2nd post from the top references posting from Egyptsearch several years back. The entire thread seems to be referenced. I will post on ESR.
Posted by xyyman (Member # 13597) on :
Seems like Professor Luisa Perieria likes this thread. So Sage. We do attract "Academics".
Posted by xyyman (Member # 13597) on :
What is my post about?
Well, I have new research papers delivered to my inbox automatically if it is given a nod by certain scientist I follow. One of these is Luisa Pereira a world renowned geneticist. (I am partial to some Iberian geneticist, they seem to embrace their African admixture). Dr Eva Fernandez come to mind, She and Luisa are ones I have some affinity for along with Helena Malstrohm, Sarah Tishkoff, Brenna Henn and MArk Shriver Guido Barbujani etc. Anyways it look like she reads or someone put her on to ES. I am not sure why she provided citation to this specific thread on North Africans that was posted on ES. The subject was broached by Lioness with input from myself and Dr Winters . My Guess is at least she read what we said on the topic. I assume she thought it important enough to reference the thread. Click the link.
Posted by xyyman (Member # 13597) on :
I wonder if she knew VJ Schuenemann knowingly REMOVED CODIS str from the Abusir mummies. I think she knows. They all do?
If a few str were removed we would leave it to chance but since ALL were removed. The str removal was intentional.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
yes but now you may be jinxing it
Posted by zarahan aka Enrique Cardova (Member # 15718) on :
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: Looks like some academics are reading our postings.
Yes they do. We have so many citations and quotes posted on ES and Reloaded somewhat, that when they Google something, their work cited here will probably come up. And not only citations but back and forth commentary and critiques as well. Another advantage is that this commentary/citation goes into the archives and are accessible for years, with every reader free to verify the citations for themselves, versus "stealth" moles on Wikipedia who cynically work to make certain scholarship on African peoples "disappear."
Posted by SlimJim (Member # 23217) on :
wtf damn thats crazy tbh
how can a paper cite a forum doe?
Posted by zarahan aka Enrique Cardova (Member # 15718) on :
They are not using the forum posts as peer reviewed data or evidence. Sometimes its in a footnote or brief comment to illustrate a particular line of reasoning, and how it bears on their argument or work. But those moles who think they can "edit out" legit scholarship on African bio-history have not only failed but by encouraging people to move to forums like ES, ensure that the scholarship remains visible worldwide for years rather than be buried on a little accessed Wiki page. And that doesn't even include motivating people to post to Facebook and other forums. Their deceptiveness backfires.
At other times authors ref forums in a foreword or acknowledgement. For example Cochran & Harpending in the book "The Ten Thousand Year Explosion", (popular among Some online racists, hereditarians, etc) gives a hat tip to racialist "HBD" blogger Steve Sailer in the preface. QUOTE:
"We have also benefited from discussions with members of the Human Biodiversity Internet discussion group run by Steve Sailer."
