posted
The Afronuts once again are exposed as liars.
All over the internet you can find Afrocentric and Black Supremacist websites distorting the literature of Godfrey Higgins.
In his 'Anacalypsis' (1833) Higgins writes of a ''black'' race of ancient times who lived in Asia - the Cushites.
However he repeatedly notes that this race was not Negroid in his footnotes. Below contains a footnote from vol. 1, p. 52 -
These Cushites of course were just dark skinned Caucasoid Asiatics, not Negroids/Sub-Saharan Africans.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
If we adapt his stupid logic (the myth of the "True Negro") to Europeans so only few of them are "true whites" : those who are tall platinum blond, blue eyes, thin nose, thin lips...All the rest would be "half apes" (French, English, Scottish, Spaniards etc) as Hermann Gauch the nazi thinker called the Italians..
Higgins said that he acknowledged with "great difficulty" than Chaldeans were blacks too. But Let's quote him:
"...In consequence of the prejudice (for it is already prejudice)against the negro, or I ought to say, against the possibility of a negro, being learned and scientific, arising from an acquaintance with the present with the present Negro Character, I admit with great difficulty the theory of all the early astronomical knowledge of the chaldean having been acquired or invented by his race, and the Chaldees were originally Negroes..."
"...The Buddhists were negroes, the Icons of the God clearly prove..."
Anacalypsis Vol 2 page 364 Book V Chapter II Section 7
Now for somebody who has visited really Africa, everybody knows that West Africans and East Africans are not different.
You go to Mali, Senegal, Guinea , Mauritania, Cameroon , and also in central africa : you'll se all features, all hair textures, all heights.
Nobody can tell the difference between a Somali in East Africa and a Fulani of the Macina.
Actually John Baldwin another racist thinker of the 19th century in "Pre-Historic Nation" says about Africa :
P 307 "...In point of fact, the great majority of the people inhabiting this grand division of the globe are not negroes…”
P 308 “ …The great body of its people consists of a brown or olive colored race occasionally described as the red race”
Being 100% African and having visited Africa I agree with his statements above
I'm black ebony, with straight silky air, tall and strong and I am 100 % West African.
When we had universities in West Africa, the guys in england painted themselves in blue before killing each other in savage war tribes.
And you won't find any African king (in the history records) doing like the Irish kings in the 12th century AD : These guys celebrated their coronations by engaging in ritual sexual intercourse with a horse (as reported by Thomas Cahill)...
-------------------- The wise man knows he knows nothing, the fool thinks he knows all Posts: 70 | From: Paris / France | Registered: Dec 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Nehesy: This guy has serious issues ( nazi ?)
If we adapt his stupid logic (the myth of the "True Negro") to Europeans so only few of them are "true whites" : those who are tall platinum blond, blue eyes, thin nose, thin lips...All the rest would be "half apes" (French, English, Scottish, Spaniards etc) as Hermann Gauch the nazi thinker called the Italians..
Caucasoids have leptorrhine (thin) noses and thin lips. Those (especially the nose) are Caucasoid racial trait markers, they are not found in Negroids who in contrast are platyrrhine (wide) nosed with thick lips.
quote: Now for somebody who has visited really Africa, everybody knows that West Africans and East Africans are not different.
East Africans have Caucasoid admixture, its why some of them are thinner nosed and straighter haired.
The average East African is 60% Eurasian (Caucasoid). Only 40% of their genes are from Sub-Sahara Africa.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
^^lol Lion: his own source debunks him. Note the footnote by his own author- QUOTE: "may not have been Negroes, though Blacks, though it is probably they were so."
His own source says they may not have been Negroes then adds: THOUGH IT IS PROBABLY THEY WERE SO."
^The Faker once again, debunks himself. And he seems not to realize that Ethiopia is in "sub-Saharan" Africa.. lol.. pathetic incompetent..
And he never shows these massive number of websites "all over the internet". Like what? How many? If they are "all over" then he should at least be able to give direct links to 6 showing pages where the "Afrocentrics" are "distorting" Higgins work. LEt's see what the faker has besides hot air. Post DIRECT LINKS to 6 of the huge number of alleged "Afrocentric" websites where the Afrocentrics are "distorting" Higgins. SHow how they are distorting Higgins with specific quotes and specific context.
Watch the Faker duck and run when he is again called on a claim, or make up yet another lie to cover his exposure...
WHile we await another attempt to wriggle away by the Faker, LEt's recap:
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: Most Europeans are not an albino hue.
A Negroid albino -
^^But that still doesn't save you from your bogus claim. YOu said no tropical Africans have light hair or eyes.
THE FAKER EXPOSED- part 8:
You said- quote:
Originally posted by Cassiredes: "Fair hair and light eyes colours are only found among Caucasoids, esp of Europe."
But then, in your own thread, by your own hand, you present a picture of an African albino that has pale skin, light brown or hazel eyes and fair hair. You said it was impossible, but then debunk yourself with your own posted picture.. This is like the 8-9th time you keep tripping over yourself with lies, contradictions, and bogus claims.
RECAP The Faker exposed- part 7 Originally posted by Cassiredes: "Fair hair and light eyes colours are only found among Caucasoids, esp of Europe."
^^Your claim is is completely bogus. Native diversity or albinism causes some tropical Africans to have light eyes and light hair. You fail againn..
================================================
THE FAKER EXPOSED: PART 6A 1-- ^^Faker! In your initial posts you claimed that it was Cavalli-Sforza talking 'bout negroes "mutating" from Pygmies. Now in your "corrected" post, YOU STILL APPEAR A FAKE. You now remove Cavalli- Sforza's name on the "mutant" claim, admitting that you were lying all along! Bwa ha aha a hah a ha ahahaha aha ahah..
2-- Second point- Peter Frost is debunked by Cavalli-Sforza who says as to his so-called "mutation" theory: QUOTE:
"It remains difficult to pinpoint an ancient place of origin for the Negroid type which includes all West, Central and South Africans. Contrary to many earlier opinions, modern Pygmies and Khosians are not good candidates for a proto-African population."
--Cavalli Sforza et al, 1994. The history and geography of human genes. 194
Frost mentions Cavalli-Sforza in connection with sexual selection, and movement of some groups from Nigeria-Cameroon to other parts of Africa. He never says Cavalli Sforza talks bout any "negro mutation" and in fact any mutation claim is directly contradicted by Sforza. Sucka, you not only lied bout Cavalli-Sforza, you lied about your own white writer- Peter Frost, and misrepresented him.
THE FAKER EXPOSED: PART 6B CassiREDES says: ''There are then no Australoids with blonde hair past the age of about twenty''
^^LMAO! Totally fake! Credible up to date sources note that blondism is prevalent in early life BUT, contrary to your claim that: "There are then no Australoids with blonde hair past the age of about twenty", the shade of color varies. In maturity the hair usually turns a darker brown color, but sometimes remains blond. See: "Gene Expression: Blonde Australian Aboriginals". Gnxp.com. http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2005/08/blonde-australian-aboriginals.php.
^^Here is one of your Australians over 20 years old who does have blonde hair. YOu are caught out spinning bogus claims AGAIN!. Bwa ha aha a hah a ha ahahaha aha ahah.. -
THE FAKER EXPOSED: PART 5a [b]So where are these tropical african peoples with pale white or fair skin? blonde red hair?
^^You fail again. African populations can readily produce blond or reddish blond hair as noted by hair study author Hrdy 1978 himself, and he references Nubia as an example. Albinism is another source of red or blond hair in Africa, and albinism is much more prevalent in African populations than among Europeans. Even African Americans produce more albinos than white Americans. (The pigmentary system: physiology and pathophysiology- By James J. Nordlund 2006: 603) (E. Roach and V. Miller 2004. Neurocutaneous disorders.) QUOTE: "In general, the prevalence of albinism in Africa is much higher, in the range of 1 in 1 100 to 1 in 3900."
So Africa can and does routinely produce red and blond hair. All non-Africans are MORE LIMITED subsets of ORIGINAL African diversity. THe originals have more built-in diversity than the limited sub-set populations. This is straight science as noted by the quote from TIshkoff 2000.
Nor are Africans the only tropical peoples who can produce reddish hair or blond hair. Among Australian Aborigines, some tropical groups produce 100% of individuals with blond hair. Melanesians can also produce blond or reddish hair, and do so routinely.
White people have no monopoly at all on that hair color. They merely show more of it, but even among whites, red hair for example is minor- occurring in less than 5% of the overall European populations, mostly in northern Europe.
So the claim that there are no tropical Africans with such variation is once again, proved fake. You made the claim.
THE FAKER EXPOSED: PART 4 ime and time again, you stand debunked and exposed for falsifying claims and references. Let's recap:
Originally posted by CASSIFAKedes::
quote: The source is Cavalli-Sforza's book on the Pygmies entitled 'African pygmies' (Academic Press, 1986).
This work shows that Negroids mutated from an ancestral pygmy population around 9,000 BC in West Africa. So the 'true' Black African today is a recent mutation. Caucasoids and Mongoloids predate them. [Wink] Negroids only migrated into other parts of Africa during the Bantu expansion or slightly earlier. Prior to them, Caucasoids inhabited North Africa and Bushmen (Capoids) to the south who were displaced by the Caucasoids from the Mediterranean around 12,000 BC.
^^A bogus reference. Why should anyone take your word for it given past bogus references? Quote where Cavalli-Sforza says these so-called "negroids" "mutated" from Pygmies. The burden of proof is on you, since you made the claim.
While you scurry to cover your tracks with yet more bogus claims, Cavali Sforza, in his well known The History and Geography of Human Genes, 1994 Cavalli-Sforza summarizes his 1986 work on Pygmies and specifically debunks the "Pygmy as ancestor" theory held by other older writings. QUOTE:
"It remains difficult to pinpoint an ancient place of origin for the Negroid type which includes all West, Central and South Africans. Contrary to many earlier opinions, modern Pygmies and Khosians are not good candidates for a proto-African population."
--Cavalli Sforza et al, 1994. The history and geography of human genes. 194
SO much for your lying claims of "mutations" from "Pygymy" ancestors. In short, you lied about Cavalli-Sforza, creating a falsified claim and a bogus "supporting" reference to a claim that is nowhere supported in his work. You are once again exposed as yet another racist faker You are not fooling anyone.
------------------------
THE FAKER EXPOSED-PART 3- YOu then tried to cover up your lie with even more bogus nformation and STILL fail
You "modified" your Cavalli Sforza claim by including page numbers, and then changing some wording to "adaptive radiation" hoping to divert attention from your exposure.. lmao..
However pages 361-362 of Cavalli Sforza's 1986 book says absolutely nothing about any Negroes "mutating" from pygmies, nor any "adaptive radiation." It merely discusses Pygmy history and geography. You picked out a page at random, not knowing it can be verified via Google Books. You were asked to provide a direct quote but are still running. Now why is that?
""It remains difficult to pinpoint an ancient place of origin for the Negroid type which includes all West, Central and South Africans. Contrary to many earlier opinions, modern Pygmies and Khosians are not good candidates for a proto-African population."
--Cavalli Sforza et al, 1994. The history and geography of human genes. 194
--------------------------------------
THE FAKER EXPOSED- PART 2 And Your pathetic "modification" STILL turned out to be bogus. You then said:
"True" Black Africans appear as a recent adaptive radiation apparently branching off from an ancestral Pygmy population — a line of ancestry also indicated by osteological data (Coon 1962:651-656; Watson et al. 1996).
^^But in fact, Watson 1996 has nothing to do with osteological data and does not even mention it. It has to do with mtDNA.
----------------------------------------
THE FAKER EXPOSED- PART 1C YOU THEN PROFFERED ANOTHER FAKE CLAIM BELOW: He says:
quote: "Note that in the Old Testament the Danites are the only Hebrew people described as being maritime and associated with ships.."
^^Complete Nonsense. In the Old Testament, the tribe of Zebulun is mentioned as specifically associated with ships and maritime elements. QUOTE:
Genesis 49:13 "Zebulun will dwell at the shore of the seas; Yea, he will be at the shore of the ships, And his side toucheth upon Sidon. "
Cassi-Fakdes: MULTIPLE TIMES AT BAT, MULTIPLE EXPOSURES AS A FAKE...
--fake claim that no Australian Abo over 20 is blonde
-- fake claim that NO tropical Africans have any diversity in hair, skin or eye color
-- fake Cavalli-Sforza citation
-- 2nd fake Cavalli-Sforza reference
-- Faked Watson reference
-- Faked Biblical reference
-- FAke representation of Peter Frost's work
-- Fake claim that "studies" say "egyptians were dark are not like 'light-skinned Europeans". COnveniently, the alleged study is missing..
--Add: fake claim of massive number of sites talking about a "lie" by HIggins, when in fact, the territory is itself in sub-Saharan Africa, and Higgins himself notes that they people "most probably" were Negroes Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
^^Sasha Shelton- nice looking girl, tropically proportioned too, if you know whut I'm sayin..
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:East Africans have Caucasoid admixture, its why some of them are thinner nosed and straighter haired.
The average East African is 60% Eurasian (Caucasoid). Only 40% of their genes are from Sub-Sahara Africa.
quote:No. The photo i posted is 40% Caucasoid, not pure-blooded. Pure-blooded Caucasoids are far lighter. Pure-blooded Caucasoids in East Africa are extinct when they admixed with the Negroid populations.
So if the "pure-blooded caucasoid" is "extinct" where are you getting your percentages from? You stated that you can accurately pinpoint this 60/40% mixture simply by "looking at a photo"... Posts: 150 | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by funkcity1000: So if the "pure-blooded caucasoid" is "extinct" where are you getting your percentages from?
East Africans have a large dose of Eurasian genes. They are an intermediate race between Caucasoid and Negroid, hence some have straighter hair and thinner noses.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
Tropical climates are extremely diverse – from humid rainforest, to higher altitude cold zones, to arid deserts with sharply dropping night temperatures. Scientists find that nose width is correlated with climate – with narrower noses seen in dry, conditions such as desert areas in eastern parts of Africa.
QUOTE: "Tropical climates range from oppressively hot and humid lowlands to cold, snow-covered mountains, from hot, dry deserts to cold, dry deserts, from extreme seasonal variability of precipitation to nearly constant year-round conditions." --Huston. M. (1994) Biological diversity: the coexistence of species on changing landscapes Cambridge university Press. p 498
QUOTE: "An important function of the nose is to warm and moisten inspired air. When air is exhaled, some heat and moisture are lost to the surroundings. The longer the nasal passage, the more efficient the nose is for warming and moistening incoming air and also the less heat and moisture are lost on exhalation. A narrow, high nose gives a longer nasal passage than a low, broad nose. Therefore, in cold or dry conditions, a high, narrow nose is preferable for warming and moistening air before it reaches the lings, and for reducing loss of heat and moisture in expired air. In hot, humid conditions a low, broad nose serves to dissipate heat (Wolpoff 1968; Franciscis and Long 1991)... The pattern of variation in nasal index corresponds very broadly to that expected if nasal form is indeed an adaptation to regional climate.
The highest nasal index values, representing broad, low noses, tend to be those of populations in humid tropical regions of Africa and south-east Asia. Populations with low mean nasal indices (high, narrow noses) tend to be found in the cold, northern latitudes, and also in arid regions, such as the desert areas of east Africa and the Arabian peninsula. ..Davies found the nasal index taken in the living was closely correlated with skeletal nasal index. This suggests that there should likewise be an association between skeletal nasal index and climatic zone, and indeed other workers have found this to be the case.“ -- Mays. S. (2010). The Archaeology of Human Bones. Pg 100-101
2011 study finds significant correlation between nasal shape and climate. Dry areas are common in tropical zone micro-climates such as deserts.
QUOTE: “"The nasal cavity is essential for humidifying and warming the air before it reaches the sensitive lungs. Because humans inhabit environments that can be seen as extreme from the perspective of respiratory function, nasal cavity shape is expected to show climatic adaptation.. We report significant correlations between nasal cavity shape and climatic variables of both temperature and humidity. Variation in nasal cavity shape is correlated with a cline from cold-dry climates to hot-humid climates, with a separate temperature and vapor pressure effect. " -- Noback, M. et al. (2011) Climate-related variation of the human nasal cavity. AJPA, 145: 4. 599-614
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
He will simply restate his spiel bout "dark skinned whites." But we all know that East Africans have a measure of recent gene flow in the Arab era for example. No one denies that at all. And we all know that yes some Middle Easterners always interacted' with East Africa via trade, warfare, etc. in ancient times. Of course. No surprise there. Persia traded with some ancient kingdoms of Ethiopia for example. This ain't no news. Bogus claims that people are "denying" this are just that, bogus.
The "Caucasoid mix" figure is based on some studies that stack the deck. They load the samples with Amhara, who have more Arab and outside gene flow, while downplaying the Oromo and other Ethiopian peoples, even though together these others are about 70% of the population. By stacking the deck, they can skew final results in favor of the Middle Eastern/Arab gene weights.
Consider Cavalli-Sorza and Passsarino studies below. Note the heavy weight given to the Amhara. Also note that Passarino HIMSELF notes that there is a skewing towards Amhara samples. So it is not merely ES people pointing out these skewed sampling methods. Academic authors themselves admit it. Same pattern shows up in Wilson study. Not saying the authors deliberately are misleading, just that their sampling leads to certain outcomes.
passarino sforza ethiopian skew
wilson image shack ethiopians skew
Other studies however that look at a bigger picture show that overall, East Africans have a small amount of outside genes. This is nothing special in any human population
Then there is hypocrisy KING, you notice how that claim of "Caucasoid" mixture is always played up where Ethiopians and others are involved. But notice the double standard. When tropical African gene patterns are found among Europeans then some of the same people talkin bout "mixtures" go into denial. Below is a comparison o Ethiopians and Europeans. The Europeans have about as much "mix" from Africans as any Ethiopian from alleged "Caucasoids". But right away notice the denials when the shoe is shown on the other foot. Using the same approach of various hypocrites people are just as entitled to talk about Europeans being "racially mixed" with Africans or Asians.
Also note Greek-African mixture below KING. LEt's flip the shoe on the other foot. Note that Greeks have smaller but clear sub-Saharan African DNA links. BUt how come those who always want to holler mix about Africa, don't want to apply their own methods in reverse to European peoples? Can you say hypocrisy?
You've seen the info above KING so nothing new, Explorer, MInd and others have extensive DNA data posted as well. These basic 5 points are recapped for new readers.
1- Enviro factors- Features like narrow noses are not necessarily due to alleged "inflowing migrants" into Africa. CLimatic factors can cause narrow noses,
2-- Built-in original OOA diversity Africa's build in gene diversity as the launching point for OOA migrations, means most phenotypical features are built in to tropical Africans without needing any "outside" explanation
3-- People interacting with other people nothing special SUre enough there has always been people outside interacting with East Africans. This ain't news, and it has happened with Europe which has absorbed a fair amount of African and "Middle Eastern" genes over time.
4-- Overall EAfrica picture shows minor mix When the overall picture is looked at, outside gene flow is small in East Africa. It might be more in certain eras like the Arab era, but when the big picture is considered, outside gene flow ain't nothing special, despite a breathless buildup by some
5-- Hypocrisy and double standards Finally always question the hypocrisy and double standards of those quick to talk about "racial admixtures" in East Africa to explain the fundamental makeup of the East Africn peoples. How come said "race mix" proponents are so reluctant to apply their own approach where Europeans are concerned? How come its OK for certain Africans to be "racially mixed" but not Europeans like Greeks, or indeed Europeans as a whole when African gene flow is detected?
Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
All I can say is that even in West Africa, we have Africans like Tuareg and Fulani with fine features. Before cassi can scream Northern Berber mixture, The Fula have E1b1a at 100% and the Tuareg are closer linked with the Beja.
All this talk of pure this and that is nonsense, because no race can avoid mixture. cassi is just an really ugly person inside who is totally obsessed with Africans and making anyone with wavy hair and fine features as non African or mixed. I believe he even goes so far as to state that Naomi Campbell as chinese then shows an pic of African woman who have slantier eyes then Miss Campbell.
Then theres the Dreaded Greeks who come out at 25% African and study after study coming out saying the same thing about them, They have AFRICAN Genes. Credit Bass for the new studies on the Greeks. All this shows that people like cassi etc are nothing but hypocrites when it comes to there ideas about who is and is not an True African(Negro). I just enjoy reading these threads that show the beauty of African woman and Africans linked closer to eachother then anyone else. Gotta post my share of Beautiful woman Zarahan, Can't let you have all the fun:
Posts: 9651 | From: Reace and Love City. | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
''Taking the British as a representative Caucasoid sample and the Mandenka as a sub-Saharan population, the proportion m of caucasoid lineages in the Somali is m = 0.46. (46%) This value is similar to the estimate based on autosomal studies (m = 0.40)''
The autosomal studies show that as a whole Somalis are about 40% Eurasian, which is about the same as Ethiopians.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by KING: [QB] More Tropically Adapted Women:
Zaharan isn't into dark skinned woman. He's a self-hating black. Out of insecurity he claims tropical africans are pale white skinned with straight red or blonde hair.
posted
Note: Like Zaharan, the other Afrocentric Mike111 claims white people are tropical africans.
So apparently everyone on the globe is tropical african. This means according to Zaharan that the ancient egyptians were pale white. In fact he says this ABOVE:
quote:Fake claim that "studies" say "egyptians were dark are not like 'light-skinned Europeans
So according to Zaharan the ancient egyptians were like ''light skinned europeans''.
Confusing to understand Zaharans' beliefs. One minute he calls people who claim egypt was white/caucasoid as ''neo-nazis'' next he's saying the egyptians and tropical africans are white people with blonde or red hair.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
Someone called Zaharan retard but it was Zaharan who showed how the following individual is a pathogenic liar and even lied about Vanessa William’s ancestry. Read the comment in red:
. .
-------------------- The nature of homelife is the fate of the nation. Posts: 2334 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by funkcity1000: So if the "pure-blooded caucasoid" is "extinct" where are you getting your percentages from?
East Africans have a large dose of Eurasian genes. They are an intermediate race between Caucasoid and Negroid, hence some have straighter hair and thinner noses.
So what is the specific "eurasian" genetic marker that causes "straighter hair and thinner noses"?
You claim that East Africans have a "large dose" of "Eurasian genes", so there should be no problem for you to pinpoint these genes...lol
Posts: 150 | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
I know you are old (you're like 60 aren't you) but do try to make sense.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
I claimed she is mixed race (which she is).
Bogus faker, only when you were exposed in another contradictory claim, and then conveniently shifted your definitions. You denied at first she had any black mixture, claiming she was "Welsh and Indian". If her grandfather was a mulatto, then she did have black admixture, and was not solely Welsh and Indian. Conveniently shifting definitions can't save you.
--------------------------------
The Faker exposed- part 11
quote: Originally posted by cassiterides: ^You claim Vanessa Williams is a black woman when her heritage is white welsh and native american
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: ^ Eurafrican is Caucasoid.
^^You are once again exposed. You said EurAfrican is Caucasoid, and cited Serti in support. But using your own citation any reader can see that Sergi considers EurAfricans to be an amalgamation or mixture of many types, directly contradicting your claim.
SErgi says: QUOTE: "This human species, with cranial and facial characters thus well determined, I call Eurafrican; and this because, having had its origin in Africa, where it is still represented by many peoples, it has been diffused from prehistoric times in Europe... The Eurafrican species thus falls into three races: the African, with red-brown and black pigmentation.. Thus the Mediterranean stock is a race or variety of the Eurafrican species." --G. Sergi
You have again failed and are once again exposed. ------------------------------------------------------------
THE FAKER EXPOSED PART 9- HE CLAIMS ALL THESE HIGGINS "DISTORTIONS" BUT WHEN ASKED TO NAME THE SPECIFIC WEBSITES OF THIS ALLEGED "AFROCENTRIC' HORROR, HE RUNS AWAY. WHY IS THAT FAKER?
In fact, Godfrey Higgins ALSO says this about "negroes"
"I believe all the Blavk bambinos of Italy are negroes- not merely blacks; this admitted, it would prove they very early date of their entrance into Italy." pg 286 pg 434 "the ancient Eturians had the countenances of Negroes, the same as the images of Buddah in INdia." pg 166 pg 474- "They aere in fact, all one nation, with one religion, that of Buddah, and they were originally NEgroes" pg 59: "nor can it be reasonably doubted, that a race of Negroes formerly had power and pre-eminence in India" pg 59- AS TO ETHIOPIA: And it is probable that an Ethiopian, a negro, correctly speaking, may have been meant, not merely a black person; and it seems probable that the following may have ben the real fact, viz, that a race of NEgroes or Blacks, but probably of the former, came to India to the west."
cASSIRETEDES own source debunks him. Note the footnote by his own author- QUOTE: ['i]"may not have been Negroes, though Blacks, though it is probably they were so."[/i]
His own source says they may not have been Negroes then adds: THOUGH IT IS PROBABLY THEY WERE SO."
^The Faker once again, debunks himself. And he seems not to realize that Ethiopia is in "sub-Saharan" Africa.. lol.. pathetic incompetent..
And he never shows these massive number of websites "all over the internet". Like what? How many? If they are "all over" then he should at least be able to give direct links to 6 showing pages where the "Afrocentrics: are "distorting" Higgins work. LEt's say what the faker has besides hot air. Post DIRECT LINKS to 6 of the huge number of alleged "Afrocentric" websites where the Afrocentrics are "distorting" Higgins. SHow how they are distorting Higgins with specific quotes and specific context.
Watch the Faker duck and run when he is again called on a claim, or make up yet another lie to cover his exposure... -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE FAKER EXPOSED- part 8:
quote:
Originally posted by Cassiredes: "Fair hair and light eyes colours are only found among Caucasoids, esp of Europe."
But then, in your own thread, by your own hand, you present a picture of an African albino that has pale skin, light brown or hazel eyes and fair hair. You said it was impossible, but then debunk yourself with your own posted picture.. This is like the 8-9th time you keep tripping over yourself with lies, contradictions, and bogus claims.
RECAP The Faker exposed- part 7 Originally posted by Cassiredes: "Fair hair and light eyes colours are only found among Caucasoids, esp of Europe."
^^Your claim is is completely bogus. Native diversity or albinism causes some tropical Africans to have light eyes and light hair. You fail againn..
================================================
THE FAKER EXPOSED: PART 6 1-- ^^Faker! In your initial posts you claimed that it was Cavalli-Sforza talking 'bout negroes "mutating" from Pygmies. Now in your "corrected" post, YOU STILL APPEAR A FAKE. You now remove Cavalli- Sforza's name on the "mutant" claim, admitting that you were lying all along! Bwa ha aha a hah a ha ahahaha aha ahah..
2-- Second point- Peter Frost is debunked by Cavalli-Sforza who says as to his so-called "mutation" theory: QUOTE:
"It remains difficult to pinpoint an ancient place of origin for the Negroid type which includes all West, Central and South Africans. Contrary to many earlier opinions, modern Pygmies and Khosians are not good candidates for a proto-African population."
--Cavalli Sforza et al, 1994. The history and geography of human genes. 194
Frost mentions Cavalli-Sforza in connection with sexual selection, and movement of some groups from Nigeria-Cameroon to other parts of Africa. He never says Cavalli Sforza talks bout any "negro mutation" and in fact any mutation claim is directly contradicted by Sforza. Sucka, you not only lied bout Cavalli-Sforza, you lied about your own white writer- Peter Frost, and misrepresented him.
THE FAKER EXPOSED: PART 6 CassiREDES says: ''There are then no Australoids with blonde hair past the age of about twenty''
^^LMAO! Totally fake! Credible up to date sources note that blondism is prevalent in early life BUT, contrary to your claim that: "There are then no Australoids with blonde hair past the age of about twenty", the shade of color varies. In maturity the hair usually turns a darker brown color, but sometimes remains blond. See: "Gene Expression: Blonde Australian Aboriginals". Gnxp.com. http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2005/08/blonde-australian-aboriginals.php.
^^Here is one of your Australians over 20 years old who does have blonde hair. YOu are caught out spinning bogus claims AGAIN!. Bwa ha aha a hah a ha ahahaha aha ahah.. -
THE FAKER EXPOSED: PART 5a [b]So where are these tropical african peoples with pale white or fair skin? blonde red hair?
^^You fail again. African populations can readily produce blond or reddish blond hair as noted by hair study author Hrdy 1978 himself, and he references Nubia as an example. Albinism is another source of red or blond hair in Africa, and albinism is much more prevalent in African populations than among Europeans. Even African Americans produce more albinos than white Americans. (The pigmentary system: physiology and pathophysiology- By James J. Nordlund 2006: 603) (E. Roach and V. Miller 2004. Neurocutaneous disorders.) QUOTE: "In general, the prevalence of albinism in Africa is much higher, in the range of 1 in 1 100 to 1 in 3900."
So Africa can and does routinely produce red and blond hair. All non-Africans are MORE LIMITED subsets of ORIGINAL African diversity. THe originals have more built-in diversity than the limited sub-set populations. This is straight science as noted by the quote from TIshkoff 2000.
Nor are Africans the only tropical peoples who can produce reddish hair or blond hair. Among Australian Aborigines, some tropical groups produce 100% of individuals with blond hair. Melanesians can also produce blond or reddish hair, and do so routinely.
White people have no monopoly at all on that hair color. They merely show more of it, but even among whites, red hair for example is minor- occurring in less than 5% of the overall European populations, mostly in northern Europe.
So the claim that there are no tropical Africans with such variation is once again, proved fake. You made the claim.
THE FAKER EXPOSED: PART 4 ime and time again, you stand debunked and exposed for falsifying claims and references. Let's recap:
Originally posted by CASSIFAKedes::
quote: The source is Cavalli-Sforza's book on the Pygmies entitled 'African pygmies' (Academic Press, 1986).
This work shows that Negroids mutated from an ancestral pygmy population around 9,000 BC in West Africa. So the 'true' Black African today is a recent mutation. Caucasoids and Mongoloids predate them. [Wink] Negroids only migrated into other parts of Africa during the Bantu expansion or slightly earlier. Prior to them, Caucasoids inhabited North Africa and Bushmen (Capoids) to the south who were displaced by the Caucasoids from the Mediterranean around 12,000 BC.
^^A bogus reference. Why should anyone take your word for it given past bogus references? Quote where Cavalli-Sforza says these so-called "negroids" "mutated" from Pygmies. The burden of proof is on you, since you made the claim.
While you scurry to cover your tracks with yet more bogus claims, Cavali Sforza, in his well known The History and Geography of Human Genes, 1994 Cavalli-Sforza summarizes his 1986 work on Pygmies and specifically debunks the "Pygmy as ancestor" theory held by other older writings. QUOTE:
"It remains difficult to pinpoint an ancient place of origin for the Negroid type which includes all West, Central and South Africans. Contrary to many earlier opinions, modern Pygmies and Khosians are not good candidates for a proto-African population."
--Cavalli Sforza et al, 1994. The history and geography of human genes. 194
SO much for your lying claims of "mutations" from "Pygymy" ancestors. In short, you lied about Cavalli-Sforza, creating a falsified claim and a bogus "supporting" reference to a claim that is nowhere supported in his work. You are once again exposed as yet another racist faker You are not fooling anyone.
------------------------
THE FAKER EXPOSED-PART 3- YOu then tried to cover up your lie with even more bogus nformation and STILL fail
You "modified" your Cavalli Sforza claim by including page numbers, and then changing some wording to "adaptive radiation" hoping to divert attention from your exposure.. lmao..
However pages 361-362 of Cavalli Sforza's 1986 book says absolutely nothing about any Negroes "mutating" from pygmies, nor any "adaptive radiation." It merely discusses Pygmy history and geography. You picked out a page at random, not knowing it can be verified via Google Books. You were asked to provide a direct quote but are still running. Now why is that?
""It remains difficult to pinpoint an ancient place of origin for the Negroid type which includes all West, Central and South Africans. Contrary to many earlier opinions, modern Pygmies and Khosians are not good candidates for a proto-African population."
--Cavalli Sforza et al, 1994. The history and geography of human genes. 194
--------------------------------------
THE FAKER EXPOSED- PART 2 And Your pathetic "modification" STILL turned out to be bogus. You then said:
"True" Black Africans appear as a recent adaptive radiation apparently branching off from an ancestral Pygmy population — a line of ancestry also indicated by osteological data (Coon 1962:651-656; Watson et al. 1996).
^^But in fact, Watson 1996 has nothing to do with osteological data and does not even mention it. It has to do with mtDNA.
----------------------------------------
THE FAKER EXPOSED- PART 1C YOU THEN PROFFERED ANOTHER FAKE CLAIM BELOW: He says:
quote: "Note that in the Old Testament the Danites are the only Hebrew people described as being maritime and associated with ships.."
^^Complete Nonsense. In the Old Testament, the tribe of Zebulun is mentioned as specifically associated with ships and maritime elements. QUOTE:
Genesis 49:13 "Zebulun will dwell at the shore of the seas; Yea, he will be at the shore of the ships, And his side toucheth upon Sidon. "
Cassi-Fakdes: MULTIPLE TIMES AT BAT, MULTIPLE EXPOSURES AS A FAKE...
--fake claim that no Australian Abo over 20 is blonde
-- fake claim that NO tropical Africans have any diversity in hair, skin or eye color
-- fake Cavalli-Sforza citation
-- 2nd fake Cavalli-Sforza reference
-- Faked Watson reference
-- Faked Biblical reference
-- FAke representation of Peter Frost's work
-- Fake claim that "studies" say "egyptians were dark are not like 'light-skinned Europeans". COnveniently, the alleged study is missing..
--Fake Higgins claims
--Fake claim that Guiseppe Sergi's EurAfrican race concept is negro-free
--Fake claim that Vanessa Williams has no black ancestry but is "white and Indian"
Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
Someone called somebody else a dumbass for pointing out that Vanessa Williams is an attractive black woman. The following is the beginning of a lie that will become apparent a couple of sentences down. This is the quote:
[SOME DUDE SAID]I claimed she [i.e. Vanessa Williams] is mixed race (which she is).
[Marc writes] No. That is not what you said. This the actual quote; this is what you said:
Vanessa Williams <snip> heritage is white welsh and native American.
[Marc continues] You DID NOT claim she was mixed race. YOU said she was Welsh and native American.
Gentlemen and ladies of E.S. This is the reason I wrote earlier that this person, as Zaharan has shown, is a psychopathological liar. I wrote:
Some certain individual is petrified with fear as he is frightened by blacks who are proud of their heritage.
His own feeling of worth and value stems from the lie that whites forged the world's civilizations and it sickens him to his stomach to countenance otherwise.
This is why he is an intransigent chump and why he makes up facts to try to convince us that what we know is true is false. He feels inferior and lives frightened in a deluded world of make-believe and falsity – that not even he believes is really true.
And HE calls someone dumbass. When you point one finger at someone you point three at yourself.
. .
-------------------- The nature of homelife is the fate of the nation. Posts: 2334 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by funkcity1000: So if the "pure-blooded caucasoid" is "extinct" where are you getting your percentages from?
East Africans have a large dose of Eurasian genes. They are an intermediate race between Caucasoid and Negroid, hence some have straighter hair and thinner noses.
Now it's official. You are indeed slow. Aka retared.
It has been explained to you many times now. And you stilllll don't get it. lol
Dummy.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by KING: [QB] More Tropically Adapted Women:
Zaharan isn't into dark skinned woman. He's a self-hating black. Out of insecurity he claims tropical africans are pale white skinned with straight red or blonde hair.
''Tropical African peoples have thin noses, wavy hair and can be orthnognathic.''
''Tropical Africans can be light skinned''
''Tropical Africans can be white''
'' Native diversity causes some tropical Africans to have light eyes and light hair. ''
=======
So Tropical Africans have white skin, straight-wavy blonde/red hair and blue or green eyes & thin noses.
So these are Tropical Africans according to Zaharan:
blonde hair, thin nose, light skin
He's a tropical african.
red hair, thin nose, light skin, blue eyes.
Another tropical african.
Boy... are you dumb! lol
I truly pity your stupidity.
Aridity Zones. Forty percent of Africa's population lives in arid, semi-arid, and dry subhumid areas. Climate change may lead to an increase in arid zones that are susceptible to drought.
This graphic shows the locations of humid, moist subhumid, dry subhumid, semi-arid, arid and hyper-arid areas in Africa.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
For thousands of years, several native tree species have provided the raw materials for some of the Horn of Africa’s most important commodities, including frankincense (from Boswellia sacra in Somalia, Yemen and Oman, and B. frereana in Somalia), myrrh (from the widespread Commiphor myrrha and C. guidottii in Somalia and eastern Ethiopia) and dragon’s blood or cinnabar (from Dracaena cinnabari, EN found on Socotra). All three are gum-resins obtained from these trees. Dragon’s blood, is used as a medicine and dye. The production of frankincense and myrrh is still a major economic activity in Somalia and, to some extent, in Ethiopia and northern Kenya.
Perfumed with myrrh and frankincense, From every powder of the merchant?" "Till the day doth break forth, And the shadows have fled away, I will get me unto the mountain of myrrh, And unto the hill of frankincense."
"They also found two curved cedar planks that were probably the steering oars on a 70-foot-long ship from Queen Hatshepsut’s famous 15th-century b.c. naval expedition to Punt, a trade destination somewhere in the southern Red Sea region."
quote:Originally posted by KING: zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova
Man, Can always count on you to post the facts that quite down the racist nuts.
As well as to post pictures of Black Women portraying us as nothing more than shapely body and batty i.e., nothing more than sexual symbols... ...we are far more than that.... and to create very long posts in nothing but a one long column-style to make it take forever to scroll past his post(s) to get to the rest of the thread...is like 'dam, I ain't past this ONE post yet?!?' smh....
and furthermore King... speaking as a Conscious Black Woman I find you offensive...
ain't gonna find no KUM-BY-YAH heresuh...
Nuff said.
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
s well as to post pictures of Black Women portraying us as nothing more than shapely body and batty i.e., nothing more than sexual symbols... [Roll Eyes] ...we are far more than that.... and to create very long posts in nothing but a one long column-style to make it take forever to scroll past his post(s) to get to the rest of the thread...is like 'dam, I ain't past this ONE post yet?!?' smh....
and furthermore King... speaking as a Conscious Black Woman I find you offensive...
ain't gonna find no KUM-BY-YAH heresuh...
Nuff said.
^^You must be mistaking me for someone who gives a damn about your fake piety. Spare me your BS "consciousness". This from you who encourages racists to post offensive things about black women, even repeating their racist pictures in your "replies" to them? ANd posting "butt pad" pictures in a pathetic attempt to counter racists?
Then there is your steroetypical gibberish here: CAH-SH*T-HE-RIDES JUS VEX CAH NO GYAL OF ANY SKIN COMPLEXION WAA SHAKE HAR BOOTY FOR HIS UGLY RENK AZZ...AH SUH HIM TUN TUH MON
quote:Originally posted by Oshun: [QUOTE]Originally posted by cassiterides: [qb] ^ Large buttocks are a feature of lower primates, they are ugly. And so called ''booty shaking'' black woman do - is what baboons etc do to attract a mate. Its what the lower primates do... White woman don't do this and have normal shaped buttocks.
No thanks.
So you'd like this instead?
Whatever man.
We've demonstrated monkeys have flat butts too. there is no 'one type' of butt that describes primates. Fat gathers along the ass of black women as a means of helping them cool down in warmer climates. Humans could expel heat from their limbs more efficiently. So it holds a purpose in warmer temperatures/climates. That may not explain as much why men don't have them, until we remember women hold onto fat more than men. So a masculine ass is flatter and an ideal feminine ass gathers excess fat. It's an issue of relativism. Liking a big ass doesn't require having some leftover instincts from baboon. Nice of you to ignore the gorilla I posted too.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by TruthAndRights: [QB] Silicon butt pads for insertion into panty:
[/IMG]
and furthermore King... speaking as a Conscious Black Woman I find you offensive...
^^Get outta here with your fake "conscious black woman" routine..
Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
ANd if you are so "conscious" why are you posting pics of near naked black women or black women in suggestive outfits and poses in the thread below:
And you are presuming to lecture people? Practice what you preach.
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ Anyone who finds those attractive is probably into beastiality.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
19th and early 20th century scholars made a distinction between the negro race and the black/dark races, specifically those of Africa. It is important to see this disctinction, which, unfortunately, many here have missed. Zondervan, in their Bible dictionary, make a clear distinction between the Negro and non-Negro Black race. The following is the definition they provide for Ham:
Zondervan's Compact Bible Dictionary: "Ham - The youngest son of Noah, born probably about 96 years before the Flood; and one of eight persons to live through the Flood. He became the progenitor of the dark races; not the Negroes, but the Egyptians, Ethiopians, Libyans and Canaanites.
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: The Afronuts once again are exposed as liars.
All over the internet you can find Afrocentric and Black Supremacist websites distorting the literature of Godfrey Higgins.
In his 'Anacalypsis' (1833) Higgins writes of a ''black'' race of ancient times who lived in Asia - the Cushites.
However he repeatedly notes that this race was not Negroid in his footnotes. Below contains a footnote from vol. 1, p. 52 -
These Cushites of course were just dark skinned Caucasoid Asiatics, not Negroids/Sub-Saharan Africans.
You're such a liar. The author clearly says they may be African negroes
quote:wooof..wooof..wooooof... Zondervan, in their Bible dictionary, make a clear distinction between the Negro and non-Negro Black race. The following is the definition they provide for Ham:
Zondervan's Compact Bible Dictionary: "Ham - The youngest son of Noah, born probably about 96 years before the Flood; and one of eight persons to live through the Flood. He became the progenitor of the dark races; not the Negroes, but the Egyptians, Ethiopians, Libyans and Canaanites.
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: The Afronuts once again are exposed as liars.
All over the internet you can find Afrocentric and Black Supremacist websites distorting the literature of Godfrey Higgins.
In his 'Anacalypsis' (1833) Higgins writes of a ''black'' race of ancient times who lived in Asia - the Cushites.
However he repeatedly notes that this race was not Negroid in his footnotes. Below contains a footnote from vol. 1, p. 52 -
These Cushites of course were just dark skinned Caucasoid Asiatics, not Negroids/Sub-Saharan Africans.
You're such a liar. The author clearly says they may be African negroes
[/QB]
Can the Ethiopian change his skin, can the panther change his spots?
Ethiopian and his leopard
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
lmao.. Since when is the "ZOndervan Bible Dictionary" any authority on the peoples of Africa? Look at the contradiction in their statement. They say Ham is progenitor of the "dark races" and then list Ethiopians who are dark, and whose name "Cush" means "black" in Hebrew. The "Bible Dictionary experts" cannot even grasp the contradiction in their own claims.
And here is what OTHER Bible dictionaries say about Ethiopians:
"They are frequently represented on Egyptian monuments, and they are all of the type of true negro. As might be expected, the history of this country is interwoven with that of Egypt." [/i]--Illustrated Bible dictionary, by MG Easton. ABE Books Reprint (ALso known as Easton Bible Dictionary)
Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
lol, indeed Lion. It seems that "Caucasoid "role models" engage in many deviant sex acts. This is not surprising. They show extensive homosexual and child molestation activity as well.
European "role models" at work
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ By your definition, that criminal/pervert is a tropical african.
Remember you claimed tropical africans are light skinned with blue eyes.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Black African men have a high crime rate for rape, regardless of what country they are in. 65 There is little punishment for rape in Africa and therefore, it would be maladaptive not to rape. It is a good reproductive strategy for a male who is unable to obtain a female any other way. 66 In a 2005 survey on “rape and sexual assault” in the United States, 67 37,460 white women were victims of blacks, but white-on-black rape was too low to show up in the statistics. 68 “What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.” 69 Between 2001 and 2003, there were, on average, 15,400 black-on-white rapes per year, while whites averaged only 900 white-on-black rapes per year, a black-white ratio of 17.1:1. (U.S. Department of Justice’s National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS)).
Blacks have the highest incidence of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), a consequence of their promiscuity and impulsiveness. Of the roughly 1 million people estimated to be living with HIV in the United States, 47% are African-American (CDC, 2005) and they were 56% of the newly diagnosed HIV cases in 2005. African Americans represent about 12.8% of the U.S. population (U.S. Census, 2005), but black men are diagnosed with HIV at more than seven times the rate of white men, and black women at 20 times the rate of white women. (Kalb, 2006; Hall, 2008).
Blacks have higher rates for other sexually transmitted diseases as well, which can also be attributed to their promiscuity and failure to practice safe sex (which requires anticipating future consequences of current acts). In 2006, the U.S. African American chlamydia rate was 8 times the white rate, the African American gonorrhea rate was 18 times the white rate; the black congenital syphilis rate in 2005 was 15.1 times the white rate. 37 About 40% of U.S. black adults have genital herpes, compared to 14% of whites. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Aug., 2006). Nearly half of black girls age 14 to 19 have at least one STD, compared to 20% for white girls. (CDC, 2003-2004 data).
Full chattel slavery (the buying and selling of people as though they were animals), either legally or tolerated, has been practiced by all three races against members of their own race and other races, 39 but it is practiced openly today only by Africans. 40 In the U.S. prior to 1865, some black slaves who had been freed even purchased their own black slaves. (Grooms, 1995, pp. 17-21; Robson, 2006; Koger, 1985). Had whites not purchased African slaves from Africans, the slaves would most likely have been slain and eaten because they were enemies and had little value unless they could be sold as slaves. Thus, being purchased by non-Africans was a successful reproductive “strategy” for African slaves
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
WHite rile models" lead in the crime of murder
While making up only about one-third of the world's population, Europeans have perpetrated around 90% of the world's genocides including not only 6 million Jews in WWII, but several million others includng Slavs, Poles, Russians etc. WHite hypocrites attempt to wriggle away from their criminal pattern by claiming that genocide is not a crime. But in fact it is, and has been so recognized by almost every major white Western nation and international law since 1948, under a CONSERVATIVE definition that specifically excludes mere political violence. It was European nations that established the definition. It is thus hilarious to see how European race proponents attempt to wriggle away from the bloody facts on the ground, perpetrated by Europeans, even allowing for the most conservative definition.
WHite role models lead in rape
QUOTE FROM ONE REPORT ON WHITE "ROLE MODELS"
"Women were raped on their death beds, pregnant women raped hours before they were due to give birth. Some women were raped by 30 men one after another and day after day."
A wave of rapes and sexual violence occurred in Central Europe in 1944–45, as the Western Allies and the Red Army battered their way into the Third Reich.[1] The majority of the assaults were committed in the Soviet occupation zone; estimates of the numbers of German women raped by Soviet soldiers range from the tens of thousands to 2 million.[2][3][4][5][6] In many cases women were the victims of repeated rapes, some as many as 60 to 70 times.[7] At least 100,000 women are believed to have been raped in Berlin, based on surging abortion rates in the following months and contemporary hospital reports,[4] with an estimated 10,000 women dying in the aftermath.[8] Female deaths in connection with the rapes in Germany, overall, are estimated at 240,000.[9][10] Antony Beevor describes it as the "greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history", and has concluded that at least 1.4 million women were raped in East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia alone.[11] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_during_the_occupation_of_Germany
Victim Recy Taylor.. Her house was firebombed by white role models for reporting her gang rape
Tens of thousands of white on black rapes occurred prior to the FBI investigations and civil rights protections of the 1960s, according to author Danielle McGuire. The horrific gang rape of Recy Taylor which many white newspapers declined to even report, is merely one example of white "role models" at work. WHite law enforcement authorities knew who the attackers were based on Taylor's description, but avoided doing an official police lineup, ensuring that Taylor would not be able to point them out in open court.
The white authorities claimed they had the men on bond, "pending trial", but court records show that they issued bond after Taylor's hearing, backdating their supposed "arrest." An all-white jury declined to indict the attackers, who did not even bother to show up in court.
Meanwhile, the black victim's house was firebombed by whites because she reported the rape.[/b]
German women break their silence on horrors of Red Army rapes Women raped by Red Army soldiers in postwar Germany have broken their silence for the first time following the release of a new film portraying the horrors.
By Allan Hall in Berlin
6:28PM BST 24 Oct 2008
Elderly victims have come forward to reveal the horrors of abuse committed by the Soviet soldiers.
The search to find their stories began as the film 'A Woman in Berlin' - which will be released in the UK early next year – opened to critical acclaim.
An estimated two million women faced savage, multiple attacks which would start with the spine-chilling words – 'Frau, Komm'.
The film is based on "Anonymous," an autobiographical account originally published by a German journalist and editor in the 1950s, describing her experiences between April and June 1945.
In one of the most moving passages in the diary, found in the rubble of Berlin, the victim wrote: "Shut your eyes, clench your teeth, don't utter a sound.
"But when the underwear is ripped apart with a tearing sound, the teeth grind involuntarily. I feel the fingers at my mouth, smell the reek of horses and tobacco. I open my eyes. Adroitly the fingers force my jaws apart.
"Eye looks into eye. Paralysis. Not disgust, just utter coldness. The spine seems to be frozen.
"Icy dizziness encircles the back of the head. I find myself floating and sinking deep down through the pillows, through the floor.
"Before leaving, he fishes something out of his pocket, throws it without a word on the table, pushes the chair away and slams the door behind him.
"What he has left turns out to be a crumpled pack of cigarettes. The fee."
Academics have begun recording the experiences of the victims while offering them comfort after staying silent for over sixty years.
Since Monday, nine survivors of the horrors visited upon them have begun speaking to researchers employed by Professor Phillipp Kuwert of Greifswald University.
"A systematic scientific processing of the trauma unleashed released by the rapes and the long-term silence over them is missing in our knowledge about them," he said.
In conjunction with the Cologne-based Medica Mondiale association which works with traumatised women, he hopes to interview hundreds of survivors for a lasting record of what occurred.
Most have hidden their agony and shame since those terrible days in 1945 when girls as young as seven and grandmothers as old as 90 were attacked by legions of drunken, depraved and diseased soldiers.
Women were raped on their death beds, pregnant women raped hours before they were due to give birth. Some women were raped by 30 men one after another and day after day.
"I can smell them now," said Ingeborg Bullert, now 83, but 20 when the soldiers came for her in her bomb cellar in Berlin.
Encouraged by the new project to record the testimony of victims before they die out, she has never before spoken of her ordeal.
"They smelled of horses and sweat and dirt. I smelled them before I heard their footfalls on the cellar steps, the cellar I thought I was so safe in...
"They were so young. One withdrew a wine bottle from his jacket, the other threw me to the ground. I was rigid from fear. And then they took me, one after the other, each holding a pistol in their hand.
"My mother asked me what had happened but I couldn't tell her. I didn't tell anyone, not until now. We all kept silent for too long."
Fear, shame and an overriding sense that there was little pity for them as members of the nation that started the bloodiest war in history contributed to their silent suffering.
Children raped and killed by white role models..
---------------------------
WHite role models lead in abortion
The highest rates of abortion in the world are among white women in Russia, where 2 babies are killed for each live birth according to scholars Loveless and Holman (2006). The website below offers a similar dismal picture, showing that 60% or more of white Russian women have abortions. http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/may/06051003.html
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: ^ what are white role models since you claimed white people, nor races exist.
Are you mentally ill?
You change your views too often. I can't keep up.
Do you believe race exists or not?
It's true race does not exist, I agree. But it's a social concept created by Europeans, remember?
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Are you dumb? There is no contradiction. They say that Ham is the progenitor of Cush. What is your beef with that?
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: lmao.. Since when is the "ZOndervan Bible Dictionary" any authority on the peoples of Africa? Look at the contradiction in their statement. They say Ham is progenitor of the "dark races" and then list Ethiopians who are dark, and whose name "Cush" means "black" in Hebrew. The "Bible Dictionary experts" cannot even grasp the contradiction in their own claims.
And here is what OTHER Bible dictionaries say about Ethiopians:
"They are frequently represented on Egyptian monuments, and they are all of the type of true negro. As might be expected, the history of this country is interwoven with that of Egypt." [/i]--Illustrated Bible dictionary, by MG Easton. ABE Books Reprint (ALso known as Easton Bible Dictionary)
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: Black African men have a high crime rate for rape, regardless of what country they are in. 65 There is little punishment for rape in Africa and therefore, it would be maladaptive not to rape. It is a good reproductive strategy for a male who is unable to obtain a female any other way. 66 In a 2005 survey on “rape and sexual assault” in the United States, 67 37,460 white women were victims of blacks, but white-on-black rape was too low to show up in the statistics. 68 “What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.” 69 Between 2001 and 2003, there were, on average, 15,400 black-on-white rapes per year, while whites averaged only 900 white-on-black rapes per year, a black-white ratio of 17.1:1. (U.S. Department of Justice’s National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS)).
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: Black African men have a high crime rate for rape, regardless of what country they are in. 65 There is little punishment for rape in Africa and therefore, it would be maladaptive not to rape. It is a good reproductive strategy for a male who is unable to obtain a female any other way. 66 In a 2005 survey on “rape and sexual assault” in the United States, 67 37,460 white women were victims of blacks, but white-on-black rape was too low to show up in the statistics. 68 “What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.” 69 Between 2001 and 2003, there were, on average, 15,400 black-on-white rapes per year, while whites averaged only 900 white-on-black rapes per year, a black-white ratio of 17.1:1. (U.S. Department of Justice’s National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS)).
I have seen these stats before, But do you actually believe this?lol
They suddenly seem to be continue and "steady" for a few years straight with a sudden peak, then a drop occurs all of a sudden.
I like to see the demographics. Such as where did these rapes take place. Locations, state, region of the state, environment and when, what time. Was it in locations of multi-ethnic environment or homogeneous "race"? All these questions remain unanswered by those stats.
A lot of what is known by the social scientist who do research on this, is that rapists usually know their victim (well) and that victims know the attacker. They also state that social status is absent and it can happen anywhere.
What is known by research is the amount of "fake rapports" by these white women. At least half of it is false. Like a historical obsession. I am not excluding any rape crime. But considering the vague claims and doubtful stats without the elaboration, it seems highly unlike to be true.
I also like to know the unknown or "other". They speak of?
What is other?
Where do all these black men come from, rape these white women year after year, 33.000 thousand per year, 2750 each month (roughly 3 thousand each month). "Are they the same men, is it a gang of rapists"...who is this group of men?
Does it happen in a club, workspace.... where?
I'm not trying to be sarcastic. Seriously, those stats say nothing about any of this, only assumption numbers.
They should be called the department of injustice. They do have a history.
"In 93% of assaults, the rapist and survivor are of the same race.
In 3.3% of sexual assault cases, black men raped white women, while in 3.4% of the cases, white men raped black women (Tjaden, 2006).
The myth of the black rapist is rooted to the racist history of our country."
White men or notorious known for child pornography and child abuse. Look at the sex-tourism at Thailand abusing little children having sex with them! Primitive! Disgusting! Is that wrong, I'll let you answer that...
Do you remember those white soldiers in Iraq raping Iraqi females, it was shown at CNN a while back? Was it wrong, I'll let you answer that...
And it was not a one time incident, it happened at other places as well. Look it up White boy!
Information and Resources: Sexual Assault - Myths & Facts
*Midland Rape Crisis and Children's Advocacy Center
The overwhelming majority of rapes involve persons of the same race or culture.
13. MYTH: MOST SEXUAL ASSAULTS INVOLVE A BLACK MAN RAPING A WHITE WOMAN.
Fact: In 93% of assaults, the rapist and victim are of the same race. In 3% of sexual assault cases black men did rape white women, while in 4% of the cases white men raped black women.
You mentioned "49 States" show me the demography of the black population in those states. What states are you actually referring at, how many black men live in those States? "All those other 49 States"? You do realize that some States barely have any black population or very marginal. Let alone plenty of black men to rape as many white women as is claimed.
So this opens the States with highly concentrated black / white populations. Which one are these? Why is there no mention of these States, and in these States?
**According to most estimates, 80% - 90% of rapes are not reported to police. Current trends project that 1 in 3 American women will be sexually assaulted at some point during her life.
Most commonly, the rapist is a 25 - 44-year-old man who plans his attack. He usually chooses a woman of the same race.
Those stats are FAKE and so ara YOU! Certainly considering the fact that it was during the Bush administration. Those stats are as real as the satellite images who supposed scanned the nuclear weapons in Iraq, and the fraudulent, fake, election he won. Also by the Bush administration.
But since you quoted from a book on eugenics I understand your position.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: Blacks have the highest incidence of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), a consequence of their promiscuity and impulsiveness. Of the roughly 1 million people estimated to be living with HIV in the United States, 47% are African-American (CDC, 2005) and they were 56% of the newly diagnosed HIV cases in 2005. African Americans represent about 12.8% of the U.S. population (U.S. Census, 2005), but black men are diagnosed with HIV at more than seven times the rate of white men, and black women at 20 times the rate of white women. (Kalb, 2006; Hall, 2008).
Read about your satanic actions. You know what, it's written in the ancient Hebriac scriptures. It was all prophesied.
An Apology 65 Years Late
Beginning in 1932, the federal government sponsored a study to examine the impact of syphilis involving black men. The experiment went on until 1972 without the test subjects' knowledge, but no President had apologized to the volunteers and their families until President Clinton did so today. Following a background report on the experiment, Charlayne Hunter-Gault looks at what the legacy of Tuskegee
Stephen B. Thomas is Associate Professor of Community Health at the Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University. He has written extensively on AIDS in the African-American community. In 1997, he represented Emory University at the Presidential Apology to survivors of the Syphilis Study at Tuskegee Institute. This is his first contribution to Body Positive.
The author wishes to acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Sandra Crouse Quinn, Associate Professor in the School of Public Health at the University of North Carolina, to the research that has informed his work on AIDS in the African-American community. Portions of this article were presented in another form at the 1999 National Conference on African-Americans and AIDS
In the 1940s, when Nazi doctors went on trial for experiments on humans, the world heard the term "research crime" for the first time. Most Americans believed such abuses could never happen here. On a hot day in July 1972, however, the national front-page news described an experiment sponsored by the U.S. government.
In fact, the two have a lot in common as you can see.
To Secretary Tommy Thompson, US Health and Human Services:
" It is only this review, at this time in history, do we stand our best opportunity to dismantle a man made biological monster, whose time has truly past. . .
Please use your considerable influence to hasten the review of the HIV antidotes listed in the U.S. Special Virus program (1948 – 1978)."
Again I am not surprised considering your eugenic supportive position.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Confirming Truth: Are you dumb? There is no contradiction. They say that Ham is the progenitor of Cush. What is your beef with that?
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: lmao.. Since when is the "ZOndervan Bible Dictionary" any authority on the peoples of Africa? Look at the contradiction in their statement. They say Ham is progenitor of the "dark races" and then list Ethiopians who are dark, and whose name "Cush" means "black" in Hebrew. The "Bible Dictionary experts" cannot even grasp the contradiction in their own claims.
And here is what OTHER Bible dictionaries say about Ethiopians:
"They are frequently represented on Egyptian monuments, and they are all of the type of true negro. As might be expected, the history of this country is interwoven with that of Egypt." [/i]--Illustrated Bible dictionary, by MG Easton. ABE Books Reprint (ALso known as Easton Bible Dictionary)
Yes you little devil. Ham was the progenitor, in fact there is a place in Chad from where this HAM roots. And this place still has a name references. Ancient Egyptians use to go back to that specific place to do certain rituals.
Tell your lord and master tarnos, that I know.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: Full chattel slavery (the buying and selling of people as though they were animals), either legally or tolerated, has been practiced by all three races against members of their own race and other races, 39 but it is practiced openly today only by Africans. 40 In the U.S. prior to 1865, some black slaves who had been freed even purchased their own black slaves. (Grooms, 1995, pp. 17-21; Robson, 2006; Koger, 1985).
Well devil, the reason why they did purchased their own people, is because they could offer them a better prospect this way. And getting them off the brutal actions, they had to endure.
It was a smart move, by these blacks.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic