posted
I'm pretty sure he's in New Guinea rather than Africa. Early in the video, he refers to sago, which is a food eaten in New Guinea instead of Africa.
posted
Afronut Slayer - What's up with those people, are they prejudiced? That White guy looks pretty plump.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Are you saying those New Guineans are naturally dumb? Please tell me it ain't so Posts: 3423 | From: the jungle - when y'all stop playing games, call me. | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I still say they are wrong to be prejudiced, that White guy could have fed a family for at least a week.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
they now have a non-interference policy. They've learned from experience to never meddle w/ the negroe. Help 'em out and they will blame you for all their mishaps. Atleast with them, they can't blame YT for causing any problems.
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: I still say they are wrong to be prejudiced, that White guy could have fed a family for at least a week.
posted
Not only is sago mentioned in the video several times, but also Papua. Which is in New Guinea. Did you even bother to watch the video afronuttedon? Or did you just see the Black faces and the title of the video?
Posts: 189 | From: Texas | Registered: Aug 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Cannibalism is well documented in Europe not only in pre-historic (Villa 2005) times but well into historic times, on into the 16th and 17 centuries when ironically, assorted European writers were hypocritically criticizing "barbaric" practices elsewhere.. According to one scholar, in Europe, "drinking human blood was a cure for epilsey. Besides blood, Europeans consumed human flesh, heart, bones (skull, burned bones and bone marrow), and other body parts and body products" (Gordon-Grube 1988, 1993) --from "Consuming grief" By Beth A. Conklin 2001
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Forget ancient religious motive for cannibalism^
I for all the times that you called me an animal...but in Melwakie walks a cannibal.....Hip hop protest lyrics of the late 80ts ..about Jeffery Darmer who chopped up his victems and stored the body parts in refrigerator...for eating..mostly Black, Latino and Asian victems. Have a scary holloween if you are into that kind o thing.... Posts: 6546 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
^^It is interesting that Egypt served as a major source of dead body parts for the consumption of Europeans as the scholarly study above notes.
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't know if this was posted here before but cannibalism did infact took place on the side of the Christians during the Crusades...but keeping it real cannibalism occured amongst all people at one time or another.
Cannibalism During the Crusades
Several Christian sources of the First Crusade report instances of cannibalism. Specifically, starving crusaders were reported to have eaten their fallen Muslim opponants. Although such behavior was undoubtedly very rare, sources claim that Muslims spread terrifying rumors of crusaders "who fed very greedily on the bodies of saracens."
Radulph of Caen, an eyewitness to events at Ma'arra in 1098, wrote, "In Ma'arra our troops boiled pagan adults in cooking-pots; they impaled children on spits and devoured them grilled." (1)
The chronicler Albert of Aix seemed to rank Muslims lower than dogs when he wrote, "Not only did our troops not shrink from eating dead Turks and Saracens; they also ate dogs!"
Guibert of Nogent, in his work Historia Hierosolymitana, provides more details on the incident of cannibalism at Ma'arra. There he notes that whenever the Tafurs who took part in the expedition discovered "scraps of flesh from the pagan's bodies" cannibalism was practiced with little discretion. According to Guibert, the Tafurs were well aware that the Muslims feared them because of cannibalism. For that reason, on at least one occasion, the Tafurs publicly "roasted the bruised body of a Turk over a fire as if it were meat for eating, in full view of the Turkish forces." Guibert notes that the Franks also practiced cannibalism, but they did so "in secret and as rarely as possible."
Fulcher of Chartres also refers to the same instance of cannibalism at Ma'arra. In his Historia Hierosolymitana, also known as A History of the Expedition to Jerusalem, Fulcher confirms that when the crusaders "suffered from excessive hunger" at Ma'arra, they engaged in cannibalism. He wrote, "I shudder to say that many of our men, terribly tormented by the maddness of starvation, cut pieces of flesh from the buttocks of Saracens lying there dead. These pieces they cooked and ate, savagely devouring the flesh while it was insufficiently roasted."
Raymond of d'Aguilers also recorded incidents of cannibalism...
[Continued...]
Anonymous author of the Gesta Francorum...
[Continued...]
Anna Comnena- Normans- Roasted babies
[Continued...
Muslim authors also attest to the practice by Crusaders...
[Continued...]
Concerning the more specific claim that the crusaders ate babies, Dr. Helen Nicholson notes,
'Eating babies' is a standard accusation in Western civilisation against one's religious or political opponents. It is the ultimate taboo, as you will realise. Hence the Romans accused the early Christians of eating babies, the medieval West accused Jews and heretics of eating babies, in medieval literature pagans eat babies, the Revolutionary French peasantry accused the French nobility of eating babies. The crusaders did eat their horses (which in Britain at least is only one step up from eating babies) and during the first crusade one group of warriors (the 'Tafurs') were accused of eating babies...The Tafurs were recorded to have resorted to cannibalism at the siege of Ma'arra; this was reported by Raymond of Aguilers, but not by other chroniclers of the First Crusade (France, Victory, p. 315 and note 49). It is tempting to deduce that they were accused of this crime because they were poor warriors, even peasants, despised and feared by the more noble warriors who regarded them of being capable of any depravity. In other words, the accusation reflects fear and distrust between classes, rather than what actually happened. The Christian peasantry were regarded as 'other' and 'alien' by the Christian nobles. In contrast, the Muslim warriors were brave and had their own code of warrior ethics which was very like the Christian warriors' code of ethics. But peasants did not share any warrior-ethic; they fought dirty. Hence Christian nobles could regard Christian peasants as being far more alien than Muslim warriors. They were sure that warriors would always act honourably, but they were sure that they could never trust the peasants to behave honourably! Alternatively, it is possible that the story of cannibalism originated with the Tafurs themselves. If they put it about that they ate the bodies of their dead enemies after battle they would scare their enemies so much that any enemy they met would flee rather than fight them. www.crusades-encyclopedia.com/cannibalism.html - Cached - Similar
Posts: 6546 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
The damn problem is the human race as a whole evolved from that sh*t. Well... Atleast they should have. Seems there is one race who seems to be lagging behind the rest of humanity by centuries.
***WARNING***
Video is not for the faint-hearted. You will see a savage eat the heart of a man, after it was ripped out from the chest. Fast fwd to 4:20 to cut to the chase.
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: I don't know if this was posted here before but cannibalism did infact took place on the side of the Christians during the Crusades...but keeping it real cannibalism occured amongst all people at one time or another.
Cannibalism During the Crusades
Several Christian sources of the First Crusade report instances of cannibalism. Specifically, starving crusaders were reported to have eaten their fallen Muslim opponants. Although such behavior was undoubtedly very rare, sources claim that Muslims spread terrifying rumors of crusaders "who fed very greedily on the bodies of saracens."
Radulph of Caen, an eyewitness to events at Ma'arra in 1098, wrote, "In Ma'arra our troops boiled pagan adults in cooking-pots; they impaled children on spits and devoured them grilled." (1)
The chronicler Albert of Aix seemed to rank Muslims lower than dogs when he wrote, "Not only did our troops not shrink from eating dead Turks and Saracens; they also ate dogs!"
Guibert of Nogent, in his work Historia Hierosolymitana, provides more details on the incident of cannibalism at Ma'arra. There he notes that whenever the Tafurs who took part in the expedition discovered "scraps of flesh from the pagan's bodies" cannibalism was practiced with little discretion. According to Guibert, the Tafurs were well aware that the Muslims feared them because of cannibalism. For that reason, on at least one occasion, the Tafurs publicly "roasted the bruised body of a Turk over a fire as if it were meat for eating, in full view of the Turkish forces." Guibert notes that the Franks also practiced cannibalism, but they did so "in secret and as rarely as possible."
Fulcher of Chartres also refers to the same instance of cannibalism at Ma'arra. In his Historia Hierosolymitana, also known as A History of the Expedition to Jerusalem, Fulcher confirms that when the crusaders "suffered from excessive hunger" at Ma'arra, they engaged in cannibalism. He wrote, "I shudder to say that many of our men, terribly tormented by the maddness of starvation, cut pieces of flesh from the buttocks of Saracens lying there dead. These pieces they cooked and ate, savagely devouring the flesh while it was insufficiently roasted."
Raymond of d'Aguilers also recorded incidents of cannibalism...
[Continued...]
Anonymous author of the Gesta Francorum...
[Continued...]
Anna Comnena- Normans- Roasted babies
[Continued...
Muslim authors also attest to the practice by Crusaders...
[Continued...]
Concerning the more specific claim that the crusaders ate babies, Dr. Helen Nicholson notes,
'Eating babies' is a standard accusation in Western civilisation against one's religious or political opponents. It is the ultimate taboo, as you will realise. Hence the Romans accused the early Christians of eating babies, the medieval West accused Jews and heretics of eating babies, in medieval literature pagans eat babies, the Revolutionary French peasantry accused the French nobility of eating babies. The crusaders did eat their horses (which in Britain at least is only one step up from eating babies) and during the first crusade one group of warriors (the 'Tafurs') were accused of eating babies...The Tafurs were recorded to have resorted to cannibalism at the siege of Ma'arra; this was reported by Raymond of Aguilers, but not by other chroniclers of the First Crusade (France, Victory, p. 315 and note 49). It is tempting to deduce that they were accused of this crime because they were poor warriors, even peasants, despised and feared by the more noble warriors who regarded them of being capable of any depravity. In other words, the accusation reflects fear and distrust between classes, rather than what actually happened. The Christian peasantry were regarded as 'other' and 'alien' by the Christian nobles. In contrast, the Muslim warriors were brave and had their own code of warrior ethics which was very like the Christian warriors' code of ethics. But peasants did not share any warrior-ethic; they fought dirty. Hence Christian nobles could regard Christian peasants as being far more alien than Muslim warriors. They were sure that warriors would always act honourably, but they were sure that they could never trust the peasants to behave honourably! Alternatively, it is possible that the story of cannibalism originated with the Tafurs themselves. If they put it about that they ate the bodies of their dead enemies after battle they would scare their enemies so much that any enemy they met would flee rather than fight them. www.crusades-encyclopedia.com/cannibalism.html - Cached - Similar
posted
Afronut should be called Euronut. Suggesting that cannibalism is only a trait for one people is downright stupid.
Africa is much larger continent than Europe and the most diverse in the world. Of course you may find some cannibalistic tribes. However the prevalence is more-or-less comparable to the European counterparts.
Cannibalism, has been documented within modern-day Europe as well. Look at the second world war and the incidents that arise here and there throughout the West. It is one of the "natural" behaviors within human society.
Posts: 1080 | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
You mention individuals while i mention actual tribes. You sir are an afrepic fail. Why don't you indulge us by providing an actual town or tribe in europe TODAY, just as i provided an afro-negroe tribe of today, that is cannibalistic.
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: Jeffrey Darmer. and others.
posted
A tribe is just a bunch of individuals. Such as a bunch of individual who are child fu!krs. who share kiddie porn..alot of whom lives in Belgium.
Police in 12 countries swoop on Internet child sex ring
Jason Bennetto Crime Correspondent
Thursday, 3 September 1998 Share
AN INTERNATIONAL child pornography "club" run on the Internet has been smashed by British police officers after a chance discovery at a house on the South Coast.
About 50 men from 12 countries were arrested and more than 100,000 images, including sexually explicit pictures of girls and boys as young as two, have been recovered during a series of raids. Police believe they have uncovered a paedophile and pornography network, known as the Wonderland Club, in which the requirement for membership is to have at least 10,000 explicit pictures of children stored on computer.
Detectives managed to crack the Internet club, protected by passwords and codes, which members used to exchange sexually explicit images of children. In at least one case in Britain, a man had been filming himself having sex with children and swapping the pictures with club members.
Two of the men arrested in England were found to have nearly 90,000 pornographic photographs of children, described by the officer in charge of the operation as "stomach-churning". School teachers were amongthose arrested worldwide. The network was discovered by chance after a police officer visited a house in St Leonards, near Hastings, East Sussex, late last year after a tip-off by United States customs officers who were investigating a separate porn ring.
In one of the biggest co- ordinated international operations, 105 addresses throughout the world were raided early yesterday morning. Eleven men were arrested in Britain after raids on 14 addresses in London, Sussex, Oxford, Berkshire, Kent, Gloucestershire, Middlesex and Norfolk.
In the US, where the club originates, there were 32 raids; there were 18 in Germany and 16 in Italy. There were also raids in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Norway, Portugal, and Sweden. Police will attempt to trace the abused children and offer them counselling.
Detective Superintendent John Stewardson, who led the operation by the National Crime Squad, said children had been abused on a massive scale to produce material to feed the international ring. "The children abused were of both sexes and some, it would appear, were as young as two, although we don't know because we don't know who these children are yet. The content would turn the stomach of any right-minded person."
The case highlights growing concern about the use of the Internet by paedophiles to swap information and images.
There has been a succession of warnings that paedophiles are exchanging names and addresses of children to abuse as well as linking up with fellow offenders throughout the world.
Bob Packham, the deputy director general of the National Crime Squad, said: "I am unaware of another police operation that has ever pulled together so many law- enforcement agencies worldwide to effect simultaneous raids and arrests."
Now does that mean all or even most white people apporve of the above?...short answer hell no!! But you on the other hand want to link bad behievour of some black people to all black people at all times... GHTFO.
Posts: 6546 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Afronut Slayer: You mention individuals while i mention actual tribes. You sir are an afrepic fail. Why don't you indulge us by providing an actual town or tribe in europe TODAY, just as i provided an afro-negroe tribe of today, that is cannibalistic.
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: Jeffrey Darmer. and others.
Which tribes did you mention? Those tribes are from Papua New Guinea. Stupid cracker, get re-educated.
As was stated earlier, cannibalism is as common in Africa as elsewhere. However since Africa is a much more diverse than Europe, I wouldn't be surprised if cannibalistic tribes exist. God, go get fucked and this time not with strangers or pets, which according to Turks I know, seems to be very common.
Posts: 1080 | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: ,, keeping it real cannibalism occured amongst all people at one time or another.
Cannibalism During the Crusades
Several Christian sources of the First Crusade report instances of cannibalism. Specifically, starving crusaders were reported to have eaten their fallen Muslim opponants...
"I shudder to say that many of our men, terribly tormented by the maddness of starvation, cut pieces of flesh from the buttocks of Saracens lying there dead. These pieces they cooked and ate, savagely devouring the flesh while it was insufficiently roasted."
Hmm.. your article mentions slicing and dicing up the buttocks of the Saracens? Would this then be early rump roast?
Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
HAHAHAHA!! This afroclown by the name of Brada-Anansi retorts with the most idiodic argument: "A tribe is just a bunch of individuals..." Nevermind the fact that a tribe shares a common culture; language, resources and land. What a pathetic fool. You see, Brada-Anansi finds himself in a quandary. Without delving into history, this afronut cannot find one ex. of an entire people, whether tribe or nation, which today practices cannibalism, save the Afrikan negroe called the Liberian. So instead, this fool resorts to a common afrocentrist ploy - invoke a strawman argument i.e., "[...] a bunch of individual who are child fu!krs" LOL. Such a pathetic, and flimsy attempt to contest the initial content of this thread. You sir are an ignoramous!
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: A tribe is just a bunch of individuals. Such as a bunch of individual who are child fu!krs.
posted
The entire people of liberia has never practiced cannibalism idiot, that's like saying the Japanese soldiers who eat Americans captives during ww11...makes all Japanese cannibals,my point stupid one is despite the rampant ch!ld fu!kn across Euro-nations does not make Europeans and Austrialians continents of child fu!krs moron.
You know jackass I could and I guess anyone could pick out the worst aspects of European or Arabic speakers..crimes and bad behaivor by some of their members and used that to smear their entire communities...but we don't, we know better...I could use as examples of the above and then some such as beastiality as porn then go on a rant making threads after thread about Euros this or that Arabs are that add infinitum...but we only concern our selves with what is of import to us mainly the full restoration of our collective past that you and your alieses tried to thrawt....so f!ck you we have more important things to consider other than your rants.
Posts: 6546 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
HAHAHAHA!! Look at this dumb afronegronut! He is in a cannibalism thread and he thinks he can speak on other issues besides cannibalism. Have you ever taken up a creative writing course, mr. clown? Do you know what it means to stay on topic? What a pathetic Afronut you are sir! Oh yea! the name of the Liberian tribe is mentioned in the documentary.
YOU SIR ARE AN EPIC LOSER!
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: The entire people of liberia has never practiced cannibalism idiot, that's like saying the Japanese soldiers who eat Americans captives during ww11...makes all Japanese cannibals,my point stupid one is despite the rampant ch!ld fu!kn across Euro-nations does not make Europeans and Austrialians continents of child fu!krs moron.
You know jackass I could and I guess anyone could pick out the worst aspects of European or Arabic speakers..crimes and bad behaivor by some of their members and used that to smear their entire communities...but we don't, we know better...I could use as examples of the above and then some such as beastiality as porn then go on a rant making threads after thread about Euros this or that Arabs are that add infinitum...but we only concern our selves with what is of import to us mainly the full restoration of our collective past that you and your alieses tried to thrawt....so f!ck you we have more important things to consider other than your rants.
posted
Jackofff..you started this topic in F!ckin New Guinea..because you were looking for cannibals and black people...something to smear Africans with..I retort with cannibalism anywhere in the world at anytime in history...you then whine about that being all in the past...I then gave you modern examples in America....you then say individuals are not a tribe...I gave you examples of child f!krs..who form bonds some times in their hundreds for the sole purpose of of child abuse....and whine about off topic. If you insist of calling Liberians cannibals...and by extention Africans..IE black folks then I reserve the right to call you and yours child f!ckrs. using your own criteria. . NOW F!CK OFF. THE END.Posts: 6546 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hey turd, quit with the strawman. Did I come sideways at you and called you the "N" word? Stop playing games. I told you already, I'm Black, so your accusation against me is an oxy-moron.
quote:Originally posted by Morpheus: Afronut Slayer what point are you trying to get across with these threads?
All you've accomplished is showing people what a racist asshole you are.
posted
Dude, you do realize you were ALREADY found to be an epic fail. Stay ON TOPIC next time.
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: Jackofff..you started this topic in F!ckin New Guinea..because you were looking for cannibals and black people...something to smear Africans with..I retort with cannibalism anywhere in the world at anytime in history...you then whine about that being all in the past...I then gave you modern examples in America....you then say individuals are not a tribe...I gave you examples of child f!krs..who form bonds some times in their hundreds for the sole purpose of of child abuse....and whine about off topic. If you insist of calling Liberians cannibals...and by extention Africans..IE black folks then I reserve the right to call you and yours child f!ckrs. using your own criteria. . NOW F!CK OFF. THE END.
quote:Originally posted by Afronut Slayer: Do you know what it means to stay on topic?
This forum is about ancient Egypt not cannibalism ancient and modern. The obvious clown lacking cognitive ability to stay on topic is you. Posts: 4254 | From: dasein | Registered: Jun 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Afronut Slayer: Hey turd, quit with the strawman. Did I come sideways at you and called you the "N" word? Stop playing games. I told you already, I'm Black, so your accusation against me is an oxy-moron.
quote:Originally posted by Morpheus: Afronut Slayer what point are you trying to get across with these threads?
All you've accomplished is showing people what a racist asshole you are.
Moron, you don't need to say, nigger, to be racist. Who the **** do you think you are?
The threads you post ARE racist. It attempts to demonstrate black inferiority. Not that different from Egypt, where the inferiority of baladi natives is reinforced. You don't need to be direct. Most Israelis are quite liberal, but they are definitely racist against Palestinians.
Posts: 1080 | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Afronut Slayer: [QB] Hey turd, quit with the strawman. Did I come sideways at you and called you the "N" word? Stop playing games. I told you already, I'm Black, so your accusation against me is an oxy-moron.
What you are is a lying racist sack of garbage. Only an idiot would believe you are Black at this point, Uncle Ruckus.
Posts: 647 | From: Atlanta | Registered: Jan 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't know what one could possibly add to a thread created by a moron who couldn't tell the difference between New Guinea in the Pacific and Guinea, Africa! LOLPosts: 26267 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
What does it say? The suicidal Haitian suggested that blacks from Papua New Guinea (part of Asia, no?) are not only black, but "Negroid".
That vile, dishonest term developed by whites to culturally appropriate cultures. Instead, Northern Europeans can't praise the fact that they went from rags - more or less culture-less barbarians according to the Greeks - to riches of today.
I find defeating such odds, are rather remarkable and something people of color should be looking at as well. Saying that, can someone post the respective excerpt detailing how Greek and Roman scholars described whites?
Don't get me wrong, I care little about individual whites. Most cannot even compete against inferior nigger farmers without USSR-esque trade barriers. Terrible scores in STEM testings, highly unproductive (can't compete with Asians despite intense barriers) and obese as ****. Taking our jobs, my ass. But yes, I view the state system due to certain whites as the only threat.
Posts: 1080 | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic