quote: Synopsis: This video demonstrates how interracial relationships are purposed toward the genocide of African people. It relates the newest trend of African women marrying European men, as advanced by the general media culture which has powerful African women marrying European men. It then relates the example of Brazil and how a U.S. President was informed that tactically integration will exterminate the Black problem as was done in Brazil. It then shows a clip of the film named “Rabbit Proof Fence” where a White man details the extermination of the African people of Australia through miscegeny. Later it speaks about how White people hate Black women and integration is an expression thereof: partly by extermination by genetics and party because Mulattoes are hostile to Africans. It goes on, but eventually the lesson comes through: “Integration is the key element in the destruction of Black civilization.”
MARCUS GARVEY:
"The "colored" group has scientifically arranged their method of propaganda. In America and the colonies, they hold out certain baits and hopes to the educated and financially prosperous men of the darker groups; such as encouraging them to marry the very lightest element of their women, and adopting them into their society. These darker men, for the special privilege and "honor" are used as active propagandists to deceive the great mass of dark people so that they would not suspect the motive or the design of the "colored" element. Generally the darker men who marry the very lightest "colored" women, who sometimes pass off as white, become more hostile to their kind in the mass as well as by individual contact than the very leaders, as the leaders are generally careful not to attract or arouse suspicion of their motive. The majority of the "colored" leaders who seek after white women and the darker men who marry very light "colored" women, are seldom on social terms with their own mothers if they are dark. If they have their mothers in their homes, which is generally never so, they hide them away either in the kitchen or a back room where they do not come in contact with either their light "colored" or white guests. Sometimes a mother is referred to, if seen, as one of the servants."
quote: Here's a European man (In Garvey's "Philosophies and Opinions" no less):
In an editorial dated March 29, 1923, the Abantu-Batho of Johannesburg states among other things: "The Cape colored people have been promised absorption by politicians, particularly those of the Dutch race. . . . Indeed we are suspicious that all this talk about absorption is a political trap which has been set to capture the colored vote in the Cape. It is the business of the politician to strengthen his position by getting as many supporters as possible. To do this, he must, of necessity, be diplomatic. That is to say, he must know how to get around the people, and the only way to get around the people is to put before them a beautiful picture of what one intends to do. There can be no doubt that to the Cape colored people the idea of their absorption by the white race presents a beautiful ideal for the attainment of which they are prepared to sacrifice everything. They cannot be blamed for this. As a distinct community they have no past, no traditions, no laws, and no language which things constitute the pride of every race of mankind. These sons of Hagar are in an awkward position. They despise the people of Hagar, because Hagar's people are despised by the people of Abraham. They are suffering because of the gulf that exists between their mothers' people and those of their fathers. . . . The difference between the treatment meted out to the colored people and the Africans does not in any way signify that the whites have more consideration for the colored people. It will be remembered that when Lord Selborne left this country in 1909, he warned the white people of South Africa against putting the Cape colored people in the same category as Africans because that would unite the two sections of the African peoples to fight for their common rights. Since then the policy has been to differentiate in the treatment of the two sections so as to make combined action impossible. Thus it is not saying too much to aver that the real object of the white race is to make the Cape colored people a buffer between the Africans and Europeans. As a buffer, the Cape colored people can never have the same rights as whites. Now the question is: What are they to do? Will they be satisfied with a position of this kind? Or will they follow the lead of our cousins in America and classify themselves as Africans? In our opinion this is the only way to the salvation of the Cape colored people. They are Africans and not Europeans. And the sooner they realize it the better."
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
This is exactly the irony. Too much black hatred kept black people 'black' in the U.S. In the much more devious Brazil, after slavery they burnt all the documents pertaining to slavery, brought in million of European immigrants and encouraged them to marry black women while at the same time discouraging black men from taking white women. Today 28% of 'White' Brazilians carry African mtDNA compare to 2% that only carry African Y-DNA. 50% of 'Black' Brazilians carry European YDNA compare to 48% with African YDNA. Autosomal studies has European ancestry at nearly 80%. This means Brazil is becoming 'whiter' and not 'browner.' Add the fact that Europeans continue to flock into Brazil because Brazil has a no visa policy with almost all European countries compare to only Angola and South Africa in Africa.
U.S is now waking up to the same tactics. We can see that the continue destruction of the black family is not without purpose. We must stop being naive.
Posts: 314 | From: Home | Registered: Apr 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
This is exactly the irony. Too much black hatred kept black people 'black' in the U.S. In the much more devious Brazil, after slavery they burnt all the documents pertaining to slavery, brought in million of European immigrants and encouraged them to marry black women while at the same time discouraging black men from taking white women. Today 28% of 'White' Brazilians carry African mtDNA compare to 2% that only carry African Y-DNA. 50% of 'Black' Brazilians carry European YDNA compare to 48% with African YDNA. Autosomal studies has European ancestry at nearly 80%. This means Brazil is becoming 'whiter' and not 'browner.' Add the fact that Europeans continue to flock into Brazil because Brazil has a no visa policy with almost all European countries compare to only Angola and South Africa in Africa.
Of course. But the Brazilian example doesn't show "genocide" but the triumph of whiteness. MOre people want to be identified as "white" as part of a move up the social scale. Those who hold the reigns of power and wealth in Brazil want to keep it so. However, black folk in Brazil ain't going anywhere soon.
U.S is now waking up to the same tactics. We can see that the continue destruction of the black family is not without purpose. We must stop being naive.
Here is where your otherwise reasonable comment breaks down. The above has nothing to do with the alleged "destruction of the black family." If your claim is an attempt to allege the decline of the black family to so-called "interracial relationships" is is pure, unadulterated bullshiit. IR hookups as shown below, are trivial- trivial in the past, and relatively trivial now. The black family always had a tough road to walk, and never enjoyed "Leave It To BEaver" perfection. But until the mid 1960s it was holding the line, especially compared with the disastrous breakdowns what would come later. As late as 1965 for example, out-of-wedlock births among blacks were less than 20%, better than today's whites, and better than today's white Nordic "role models" in places like Sweden, Denmark, etc. As far as marriage for a period of 50 years, every census between 1890 and 1950 shows that black folk posted HIGHER marriage rates than whites (SOwell 1981, 2004). COmpare this to the dismal situation today.
Trivial IR unions did not cause the reversal of a previously positive trend. Something happened in the 1960s that caused decline. Some blame the liberal welfare state. Others argue that family breakdown is nothing special among rural people being urbanized, and can be seen among the white IRish as well (Sowell 1983). Serious students of the issue aren't grasping at such dubious straws as "chump change" IR unions.
quote: Synopsis: This video demonstrates how interracial relationships are purposed toward the genocide of African people. It relates the newest trend of African women marrying European men, as advanced by the general media culture which has powerful African women marrying European men. It then relates the example of Brazil and how a U.S. President was informed that tactically integration will exterminate the Black problem as was done in Brazil. It then shows a clip of the film named “Rabbit Proof Fence” where a White man details the extermination of the African people of Australia through miscegeny. Later it speaks about how White people hate Black women and integration is an expression thereof: partly by extermination by genetics and party because Mulattoes are hostile to Africans. It goes on, but eventually the lesson comes through: “Integration is the key element in the destruction of Black civilization.”
Dubious. There is no big "trend" of black women marrying European men leading to "genocide." What a bunch of malarkey. Sheesh.. can;t we do better than this nonsense?
WHat the statistics show is this:
1- A SMALL NUMBER of black women, less than 5% of the black population (whoooo... genocide numbers there y'all) are increasingly marrying "out" of the group
2-- Black male- white female IR marriages, previously the dominant IR pattern is undergoing a more balanced pattern with more black women "stepping out."
3-- There are an increasing number of biracial children and persons as a result of these unions, challenging America's little racial checkbox format.
4-- Despite the above, black-white IR numbers are STILL TRIVIAL. Black-white IR marriage make up LESS THAN 1 % of all marriages. They are chump change in the large scheme of things. The main IR marriage action is between Asian women-white men, and a more mixed Hispanic-WHite pattern. And IR unions as far as the black community is concerned weigh in at a less than 10%, hardly "genocidal" speed.
In sum, despite all the drama, Black folk ain't disappearing anytime soon, nor are black women going anywhere fast for the next few centuries at current rates. There is no and will be no big number of black women "headed for the exits" because (a) there is immensely strong white female competition for the pool of available white men and (b) black women are not all that impressed by available white male offerings out there to begin with. They do however, deserve the right to choose or not to choose to pursue "outside" relationships, dubious "genocide" claims notwithstanding.
At the most, if at all at current rates, a substantial number, maybe a majority of blacks will become more "mixed" in a century or two. The gubment will tally up mo people under its "biracial" check box categories, but that's about it. Even if Americ moves more to a "Rationalization" model, in America's popular societal race checkbox or "one drop model, the "mixed" may still remain "black."
Data from: --Kennedy Randall, 2000. Interracial Intimacies --Sowell, Thomas. Ethnic America, 1981. Econ and Politics of Race 1983. Black Rednecks 2005.
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
^^^ I agree, some folks want to play the white man better than he plays himself. Black people esp. black women in the U.S have the lowest I.R statistics. and besides People can marry and date who the f-k they want its none of your beeswax.
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
If it wasn't for the Hyksos teaching the Egyptians chariot warfare they never would have made it to the New Kingdom, real talk
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: If it wasn't for the Hyksos teaching the Egyptians chariot warfare they never would have made it to the New Kingdom, real talk
speculation and stupidity, but nothing less is to be expected from you. We have pictures in the Sahara that are much older than even the kingdom of Kmt which show blacks riding Chariots. So I don't think it took some barbarian force to show Kmt anything.The only thing the Hyksos did was give the ancient empire the driving force to subdue the savage middle east, create a empire and protect their boarders.
Posts: 1296 | From: the planet | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: If it wasn't for the Hyksos teaching the Egyptians chariot warfare they never would have made it to the New Kingdom, real talk
speculation and stupidity, but nothing less is to be expected from you. We have pictures in the Sahara that are much older than even the kingdom of Kmt which show blacks riding Chariots. So I don't think it took some barbarian force to show Kmt anything.The only thing the Hyksos did was give the ancient empire the driving force to subdue the savage middle east, create a empire and protect their boarders.
These Libyan rock art pictures have different time periods beginning in 10,000 BC . The chariots are from ta later period the Garamantian Period 2000 - 1200 BC (a Berber culture that died out). This period of the rock art is also called "the Horse period". Horses were not indigenous to Africa. However it was not the Garamantians that intoduced the chariot into Egyptian warfare, it was the Hyksos around 1500 BC.
typeZeiss, what do you think of all these Americans crying about integration yet will not move to a majority black country? Seems like blowing hot air to me
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: If it wasn't for the Hyksos teaching the Egyptians chariot warfare they never would have made it to the New Kingdom, real talk
speculation and stupidity, but nothing less is to be expected from you. We have pictures in the Sahara that are much older than even the kingdom of Kmt which show blacks riding Chariots. So I don't think it took some barbarian force to show Kmt anything.The only thing the Hyksos did was give the ancient empire the driving force to subdue the savage middle east, create a empire and protect their boarders.
These Libyan rock art pictures have different time periods beginning in 10,000 BC . The chariots are from ta later period the Garamantian Period 2000 - 1200 BC (a Berber culture that died out). This period of the rock art is also called "the Horse period". Horses were not indigenous to Africa. However it was not the Garamantians that intoduced the chariot into Egyptian warfare, it was the Hyksos around 1500 BC.
typeZeiss, what do you think of all these Americans crying about integration yet will not move to a majority black country? Seems like blowing hot air to me
berbers prior to 1500 bc :S lol Sweetie if the rock art was there around 2,000 B.C. and hyksos are around 1600 B.C. do you see the problem with your flawed logic? As I have said many times, you are foolish person. 1. The rock art in places like Jabal 3ywanat show BLACK people. There are no whites on those walls. It is a black man on those chariots. Your logic again is flawed. Do not rely on the internet, you will only expose your ignorance. Do real research. As to the rest of your question, its foolish and I don't waist my time on conversations that amount to little more than mental masterbation (i.e. might feel good but produces nothing)
Posts: 1296 | From: the planet | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
... these Americans crying about integration yet will not move to a majority black country? Seems like blowing hot air to me
I am sure you are referring just to who you are referring to: "Americans crying about integration" no?....as I am sure you do real-eyes that Marcus Garvey was not Amerikkkan and he came from a majority black country as you put it...just as I am not and I do lol....
yuh reeeeeealllllllyyyyyyy think seh when I retire, Amerikkka is where I will be? Best know I forward HOME as often as possible....
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: This is exactly the irony. Too much black hatred kept black people 'black' in the U.S. In the much more devious Brazil, after slavery they burnt all the documents pertaining to slavery, brought in million of European immigrants and encouraged them to marry black women while at the same time discouraging black men from taking white women. Today 28% of 'White' Brazilians carry African mtDNA compare to 2% that only carry African Y-DNA. 50% of 'Black' Brazilians carry European YDNA compare to 48% with African YDNA. Autosomal studies has European ancestry at nearly 80%. This means Brazil is becoming 'whiter' and not 'browner.' Add the fact that Europeans continue to flock into Brazil because Brazil has a no visa policy with almost all European countries compare to only Angola and South Africa in Africa.
Of course. But the Brazilian example doesn't show "genocide" but the triumph of whiteness. MOre people want to be identified as "white" as part of a move up the social scale. Those who hold the reigns of power and wealth in Brazil want to keep it so. However, black folk in Brazil ain't going anywhere soon.
U.S is now waking up to the same tactics. We can see that the continue destruction of the black family is not without purpose. We must stop being naive.
Here is where your otherwise reasonable comment breaks down. The above has nothing to do with the alleged "destruction of the black family." If your claim is an attempt to allege the decline of the black family to so-called "interracial relationships" is is pure, unadulterated bullshiit. IR hookups as shown below, are trivial- trivial in the past, and relatively trivial now. The black family always had a tough road to walk, and never enjoyed "Leave It To BEaver" perfection. But until the mid 1960s it was holding the line, especially compared with the disastrous breakdowns what would come later. As late as 1965 for example, out-of-wedlock births among blacks were less than 20%, better than today's whites, and better than today's white Nordic "role models" in places like Sweden, Denmark, etc. As far as marriage for a period of 50 years, every census between 1890 and 1950 shows that black folk posted HIGHER marriage rates than whites (SOwell 1981, 2004). COmpare this to the dismal situation today.
Trivial IR unions did not cause the reversal of a previously positive trend. Something happened in the 1960s that caused decline. Some blame the liberal welfare state. Others argue that family breakdown is nothing special among rural people being urbanized, and can be seen among the white IRish as well (Sowell 1983). Serious students of the issue aren't grasping at such dubious straws as "chump change" IR unions.
quote: Synopsis: This video demonstrates how interracial relationships are purposed toward the genocide of African people. It relates the newest trend of African women marrying European men, as advanced by the general media culture which has powerful African women marrying European men. It then relates the example of Brazil and how a U.S. President was informed that tactically integration will exterminate the Black problem as was done in Brazil. It then shows a clip of the film named “Rabbit Proof Fence” where a White man details the extermination of the African people of Australia through miscegeny. Later it speaks about how White people hate Black women and integration is an expression thereof: partly by extermination by genetics and party because Mulattoes are hostile to Africans. It goes on, but eventually the lesson comes through: “Integration is the key element in the destruction of Black civilization.”
Dubious. There is no big "trend" of black women marrying European men leading to "genocide." What a bunch of malarkey. Sheesh.. can;t we do better than this nonsense?
WHat the statistics show is this:
1- A SMALL NUMBER of black women, less than 5% of the black population (whoooo... genocide numbers there y'all) are increasingly marrying "out" of the group
2-- Black male- white female IR marriages, previously the dominant IR pattern is undergoing a more balanced pattern with more black women "stepping out."
3-- There are an increasing number of biracial children and persons as a result of these unions, challenging America's little racial checkbox format.
4-- Despite the above, black-white IR numbers are STILL TRIVIAL. Black-white IR marriage make up LESS THAN 1 % of all marriages. They are chump change in the large scheme of things. The main IR marriage action is between Asian women-white men, and a more mixed Hispanic-WHite pattern. And IR unions as far as the black community is concerned weigh in at a less than 10%, hardly "genocidal" speed.
In sum, despite all the drama, Black folk ain't disappearing anytime soon, nor are black women going anywhere fast for the next few centuries at current rates. There is no and will be no big number of black women "headed for the exits" because (a) there is immensely strong white female competition for the pool of available white men and (b) black women are not all that impressed by available white male offerings out there to begin with. They do however, deserve the right to choose or not to choose to pursue "outside" relationships, dubious "genocide" claims notwithstanding.
At the most, if at all at current rates, a substantial number, maybe a majority of blacks will become more "mixed" in a century or two. The gubment will tally up mo people under its "biracial" check box categories, but that's about it. Even if Americ moves more to a "Rationalization" model, in America's popular societal race checkbox or "one drop model, the "mixed" may still remain "black."
Data from: --Kennedy Randall, 2000. Interracial Intimacies --Sowell, Thomas. Ethnic America, 1981. Econ and Politics of Race 1983. Black Rednecks 2005.
I think you are missing the point, which is that Europeans have openly stated their intentions and put in place policies to promote race mixing as a way of diluting and eventually destroying the black population in Brazil. This can not and should not be downplayed at all. Blacks in Brazil are catching hell at the bottom of the social and economic totem pole and are only tolerated at best because of their cultural traditions but in all honesty those whites who brought them there see them as a unnecessary by product of colonization and wealth building for whites. You can not exist and survive in a culture and society that openly or secretly continually plots your destruction. Trying to pretend that this is not the case even when presented with the facts is ridiculous.
Note, I understand your response, but I only commented because I believe the main point can not and should not be diminished, which is that white supremacy still exists and still has an agenda to destroy black folks, which has not changed one bit. Only the tactics have changed. One of the key features of colonization is the forced movement of labor to suit the whims of the European colonial elites and it is precisely that system of population control that has caused the elimination of native black populations all over the globe. In America they have simply opened the gates for the Mexicans and other persons of mixed European/Native American descent to flood the country to stack the odds against blacks. Brazil is already a country with mixed European/Native and African populations, so they use European immigration instead of "native American" integration because in reality they want European blood to wipe out both native and black bloodlines. This policy of immigration and population control has devastated black folks yet some people have still not understood it for what it is. Many black populations in South Asia and the pacific have been decimated within the span of 100 years because of exactly these sorts of policies. The French did it in Laos. The British in Burma, the Spanish in the Philippines and the Dutch in Indonesia. This is why there are no full blood native Hawaiians in Hawaii. So these sorts of things should not be underestimated.
And then you got some clowns who think this is good because they can get some "latin draws" or "asian draws" and "white draws" not realizing that this is exactly the desired response..... Anything but building healthy and constructive relationships between black men and women which would reduce the abortion rate, reduce out of wedlock births and produce strong, stable and prosperous families. Now I am not saying that people shouldn't be free to have relationships outside of the race. What I am saying is that the black community is in crisis because of a lack of stable relationships between black men and women. Dating outside of the race is no substitute for stable relationships. The only way the black population will survive is through strong relationships between black men and women. Anything that deviates from building strong relationships between black men and women only leads to the destruction of the black race as only a black man and woman can produce black people.
None of these other populations are in jeopardy from race mixing because they in most cases have numeric superiority within their countries and because they have strong family bonds and cultural ties along with healthy and strong relationships, not to mention the social and economic power that comes from those family bonds and cultural ties. However, it is the black population as a whole that lacks these things across the board and that is a principle reason why they continue to suffer. And it is exactly that suffering and dysfunction that the system promotes. And in reality what is happening now is a spread of dysfunction within mix raced relationships, which really hasn't solved anything and only makes things worse. Having sex and engaging in relationships for the wrong reasons no matter whether within or without your "race" only leads to disaster. As an example, some folks date outside the race because they believe that will improve the odds for their relationship or socio-economic status.... And in most cases that is wrong. No black person has attained power, real power, through mixed race relationships. None. You attain power and wealth through strong communities and bonds within that community based on a strong sense of identity from shared experience, history and culture and the ability to communicate, nurture and protect that identity and culture.
A lecture by Bobby Hemmitt which touches on the same thing.
And to reinforce what is discussed in these videos, note the new movie called "Joyful Noise" about gospel music, which is a uniquely black cultural experience, featuring almost all black CHoirs, yet they find a way to fit in an interracial relationship. That is nonsensical.
The last film I know of to address black sexuality openly was "Shes Gotta Have it" even though it does also promote stereotypes in a sense...
Posts: 8896 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Doug M: I think you are missing the point, which is that Europeans have openly stated their intentions and put in place policies to promote race mixing as a way of diluting and eventually destroying the black population in Brazil. This can not and should not be downplayed at all. Blacks in Brazil are catching hell at the bottom of the social and economic totem pole and are only tolerated at best because of their cultural traditions but in all honesty those whites who brought them there see them as a unnecessary by product of colonization and wealth building for whites. You can not exist and survive in a culture and society that openly or secretly continually plots your destruction. Trying to pretend that this is not the case even when presented with the facts is ridiculous.
Note, I understand your response, but I only commented because I believe the main point can not and should not be diminished, which is that white supremacy still exists and still has an agenda to destroy black folks, which has not changed one bit. Only the tactics have changed. One of the key features of colonization is the forced movement of labor to suit the whims of the European colonial elites and it is precisely that system of population control that has caused the elimination of native black populations all over the globe. In America they have simply opened the gates for the Mexicans and other persons of mixed European/Native American descent to flood the country to stack the odds against blacks. Brazil is already a country with mixed European/Native and African populations, so they use European immigration instead of "native American" integration because in reality they want European blood to wipe out both native and black bloodlines. This policy of immigration and population control has devastated black folks yet some people have still not understood it for what it is. Many black populations in South Asia and the pacific have been decimated within the span of 100 years because of exactly these sorts of policies. The French did it in Laos. The British in Burma, the Spanish in the Philippines and the Dutch in Indonesia. This is why there are no full blood native Hawaiians in Hawaii. So these sorts of things should not be underestimated.
And then you got some clowns who think this is good because they can get some "latin draws" or "asian draws" and "white draws" not realizing that this is exactly the desired response..... Anything but building healthy and constructive relationships between black men and women which would reduce the abortion rate, reduce out of wedlock births and produce strong, stable and prosperous families. Now I am not saying that people shouldn't be free to have relationships outside of the race. What I am saying is that the black community is in crisis because of a lack of stable relationships between black men and women. Dating outside of the race is no substitute for stable relationships. The only way the black population will survive is through strong relationships between black men and women. Anything that deviates from building strong relationships between black men and women only leads to the destruction of the black race as only a black man and woman can produce black people.
None of these other populations are in jeopardy from race mixing because they in most cases have numeric superiority within their countries and because they have strong family bonds and cultural ties along with healthy and strong relationships, not to mention the social and economic power that comes from those family bonds and cultural ties. However, it is the black population as a whole that lacks these things across the board and that is a principle reason why they continue to suffer. And it is exactly that suffering and dysfunction that the system promotes. And in reality what is happening now is a spread of dysfunction within mix raced relationships, which really hasn't solved anything and only makes things worse. Having sex and engaging in relationships for the wrong reasons no matter whether within or without your "race" only leads to disaster. As an example, some folks date outside the race because they believe that will improve the odds for their relationship or socio-economic status.... And in most cases that is wrong. No black person has attained power, real power, through mixed race relationships. None. You attain power and wealth through strong communities and bonds within that community based on a strong sense of identity from shared experience, history and culture and the ability to communicate, nurture and protect that identity and culture.
A lecture by Bobby Hemmitt which touches on the same thing.
And to reinforce what is discussed in these videos, note the new movie called "A Joyful Noise" about gospel music, which is a uniquely black cultural experience, featuring almost all black CHoirs, yet they find a way to fit in an interracial relationship. That is nonsensical.
The last film I know of to address black sexuality openly was "Shes Gotta Have it" even though it does also promote stereotypes in a sense...
SEET DEH....EXACTLY....
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
I agree and disagree at the same time destruction of blacks through integration is a fleeting fantasy and has largely to do with who controls the economics and levers to power lets take Brazil for instance, it used to be that a man like Lula De Silva would just be content with what passes for white in Brazil,he along with Chavez have long declared themselves blackmen,well one might say these are politicians who will say anything to get themselves elected but that would mean that they would have to go through the process of dewytifing themselves to get power,now this is after centuries of white supremacy indoctrination and of late not 20 or 40 yrs ago but today.. populations in Latin American countries are reconnecting to their blackness see the documentary Black in Latin America..now this is not to say that there is no problem,for more damaging is cultural imperialism where one can be black but had the African stomped out of them the more extreme cases come in the form of religion,the situation with the government in North Sudan comes to mind where you can be black all you want but your cultural orientation must be Arab not African,It is an extremely difficult task to break free of cultural imperialism masked as religion.
Posts: 6546 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TruthAndRights: Marcus Garvey was not Amerikkkan and he came from a majority black country as you put it...just as I am not and I do lol....
yuh reeeeeealllllllyyyyyyy think seh when I retire, Amerikkka is where I will be? Best know I forward HOME as often as possible.... [/QB]
why have you chosen to live in babylon until you grow old?
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well such policies wont have an immediate impact. These things are designed to occur over time. Looking at the U.S. it is forecasted that the black population will not increase by very much in 50 years time, meanwhile Asian and Latin populations will swell greatly. So this means you go from a large blot in a bowl of milk to a small pea size spot to a tiny dot to nothing at all. And similar things are happening elsewhere in the Americas.
The important things are: 1) The blacks have no power to control immigration policies 2) These policies often promote European immigration but restrict immigration from majority black countries 3) Blacks have little control over the social and economic system and 4) are at the bottom of the totem pole because of the history of racist acts by the European ruling classes.
None of that in any way should make one comfortable with the present situation and only guarantees more problems down the road.
Posts: 8896 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TruthAndRights: Marcus Garvey was not Amerikkkan and he came from a majority black country as you put it...just as I am not and I do lol....
yuh reeeeeealllllllyyyyyyy think seh when I retire, Amerikkka is where I will be? Best know I forward HOME as often as possible....
why have you chosen to live in babylon until you grow old? [/QB]
I have family both here and JA....I was brought to the U.S. when I was younger I didn't want to come here lol...and I deliberately have not obtained U.S. citizenship because I don't care to have it...but the opportunities are here and I am here already so why be eediat and not tek said opportunities as I said, I forward home often during the year...I have property in JA to go home to....where I can both visit and live when mi ready...
You don't know how much people come to the U.S. simply to take the opportunities here and pimp money from it, then return to their homeland to retire?
FYI, I will say this to you....it's funny how school-age Jcans come to the U.S, and when we are enrolled in school they always enroll us a grade behind...but yet, lol...nuff of your high school stuff taught in the U.S., and then some lol, we learned in primary school already back in JA and so we are actually ahead of the students we are placed back with smh....
Back on topic please and thanks....
quote: Well such policies wont have an immediate impact. These things are designed to occur over time. Looking at the U.S. it is forecasted that the black population will not increase by very much in 50 years time, meanwhile Asian and Latin populations will swell greatly. So this means you go from a large blot in a bowl of milk to a small pea size spot to a tiny dot to nothing at all. And similar things are happening elsewhere in the Americas.
The important things are: 1) The blacks have no power to control immigration policies 2) These policies often promote European immigration but restrict immigration from majority black countries 3) Blacks have little control over the social and economic system and 4) are at the bottom of the totem pole because of the history of racist acts by the European ruling classes.
None of that in any way should make one comfortable with the present situation and only guarantees more problems down the road.
quote: It is an extremely difficult task to break free of cultural imperialism masked as religion.
INDEED....Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TruthAndRights: Marcus Garvey was not Amerikkkan and he came from a majority black country as you put it...just as I am not and I do lol....
yuh reeeeeealllllllyyyyyyy think seh when I retire, Amerikkka is where I will be? Best know I forward HOME as often as possible....
why have you chosen to live in babylon until you grow old?
the opportunities are here
stop selling out for "oppoutunites" (money) we need you in Africa, not paying Uncle Sam taxes and working for the man's economy. Stand up my sistah, leave the belly of the beast
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TruthAndRights: Marcus Garvey was not Amerikkkan and he came from a majority black country as you put it...just as I am not and I do lol....
yuh reeeeeealllllllyyyyyyy think seh when I retire, Amerikkka is where I will be? Best know I forward HOME as often as possible....
why have you chosen to live in babylon until you grow old?
the opportunities are here
stop selling out for "oppoutunites" (money) we need you in Africa, not paying Uncle Sam taxes and working for the man's economy. Stand up my sistah, leave the belly of the beast
Chat bout 'sell out'...
Yuh sound eediat as nuff round 'ere seh yuh are (personally, I doan think seh yuh suh dumb as suh many 'ere think you are...you know EXACTLY what you be doing more time, I think....)
kmt Best yuh guh one side and lo me and stick to the thread topic cah yuh ah bait up yuhself right yah now and soon ripe fe di tracing....
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
Synopsis: This video demonstrates how interracial relationships are purposed toward the genocide of African people. It relates the newest trend of African women marrying European men
quote:Originally posted by Truthcentric:
Racists on all sides may rant about it, but true multiculturalism, without all the residential segregation and prejudice, is my idea of a perfect society. I am an ardent integrationist and am angry that America hasn't been as committed to integration as it should be.
.
T&R, in theory would you do Truthcentric? he seems to have his mind right.
Also, have you ever sampled white meat? be honest
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Synopsis: This video demonstrates how interracial relationships are purposed toward the genocide of African people. It relates the newest trend of African women marrying European men
Negroid genes are not recessive, so they will never disappear. It is only the white race which has distinct genes which provide us with a unique phenotype - pale skin, fair hair and light eyes which are traits across the world universally admired. Black people don't have them.
I don't think anyone would even care if the negroid phenotype went extinct. People don't regard black afros or 'nappy' hair, wide noses and dark skin (typical negroid traits) as attractive. I highly doubt they will be missed. Black woman don't even want these natural negroid features hence they artifically straighten their hair.
The world though would miss white blondes and redheads and blue or green eyes. White people are the only people who bring the world diversity. These traits are universally admired, even in Japan or isolated parts of south america. They are worth preserving. Who in contrast cares if nappy hair or wide noses go extinct?
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
SEET DEH....EXACTLY....
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
as I said, I forward home often during the year...I have property in JA to go home to....where I can both visit and live when mi ready...![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Mad]](mad.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic