posted
This is what happens when an African Black murders for lucre people who have done nothing to him. As long as Blacks make irrational decisions that impact others, they will always be the scourge of the planet.
quote:Originally posted by Afrocentric Liars Exposed: they will always be the scourge of the planet.
Stop using obscure words out of context you intellectual fraud. In exactly what way, even stereotypically, have Blacks ever been seen as a "scourge"? Europeans have always been the scourge of the planet and this is well agreed upon. To "scourge" denotes devastating (to ruin everything) that with which you come in contact (Ex; war, conflict, disease, global warming, slavery, post-colonialism, etc, etc.). You are just some opportune racist who sees an isolated incident as an opportunity to degrade Blacks and justify overt acts of prejudice, yet you look ignorant and uneducated in the process. How ironic. Posts: 4021 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
^What is it the mercenary negroes are doing that does not constitute scourging, mr. intellectually bankrupt? What is it about the high crime rate amongst Black Americans against non blacks that does not fit the defintion, mr. dunce?
Posts: 270 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
Afrocentric liar, you forgot to mention that it is a "non-Negro" Arab Libyan leader who sanctioned the killings you are ascribing just to "mercenary Negroes". You also failed to note the"non-black" mercenary Libyans are part of this execution. How come this doesn't qualify them as culprits of "scourging", while you defend reactionary and racist "scourging" of "blacks" by "non-black" Libyans. That is a defeatist mentality.
-------------------- The Complete Picture of the Past tells Us what Not to Repeat Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Afrocentric Liars Exposed: ^What is it the mercenary negroes are doing that does not constitute scourging, mr. intellectually bankrupt? What is it about the high crime rate amongst Black Americans against non blacks that does not fit the defintion, mr. dunce?
Running away from your ignorance by exaggerating your imaginary statistics while begging the question that such suggests "scourging the planet" won't help you. You are stupid and uneducated, end of story.
Posts: 4021 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Afrocentric Liars Exposed: ^What is it the mercenary negroes are doing that does not constitute scourging, mr. intellectually bankrupt? What is it about the high crime rate amongst Black Americans against non blacks that does not fit the defintion, mr. dunce?
Afrocentric Liars Exposed: You MUST be a southern American Albino, because except for those Italian mulatto Sand Niggers in Libya, you are probably the stupidest people on Earth!
Let me explain: By showing racism to Africans IN Africa, those idiots have turned 2 billion Africans to the south against them.
By showing their racism, those idiots have turned native Libyans against them.
By showing their racism, countries who might have wanted to help them, now cannot, for fear of angering Blacks EVERYWHERE.
Even now, Libyans who may have hated Gadhafi, are now rallying to him - INCLUDING THE MILITARY!!!!
You fuching fool - have you never seen the Libyan military????
Those Sand Niggers are TOAST!
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I repeat what I posted a while back: Gaddafi once said that Libya is 30% black.
Those Africans whom the hodge-podge[ their mothers were imported from everywhere] Benghazi feudalists[look at the feudal colonial flag they are waving]are accusing of being "mercenaries" are actually Libyans from inside Libya. Many are Tuaregs from the Fezzan and many are Libyan citizens who crossed over from Chad and Niger years ago. Remember that MK despite being eccentric and unpredictable kinda stuck himself to the idea of the Pan-African idea of an Africa with no colonial borders. Hence it was easy for any African to cross over into Libya and become a Libyan.
Posts: 5492 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Fools this is a typical "News" genre piece. Its like in the "Tee Vee" industry you have:
Your cop show Your detective show Your lawyer show Your doctor show
In the news industry there are certain rules.
1. You must have a constant rotation of stories with the subject involving "black people".
Then the subject has different genres:
A. Victim B. Villain C. Criminal D. Clown E. Outcast F. Imbecille G. Loser
Every time there is a new country of the moment newswise you are certain to get the usual "blacks" subject matter news story.
Of the seven listed genres you can almost guarantee that one of the genres will be A. Victim. It is almost 100% likely.
The Libyan rebels who also contain so called "blacks" are also capturing mercenaries. You will hardly see them in any photos or videos because the people who sell the photos and videos to the tv news organizations, newspapers, and news magazines edit them out the best they can. On occasion they will slip up and will accidently leave a "black" person in the frame. Their remedy for this is to quickly cut away from the video clip frame.
Notice how the Chinese news photographers differ from the white photographers.
Notice also that the story is written by a white AP reporter, but the newspaper had to use photographs from a Chinese reporter. This is because white photographers would not use non-blacks as victims.
The white news photographers would not show the "non-black" mercenaries being held unlike the Chinese. This is because whites have a damn near intractible racist obsession with "blacks" and need to see them as victims as often as possible. This includes liberals, independents, and conservatives.
The two pictures the Chinese took would not get the buzz from whites because only two or three of the mercenaries in those pictures would be considered "black". The Chinese don't have the obsessive "black people" psychosis that whites do.
It is time for many of you clowns to face the reality that whites have a mental illness when it comes to "black people".
Posts: 3085 | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ Why do you guys even bother replying to Liar Exposed?? He is racist of the braindead-idiot kind. All of his threads including this one should be deleted just for the senselessness and irrationality let alone the provactive nature.
Posts: 26266 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ignorance is bliss with the illiterate, I see.
quote:Originally posted by Sundjata: while begging the question that such suggests "scourging the planet" won't help you. You are stupid and uneducated, end of story.
posted
argyle104 Quote: The white news photographers would not show the "non-black" mercenaries being held unlike the Chinese. This is because whites have a damn near intractible racist obsession with "blacks" and need to see them as victims as often as possible. This includes liberals, independents, and conservatives.
What you say is only partly true: White media will filter the news to reflect whatever they want. If they had access for their own pictures, they would have shown only the Black mercenary, to depict Blacks as villains.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
What's happening is that mobs are treating all blacks that they do not personally know as "mercenaries," a ruse. Anti-black hatred in Libya has nothing to do with mercenaries YouTube: Lybia: immigrants wants to go back home (2008)
Try a YouTube search using 'african mercenaries' or 'african mercenaries libya'
Posts: 8014 | From: the Tekrur in the Western Sahel | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ Of course. And anyone educated in the situation in Libya knows this.
quote:Originally posted by An Idiot Eurocentric Liar Exposed: Ignorance is bliss with the illiterate, I see.
And you are the most ignorant as well as stupid of all. Yet I doubt you enjoy any bliss as evidence by your behavior in this forum. Posts: 26266 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
You're the most helpless, vicitimized POS on these forums. And that's saying something, since anyone whose been on these boards awhile remembers Doug's patented caterwauling victim oriented posts.
At least Doug has grown up amd stopped, and started acting like a man for once.
You on the other hand...................
Posts: 3085 | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
What's amazing to me is how no one in the media is making this blatant racism an issue. Is it because Western influences don't want to acknowledge that there are blacks in Libya that aren't immigrants? Killing this age-old notion that North Africa is somehow non-black. I personally think it's because they don't want to hurt the rosy image of these rebels. If they're targeting innocent people just because of their skin color and killing some of them, then why are we supporting them? Would we support them if they were targeting innocent Europeans? The whole thing is bullshit to me.
Posts: 1219 | From: North Carolina, USA | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ No. I personally think the reason is the media is actually pro-Arab and under Arab influence. That's the reason why they don't like reporting anything bad in the Arab world in general. Just look at how much coverage Laura Logan's gang rape in Egypt got. If you don't believe me, just look at who owns some of the shares of the media. All I can say is that they are some big 'kuffiyas'. Even some journalist schools on Middle Eastern affairs are under their control. Ironic since the stereotype is that the media is under the control of 'Jews'. Posts: 26266 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:What's amazing to me is how no one in the media is making this blatant racism an issue. Is it because Western influences don't want to acknowledge that there are blacks in Libya that aren't immigrants? Killing this age-old notion that North Africa is somehow non-black. I personally think it's because they don't want to hurt the rosy image of these rebels. If they're targeting innocent people just because of their skin color and killing some of them, then why are we supporting them? Would we support them if they were targeting innocent Europeans? The whole thing is bullshit to me.
It's a mistake to see the western corporate media as having a mission related to truth or justice. Kaddafi is the enemy of jews. Therefore his enemies are the friends of the western corporate media. The plight of Arabs on the street meant nothing to the western media when bombs where dropping on Baghdad a few years ago. Or when Israel, in occupied Palestine, is daily butchering Palestinians.
There was probably a benefit to Israel in the coverage of the atrocities in Dafur. Otherwise the media wouldn't give a damn about the lives of blacks.
Bottom line the media exists for profit and Israel.
Posts: 1038 | From: Franklin Park, NJ | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by AswaniAswad: Those are not libyans they are refugees who want to go home as altakrur has said these are real libyans fighting.
Did you read your link? Those boys are Al Qaeda! They are terrorists from Iraq, and Afghanistan. I have news from friends in neighbouring Algeria that indeed it is Al Qaeda boys from Afghan performing this revolution.
Damn, the US and Britain and France are dragging the world into another 911 scenario. Make friends with al-qaeda, arm them, then complain about their terrorist activity.
Recall Osama Bin Laden used to live in Northern Sudan. Sudan is just south of the border from Libya. Same territory.
US Africom was rejected by all African countries upon the insistence of Nigeria, South Africa and Libya. US Africom is leading the current war on Libya.
Why would the west aid Al-qaeda to throw out Ghadafi?
Why did they start lieing about "black African mecenaries" of Ghadafi, when indeed the real mecenaries were the Al Qaeda boys?
I am not forgeting that Ghadafi sponsored many liberation movements in Africa, but he also created many unnecessary "tribal" wars. See Chad, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Central African Republic, etc.
Something not quite clear is going on behind the scene. But it is something more sinister than any of us here can imagine. And it connects with the disaster in Japan, unfolding before your eyes now....
Strange times..
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
Myself puzzled too. It could be that it is an attempt by the West to kill the idea and practice of Pan-Africanism.
After all, there was no African leaderon the African actually pushing and implementing the idea of Pan Africanism. Proof: I have a friend who is supposed to attend a Pan African conference on literature slated to take place in Addis soon. This friend,seeing the bad press that Gaddafi is getting and believing it, is contemplating not going.
Posts: 5492 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
Myself puzzled too. It could be that it is an attempt by the West to kill the idea and practice of Pan-Africanism.
After all, there was no African leaderon the African continent actually pushing and implementing the idea of Pan Africanism. Proof: I have a friend who is supposed to attend a Pan African conference on literature slated to take place in Addis soon--sponsored by Libya. This friend,seeing the bad press that Gaddafi is getting and believing it, is contemplating not going.
Sure Gaddafi stirred many pots in Africa over the years--butone must also blame the passivity of Africa's leaders over all these years. One thing though in the conflicts in Africa it seems that Gaddafi was always pushing for some kind of unity among nations. The war in Sierra Leone was funded mainly by the diamond and timber trade in Sierra Leone and Liberia. Gaddafi foolishly supported Charles Taylor because he thought--erroneously--that Taylor would create some kind of amalgam of Liberia and Sierra Leone which would eventually incorporate Guinea.
In terms of investments all over West Africa there are petrol stations named Libya Oil and I believe there are other kinds of investments. There were also large numbers of other Africans from West Africa working in Libya for many years that were well-paying. For those who wanted to cross over to Europe Libya was the transit point.
So I want to believe that with Gaddafi gone the Nkrumah idea will be buried until someone else(who?) assumes a Pan-African responsibility.
[b]The racist Eurocentric argument pushed by Sarkozy and the rest of Europe is that North Africa should be excised from the rest of Africa and that Africa be limited to so-called "sub-Saharan Africa. If you listen to Radio France International--whenever there's talk about Africa, the station never, ever misses to say "Afrique Sub-Saharienne"--even for the most trivial things.
Thus it seems that the move against Gaddafi is a geopolitical move on the part of Europe/America and a move on the part of Al Quaeda to win in one of the uprisings now taking place in North Africa.
But again note the role that Zionist Jews like Bernard Henri levy and Kouchner are playing in all this. It was Levy who arranged the autonomy declaration to be sanctioned by France by the racist, fascist Benghazi mobs.
Posts: 5492 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Im a Muslim born and raised i have lived in Yemen and Saudi arabia ahahhahaha u cant tell me nothing about al-qaieeda it doesnt exist its made up.
All those fighters who went to afghanistan were all sent and applauded by there own governments what are u crazy every singe arabian islamic country sent fighters as well as money.
I have documents in arabic showing every single fighter that left his home with consent from there own governments to go fight in Afghanistan.
Did u know that the saudi government numbered there fighters before they left to afghanistan and had a tv show for donation for the muslim mujihadeen against the soviets.
Its easy to see that United States and Israel are the ones gaining the most from these dire situations.
Posts: 410 | From: Al-Ard | Registered: Jun 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by AswaniAswad: Im a Muslim born and raised i have lived in Yemen and Saudi arabia ahahhahaha u cant tell me nothing about al-qaieeda it doesnt exist its made up.
All those fighters who went to afghanistan were all sent and applauded by there own governments what are u crazy every singe arabian islamic country sent fighters as well as money.
I have documents in arabic showing every single fighter that left his home with consent from there own governments to go fight in Afghanistan.
Did u know that the saudi government numbered there fighters before they left to afghanistan and had a tv show for donation for the muslim mujihadeen against the soviets.
Its easy to see that United States and Israel are the ones gaining the most from these dire situations.
If the Muslim Brotherhood has more opportunity for power in Egypt and elsewhere due to the revolution how is that a gain for the US and Israel? If the general population of Egypt is more anti-Israel than Mubarak who was somewhat friendly to Israel and Mubarak is no longer in power how is that a gain for the US and Israel? Same thing for Libya, the potential for an Islamic state without the socialist emphasis. How is this a gain for the US and Israel?
Posts: 42934 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
The same reason why a free and peaceful palestinian state would work for israel but you still havent seen a palestinian state have you.
Israel created and funded Hamas get a grip lioness you are not arab nor have you any understanding of the politics going on in arabia.
Posts: 410 | From: Al-Ard | Registered: Jun 2009
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Embarrassed]](redface.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic