The city of Pompeii is a partially buried Roman town-city near modern Naples in the Italian region of Campania, in the territory of the comune of Pompei. Along with Herculaneum, its sister city, Pompeii was destroyed and completely buried during a long catastrophic eruption of the volcano Mount Vesuvius spanning two days in 79 AD. The eruption buried Pompeii and it's residents who could not get out, under 4 to 6 meters of ash and pumice.
People and animals were mummified and frozen in time. Giuseppe Fiorelli took charge of the excavations in 1860. Fiorelli realized these were spaces left by the human bodies, and so devised the technique of injecting plaster into them to perfectly recreate the forms of Vesuvius's victims. What resulted were highly accurate and eerie forms of the doomed Pompeiani who failed to escape. In their last moment of life, the expression of terror is often quite clearly visible . Pompeii was lost for over 1,500 years, before its accidental rediscovery in 1599. Since then, its excavation has provided an extraordinarily detailed insight into the life of a city at the height of the Roman Empire.
Erotic art in Pompeii and Herculaneum was discovered in the ancient cities around the bay of Naples (particularly of Pompeii and Herculaneum) after extensive excavations began in the 18th century. The city was found to be full of erotic art and frescoes, symbols, and inscriptions regarded by its excavators as pornographic. Even many recovered household items had a sexual theme. The ubiquity of such imagery and items indicates that the sexual mores of the ancient Roman culture of the time were much more liberal than most present-day cultures, although much of what might seem to us to be erotic imagery (e.g. oversized phalluses) could arguably be fertility-imagery. This clash of cultures led to an unknown number of discoveries being hidden away again. For example, a wall fresco which depicted Priapus, the ancient god of sex and fertility, with his extremely enlarged penis, was covered with plaster (and, as Schefold explains (p. 134), even the older reproduction below was locked away "out of prudishness" and only opened on request) and only rediscovered in 1998 due to rainfall.
Some may notice that while the artwork mostly depicts Mulattoes, the actual Human casts depict mostly typical pure Blacks. One can only say that the White man works in mysterious ways!
posted
^While scratching may head about Somalia, I noticed the numbed-down recent threads, and realized that as usual, the Negroes had been lead away from their edification and self interest. So I thought that I had better try to get them back on track.
Problem is, I'm not sure how many understand the implications of a thread like this. Here you have two major cities of ancient Rome frozen in time. It turns out that the inhabitants of these cities were to a large degree, Black and Mulatto. How many do you suppose understand that this proves that White history is a complete fabrication, and the White man is a degenerate liar?
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Your research is extremely useful! Continue demolishing the lies of the establishment Ice people. Lets see them whitewash this.
Posts: 55 | From: nairobi | Registered: Jul 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by kikuyu2: Your research is extremely useful! Continue demolishing the lies of the establishment Ice people. Lets see them whitewash this.
there's nothing to white wash. All male people shown above are swarthy Medditerranean/Middle Eastern who have brown skin not Negroes. Were there some blacks in Rome? Yes, but none have been shown above. This is thread is just Mike's fantasy of boning a cute albino girl. He's never had one and so he's obesessed on it.
Let's look at a better quaility photo of one of the examples shown earlier:
^^^ this guy is a just dark Southern Italian white boy. Mike just has penis envy Looks at the beards, ain't no fro either both of these are the same god: Priapus the god of virility and of vineyards with a scythe, used to prune orchards, hanging from the tree above him
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by kikuyu2: Your research is extremely useful! Continue demolishing the lies of the establishment Ice people. Lets see them whitewash this.
kikuyu2 - I hope you noticed that I opened the thread with this statement. Quote: "Some may notice that while the artwork mostly depicts Mulattoes, the actual Human casts depict mostly typical pure Blacks. One can only say that the White man works in mysterious ways!"
Point being: Do you really believe that a two thousand year-old painting could look like this - condition-wise?
Of course NOT. By now you must have come to know that Lioness is your typical degenerate Albino liar and falsifier. Believe me, there were many more before her, and there will be many more after her.
And like all degenerate Albino liars, she is also stupid - it still looks like a Black man.
Below is what the frescoes originally looked like.
As with the Minion, Etruscan, and Egyptian paintings. Whites repainted them to reflect what they wanted, in order to bolster their false history. The fact that they left them at least still Black, was very lucky.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
kikuyu2 - The only way to see what the Pompeiians originally depicted, is to find the few Tile Murals. Tile murals, like faience in Egyptian art, is very difficult to modify without breaking, so Whites usually leave them alone. Thus they are an accurate indicator of what the ancients actually created.
EXAMPLE
Another tactic Whites use, is to create MODERN artwork depicting WHITE people, and passing it off as ancient art.
To glean an understanding of the TRUE nature of the ancient world, one might take note of the fact that ALL authentic depictions of the Gods, show them as Black people!
Wall mural of Mercury/Priapus - between 89 B.C. and 79 A.D. Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
kikuyu2, keep in mind, as Mike continues on his white girl fantasies, both reditions of this same picture of Priapus are in ths exact same so so condiition, Mike is merely trying to hustle BS now. The only difference is one is darker than the other. The difference is that my picture matches the character of the tomb picture Mike posted. On his less quality picture, the picture has a slight glow look to it. This is what you get when you adjust the contrast controls on a photo editing program. The give away is how bright the white of the wall is, it's a bleached out pure white in a lot of places it whereas in the version I posted the wall white is browned a bit. It's simply the contrast controls, used in Mike's version,they make the darks darker and the whites whiter, a more dramatic photo but less accurate. It's more of Mike's lies and half truths. The man is not even a black man look at the scraggly beard. If you take random picture of a white man and then darken the tone does this suddenly make him a black African? Were there some black Africans in Rome. Yes. have any been shown in these paintings? No. These are swarthy Mediterraneans, Southern Italians. They have dark skin because there is more sun in the South and the skin tans. Why are the women lighter? Some thought that looked more attractive. Are we to believe that in all of these painting they just painted the moment when two different "races" were mingling? What about the offspring of men and women in these paintings? You would have somebody in between in skin color. Then they have a child with someone else of that color. Or did the Romans only do race mixing, did they kill off the dark women and light men, not allow the in between types to have children? This is nonsense. Look at Roman sculpture. On his webiste Mike describes 6th century Rome as "early white Rome" and shows what he claims is racial mixing going on. In fact none of the people are black Africans. one of the tanned folks even has blond hair. What society in history was the result of an ongoing perpetual race mixing? Once two people of two different "races" mix the children look all the same and when they grow up the population starts looking the same. But we are off topic now. Mike said early white Rome was 6th century. The painting of Priapus is 1st century AD, hundreds of years later into what Mike had called white Rome, case closed.
But don't take my word for it just do the following in in any situation, go with the darker version at any time. This way it's easier to get yourself into the history, a little credit for the black man.
Here's and example. Say you are looking at some painting of ancient Italians. If one painting looks like this guy:
go with the painting that looks more like this Turkish man:
^^^^ you can't go wrong always picking the darker one. It doesn't matter if it's wrong just do it, Queen Tiye is watching
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Even better high resolution version, includes detail
File:Museo Nazionale Napoli Gabinetto Segreto Mercury nicknamed "Priapus with Caduceus", "Priapus-Mercury", or erroneously "Well-endowed Mercury": a character with the beard and giant erect phallus of Priapus is walking away with the caduceus and winged sandals of Mercury (supposedly, the humour was to see Priapus thieving the god of thieves, but both are gods of fertility and abundance). Anonymous fresco in Pompeii, between 89 BC and 79 AD. Museo Archeologico Nazionale (Naples), Italia
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
What a wonderful thread Mike111. The secret lies in the phalli: this I have tried explaining for many years, but sadly misunderstood. now I see you and lioness have finally come out.
I remember classes, when I was younger. A teacher once told me and the class that the people of PompeIi were black.
Later on in middleschool I had a history teacher who spoken of Pomeii, and I noticed envy and hatred in his eyes, as he looked towards me. I never forgot those moments.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
Herodotus Book 1 - CLIO [1.57] What the language of the Pelasgi was I cannot say with any certainty. If, however, we may form a conjecture from the tongue spoken by the Pelasgi of the present day - those, for instance, who live at Creston above the Tyrrhenians, who formerly dwelt in the district named Thessaliotis, and were neighbours of the people now called the Dorians - or those again who founded Placia and Scylace upon the Hellespont, who had previously dwelt for some time with the Athenians - or those, in short, of any other of the cities which have dropped the name but are in fact Pelasgian; if, I say, we are to form a conjecture from any of these, we must pronounce that the Pelasgi spoke a barbarous language. If this were really so, and the entire Pelasgic race spoke the same tongue, the Athenians, who were certainly Pelasgi, must have changed their language at the same time that they passed into the Hellenic body; for it is a certain fact that the people of Creston speak a language unlike any of their neighbours, and the same is true of the Placianians, while the language spoken by these two people is the same; which shows that they both retain the idiom which they brought with them into the countries where they are now settled.Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^Was the first teacher White or Black?
Herodotus Book 1 - CLIO [1.57] What the language of the Pelasgi was I cannot say with any certainty. If, however, we may form a conjecture from the tongue spoken by the Pelasgi of the present day - those, for instance, who live at Creston above the Tyrrhenians, who formerly dwelt in the district named Thessaliotis, and were neighbours of the people now called the Dorians - or those again who founded Placia and Scylace upon the Hellespont, who had previously dwelt for some time with the Athenians - or those, in short, of any other of the cities which have dropped the name but are in fact Pelasgian; if, I say, we are to form a conjecture from any of these, we must pronounce that the Pelasgi spoke a barbarous language. If this were really so, and the entire Pelasgic race spoke the same tongue, the Athenians, who were certainly Pelasgi, must have changed their language at the same time that they passed into the Hellenic body; for it is a certain fact that the people of Creston speak a language unlike any of their neighbours, and the same is true of the Placianians, while the language spoken by these two people is the same; which shows that they both retain the idiom which they brought with them into the countries where they are now settled.
The teacher during middle school was white, he was caught a racist later that year, he gave me lower grates on purpose. The other one, the first one was white too, but from what I can remember he had Indonisian admixture or something.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Lioness,thanks for your personal educational outreach efforts in my direction but I think I'll go with mike 111's explanation. The original tile murals are the clincher.
Posts: 55 | From: nairobi | Registered: Jul 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by kikuyu2: Lioness,thanks for your personal educational outreach efforts in my direction but I think I'll go with mike 111's explanation. The original tile murals are the clincher.
The "Alexander mosaic" at the Battle of Issus, Discovered in Pompeii, to be seen in Napoli (Museo Archeologico Nazionale)
The Alexander Mosaic, dating from circa 100 BC, is a famous Roman floor mosaic originally from the House of the Faun in Pompeii. It depicts a battle between the armies of Alexander the Great and Darius III of Persia and measures 5.82 x 3.13m (19 ft x 10 ft 3in).The mosaic is made of about one and a half million tiny colored tiles called tesserae
Alexander's opponent in the mural Darius III of Persia:
posted
Ish Gebor AKA Troll Patrol and kikuyu2 - The above "Alexander Mosaic" is a really great test for the two of you. It will test you ability to research and your use of logic.
It' okay if you don't want to try your hand though, I will explain if you don't.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
1) Whites are telling us what it is - and we know Whites LIE! 2) It is suppose to be from 100 B.C. and found in Pompeii, a ROMAN city in the middle of Italy. Romans were NOT fond of Greeks at this time - why would they have a mosaic of Alexander?
Now lets look at what is supposed to be Alexander. Note that his armor is not a single piece, but is made-up of plates. And he has a PICTURE in the middle???
Greek soldiers.
I don't know about you, but to me it seems that this supposed Alexander is wearing a Roman uniform.
Coin of Artaxerxes III in his chariot. Note the chariot design and his hat.
(Nothing similar here, is there?)
Now lets look at a Persian Soldier.
Now lets read how Herodotus describes Persian soldiers and Cavalrymen.
Book 7 - POLYMNIA
[7.40] Then the king's orders were obeyed; and the army marched out between the two halves of the carcase. First of all went the baggage-bearers, and the sumpter-beasts, and then a vast crowd of many nations mingled together without any intervals, amounting to more than one half of the army. After these troops an empty space was left, to separate between them and the king. In front of the king went first a thousand horsemen, picked men of the Persian nation - then spearmen a thousand, likewise chosen troops, with their spearheads pointing towards the ground - next ten of the sacred horses called Nisaean, all daintily caparisoned. (Now these horses are called Nisaean, because they come from the Nisaean plain, a vast flat in Media, producing horses of unusual size.) After the ten sacred horses came the holy chariot of Jupiter, drawn by eight milk-white steeds, with the charioteer on foot behind them holding the reins; for no mortal is ever allowed to mount into the car. Next to this came Xerxes himself, riding in a chariot drawn by Nisaean horses, with his charioteer, Patiramphes, the son of Otanes, a Persian, standing by his side.
[7.41] Thus rode forth Xerxes from Sardis - but he was accustomed every now and then, when the fancy took him, to alight from his chariot and travel in a litter. Immediately behind the king there followed a body of a thousand spearmen, the noblest and bravest of the Persians, holding their lances in the usual manner - then came a thousand Persian horse, picked men - then ten thousand, picked also after the rest, and serving on foot. Of these last one thousand carried spears with golden pomegranates at their lower end instead of spikes; and these encircled the other nine thousand, who bore on their spears pomegranates of silver. The spearmen too who pointed their lances towards the ground had golden pomegranates; and the thousand Persians who followed close after Xerxes had golden apples. Behind the ten thousand footmen came a body of Persian cavalry, likewise ten thousand; after which there was again a void space for as much as two furlongs; and then the rest of the army followed in a confused crowd.
[7.61] Now these were the nations that took part in this expedition. The Persians, who wore on their heads the soft hat called the tiara, and about their bodies, tunics with sleeves of divers colours, having iron scales upon them like the scales of a fish. Their legs were protected by trousers; and they bore wicker shields for bucklers; their quivers hanging at their backs, and their arms being a short spear, a bow of uncommon size, and arrows of reed. They had likewise daggers suspended from their girdles along their right thighs.
Soldier wearing a tiara.
[7.62] The Medes had exactly the same equipment as the Persians; and indeed the dress common to both is not so much Persian as Median.
[7.83] The whole of the infantry was under the command of these generals, excepting the Ten Thousand. The Ten Thousand, who were all Persians and all picked men, were led by Hydarnes, the son of Hydarnes. They were called "the Immortals," for the following reason. If one of their body failed either by the stroke of death or of disease, forthwith his place was filled up by another man, so that their number was at no time either greater or less than 10,000.
Of all the troops the Persians were adorned with the greatest magnificence, and they were likewise the most valiant. Besides their arms, which have been already described, they glittered all over with gold, vast quantities of which they wore about their persons. They were followed by litters, wherein rode their concubines, and by a numerous train of attendants handsomely dressed. Camels and sumpter-beasts carried their provision, apart from that of the other soldiers.
[7.84] All these various nations fight on horseback; they did not, however, at this time all furnish horsemen, but only the following:- The Persians, who were armed in the same way as their own footmen, excepting that some of them wore upon their heads devices fashioned with the hammer in brass or steel.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
^On a serious note: Exposing these frauds is the easy part, understanding them is another matter.
Perhaps being Black, I don't understand the machinations of the liars mind, but is there no fear at all, of refutation by Whites?
I mean, it seems to me that and any fool who knows anything about Persians knows that the "Alexander mosaic" is bogus. Just like they would know that this bust of Rameses II in the Turin museum is bogus.
So is there no fear that some White tourist will say: um momento pisano, that's bullsh1t: and thus destroy the museums creditability?
It has not escaped my notice that these most obvious frauds are in Italian museums. So is there some kind of expectation that Italians are most prone to lies, and are thus tolerated?
White posters speak-up, what's going on here?
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Ish Gebor AKA Troll Patrol and kikuyu2 - The above "Alexander Mosaic" is a really great test for the two of you. It will test you ability to research and your use of logic.
It' okay if you don't want to try your hand though, I will explain if you don't.
I'd never have seen that fakery,honestly. You,along with Clyde are masters.Am here learning at your feet-preach on!
Posts: 55 | From: nairobi | Registered: Jul 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^On a serious note: Exposing these frauds is the easy part, understanding them is another matter.
Perhaps being Black, I don't understand the machinations of the liars mind, but is there no fear at all, of refutation by Whites?
I mean, it seems to me that and any fool who knows anything about Persians knows that the "Alexander mosaic" is bogus. Just like they would know that this bust of Rameses II in the Turin museum is bogus.
So is there no fear that some White tourist will say: um momento pisano, that's bullsh1t: and thus destroy the museums creditability?
It has not escaped my notice that these most obvious frauds are in Italian museums. So is there some kind of expectation that Italians are most prone to lies, and are thus tolerated?
White posters speak-up, what's going on here?
You say the strangest things, like most frauds are in Italian Museums. Did you study all the museums in the world to arrive at such a sweeping conclusion?
I wish you would just sit for an hour to answer your question: why do they lie?
Well, what you call lie is a whole system called eurocentrism which only purpose is to extirpate Blacks and blackness from history.
Why? Because whites were kept till 1848 as shoe leather for the Black, black identified European elite.
So these people are fucked up, mad as hell, frightened out of their wits for Blacks not to dominate them again.
And do not get me started on tourist, I saw the masses at the Louvre and Versailles and never saw more stupid and ignorant people. And racist like hell.
Posts: 5454 | From: Holland | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Ish Gebor AKA Troll Patrol and kikuyu2 - The above "Alexander Mosaic" is a really great test for the two of you. It will test you ability to research and your use of logic.
It' okay if you don't want to try your hand though, I will explain if you don't.
I'd never have seen that fakery,honestly. You,along with Clyde are masters.Am here learning at your feet-preach on!
I was fortunate enough to be able to identify the people in the mosaic. See the "Alexander Mosaic Revealed" thread.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^On a serious note: Exposing these frauds is the easy part, understanding them is another matter.
Perhaps being Black, I don't understand the machinations of the liars mind, but is there no fear at all, of refutation by Whites?
I mean, it seems to me that and any fool who knows anything about Persians knows that the "Alexander mosaic" is bogus. Just like they would know that this bust of Rameses II in the Turin museum is bogus.
So is there no fear that some White tourist will say: um momento pisano, that's bullsh1t: and thus destroy the museums creditability?
It has not escaped my notice that these most obvious frauds are in Italian museums. So is there some kind of expectation that Italians are most prone to lies, and are thus tolerated?
White posters speak-up, what's going on here?
You say the strangest things, like most frauds are in Italian Museums. Did you study all the museums in the world to arrive at such a sweeping conclusion?
I wish you would just sit for an hour to answer your question: why do they lie?
Well, what you call lie is a whole system called eurocentrism which only purpose is to extirpate Blacks and blackness from history.
Why? Because whites were kept till 1848 as shoe leather for the Black, black identified European elite.
So these people are fucked up, mad as hell, frightened out of their wits for Blacks not to dominate them again.
And do not get me started on tourist, I saw the masses at the Louvre and Versailles and never saw more stupid and ignorant people. And racist like hell.
Egmond why do you keep scratching your head asking "why do they hate us so much? "
They are being practical. By falsifing history it prevents us from removing their skins to make shoes.
Can you blame them for falsifing history if it's going to keep them from being serfs and having their skin being used to make apparel?
Why are you getting so mad about it? White people simply took a "by any means necessary" approach and freed themselsves from us ripping off their skins to make book bindings and shoes.
Wouldn't you falsify history if it kept you from becoming a shoe?
Egmond, maybe you need to get out of Holland and either live in a predominantly black country or a least one with hipper white people than these lame ass Dutch whites. The wooden clogs should have tipped you off.
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
[/IMG]
Printer-friendly view of this topic