happy, by catering to their frivolous begging for false confessions; it ain't my style. Sorry buddy, no can do.
quote:Vidadavida:
When you act like Africans and the diaspora haven't claim descendancy from the people that enslaved them, that ends the debate.
Evidence of Lemba descendancy from people who owned their mothers as slaves, accounting for the high frequency of CMH?
quote:Vidadavida:
Debating is for learning not just debating; that is female like.
Well, if that were the case, then I'd say that you fit the bill, if only you were fit to be a female. Most females are quite intelligent, in my book, and know how to produce evidence immediately upon request...something that you are apparently unfit to do.
quote:Vidadavida:
What we have learned in this debate is
1. Original Carriers of J haplotype were "black"
2. Africans have never been enslaved by anyone nor claimed descendancy or culture/religion from anyone that enslaved them
3 Africans(blacks) loving Middle eastern features and people more than Africans(blacks) isn't self hating.
4. Over 70% of a person's dna = the minority of what their ancestory is
5. Having a certain lineage means that you descend from fictional characters in a mythological religious book .
Thanks Mystery I have really learned alot you are the greatest
I'd say you're welcome, but your report above says that you are not perceptive to learning. That would be translated into a grade below 'f', if there's any. But don't let this demoralization hold you back; after all, it doesn't relieve you from your obligation to produce pending evidences, does it Vida?
Ps - Good luck with your next best effort in dodging requests for evidence.
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
^^^^At any rate Mystery I sincerely appreciate you for debating sensably and maturely and not being emotional like others
Thank you
Posted by JMT (Member # 12050) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*: ^^^^At any rate Mystery I sincerely appreciate you for debating sensably and maturely and not being emotional like others
Thank you
This sounds like a cop out.
Posted by xyyman (Member # 13597) on :
I thought the Askenazi Jews were "converted" Eurpoeans to Judaism. But this site is saying that there is a genetic link to the people in the Levant:
Around half of all Ashkenazi Jews trace their mitochondrial lineage back to one of four women, and your haplogroup K represents a lineage that gave rise to three of them. While this lineage is found at a smaller frequency in non-Ashkenazi Jews, the three K lineages that helped found the Ashkenazi population are seldom found in other populations. While virtually absent in Europeans, they appear at frequencies of three percent or higher in groups from the Levant, Arabia, and Egypt. This indicates a strong genetic role in the Ashkenazi founder event, which likely occurred in the Near East
Are they converted or are they decendants?
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
Like most all Jews, they are partially both.
Posted by songhai (Member # 13721) on :
quote:Originally posted by JMT:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*: ^^^^At any rate Mystery I sincerely appreciate you for debating sensably and maturely and not being emotional like others
Thank you
This sounds like a cop out.
I think he is being sarcastic, as well as coping out.
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
^^^No it was sincere Mystery didn't try to gang up and he wasn't immature and was very respectful in the debate unlike other people.
It's not a cop out it is just that I am my argument is normative and his is constative so we won't really be able to come to an intelligable point.
Posted by JMT (Member # 12050) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*: ^^^No it was sincere Mystery didn't try to gang up and he wasn't immature and was very respectful in the debate unlike other people.
It's not a cop out it is just that I am my argument is normative and his is constative so we won't really be able to come to an intelligable point.
I simply felt Mystery Solver raised some valid points in regard to producing counter evidence of the Lemba's proclamations about their ancestry from the Levantine which have yet to be addressed.
Posted by yazid904 (Member # 7708) on :
quote:I simply felt Mystery Solver raised some valid points in regard to producing counter evidence of the Lemba's proclamations about their ancestry from the Levantine which have yet to be addressed.
What is our hypothesis? Are we saying the the specific genotype denoting Jews are the same (relative frequency) in Africa, Europe and America?
We already know that the Lemba have a higher frequency of the cohanim gene that denotes the priestly caste! What else are we looking for? Shouldn't more of the Jews from Europe go through the same frequency of test to assert their "Jewishness"? They are rarely tested or challenged vis a vis the asertion of the ones from Africa!
Posted by yazid904 (Member # 7708) on :
According to Jewish tradition, only males from the direct line of Aaron could serve as priests in the holy temple of God. This tradition began when Moses brought his brother Aaron before God to be anointed as the first high priest to the Israelites. Historical documentation confirms Aaron’s lineage was stringently followed from the first temple of Solomon, through the Jewish exile in Babylon, and continued past the destruction of Herod’s temple by Titus in 70 AD. These priests called Cohanim, persist today and are charged with performing all religious rituals for the Jewish people. While today’s Cohanim continue to endure as the group charged with implementing the rites of the Jewish faithful, it has always been an issue sparking vigorous debate whether the members of this priestly order were in fact direct bloodline descendants of Aaron. Now due to scientific advances in DNA analysis, the existence of a common genetic marker in today’s Cohanim can be investigated to determine if Aaron’s lineage has been preserved. Since the Cohanim priesthood is only transferred through males, the confirmation of their bloodline was believed to rest in the Y-chromosome. Y-chromosome DNA analysis has proven useful in constructing patrilineal genealogies in the past because it is passed down exclusively through males and most of the genetic material is noncoding (does not cause life-threatening mutations). If the Cohanim have succeeded in preserving their bloodline, they should have a higher frequency of common genetic markers (called haplotypes) in their Y-chromosomes than the general Jewish population. The scientific results indicate: The general Jewish community possesses certain genetic haplotypes that are absent in most of the Cohanim 1. More surprising, the Cohanim possess a single haplotype that is absent in most of the general Jewish community2. This single haplotype (called the Cohen modal haplotype) was then tested on the Cohanim in two major Jewish communities. The results indicate that the Cohen haplotype is strikingly prevalent and similar in both communities; which strongly suggests the Cohanim all descended from a single male common ancestor. Mutational analysis also suggests this common ancestor lived about 3000 years ago approximately when Jewish tradition believes Aaron was anointed to the priesthood 3. There have been other "dispersed tribes" which follow ancient Jewish traditions who have attempted to claim a blood lineage to Israel. A black African clan named the "Lemba" and the "Bene Israel" from India have made this claim and have submitted their DNA to analyze for the "Cohen modal haplotype. The Lemba are a black race of people from northern Africa alleging their ancestors descended from Israelites. While they do practice a curious number of Jewish rituals (such as dietary laws), their assertions to Jewish lineage have been rejected in the past. Several Lemba males were tested for the Cohanim modal haplotype in a recent study. Results indicate that ~50% of the male Lemba leaders contain the Cohen gene. This is a striking discovery since only ~10% of the general male Jewish population carry this Cohen haplotype 4. The "Bene Israel" are located in India and considered to be a very curious and obscure community. The legend of the "Bene Israel" (translated Children of Israel) goes back to 175 BC when their Israeli ancestors supposedly were fleeing the persecution of Antiochus Epiphanes by escaping to India. Except for possessing numerous Indian customs, the "Bene Israel" remarkably observed Saturday as their Sabbath. The "Bene Israel" were also recently tested for the presence of the Cohanim haplotype. Results confirm they had a greater than 50% occurrence of the Cohen genetic marker 4. It has now been demonstrated that the priestly order of Cohanim has a common genetic marker that is characteristic of only ~10% of the general Jewish population and completely absent in gentiles. While this is not a direct confirmation that the Cohanim specifically descended from Aaron, it does demonstrate a separation and preservation of this priestly group that has persisted for over 3000 years. It is fascinating that the Bible independently confirms the Cohen priestly line existed in the past and is expected to continue in the future.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-chromosomal_Aaron Descendants of Aaron. Buba sub clan of Lemba. What did the bible describe Moses as >>>>therefore Lemba The proportion of the whole male Jewish population that has Cohen ancestry has been estimated at 5%[1]. So if we take that 5% as our initial estimate of the probability of shared Cohen ancestry, then on the basis of the data above: • Not belonging to haplogroups D or E improves the odds for a Sephardi Jew from 19/1 against to (19/1)*(0.85/1.00) = 16.2/1 against (a 5.8% probability) • Not belonging to haplogroups D,E,P,Q or R takes the odds to (19/1)*(0.63/0.88) = 13.6/1 against (6.8% probability). • Membership of Haplogroup J improves the odds to (19/1)*(0.37/0.75) = 9.4/1 against (9.6% probability). • Being within the CMH.1 group takes the odds to (19/1)*(0.14/0.61) = 4.4/1 against (18.7% probability). • A full 6/6 match takes the odds to (19/1)*(0.10/0.56) = 3.4/1. (22.7% probability). Even a full 6/6 match for the 6 marker CMH thus cannot "prove" Cohen ancestry. It can only somewhat strengthen a previously existing belief. But for populations where the background probability assessment of shared Cohen ancestry must be vanishingly low, such as almost all non-Jews, even a full 6/6 match makes only a small difference. For individuals in such populations the CMH likely indicates Haplogroup J, but a completely different ancestry to the Cohanim.
Look at the map quadrants and see where the Lemba are positioned vis a vis sub-Saharan, European and North African groups!
Posted by songhai (Member # 13721) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*: ^^^No it was sincere Mystery didn't try to gang up and he wasn't immature and was very respectful in the debate unlike other people.
It's not a cop out it is just that I am my argument is normative and his is constative so we won't really be able to come to an intelligable point.
In other words, you've been asserting opinions with no basis in fact. This is what I've suspected all along.
All you had to do is admit this when you were asked for your sources/evidence. Sigh Posted by JMT (Member # 12050) on :
quote:Originally posted by yazid904:
quote:I simply felt Mystery Solver raised some valid points in regard to producing counter evidence of the Lemba's proclamations about their ancestry from the Levantine which have yet to be addressed.
What is our hypothesis? Are we saying the the specific genotype denoting Jews are the same (relative frequency) in Africa, Europe and America?
We already know that the Lemba have a higher frequency of the cohanim gene that denotes the priestly caste! What else are we looking for? Shouldn't more of the Jews from Europe go through the same frequency of test to assert their "Jewishness"? They are rarely tested or challenged vis a vis the asertion of the ones from Africa!
My hypothesis is if the Lemba say their ancestry is from the Levatine then that is the case. DNA evidence supports the Lemba's claim. Who is this Vida person to refute the Lemba. And where is his science that contradicts the evidence that Mystery Solver requested? I haven't seen any.
What's strange to me is I'm not the one here espousing eurocentric garbage by feeding into the false stereotype of Black Africans never traveling outside of continental Africa in ancient times. Only a fool with room temperature IQ and an ulterior motive would peddle this nonsense. Vida's scheme is transparent to me. He is suggesting the Lemba became Black only through miscegenation with Black Africans after the Lemba's exodus from the middle east which is subliminally implying the original jews that came out of Egypt or the Levant must have been a different race or color than the present day Lemba. All B.S.! I believe the Lemba phenotypically looked the same way they did thousands of years ago before they arrived at their present location in Southern Africa.
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by JMT:
quote:Originally posted by yazid904:
quote:I simply felt Mystery Solver raised some valid points in regard to producing counter evidence of the Lemba's proclamations about their ancestry from the Levantine which have yet to be addressed.
What is our hypothesis? Are we saying the the specific genotype denoting Jews are the same (relative frequency) in Africa, Europe and America?
We already know that the Lemba have a higher frequency of the cohanim gene that denotes the priestly caste! What else are we looking for? Shouldn't more of the Jews from Europe go through the same frequency of test to assert their "Jewishness"? They are rarely tested or challenged vis a vis the asertion of the ones from Africa!
My hypothesis is if the Lemba say their ancestry is from the Levatine then that is the case. DNA evidence supports the Lemba's claim. Who is this Vida person to refute the Lemba. And where is his science that contradicts the evidence that Mystery Solver requested? I haven't seen any.
What's strange to me is I'm not the one here espousing eurocentric garbage by feeding into the false stereotype of Black Africans never traveling outside of continental Africa in ancient times. Only a fool with room temperature IQ and an ulterior motive would peddle this nonsense. Vida's scheme is transparent to me. He is suggesting the Lemba became Black only through miscegenation with Black Africans after the Lemba's exodus from the middle east which is subliminally implying the original jews that came out of Egypt or the Levant must have been a different race or color than the present day Lemba. All B.S.! I believe the Lemba phenotypically looked the same way they did thousands of years ago before they arrived at their present location in Southern Africa.
You must be retarded because none of this is what we were talking about lol
quote: quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*: ^^^No it was sincere Mystery didn't try to gang up and he wasn't immature and was very respectful in the debate unlike other people.
It's not a cop out it is just that I am my argument is normative and his is constative so we won't really be able to come to an intelligable point. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In other words, you've been asserting opinions with no basis in fact. This is what I've suspected all along.
All you had to do is admit this when you were asked for your sources/evidence. Sigh
Again, this wasn't the debate lol..you have shown you can't comprehend either.
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
It's not a cop out it is just that I am my argument is normative and his is constative so we won't really be able to come to an intelligable point.
Not sure what makes your argument normative, when it is not only inconsistent with Lemba oral traditions, but also DNA studies. My approach may well be both normative and constative, but from the perspective of the latter, it would appear that nothing I'd produced thus far has been falsified, while your so-called 'normative' approach wasn't able to hold up to minimal scrutiny.
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by songhai:
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Solver:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by yazid904:
Vida said
quote:Because Lemba are mostly African and Egyptians mostly aren't
What kind of foolishness is this? Both Lemba and Egyptians are African! If you are injecting colour, then you are truly embodying a Anglo-Saxon bias in your pronouncement!
I am talking about current Egyptians dude calm down lol.
It isn't a matter of calming down, it is a matter of your producing past due evidence for this funny claim. We've been overly patient with you, Vida.
Good luck, Mystery. I also have a request pending for evidence. If his first attempt at providing me evidence is any indication, brace yourself for disappointment. I've received better service at my local DMV.
I am sorry I got distracted and forgot to respond.
In my opinion and in a nut shell, this is how I view this: Jews/Ashkenazi/Khazars = Mongols mixed with European White/Turkish/In-breeding elements which makes up a great number of what Jews are today. They [Jews] practice an adopted form of highly modified religion known as Judaism.
In clarity, I'll use the following comparative analogy to sharpen my understanding:
Nigerians = a people of a country. Nigerian is not a religion. Nigeria is a physical regional location.
Russians = a people of a country. Russian is not a religion. Russia is a physical regional location.
Irish = a people of a country. Irish is not a religion. Ireland is a physical regional location.
Germans = a people of a country. German is not a religion. Germany is a physical regional location.
Jews = a people of a religious philosophy, not a country therefore, not a physical regional location.
The remaining questions is: What was to original countries Jews come from and what happened to it?
Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
Great question.
A better one would be "what is Judaism to even define it" and "when did Judaism start to better "locate" it.
Jews dance around this question a lot.
Some say it started during the Exodus which there was no "Exodus" or a Moses or an Aaron so its shrouded in myth which was the point of my debate originally in this thread.
Some stay it started at the feast of the tabernacle.
Some say it started after Babylonian captivety.
Some say they come from Sumeria and Sargon of Agade was their "adam" during the Akkadian period in that region.
The evidence shows that they are Canannites(phonecians) based on their language and gods of EL and Yahweh.
But, then again El and Yah both come from "ea" which is the Akkadian word for En.ki a god in Sumerian lore which was actually Abram/ibrum/Sin/suen/zuen/en.zu's god in the Sumerian tablets and Terah being Abrams father in the bible's god was En.lil(the half brother of En.ki). The word "SIN" comes from the fact that original "sin" was worshiping a god different than your father's..which I could see back then WOULD be something rather major. This is why the flood myth in the Bible has the ark landing in Ararat(north) which is En.ki's domain(tropic of capricorn) and not in the south as in the original Sumerian tablets(En.lil's domain)[tropic of cancer].
So maybe there IS a Sumerian connection who knows?
Posted by yazid904 (Member # 7708) on :
Language spoken during the time of those events are also a key indicator. Look at Aramaic, the land area and speakers to ascertain a source and influences of the area. It is obvious a dispersal took place but there may have been many as opposed to just one! We have the Buba clan of Lemba, the ones in India, the Khazars of Russia and similar communites so there were at least 3 branches of the same tree (origin)!
Posted by songhai (Member # 13721) on :
quote:Originally posted by Kemson: In my opinion and in a nut shell, this is how I view this: Jews/Ashkenazi/Khazars = Mongols mixed with European White/Turkish/In-breeding elements which makes up a great number of what Jews are today. They [Jews] practice an adopted form of highly modified religion known as Judaism.
In clarity, I'll use the following comparative analogy to sharpen my understanding:
Nigerians = a people of a country. Nigerian is not a religion. Nigeria is a physical regional location.
Russians = a people of a country. Russian is not a religion. Russia is a physical regional location.
Irish = a people of a country. Irish is not a religion. Ireland is a physical regional location.
Germans = a people of a country. German is not a religion. Germany is a physical regional location.
Jews = a people of a religious philosophy, not a country therefore, not a physical regional location.
The remaining questions is: What was to original countries Jews come from and what happened to it?
We'll it's not a mystery what regional location gave birth to the Jews. It would be the same location that gave birth to the Afro-Asiatic language family: North East Africa.
Posted by songhai (Member # 13721) on :
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by songhai:
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Solver:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
quote:Originally posted by yazid904:
Vida said
quote:Because Lemba are mostly African and Egyptians mostly aren't
What kind of foolishness is this? Both Lemba and Egyptians are African! If you are injecting colour, then you are truly embodying a Anglo-Saxon bias in your pronouncement!
I am talking about current Egyptians dude calm down lol.
It isn't a matter of calming down, it is a matter of your producing past due evidence for this funny claim. We've been overly patient with you, Vida.
Good luck, Mystery. I also have a request pending for evidence. If his first attempt at providing me evidence is any indication, brace yourself for disappointment. I've received better service at my local DMV.
I am sorry I got distracted and forgot to respond.
These must be the wrong links. They say nothing Mecca or Hausa brainwashing.
The following link makes your case for Hausa brainwashing:
EDO Nation Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
Theone I gave you was about Fulani brainwashing.
But thank you for that site
Posted by Willing Thinker {What Box} (Member # 10819) on :
quote:Originally posted by Yonis:
quote:3. I am not a native African I am third generation African American, all of my grand parents came to this country in the 40's. I am as American as an African can get and I know African American pseudo culture and history to a TEE. I don't look nor seem any differen't than them for survival purposes and I speak 6 dialects of jive lmao!!!!!!!!!
LMAO the only reason you suddenly say that you're not born in Nigerian is because you know that igbogoddes might ask you something in igbo or yoruba, that's why you have shifted to call yourself a third generation American, lol your busted.
Lol I remember that!
quote:Originally posted by Yonis:
quote:yet these Lemba are discriminated by the other Jews LMAO go figure. Where is your GOD now!!
The Ashkenazi jews discriminate against all Jews who are not Ashkenazi, have you ever heard about the Israeli Black Panthers (Mizrahi)? http://www.marxist.com/MiddleEast/israeli_black_panthers.html And also the Beta israelis are constantly discriminated againt in israel, so for sure they will also discriminate against the Lemba jews.
Good point Yonis, glad you put that out there.
quote:Originally posted by Sundiata:
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*:
Do you African Americans make a big deal about being connected to British peoples other then when purporting to have "good hair" lol?
No, because African-Americans don't sincerely believe that they were the original British colonists who settled the Americas,
Considers what is meant by "big deal".
If someone is asked of course, they'd tell you whatever they know and are not ashamed of. If they cared to tell you.
What relevance is this to the question of the Lemba Israelites?
All I can deduce from this is that the Lemba are more proud of there Hebrew tradition/ancestry than african-americans are of being part white. So what?
(You see a glass half-empty, I see a glass half-full)
quote: you can't turn this on its head and make it a case about the self-esteem of the Lemba. You're simplifying an issue that you have no answers for, only dismissive and hateful rhetoric, with pre-conceived assumptions based on your self-hatred of black people(or just hatred, since there's a good chance that you're not black).. This is why you spend 75% of your time here obsessing over African-Americans(when this site isn't dedicated to A,.A.s), and the other 25% doubting that the Egyptians were Black, which you have recently feigned coming to terms with, but given your psychological instability, you're due to backslide anyways.
Excellently put.^
quote:Originally posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh*: Idiot my "deduction" was quite sound. Lemba can't claim being Jews/Isrealites/Hebrews because of their J and J2 haplogroups those haplogroups are not African nor black what part of that do you not understand?!?!?
since J and J2 are extra african maybe that proves their extra african origin.(?)
quote:Vida:
Though non-Lemba women are allowed to marry into the tribe, Lemba men face expulsion if they marry gentiles.
Now Vida, tell me how this makes sense.
You mean to tell me that non-Lemba jew women can marry into the the tribe, but not to a Lemba man because they'll face expulsion??!
So you mean to tell me Lemba do lesbian marriages??!!!!~!
Secondly, gentiles does not mean non-Israelites, where it is applied as such is an error or mis-translation. A common mis-conception.
[ 24. July 2007, 01:10 PM: Message edited by: Horus_Den_1 ]
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
quote:Just sit back and watch we aren't even debating anymore "keep up".
For one to debate, one must have coherent arguments let alone arguments that supported by evidence. You have yet to make such arguments.
[ 24. July 2007, 01:09 PM: Message edited by: Horus_Den_1 ]
Posted by IgboIbo (Member # 13901) on :
I have read some of your comments on Igbos and Lembas and have been disgusted at some of them.
Why anyone would think that Igbos would want to align themselves with a country like Israel where one gets shot at/bombed on a daily or weekly basis if they didn't have strong evidence to show that they were from there, is beyond me.
Nigeria is a rich oil producing nation and is currently run by Muslims, Igbos have much to lose by being connected with Israel.
The Biblical word OL is OLU in Igbo, the Biblical word Maaz is Maazi in Igbo and yes the word Igbo is our pronounciation of the word Hebrew. The memorial onyx with Gad(son of Jacob) written in Hebrew is with the Igbos Exodus 39:14, there are numerous villages named after Eri and Arodi sons of Gad. The evidence goes on.
We are who we say we are and with time the world will agree.
Posted by Yonis (Member # 7684) on :
Since when did Igbo become jews? Posted by yazid904 (Member # 7708) on :
quote:Originally posted by Yonis: Since when did Igbo become jews?
Yonis, It does not mean that the Igbo are Jews, or have become them!
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
^ A better question is what has become of this thread?? Posted by Nice Vidadavida *sigh* (Member # 13372) on :
quote:Originally posted by Yonis: Since when did Igbo become jews?
*Snickering* That's what I said LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Damn my own arch enemy is taking words right out of my mouth Posted by igbogoddess (Member # 12132) on :
Igbos are not Jews but Hebrews, Yonis. Just because you haven't heard of this doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. But most of us are here to learn, so I am telling you. This thread is about the Lemba, so if you are truly interested in finding out how Igbos are Hebrews, PM me and I will send you what I have. You will notice that most African Hebrews have a particular tribe of Israel that they are affiliated with. It is a pity that Lemba, and Igbo for that matter, seem to have to jump through hoops to prove who they are to the world. Quite disgusting, actually.
Djehuti, this thread has fallen by the wayside because there are people here who aren't here to learn, but to name call and specualate. Threads get really boring when that happens. I am a teacher and I have, in the past, directed students here for information. I won't be doing that again, because some of the posters (and you all know who I'm talking about) act worse than some of the students that I direct here. It is a pity, because there is so many other intelligent people here.
IgboIbo, I would love to learn more about Hebrew Ibgos. Please PM information to me. Thank you.
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess: Igbos are not Jews but Hebrews,.. .
Now I've heard everything! LOL
Manding Japanese and now Igbo Hebrews!
By the way, your comment is contradictory. The Hebrews were the ancestors of the Jews and they were in fact original Jews. How are modern West African Igbo 'Hebrews' all of a sudden but not even Jews?! LMAO Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
You need to respect people's right to self-determination and not laugh in mocking ignorance of what you know not.
For your information there is a very concerted effort going on right now and supported by an influential American white Jewish organization spearheading efforts to reallign those Igbo's of Hebrew antecedents with the rest of K*lal Yisra'el.
Over a decade ago the community of Libyan Jews in Israel accepted an Igbo who made aliyah into their kahila no questions asked presumably based on old rabbinic records of trade between these two diasporan Israelite settlements.
Because without approval of their rabbis, after thorough investigation, the Igbo would not have been invited into the Libyan (white and near white) community of Israel.
Most importantly, no community of Israelites or Jews anywhere in Africa needs to prove anything about their identity to anyone other than those Jewish authorities who preside over marriages, especially they have no need to do so to scoffing gentiles to whom this matter is none of their gawd damned business.
Posted by igbogoddess (Member # 12132) on :
So Djehuti, who do you think the Jews are?
Posted by igbogoddess (Member # 12132) on :
Eloquently put, alTakruri!!! Posted by One_and_Done (Member # 10712) on :
igbogoddess wrote:
quote: So Djehuti, who do you think the Jews are?
Why would you even bother. This boy is a submissive troll. He has an ethnic hierarchial belief both globally and within Africa by region or ethnicity. Which is why he responded the way he did to you.
It is also why in his opinion "scholars" and scientists of euro ethnic backgrounds are intellectually superior, more trustworthy and knowledgable when compared to scholars of certain African ethnicities, or from certain nations.
His ethnic ranking beliefs should be obvious to all by now. You can easily see when it is between Africans and other groups. It is even more visible when it is between different Africans whether it be regional wise or nationality wise.
He's a sorry foreigner who does nothing but repeat whatever certain posters that he coattails say. The boy doesn't even think for himself he just waffles along cheerleading. Coattailing certain posters like a puppy.
Posted by One_and_Done (Member # 10712) on :
igbogoddess wrote:
quote: I am a teacher and I have, in the past, directed students here for information. I won't be doing that again, because some of the posters (and you all know who I'm talking about) act worse than some of the students that I direct here. It is a pity, because there is so many other intelligent people here.
That is a wise decision. The last thing that I have learned on this site is that there was no such thing as "Nubia" or "Nubians" in the Ancient Nile Valley and that these terms are part of a ruse. And this was way back in Jan 2006. The rest of the stuff on here is mostly just unsubstantiated opinions.
This is the only forum where it appears that just about every poster either has some form of psychological problem or is just a flat out dunce.
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess: So Djehuti, who do you think the Jews are?
Jews are anyone who practices the Judaic faith regardless of lineage or ancestry. But you are all of a sudden talking about Hebrews of the Levant and saying they were Igbo?
quote:Originally posted by One_and_Done: Why would you even bother. This boy is a submissive troll. He has an ethnic hierarchial belief both globally and within Africa by region or ethnicity. Which is why he responded the way he did to you.
It is also why in his opinion "scholars" and scientists of euro ethnic backgrounds are intellectually superior, more trustworthy and knowledgable when compared to scholars of certain African ethnicities, or from certain nations.
His ethnic ranking beliefs should be obvious to all by now. You can easily see when it is between Africans and other groups. It is even more visible when it is between different Africans whether it be regional wise or nationality wise.
He's a sorry foreigner who does nothing but repeat whatever certain posters that he coattails say. The boy doesn't even think for himself he just waffles along cheerleading. Coattailing certain posters like a puppy.
In correct. A troll is someone who contributes nothing to a forum, let alone valid information but instead hurls insults and makes negative rhetoric-- YOU.
You say I propose an "ethnic hierarchy"?? And what gave your twisted mind that idea?!
I may be non-African, but I seem to hold more respect for African peoples regardless of ethnicity than you. Hence, your silly ethnic insults here. Insults such as those is also the behavior of a troll.
One-and-done, you were finished a long time ago. Posted by igbogoddess (Member # 12132) on :
That's exactly what I'm saying, Djehuti. Yes,(some)Igbos are of the family(tribe)of the Hebrews. Are you implying that the Igbos were taught the faith from other sources? If so, how very 'Eurocentric' of you. Igbos have a family connection to Hebrews. They can tell you which tribe of Israel they belong to. Again, Igbos and Lemba don't have a history of lying and falsifying history. I don't understand why some people on this board think that Igbos or any other black African group of people have an innate desire to align themselves with whiter/lighter people. Here is something that you might find informative.
I'm going back to lurking. Posted by Yonis (Member # 7684) on :
But is this part of Igbos or are all Igbos Hebrews according to the belief?
Posted by Obelisk_18 (Member # 11966) on :
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess: That's exactly what I'm saying, Djehuti. Yes,(some)Igbos are of the family(tribe)of the Hebrews. Are you implying that the Igbos were taught the faith from other sources? If so, how very 'Eurocentric' of you. Igbos have a family connection to Hebrews. They can tell you which tribe of Israel they belong to. Again, Igbos and Lemba don't have a history of lying and falsifying history. I don't understand why some people on this board think that Igbos or any other black African group of people have an innate desire to align themselves with whiter/lighter people. Here is something that you might find informative.
You really believe your people are descended from the ancient israelites? Has any genetic test been done on the Igbo to see if they carry "Semitic" genes? The burden of proof is on you babe Posted by Willing Thinker {What Box} (Member # 10819) on :
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess: I don't understand why some people on this board think that Igbos or any other black African group of people have an innate desire to align themselves with whiter/lighter people.
Purhaps Vida is simply projecting his own feelings of self-hate (or more likely hate which is still purhaps rooted back to his self ).
You know, projection, he devalues africans himself, placing "Jewish ancestry" as higher, therefore the suspiscion of them clinging onto the alleged ancestry because of self-hate.
Now what else of substance does he really have to say? Nada.
He has never had a problem with American Jews claims of being such, though it is HIGHLY unlikely they still today have much of the original Hebrew DNA. Then again, the Hebrews have never been pure, but have always clung to gether under one title similar to Afro-America and the one drop rule.
So to me much of that second page was bull-**** and it was like WTF is your point?!
THERE IS AN ANNOYANCE, THOUGH.
Though we know that civilization in West Africa began before any Hebrews existed, and extend back prior to even Ghana, there are ever popular diffusionist theories especially when it comes to Africa. Even of South African Atlantian Zulu!
Posted by One_and_Done (Member # 10712) on :
quote: You say I propose an "ethnic hierarchy"?? And what gave your twisted mind that idea?!
You have already been exposed with regards to the white scholars vs. black scholars. Regarding your thoughts of the higher credibility and intelligence of white scholars/scientists versus the lack of same in black scholars/scientists. That was done in at least two earlier threads. Those that read them know what I'm speaking of.
quote: I may be non-African, but I seem to hold more respect for African peoples regardless of ethnicity than you. Hence, your silly ethnic insults here. Insults such as those is also the behavior of a troll.
That served two purposes, one of which was to prove my point about your ethnic hiearchy. There have been worse things said about other Africans from other nationalities and regions and yourself has never felt a compunction to refute or run to their defense.
People have noticed who you attack and who you don't. Who you defend and who you don't.
Secondly Yonis doesn't need you to defend him. If he is a grown man let him act like one
Oh yeah, don't think people haven't noticed that earlier in this thread you got spanked for speaking derogatively of certain Africans and you have submissively not replied.
Now I'm off
[ 27. July 2007, 03:10 PM: Message edited by: Horus_Den_1 ]
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
quote:Originally posted by One_and_Done: You have already been exposed with regards to the white scholars vs. black scholars. Regarding your thoughts of the higher credibility and intelligence of white scholars/scientists versus the lack of same in black scholars/scientists. That was done in at least two earlier threads. Those that read them know what I'm speaking of.
Ridiculous! Show me where exactly I stated that I hold white scholars at a higher standard than black ones! I'm not a racist idiot so I never hold any scholars to standards based on their color or 'race' but to their works! You probably say this because of my dissmisal of Clyde's work, whic is a load of rubbish! It has nothing to do with the guy being black, but his shoddy scholarship! I take works of black scholars like Keita and Kittles as perfect examples of high standard scholarship. In fact, Keita in particular is changing the very field with his methodology and eradicating the old biases that plagued his field. Perhaps it is YOU who continues to hold a bias doing the opposite-- favoring black scholars over white ones?
quote:That served two purposes, one of which was to prove my point about your ethnic hiearchy. There have been worse things said about other Africans from other nationalities and regions and yourself has never felt a compunction to refute or run to their defense.
What the heck are you talking about?! What "ethnic hierarchy"?! I think you lost it! I don't condone any insults against those of any ethnicity or nationality! I think your own ethnic prejudice has really affected your thinking.
quote:People have noticed who you attack and who you don't. Who you defend and who you don't.
I attack ignorant and pathetic trolls like YOU. I defend those who like to contribute their ideas and especially information to this forum! And?
quote:Secondly Yonis doesn't need you to defend him. If he is a grown man let him act like one
I was not defending him; I was merely pointing out YOUR obvious ethnic prejudice. We have enough problems with 'race' in this forum to be bringing up intra-African ethnic nonsense!
quote:Oh yeah, don't think people haven't noticed that earlier in this thread you got spanked for speaking derogatively of certain Africans and you have submissively not replied.
Please cite where I have said anything derogative about any group of people?!! Again, I think your personal issues have started to affect your thinking.
[ 27. July 2007, 03:09 PM: Message edited by: Horus_Den_1 ]
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
This certainly not the definition Jews themselves have of who is or what constitutes a Jew. It's not religion (a word that doesn't exist in the Hebrew language) rather it's peoplehood and how one lays claim to that peoplehood, be it by descent or by nationalizing (which, true, is called conversion but note there are atheist Jews, Buddhist Jews, and so on, who don't adhere to or follow the Law of Moses at all in the least).
quote:Originally posted by Djehuti:
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess: So Djehuti, who do you think the Jews are?
Jews are anyone who practices the Judaic faith regardless of lineage or ancestry.
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
No, they have nothing to prove to you or any other gentile. Nor do the authorities that proof has to be given to accept genetic test results as evidence being a Jew.
As relayed previously, the rabbinic authorities of the Libyan Jewish community in Israel have accepted Igbo within their kehila, and believe me there's nothing black about Libyan Jewry.
This is not a debate. This is a peoples right to identity, purpose, and direction -- who you are, where you come from, what you're supposed to be about. Understand that.
quote:Originally posted by Obelisk_18: You really believe your people are descended from the ancient israelites? Has any genetic test been done on the Igbo to see if they carry "Semitic" genes? The burden of proof is on you babe
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
The truest statement yet made in this thread!
quote:Originally posted by Willing Thinker {What Box}: Then again, the Hebrews have never been pure, but have always clung to gether under one title similar to Afro-America and the one drop rule.
Posted by Nay-Sayer (Member # 10566) on :
quote:Originally posted by Djehuti:
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess: So Djehuti, who do you think the Jews are?
Jews are anyone who practices the Judaic faith regardless of lineage or ancestry. But you are all of a sudden talking about Hebrews of the Levant and saying they were Igbo?
We know that Semites originally came from the Nile Valley so I don't see this as being all that improbable...
Posted by Kemson (Member # 12850) on :
As you can see they come from Europe, went into Palestine and jacked their **** while saying talking about some right to return.
Posted by King_Scorpion (Member # 4818) on :
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess: That's exactly what I'm saying, Djehuti. Yes,(some)Igbos are of the family(tribe)of the Hebrews. Are you implying that the Igbos were taught the faith from other sources? If so, how very 'Eurocentric' of you. Igbos have a family connection to Hebrews. They can tell you which tribe of Israel they belong to. Again, Igbos and Lemba don't have a history of lying and falsifying history. I don't understand why some people on this board think that Igbos or any other black African group of people have an innate desire to align themselves with whiter/lighter people. Here is something that you might find informative.
I think it's just the suspecion of afrocentrism. Though, the legacy of a lot of these tribes in Africa go back long before afrocentrism even came into existence. Besides, many African tribes like the Lemba, Igbo, and Falasha aren't as aware of Western (American) afrocentrism so haven't really been affected by it.
Posted by Kemson (Member # 12850) on :
Afrocentrism is a wonderful thing and I promote it as much as possible.
Posted by songhai (Member # 13721) on :
quote:Originally posted by Kemson: songhai, wrong!
As you can see they come from Europe, went into Palestine and jacked their **** while saying talking about some right to return.
I thought your question pertained to the 'original' Jews or proto-Jewish populations if you prefer. The Jews who were inhabitating southern Arabia and northern Africa in the 7th century and earlier didn't arrive there from Europe, to the best of my knowledge.
Posted by Willing Thinker {What Box} (Member # 10819) on :
quote:Originally posted by alTakruri: The truest statement yet made in this thread!
quote:Originally posted by Willing Thinker {What Box}: Then again, the Hebrews have never been pure, but have always clung to gether under one title similar to Afro-America and the one drop rule.
Thanks.
quote:Originally posted by Djehuti:
How are modern West African Igbo 'Hebrews' all of a sudden but not even Jews?!
Actually the use of 'Hebrew' predates that of 'Jew'.
Matter of fact, I don't even think they had the letter 'J' back then, which is why I find the word "Jahovah" funny, as if they're trying to get back to the original name or something.
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
The sound of 'j' was written with a 'g.' True that 'y' was never sounded like 'j.'
Posted by Obelisk_18 (Member # 11966) on :
quote:Originally posted by Willing Thinker {What Box}:
quote:Originally posted by igbogoddess: I don't understand why some people on this board think that Igbos or any other black African group of people have an innate desire to align themselves with whiter/lighter people.
Purhaps Vida is simply projecting his own feelings of self-hate (or more likely hate which is still purhaps rooted back to his self ).
You know, projection, he devalues africans himself, placing "Jewish ancestry" as higher, therefore the suspiscion of them clinging onto the alleged ancestry because of self-hate.
Now what else of substance does he really have to say? Nada.
He has never had a problem with American Jews claims of being such, though it is HIGHLY unlikely they still today have much of the original Hebrew DNA. Then again, the Hebrews have never been pure, but have always clung to gether under one title similar to Afro-America and the one drop rule.
So to me much of that second page was bull-**** and it was like WTF is your point?!
THERE IS AN ANNOYANCE, THOUGH.
Though we know that civilization in West Africa began before any Hebrews existed, and extend back prior to even Ghana, there are ever popular diffusionist theories especially when it comes to Africa. Even of South African Atlantian Zulu!
west african civilizations before ghana? fill me in here.. you talking about the nok? Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
Don't we have old Ghana or Nok threads where the above discussion is more relevant and won't get lost?
Posted by Willing Thinker {What Box} (Member # 10819) on :
quote:Originally posted by alTakruri: Don't we have old Ghana or Nok threads where the above discussion is more relevant and won't get lost?
^Yes. Infact I'll bump one up when I get back to my pc which will be likely/at earliest by tommorow morning.
Posted by Willing Thinker {What Box} (Member # 10819) on :
Here's a thread specifically disussing the matter.