posted
evolution sounds like those eyes would be better for everyone tho thats not true. Its a trait that could be good adaptation to some environments but not all tho is what im sayin. Cause they say he can see in dark very good but got trouble in normal daylight.
Posts: 2508 | From: . | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Oshun: evolution sounds like those eyes would be better for everyone tho thats not true. Its a trait that could be good adaptation to some environments but not all tho is what im sayin. Cause they say he can see in dark very good but got trouble in normal daylight.
posted
Brilliant find. I've been saying this for years.
Blue, gray or green eyes transmit more light, hence it is easier to see in the dark.
According to ancient sources the Roman emperor Tiberius, who had blue eyes, could distinguish objects in the pitch black when he woke up a night (HN. xi. 37; Suet. Tib. 68; Sext. Emp. Pyr. i. 14. 84). I wrote a short essay on this a while back.
Yes certainly light eyes are superior. They are most prevalent among Caucasoids, esp in northern europe, but are not unheard of in Mongoloids.
Posts: 1575 | From: - | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Crush Black Lies: He can still see in the daylight.
I said he had trouble not that hes blind. It say in bright sunlight he squints and has complained bout blurry vision. Everyone else saw normal. Thats what the man said at around 1:30-40. Its not superior in EVERY situation but mainly in the dark.
Posts: 2508 | From: . | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Piss Pot: Brilliant find. I've been saying this for years.
Blue, gray or green eyes transmit more light, hence it is easier to see in the dark.
According to ancient sources the Roman emperor Tiberius, who had blue eyes, could distinguish objects in the pitch black when he woke up a night (HN. xi. 37; Suet. Tib. 68; Sext. Emp. Pyr. i. 14. 84). I wrote a short essay on this a while back.
Yes certainly light eyes are superior. They are most prevalent among Caucasoids, esp in northern europe, but are not unheard of in Mongoloids.
Kaamos alkoi Utsjoella
Kaamos on alkanut Utsjoella. Lauantai on talven ensimmäinen päivä, kun aurinko ei näyttäydy siellä ollenkaan. Ilmatieteen laitoksen mukaan aurinko nousee horisontin takaa seuraavan kerran ensi vuoden puolella 16. tammikuuta. Kaamosaika on alkanut poikkeuksellisissa pakkaslukemissa.
Samaan aikaan Helsingissä päivä on yhä noin seitsemän tunnin mittainen. Sodankylän korkeudella kaamos kestää vain muutaman päivän ennen jouluaattoa, jolloin aurinko jälleen nousee.
Kaamoksen raja on napapiirillä, missä kaamos kestää yhden päivän eli talvipäivänseisauksen.
Napapiirin tuntumassa aurinko tosin näyttäytyy myös kaamosaikana, sillä ilmakehä taittaa valoa ja nostaa auringon lähellä napapiiriä taivaanrannan yläpuolelle.
Poikkeuksellisen kylmää
Kaamosaika on alkanut harvinaisen purevassa pakkasessa. Ylen meteorologin Matti Huutosen mukaan maassa on jopa 15 astetta kylmempää kuin tavallisesti marraskuun lopussa.
- Tuuli on edelleen pohjoisen puolelta ja pakkanen paukkuu koko maassa, Huutonen kertoi Aamu-tv:ssä lähipäivien säästä.
Jo Keski-Suomen korkeudella pakkanen voi kiristyä ensi yönä 20 asteen tienoille.
Tulevasta talvesta on otaksuttu vuosituhannen pahinta, mutta Huutosen mukaan jää nähtäväksi, tuleeko talvesta edellisvuotista kylmempää.
- Viime talvi oli jo aika ankara. Aikamoinen pitää tämän talven siihen verrattuna olla.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2011 Sep;27(6):609-13. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.1214.
Blue eyes as a risk factor for type 1 diabetes.
Di Stasio E, Maggi D, Berardesca E, Marulli GC, Bizzarri C, Lauria A, Portuesi R, Cavallo MG, Costantino F, Buzzetti R, Astorri E, Pitocco D, Songini M, Pozzilli P; IMDIAB Group. Collaborators (41)
Source
Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, Catholic University of Sacred Hearth, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
A high frequency of blue eyes and fair skin are reported in northern European Caucasians with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Also there is an inverse relationship between latitude and T1D incidence. We determined whether iris colour and skin pigmentation are risk factors in a Caucasian population living in two Mediterranean regions located at the same latitude with higher ultraviolet B irradiance, but with different T1D incidence.
METHODS:
We studied iris colour in 281 consecutive subjects with T1D and 298 controls. Skin type was evaluated by melanin quantification.
CONCLUSIONS:
As previously shown in a Caucasian population from northern Europe, blue eyes and a trend for fair skin increase the risk for T1D also in a Caucasian population born and residing in a Mediterranean region (Continental Italy). This finding may be relevant for explaining different T1D incidence as prevalence of blue eyes differ substantially between northern and southern European Caucasians.
Medical tests conducted in complete darkness show Youhui can read perfectly without any light and sees as clearly as most people do during the day.
Could Nong Youhui be a Hybrid or Starchild? A new and growing generation of extraordinary and gifted children are springing up across our planet, is the human species evolving, or possibly our Extraterrestrial visitors tinkering with our DNA? As always you decide.
1:50 Teacher comment:
If playing outside in bright sunlight Nong would squint his eyes and complain of blurry vision, while the other children could see normally.
Uploader comment again: "A new and growing generation of extraordinary and gifted children"
Can't see in the sunlight, but it's a GOOD THING???
Ah, the delusional, defective, Albino mind. Which seeks to twist reality so as to find a higher purpose for Albinism. What next, the Blind claiming that Blindness is better, because it heightens the other senses?
Albino Cave Crayfish
Nature tells us that Albinism is better for the "Dark".
Uploaded to photobucket and imageshack by someone who edited, no real source. Furthermore exposed as photoshopped at forumbiodiversity, i've seen it before.
Blacks have no physical diversity, so they have to photoshop or edit themselves. lol. Mike111 posted an image here of a black african with straight blonde hair, i tracked the source down... it was a computer generated image for an avertising company lol.
Posts: 1575 | From: - | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
I have had a similar theory for a number years now based on the physical characteristics of gem or light color eyes.
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist: Brilliant find. I've been saying this for years.
Blue, gray or green eyes transmit more light, hence it is easier to see in the dark.
According to ancient sources the Roman emperor Tiberius, who had blue eyes, could distinguish objects in the pitch black when he woke up a night (HN. xi. 37; Suet. Tib. 68; Sext. Emp. Pyr. i. 14. 84). I wrote a short essay on this a while back.
Yes certainly light eyes are superior. They are most prevalent among Caucasoids, esp in northern europe, but are not unheard of in Mongoloids.
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist: Brilliant find. I've been saying this for years.
Blue, gray or green eyes transmit more light, hence it is easier to see in the dark.
According to ancient sources the Roman emperor Tiberius, who had blue eyes, could distinguish objects in the pitch black when he woke up a night (HN. xi. 37; Suet. Tib. 68; Sext. Emp. Pyr. i. 14. 84). I wrote a short essay on this a while back.
Yes certainly light eyes are superior. They are most prevalent among Caucasoids, esp in northern europe, but are not unheard of in Mongoloids.
.
You are becoming even more deranged and out-of-touch with reality lately. But be warned, Crush Black Lies is gaining on you!
Uploaded to photobucket and imageshack by someone who edited, no real source. Furthermore exposed as photoshopped at forumbiodiversity, i've seen it before.
Blacks have no physical diversity, so they have to photoshop or edit themselves. lol. Mike111 posted an image here of a black african with straight blonde hair, i tracked the source down... it was a computer generated image for an avertising company lol. [/QB]
quote:-Cassiteredes-"When we look at something what is actually going on? The emission theory states that the light emits (not a travelling speed) from our own eyes not from the object we look at."
Don't forget this is the person who does'nt believe Light Travels..
LOL
Cassiterdes-
quote:"If it takes 11 million years to travel to earth, how can i see it now? I'm only 20.
LMFAO, the funny part is this dude as dumb as he is, is all over the internet trying to debate people like he is intelligent or functions on a Normal Cognitive level.
I mean really, the 5-8 yr olds I take care of after school are smarter than him..."It takes 11 Million yrs and Im 20, how can I see it" LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
quote:#1220989 Alcari
He may be 20, but he has the intellect of an 11 year old.
10/25/2010 7:06:32 AM #1220995 nutbunny
You are as dumb as ****.......
10/25/2010 7:15:12 AM #1220997 ergo
Typically, when people don't know what the **** they're talking about they will either admit ignorance and just don't say anything. This idiot decided to keep talking while showing everyone he doesn't know what the **** he's talking about.
10/25/2010 7:16:32 AM #1220999 TGRwulf
It didn't start travelling when you were born you fucking numbnutz!
10/25/2010 7:17:13 AM #1221000 13.6
Imagine telling Cassiterides that there was a universe before he existed. I hope his brain would explode.
10/25/2010 7:17:22 AM #1221003 TB Tabby
So...eyewitness accounts are the only form of evidence you'll accept, huh?
If you were on trial for a crime you didn't commit, and the only evidence the prosecution could come up with was "I was there, I saw it," would you conclude that you MUST be guilty? Of course not--and the courts wouldn't either. Even if they're not lying, they could be mistaken. That's why you need more evidence to support an eyewitness account. And that's why "were you there?" is no way to refute a scientific theory. We know how fast light travels and how big the universe is because of calculations, measurements and observations of the stars dating back to Johann Kepler. Could we be wrong? Sure! But you'll need a better argument than the tired old "were you there" canard to prove it.
10/25/2010 7:19:43 AM #1221008 dingo
oh my god. *slow facepalm*
10/25/2010 7:23:59 AM #1221011 aaa
You are still young and you should pick up a book about this subject.
10/25/2010 7:25:58 AM #1221014 Dr. Razark
You do realize the light travels from the object to you, not from you to the object, right?
Edit: Ok, I went and read the original thread. It turns out that is exactly what he thinks. "When we look at something what is actually going on? The emission theory states that the light emits (not a travelling speed) from our own eyes not from the object we look at."
And he doesn't believe light travels, either.
10/25/2010 7:37:40 AM #1221017 Flufflesthepancake
Read the rest of his comments in that thread... I shouldn't be laughing because it's actually shocking someone can be that fucking stupid.
10/25/2010 7:45:53 AM #1221020 Mr. Boston
Well by that rationale you'd have to be 6000 years old to read the Bible.
10/25/2010 7:53:30 AM #1221021 storymoron
You know, I think he might be wrong about this.
10/25/2010 7:53:53 AM #1221024 I read about the afterlife
The next thread reads "Cassiterides trying to read a book, 'The...c-c-cat...ruh-ruh-ruh" Good try.
10/25/2010 8:00:28 AM #1221025 Dan Onymous
Is this an 'eyebeams' thing?
10/25/2010 8:01:49 AM #1221026 Mister Spak
Here's a clue: Creationism is a myth.
Edit: Just read the thread. This moron appears to 1.think that light has an infinite speed and 2. does not know why a light year is called a light year.
He does realise however that we see stars because stars produce light.
10/25/2010 8:05:33 AM #1221036 physalis17
ugh...just what I need first thing in the morning. A headache caused by pure stupidity. These fundies will never learn that the world doesn't revolve around them.
10/25/2010 8:15:52 AM #1221038 Horsefeathers
"So my question is how are we observing this light 11 million light years away now?
I'm not 11 million years old, i'm 20."
This has just made my list of stupidest things I've ever read.
"If it takes 11 million years to travel to earth, how can i see it now? I'm only 20.
If it takes 11 million years to travel to earth then the viewer would need to be 11 million years old."
Congratulations. You get the runner up spot on the list, too. Particularly since by this point you've had it explained to you and, instead of understanding what was said or asking clarification questions, you simply restate your first inanity.
EDIT: I stand corrected. This is probably the stupidest thing I've ever read: "When we look at something what is actually going on? The emission theory states that the light emits (not a travelling speed) from our own eyes not from the object we look at."
10/25/2010 8:20:37 AM #1221040 Spencer
Im 19, how the **** can i read this?
10/25/2010 8:21:04 AM #1221051 Doctor Whom
I could have answered that when I was 20. Heck, I probably could have answered that when I was 7.
10/25/2010 8:36:59 AM #1221052 shadkat
So, hypothetically, if I met you Cassiterides, would I be able to see you? I'm only nineteen. Theoretically, it took you twenty years to get to our meeting point, so I wouldn't be old enough to observe you.
HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE YOU?!
10/25/2010 8:40:47 AM #1221055 Papabear
Perhaps he means 20 months old.
10/25/2010 8:46:48 AM #1221060 EMT420
Gah! Why do fundies try to do science? Can't they just sit in their churches, eat their little crackers, and shut up?
10/25/2010 8:53:20 AM #1221071
Holy crap, this person is a lunatic. S/he, besides this stupidity, also believes that light does not travel, that we see because light projects out of our eyes, that staring at the sun does not cause damage to the eyes, that people can survive without food or drink if they stare at the sun long enough in a day, and that God is not eternal but the water on earth is and God sprang out of it...
10/25/2010 9:28:31 AM #1221073
Right because if it takes me a hundred days to walk from Los Angeles to New York, then everyone who observes me walking into New York would have to be a hundred days old. Damn those non-existent newborns.
10/25/2010 9:31:09 AM #1221075 Mudak
Behold, the benefits of homeschooling. Thank you Cassiterides.
Nature tells us that Albinism is better for the "Dark".
So is Blue Eyes - "Evolving" or "Devolving"
Mike you're stupid, please let me explain. I don't mean to be disrespectful
The albino Crayfish that live in caves are blind
Yes Lioness, eventually people who see better in the dark will become inhabitants of the dark, as with the boy: sunlight hurts his eyes.
The laws of nature and evolution say that eventually they will develop new ways of moving about in the dark, and not need eyes at all. (the crayfish originally had eyes).
So the question to intelligent people, who could actually understand the related issues; was, is the loss of sun related capabilities, human devolving or evolving. Strangely, only you answered.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:-Cassiteredes-"When we look at something what is actually going on? The emission theory states that the light emits (not a travelling speed) from our own eyes not from the object we look at."
Don't forget this is the person who does'nt believe Light Travels..
LOL
Cassiterdes-
quote:"If it takes 11 million years to travel to earth, how can i see it now? I'm only 20.
LMFAO, the funny part is this dude as dumb as he is, is all over the internet trying to debate people like he is intelligent or functions on a Normal Cognitive level.
I mean really, the 5-8 yr olds I take care of after school are smarter than him..."It takes 11 Million yrs and Im 20, how can I see it" LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
quote:#1220989 Alcari
He may be 20, but he has the intellect of an 11 year old.
10/25/2010 7:06:32 AM #1220995 nutbunny
You are as dumb as ****.......
10/25/2010 7:15:12 AM #1220997 ergo
Typically, when people don't know what the **** they're talking about they will either admit ignorance and just don't say anything. This idiot decided to keep talking while showing everyone he doesn't know what the **** he's talking about.
10/25/2010 7:16:32 AM #1220999 TGRwulf
It didn't start travelling when you were born you fucking numbnutz!
10/25/2010 7:17:13 AM #1221000 13.6
Imagine telling Cassiterides that there was a universe before he existed. I hope his brain would explode.
10/25/2010 7:17:22 AM #1221003 TB Tabby
So...eyewitness accounts are the only form of evidence you'll accept, huh?
If you were on trial for a crime you didn't commit, and the only evidence the prosecution could come up with was "I was there, I saw it," would you conclude that you MUST be guilty? Of course not--and the courts wouldn't either. Even if they're not lying, they could be mistaken. That's why you need more evidence to support an eyewitness account. And that's why "were you there?" is no way to refute a scientific theory. We know how fast light travels and how big the universe is because of calculations, measurements and observations of the stars dating back to Johann Kepler. Could we be wrong? Sure! But you'll need a better argument than the tired old "were you there" canard to prove it.
10/25/2010 7:19:43 AM #1221008 dingo
oh my god. *slow facepalm*
10/25/2010 7:23:59 AM #1221011 aaa
You are still young and you should pick up a book about this subject.
10/25/2010 7:25:58 AM #1221014 Dr. Razark
You do realize the light travels from the object to you, not from you to the object, right?
Edit: Ok, I went and read the original thread. It turns out that is exactly what he thinks. "When we look at something what is actually going on? The emission theory states that the light emits (not a travelling speed) from our own eyes not from the object we look at."
And he doesn't believe light travels, either.
10/25/2010 7:37:40 AM #1221017 Flufflesthepancake
Read the rest of his comments in that thread... I shouldn't be laughing because it's actually shocking someone can be that fucking stupid.
10/25/2010 7:45:53 AM #1221020 Mr. Boston
Well by that rationale you'd have to be 6000 years old to read the Bible.
10/25/2010 7:53:30 AM #1221021 storymoron
You know, I think he might be wrong about this.
10/25/2010 7:53:53 AM #1221024 I read about the afterlife
The next thread reads "Cassiterides trying to read a book, 'The...c-c-cat...ruh-ruh-ruh" Good try.
10/25/2010 8:00:28 AM #1221025 Dan Onymous
Is this an 'eyebeams' thing?
10/25/2010 8:01:49 AM #1221026 Mister Spak
Here's a clue: Creationism is a myth.
Edit: Just read the thread. This moron appears to 1.think that light has an infinite speed and 2. does not know why a light year is called a light year.
He does realise however that we see stars because stars produce light.
10/25/2010 8:05:33 AM #1221036 physalis17
ugh...just what I need first thing in the morning. A headache caused by pure stupidity. These fundies will never learn that the world doesn't revolve around them.
10/25/2010 8:15:52 AM #1221038 Horsefeathers
"So my question is how are we observing this light 11 million light years away now?
I'm not 11 million years old, i'm 20."
This has just made my list of stupidest things I've ever read.
"If it takes 11 million years to travel to earth, how can i see it now? I'm only 20.
If it takes 11 million years to travel to earth then the viewer would need to be 11 million years old."
Congratulations. You get the runner up spot on the list, too. Particularly since by this point you've had it explained to you and, instead of understanding what was said or asking clarification questions, you simply restate your first inanity.
EDIT: I stand corrected. This is probably the stupidest thing I've ever read: "When we look at something what is actually going on? The emission theory states that the light emits (not a travelling speed) from our own eyes not from the object we look at."
10/25/2010 8:20:37 AM #1221040 Spencer
Im 19, how the **** can i read this?
10/25/2010 8:21:04 AM #1221051 Doctor Whom
I could have answered that when I was 20. Heck, I probably could have answered that when I was 7.
10/25/2010 8:36:59 AM #1221052 shadkat
So, hypothetically, if I met you Cassiterides, would I be able to see you? I'm only nineteen. Theoretically, it took you twenty years to get to our meeting point, so I wouldn't be old enough to observe you.
HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE YOU?!
10/25/2010 8:40:47 AM #1221055 Papabear
Perhaps he means 20 months old.
10/25/2010 8:46:48 AM #1221060 EMT420
Gah! Why do fundies try to do science? Can't they just sit in their churches, eat their little crackers, and shut up?
10/25/2010 8:53:20 AM #1221071
Holy crap, this person is a lunatic. S/he, besides this stupidity, also believes that light does not travel, that we see because light projects out of our eyes, that staring at the sun does not cause damage to the eyes, that people can survive without food or drink if they stare at the sun long enough in a day, and that God is not eternal but the water on earth is and God sprang out of it...
10/25/2010 9:28:31 AM #1221073
Right because if it takes me a hundred days to walk from Los Angeles to New York, then everyone who observes me walking into New York would have to be a hundred days old. Damn those non-existent newborns.
10/25/2010 9:31:09 AM #1221075 Mudak
Behold, the benefits of homeschooling. Thank you Cassiterides.
quote:-Cassiteredes-"When we look at something what is actually going on? The emission theory states that the light emits (not a travelling speed) from our own eyes not from the object we look at."
Don't forget this is the person who does'nt believe Light Travels..
LOL
Cassiterdes-
10/25/2010 8:53:20 AM #1221071
Holy crap, this person is a lunatic. S/he, besides this stupidity, also believes that light does not travel, that we see because light projects out of our eyes, that staring at the sun does not cause damage to the eyes, that people can survive without food or drink if they stare at the sun long enough in a day, and that God is not eternal but the water on earth is and God sprang out of it...
quote:"If it takes 11 million years to travel to earth, how can i see it now? I'm only 20.
LMFAO, the funny part is this dude as dumb as he is, is all over the internet trying to debate people like he is intelligent or functions on a Normal Cognitive level.
I mean really, the 5-8 yr olds I take care of after school are smarter than him..."It takes 11 Million yrs and Im 20, how can I see it" LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
Logic tells, if light is 11 Millions years old (photonic atoms), and you are 20. It means these photonic atoms are way older and all ready had appeared, long before the "20 year old" appeared.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Just Call Me Jari, that's not my account and i never made those comments. I have a lot of people impersonating me all over the net, or making posts up and then attributing them in my name. There is a fake account even here in my name, Cassiterides (the 'i' spelt with an 1).
The equivilant would be me creating a fake acccount of you, an then posting you believe the Egyptians were Eskimos, or something as stupid.
Posts: 1575 | From: - | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ the funniest part is that all these so called impersonators are # stupid!
That's the irony!
Look at the cup in your avatar. That's the exact expression on your face!
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Cass, you are out-doing yourself lately.
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist: Brilliant find. I've been saying this for years.
Blue, gray or green eyes transmit more light, hence it is easier to see in the dark.
According to ancient sources the Roman emperor Tiberius, who had blue eyes, could distinguish objects in the pitch black when he woke up a night (HN. xi. 37; Suet. Tib. 68; Sext. Emp. Pyr. i. 14. 84). I wrote a short essay on this a while back.
Yes certainly light eyes are superior. They are most prevalent among Caucasoids, esp in northern europe, but are not unheard of in Mongoloids.
.
You are becoming even more deranged and out-of-touch with reality lately. But be warned, Crush Black Lies is gaining on you!
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: ^ the funniest part is that all these so called impersonators are # stupid!
That's the irony!
Well that is their point. Create fake accounts in my name, and post absurd claims in attempt to discredit me. Hence my name via a google search is linked to the belief the earth is flat, the belief stars don't generate their own light, hollow earth theory, aliens etcetc. They can't even get my race or ethnicity correct, they claim i am Jewish to Japanese. About all they got right was my age. Although some of those fake accounts still claim i am 21 (despite i've been 22 now for more than a month).
Posts: 1575 | From: - | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Cass, you are out-doing yourself lately.
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist: Brilliant find. I've been saying this for years.
Blue, gray or green eyes transmit more light, hence it is easier to see in the dark.
According to ancient sources the Roman emperor Tiberius, who had blue eyes, could distinguish objects in the pitch black when he woke up a night (HN. xi. 37; Suet. Tib. 68; Sext. Emp. Pyr. i. 14. 84). I wrote a short essay on this a while back.
Yes certainly light eyes are superior. They are most prevalent among Caucasoids, esp in northern europe, but are not unheard of in Mongoloids.
.
You are becoming even more deranged and out-of-touch with reality lately. But be warned, Crush Black Lies is gaining on you!
Many Negroids have blue eyes, but they are not natural. They are the result of poverty and poor conditions in Sub-Sahara Africa. The disease changes black eyes to blue.
You can find whole villages in sub-sahara africa with Klein-Waardenburg syndrome.
Its obviously not the same as natural blue eye pigmentation.
Posts: 1575 | From: - | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
Waardenburg syndrome, is also associated with unilateral heterochromia.
We already have covered this part. However, the people I have posted have those eyes naturally, without the syndrome.
The last post to Mike, was different. But still strinking beautiful.
Waardenburg syndrome (WS) is an inherited disorder often characterized by varying degrees of hearing loss and changes in skin and hair pigmentation. The syndrome got its name from a Dutch eye doctor named Petrus Johannes Waardenburg who first noticed that people with differently colored eyes often had a hearing impairment. He went on to study over a thousand individuals in deaf families and found that some of them had certain physical characteristics in common.
One commonly observed characteristic of Waardenburg syndrome is two differently colored eyes. One eye is usually brown and the other blue. Sometimes, one eye has two different colors. Other individuals with Waardenburg syndrome may have unusually brilliant blue eyes.
People with WS may also have distinctive hair coloring, such as a patch of white hair or premature gray hair as early as age 12. Other possible physical features include a wide space between the inner corners of eyes called a broad nasal root. In addition persons with WS may have low frontal hairline and their eyebrows may connect. The levels of hearing loss associated with the syndrome can vary from moderate to profound.
Individuals with Waardenburg syndrome may have some or all of the traits of the syndrome. For example, a person with WS may have a white forelock, a patch of white hair near the forehead, and no hearing impairment. Others may have white patches of skin and severe hearing impairment. The severity of the hearing impairment varies among individuals with WS as do changes in the skin and hair.
Cause
As a genetic disorder, Waardenburg syndrome is passed down from parent to child much like hair color, blood type, or other physical traits. A child receives genetic material from each parent. Because Waardenburg syndrome is a dominant condition, a child usually inherits the syndrome from just one parent who has the malfunctioning WS gene. Actually, there is a 50/50 chance that a child of an individual with WS will also have the syndrome.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003 Sep;112(9 Pt 1):817-20.
Worldwide distribution of Waardenburg syndrome.
Nayak CS, Isaacson G.
Source
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine, Temple University Children's Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, USA.
Abstract
To clarify the multiracial occurrence of Waardenburg syndrome, we present a case series and literature review. A computerized review of the English-language literature was conducted to assess the distribution of reported occurrences of Waardenburg syndrome in populations around the world. We detail the clinical features of 2 family cohorts: one of Western European origin and the other from South Asia. A computerized literature review found sporadic cases of the syndrome in many ethnic groups, including Japanese, Taiwanese, and Middle Eastern families. The highest reported incidence is among Kenyan Africans. Waardenburg syndrome accounts for between 2% and 5% of cases of congenital deafness.
It was first described in Northern European cohorts and is widely identified in fair-skinned populations. We hope to raise awareness of the worldwide distribution of this important cause of hearing loss.
Genet Couns. 2006;17(1):41-8.
Waardenburg syndrome in the Turkish deaf population.
Silan F, Zafer C, Onder I.
Source
Department of Medical Genetics, Duzce Faculty of Medicine, University of Abant Izzet Baysal, Duzce, Turkey. fsilan@dtip.edu.tr
Abstract
Waardenburg Syndrome (WS) is an autosomal, dominantly inherited disorder that accounts for more than 2% cases of congenital deafness. The aim of this study is to determine the WS incidence among deaf pupils. Dysmorphological examination was performed on 720 children who were attending 7 special schools in Turkey and who had hearing disabilities. All subjects in the study were examined for WS diagnostic criteria. We detected 49 patients (6.8%) with WS among the 720 children examined. Six patients had WS type 1 (12.2%) and 43 had type 2 (87.8%). We observed 2 to 5 major diagnostic criteria for WS. Out of all the subjects in the study, only two patients have deaf first degree relatives. All subjects had been previously examined by physicians for deafness but none of them had been then diagnosed to have Waardenburg Syndrome. Instead, they were all misdiagnosed as to have nonsyndromic deafness. Awareness of WS diagnostic criteria by the physicans will provide accurate diagnosis for many deaf pupils and their first degree relatives who are able-to-hear WS patients and whose children are at risk for deafness.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Cass, you are out-doing yourself lately.
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Piss Pot: Brilliant find. I've been saying this for years.
Blue, gray or green eyes transmit more light, hence it is easier to see in the dark.
According to ancient sources the Roman emperor Tiberius, who had blue eyes, could distinguish objects in the pitch black when he woke up a night (HN. xi. 37; Suet. Tib. 68; Sext. Emp. Pyr. i. 14. 84). I wrote a short essay on this a while back.
Yes certainly light eyes are superior. They are most prevalent among Caucasoids, esp in northern europe, but are not unheard of in Mongoloids.
.
You are becoming even more deranged and out-of-touch with reality lately. But be warned, Crush Black Lies is gaining on you!
Many Negroids have blue eyes, but they are not natural. They are the result of poverty and poor conditions in Sub-Sahara Africa. The disease changes black eyes to blue.
You can find whole villages in sub-sahara africa with Klein-Waardenburg syndrome.
Its obviously not the same as natural blue eye pigmentation.
quote:
Genetic mutation makes those brown eyes blue
People with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor, according to new research.
A team of scientists has tracked down a genetic mutation that leads to blue eyes. The mutation occurred between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago, so before then, there were no blue eyes. "Originally, we all had brown eyes," said Hans Eiberg from the Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine at the
University of Copenhagen.
The mutation affected the so-called OCA2 gene, which is involved in the production of melanin, the pigment that gives color to our hair, eyes and skin.
"A genetic mutation affecting the OCA2 gene in our chromosomes resulted in the creation of a 'switch,' which literally 'turned off' the ability to produce brown eyes," Eiberg said.
The genetic switch is located in the gene adjacent to OCA2 and rather than completely turning off the gene, the switch limits its action, which reduces the production of melanin in the iris. In effect, the turned-down switch diluted brown eyes to blue.
If the OCA2 gene had been completely shut down, our hair, eyes and skin would be melanin-less, a condition known as albinism.
"It's exactly what I sort of expected to see from what we know about selection around this area," said John Hawks of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, referring to the study results regarding the OCA2 gene. Hawks was not involved in the current study.
Baby blues
Eiberg and his team examined DNA from mitochondria, the cells' energy-making structures, of blue-eyed individuals in countries including Jordan, Denmark and Turkey. This genetic material comes from females, so it can trace maternal lineages.
They specifically looked at sequences of DNA on the OCA2 gene and the genetic mutation associated with turning down melanin production.
Over the course of several generations, segments of ancestral DNA get shuffled so that individuals have varying sequences. Some of these segments, however, that haven't been reshuffled are called haplotypes. If a group of individuals shares long haplotypes, that means the sequence arose relatively recently in our human ancestors. The DNA sequence didn't have enough time to get mixed up. Don't miss these Health stories
Robin Pierre
Nearly 1,000 dogs sick from jerky treats now
Nearly 1,000 dogs reportedly have been sickened by chicken jerky pet treats from China, according to a new tally of complaints from worried owners submitted to federal veterinary health officials.
No routine PSA tests for men, panel rules
JPMorgan exec's Lyme infection shows need for quick care
Stress turns guys into social butterflies
Toxic mushrooms: Drug promises new cure
"What they were able to show is that the people who have blue eyes in Denmark, as far as Jordan, these people all have this same haplotype, they all have exactly the same gene changes that are all linked to this one mutation that makes eyes blue," Hawks said in a telephone interview.
Melanin switch
The mutation is what regulates the OCA2 switch for melanin production. And depending on the amount of melanin in the iris, a person can end up with eye color ranging from brown to green. Brown-eyed individuals have considerable individual variation in the area of their DNA that controls melanin production. But they found that blue-eyed individuals only have a small degree of variation in the amount of melanin in their eyes.
"Out of 800 persons we have only found one person which didn't fit — but his eye color was blue with a single brown spot," Eiberg told LiveScience, referring to the finding that blue-eyed individuals all had the same sequence of DNA linked with melanin production.
"From this we can conclude that all blue-eyed individuals are linked to the same ancestor," Eiberg said. "They have all inherited the same switch at exactly the same spot in their DNA." Eiberg and his colleagues detailed their study in the Jan. 3 online edition of the journal Human Genetics.
That genetic switch somehow spread throughout Europe and now other parts of the world.
"The question really is, 'Why did we go from having nobody on Earth with blue eyes 10,000 years ago to having 20 or 40 percent of Europeans having blue eyes now?" Hawks said. "This gene does something good for people. It makes them have more kids."
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist: Its called Klein-Waardenburg syndrome.
Many Negroids have blue eyes, but they are not natural. They are the result of poverty and poor conditions in Sub-Sahara Africa. The disease changes black eyes to blue.
You can find whole villages in sub-sahara africa with Klein-Waardenburg syndrome.
Its obviously not the same as natural blue eye pigmentation.
Really Cass, your lying is getting out of hand. ausar may need to ban you.
A question for you: you must know that no one believes anything that you say. So is this like Albino denial therapy for you? I mean, are you trying to convince yourself?
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
As you see, Albinism in whites is no real secret to whites.
Of course the Albino Ho is attracted to the black man. Woman always gravitate to the superior gene pool, and the most BANG for the buck.
Posts: 4693 | From: Saturn | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ True dat, it's a film written, produced, directed by an Albino man, who suggests, a black man can be changed into a white man by injecting him with an "Albinism" formula. The white man also suggests that blond, blue eyed Nazi women could not possibly resist black men to the point of where they will reject the strongest white man, for an average black man.
LOL, don't blame me. I'm not the one writing this stuff. That would be the Albino male.
reminds me of what my Grandfather used to tell me; "All truth is told in jest".
-------------------- Selenium gives real life and true reality Posts: 4693 | From: Saturn | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
Schauspielerin Julia Dietze, bekannt aus Soloalbum, in Begleitung einer Freundin
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't know who it is directed by. Its just a terrible film, no surprise it has recieved terrible reviews.
Real films are about entertainment, or sometimes you get the more sophisticated or emotional film. I don't however understand why someone would want to watch a film that resolves around interracialism, but thats the modern depraved world for you. I honestly thought the film industry had given up this sort of race relation stuff back in the 90's with the whole ''black cop, white cop'' genre (lethal weapon etc). Obviously not. As i said, just more brainwashing.
Posts: 1575 | From: - | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ Is there any wonder WHY the film gets bad reviews?
I mean, it presents the case that Whites are akin to Albinism, or the path to "whiteness" is Albinism. It also sets up the Albino females sexual attraction to the "Negro" from the very beginning, on first sight. Either of these concepts would be cause real conflicting emotions in the majority viewer-ship, whites. Still, it shows that the white mainstream do understand their very close and personal relationship with the Albinism defect.
-------------------- Selenium gives real life and true reality Posts: 4693 | From: Saturn | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist: Just Call Me Jari, that's not my account and i never made those comments.
Of course you made those comments, what you said here in this thread (eyes transmit light), is the exact same thing that was said on that physics website (light emits from our own eyes).
Posts: 8785 | From: Discovery Channel's Mythbusters | Registered: Dec 2009
| IP: Logged |
Light is "reflected" in the eyes of Albinos due to poorly crafted optical components. This is a side effect of poor design, where light that should have been blocked by adequately melaniated Iris is allowed to pass through in inadequately melaniated Albino eye. Due to this defect, small amounts of light is allowed also to reflect off of the inadequately formed retina and fovea regions of the eye, with small amount reflected back to source.
In short, the kid in the article has extreme optical Albinism component which allows stray light in dark environment to enter iris. This is only possible due to the lack of melanin in the Iris due to Albinism. In "normal"light, the kid will suffer the same defect as every other Albino; Optic impairment.
This is certainly no "evolution" but just another side effect of the genetic defect of Albinism.
Posts: 4693 | From: Saturn | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ Mole´-eyed` a. 1. Having eyes like those of the mole; having imperfect sight. Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, published 1913 by C. & G. Merriam Co.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic