posted
Clyde: some clarification on Indo-European languages if you please.
As I'm sure you know, many, especially Negroes, find it very hard to believe that languages like German were indigenous to Black people. Of course, the way Albinos categorize languages is designed to hide their true origins, and certainly terms like "Indo-Aryan" and "Indo-Iranian" are normal Albino lie terms, seeing as how the word Iran is only about 80 years old, and Aryan was the Persian word for their nobility.
The following is common Albino fare on the subject:
The Indo-European languages comprise a language family of several hundred languages and dialects - 449 according to the 2005 SIL estimate, about half (219) belonging to the Indo-Aryan sub-branch -, including most of the major languages of Europe, as well as many spoken in Southwest Asia, Central Asia and South Asia. Contemporary languages in this family with more than 100 million native speakers each include Hindi, Spanish, English, Portuguese, Bengali, Russian, French, German and Punjabi. Numerous national or minority languages with fewer than 100 million native speakers also exist. Indo-European has the largest numbers of speakers of the recognised families of languages in the world today, with its languages spoken by approximately 3 billion native speakers.
To me, it seems that the only thing these languages have in common, is that the ancient speakers of these languages were forced together by invasion and wars. Thereby forcing the creation of hybrid languages over time, so that they could communicate with one another.
The question is, what was the original language that each spoke?Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
^Remembering that the Franks of France moved to, and governed Europe from Germany, and they spoke what we call German today. I looked up "Old French".
Old French (franceis, françois, romanz; Modern French ancien français) was the Romance dialect continuum spoken in territories that span roughly the northern half of modern France and parts of modern Belgium and Switzerland from the 9th century to the 14th century. It was then known as the langue d'oïl (oïl language) to distinguish it from the langue d'oc (Occitan language, also then called Provençal), whose territory bordered that of Old French to the south. The Norman dialect was also spread to England, Ireland, the Kingdom of Sicily and the Principality of Antioch in the Levant.
Historical influences
Gaulish, maybe the only survivor of the continental Celtic languages in Roman times, slowly became extinct during the long centuries of Roman dominion.
Latin
Old French began when the Roman Empire conquered Gaul during the campaigns of Julius Caesar, which were almost complete by 51 BC. The Romans introduced Latin to southern France by 120 BC when it came under Roman occupation.
Beginning with Plautus's time (254–184 BC), the phonological structure of classical Latin underwent change, which would eventually yield vulgar Latin, the common spoken language of the western Roman empire. This latter form differed strongly from its classical counterpart in phonology; it was the ancestor of the Romance languages, including Old French.
Old Low Frankish
The pronunciation, the vocabulary and the syntax of Low Latin were modified step by step by the Germanic tribe of the Franks and others as their settlements in the Empire were accepted by the Romans, or forced upon them, and finally as they conquered portions of Roman Gaul that are now France and Belgium during the Migration Period. These Germanic settlements were much more consequent in Northern France and Belgium, than in the south of France and Europe. The name français is derived from the name of this tribe. Other less numerous Germanic peoples, including the Burgundians and the Visigoths, were active in the territory at that time; the Germanic languages spoken by the Franks, Burgundians, and others were not written languages, and at this remove it is sometimes difficult to identify from which specific Germanic source a given Germanic word in French is derived.
In fact, the Old Frankish language has had a determining influence on the birth of Old French, that explains partly why the first documents in Old French are older than the documents in other Romance languages
Earliest written Old French
At the third Council of Tours in 813, priests were ordered to preach in the vernacular language (either Romance or Germanic), since the common people could no longer understand formal Latin.
The earliest documents said to be written in French after the Reichenau and Kassel glosses (8th and 9th centuries) are the Oaths of Strasbourg (treaties and charters into which King Charles the Bald entered in 842):
Pro Deo amur et pro Christian poblo et nostro commun salvament, d’ist di en avant, in quant Deus savir et podir me dunat, si salvarai eo cist meon fradre Karlo, et in aiudha et in cadhuna cosa... (For the love of God and for the Christian people, and our common salvation, from this day forward, as God will give me the knowledge and the power, I will defend my brother Charles with my help in everything...)
The second-oldest document in Old French is the Eulalia sequence, which is important for linguistic reconstruction of Old French pronunciation due to its consistent spelling.
The royal House of Capet, founded by Hugh Capet in 987, inaugurated the development of northern French culture in and around Ile-de-France, which slowly but firmly asserted its ascendency over the more southerly areas of Aquitaine and Tolosa (Toulouse).
The Capetians' Langue d'oïl, the forerunner of modern standard French, did not begin to become the common speech of all of France, however, until after the French Revolution (1789–1799).
From that, we see just how "Young" the Albino influence in Europe really is.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
The English language is the language created by tribes that moved to Britain from West Germany around 450 AD. The Germanic languages spoken by these tribes became Anglo-Saxon, or Old English.
Germanic tribes (Saxons, Angles, and Jutes) came to Britain from around 449 AD. They made their home in the south and east of the island, pushing out the Celtic Britons who were there before them, or making them speak the English language instead of the old Celtic language.
The closest language to English that is still used today is Frisian, spoken by about 500,000 people living in the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark. Despite its similarity to English, speakers of the two languages would not be able to understand each other. But there are still some people that strongly suggest that the closest language to English is the Dutch language.
Many other people came to England later at different times, speaking different languages, and these languages added more words to make today's English.
For example, around 800 AD, many Danish and Norse pirates, also called Vikings, came to the country and English received many Norse loanwords. Their languages were Germanic languages, like Old English.
After William the Conqueror took over England in 1066 AD with his armies and became king, he brought his nobles, who spoke Norman, a language closely related to French, to be the new government. They stopped English from being taught in schools for a long time, and the language changed greatly, because it was mostly being spoken instead of written for about 300 years. English borrowed so many words from Norman at that time that it could be called a different language, Middle English.
English has continued to take new words from other languages, for example mainly from French (around 30% to 40% of its words).
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
German is a West Germanic language related to and classified alongside English and Dutch.
The history of the language begins with the High German consonant shift during the migration period, separating Old High German dialects from Old Saxon. The earliest testimonies of Old High German are from scattered Elder Futhark inscriptions, especially in Alemannic, from the 6th century AD; the earliest glosses (Abrogans) date to the 8th; and the oldest coherent texts (the Hildebrandslied, the Muspilli and the Merseburg Incantations) to the 9th century. Old Saxon at this time belongs to the North Sea Germanic cultural sphere, and Low Saxon was to fall under German rather than Anglo-Frisian influence during the Holy Roman Empire.
As Germany was divided into many different states, the only force working for a unification or standardization of German during a period of several hundred years was the general preference of writers trying to write in a way that could be understood in the largest possible area.
Modern German
When Martin Luther translated the Bible (the New Testament in 1522 and the Old Testament, published in parts and completed in 1534), he based his translation mainly on the bureaucratic standard language used in Saxony (sächsische Kanzleisprache), also known as Meißner-Deutsch (German from the city of Meissen). This language was based on Eastern Upper and Eastern Central German dialects and preserved much of the grammatical system of Middle High German (unlike the spoken German dialects in Central and Upper Germany, which had already at that time begun to lose the genitive case and the preterit). In the beginning, copies of the Bible had a long list for each region, which translated words unknown in the region into the regional dialect. Roman Catholics rejected Luther's translation initially and tried to create their own Catholic standard (gemeines Deutsch) — which, however, differed from "Protestant German" only in some minor details. It took until the middle of the 18th century to create a widely accepted standard, thus ending the period of Early New High German.
Until about 1800, standard German was almost only a written language. At this time, people in urban northern Germany, who spoke dialects very different from Standard German, learned it almost like a foreign language and tried to pronounce it as closely to the spelling as possible. Prescriptive pronunciation guides used to consider northern German pronunciation to be the standard. However, the actual pronunciation of Standard German varies from region to region.
German was the language of commerce and government in the Habsburg Empire, which encompassed a large area of Central and Eastern Europe. Until the mid-19th century it was essentially the language of townspeople throughout most of the Empire. Its use indicated that the speaker was a merchant, an urbanite, not their nationality. Some cities, such as Prague (German: Prag) and Budapest (Buda, German: Ofen), were gradually Germanized in the years after their incorporation into the Habsburg domain. Others, such as Bratislava (German: Pressburg), were originally settled during the Habsburg period and were primarily German at that time. A few cities such as Milan (German: Mailand) remained mainly non-German. However most cities, such as Prague, Budapest, Bratislava, Zagreb (German: Agram), and Ljubljana (German: Laibach), were primarily German during this time, although surrounded by territory where other languages were spoken.
In 1901, the 2nd Orthographical Conference ended with a complete standardization of the German language in its written form while the Deutsche Bühnensprache (literally, German stage language) had established rules for German three years earlier, which were later to become obligatory for general German pronunciation.
Media and written works are now almost all produced in Standard German (often called Hochdeutsch in German) which is understood in all areas where German is spoken.
The first dictionary of the Brothers Grimm, the 16 parts of which were issued between 1852 and 1860, remains the most comprehensive guide to the words of the German language. In 1860, grammatical and orthographic rules first appeared in the Duden Handbook. In 1901, this was declared the standard definition of the German language. Official revisions of some of these rules were not issued until 1998, when the spelling reform of 1996 was officially promulgated by governmental representatives of all German-speaking countries.
Once again, we see just how "Recent" Albino influence really is in Europe.Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Cass - Why didn't you post the particulars of the Proto-Indo-European language theory?
He,he,he:
Afraid of Doxie aren't you? Coward!
Come-on, she's a big girl, sooner or later she will have to accept that you people are from central Asia - and are indeed - ALBINOS!
Proto-Indo-European language
The Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Indo-European languages, spoken by the Proto-Indo-Europeans. The existence of such a language has been accepted by linguists for over a century, and reconstruction is advanced and detailed.
Scholars estimate that PIE may have been spoken as a single language (before divergence began) around 3700 BC, though estimates by different authorities can vary by more than a millennium. The most popular hypothesis for the origin and spread of the language is the Kurgan hypothesis, which postulates an origin in the Pontic-Caspian steppe of Eastern Europe and Western Asia.
In modern times the existence of the language was first postulated in the 18th century by Sir William Jones, who observed the similarities between Sanskrit, Ancient Greek, and Latin. By the early 1900s, well-defined descriptions of PIE had been developed that are still accepted today (with some refinements).
The Pontic-Caspian steppe is the vast steppeland stretching from the northern shores of the Black Sea in antiquity) as far east as the Caspian Sea, from western Ukraine across the Southern Federal District and the Volga Federal District of Russia to western Kazakhstan, forming part of the larger Eurasian steppe, adjacent to the Kazakh steppe to the east. It is of the paleartic temperate grasslands, savannas, and shrublands ecoregion of the temperate grasslands, savannas, and shrublands biome.
The area corresponds to Scythia and Sarmatia of Classical antiquity. Across several millennia the steppe was used by numerous tribes of nomadic horsemen, many of which went on to conquer lands in the settled regions of Europe and in western and southern Asia. It was finally brought under the control of a sedentary people by the Russian Empire in the 16th to 18th centuries.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
^Of course like all Albino theories it is totally STUPID! Who but a dumb-assed fantasizing Albino, would forget that there were highly advanced Black cultures already in Europe, some with written languages. Yet European language derives from illiterate Albino Nomads from Asia?????
Who but a fuching fantasizing Albino is that stupid.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
There were Pre-Indo-European languages in Europe upon arrival of Indo-European. These non-Indo-European language speakers include:
Pelasgians and Lemnians (Greece and the Aegean) Eteocretans (Crete) Eteocypriots (Cyprus) Elymians and Sicani (Sicily) Basques, Tartessians and Iberians (Western Europe) Picts (Britain) Etruscans and Camunni (Italy) Rhaetians (Alpine Region) Lapps (Scandinavia)
So basically they covered the whole of Europe.
The Indo-Europeans first moved into Europe from around the 4th or 3rd millenium BC, conquering the pre-Indo-Europeans and essentially became an elite caste over those they subjugated, imposing their culture and language onto the natives.
Posts: 1575 | From: - | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
^Ha,ha,ha: Damn Cass, you are deluded! As are all albinos.
Cass, just try to think for a minute: up until the time of Herodotus (400 B.C.), the Scythian's were still illiterate Nomads in Asia. The Gothic migrations were circa 200-600 A.D.
Please tell me how illiterate Nomads would have imposed their language on civilized people - AND - just WHO these mystery people were?
Damn, Albino history is the funniest thing.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
It is almost impossible to determine what language the ancient Europeans spoke. This results from the fact that the so-called Indo- Europeans acquired their culture from African people.
The IndoEuropean languages are a myth. There probably never was a Proto-Indo European people.
The IE languages are united via the Greek language. Researchers declare there was a Proto-European people because the speakers of these languages share terms. This is a false analogy because the relationship between these languages can be explained by the Greek conquest of many parts of asia and the Roman Empire.
Due to the elite dominance model, many people conqured by the Greeks adopted Greek because it was a language that allowed the conqured people to advance.
The Romans admired the greeks and incorporated Greek terms in Latin and transferred these terms to the people they conquered. This is why the various languages in Europe and Asia included in the IE languages share affinities. They share affinities because the conquered peoples adopted Greek culture terms so they could progress in a colonial society.
When the Europeans arrived in Europe Africans were already settled in the land. As a result, the poverty stricken Europeans adopted African terms to describe the new cultural experiences and items they obtained from African people. This is why we don’t know what language europeans originally spoke.
Dr. Anna Morpurgo Davies, has made it clear that "less than 40% of the words which have an Indo-European etymology". According to Dr. Davies, 52.2 % of the Greek terms in Chantraine's Dictionnaire Etymologique de la langue Grecque (1968) have an unknown etymology. The mixed nature of the Greek language results from the early settlement of the Aegean by Blacks from Africa. Some of these words are of African origin. Robert K.G. Temple, in The Sirius Mystery, shows that many of the most common words of the Greek vocabulary are of Egyptian origin. Diop (1991) has also discussed the Egyptian origin for many Greek terms. This is why Niger-Congo languages are at the base of IE languages. http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/gc_dunn/Comparative_Linguistics.pdf
He wrote
quote:
The result was the modern genetic constitution of Europe, 35% African, 65% mixed Mediterranean or Afro-Asian.This is in accord with the genetic evidence which testifies to the unity of the Mediterranean peoples and does not recognise a separate “Indo -European” stock. Arnaiz -Villena, Gomez-Casado and Martinez-Laso (2002) state clearly that there is no genetic trace of an Aryan migration, and that if it occurred, it must have been a domination by a small élite.
Asia Minor, before the coming of the Afro-Asiatic farmers, was also colonised by African peoples, as Runoko Rashidi (1993) has argued in a recent publication by Karnak House. The survival in antiquity of a Niger-Congo language on Lemnos, which was closely related to Etruscan is proof of this. And Minoan Crete, as we now know , (Campbell-Dunn in Minoan Linear Scripts : The Niger-Congo Context), was African (Niger-Congo). A non-Indo-European language was still spoken at Praisos on E. Crete in the fourth century BC (Stanford 1948 : II, 322).
The shores of the Aegean and Mediterranean therefore were originally occupied by Africans, and subsequently overlaid by Afro-Asiatic farmers. It follows that the Mediterranean was once, in the remote past, the home of African blacks. No doubt this is the reason that the Mediterranean peoples are olive skinned, a blend of Afro- Asiatics and of black Africans, from closer to the equator. But this is not a linguistic question, and raises controversial issues outside the ambit of our inquiry. So we will not pursue it further.
In summary the Europeans' original languages can never be recovered because these people lacked any type of culture so they adopted culture terms Africans taught them.
posted
Since modern European languages, the so-called Indo-European, are derived from the Indian languages of the Dravidians, plus the East Asian languages of people like the Persians, plus whatever the Aryans and other White Central Asians spoke, plus the languages of the native Black Europeans that they melded with.
Point being, that modern languages are modern combinations of ancient languages - the English language is a perfect example. Therefore a case can be made for just about any connection. [/qb][/QUOTE]The relationship between English and ancient language is mainly due to literacy, not the combination of ancient and modern languages. Speakers of the Germanic languages (which) include English) lexicalized many Greek and Roman terms as they became literate in these languages.
Blacks spread civilization around the world. As other people came in contact with these bLacks they adopted cultural traditions and the terms that came along with the new way of life introduced to Europeans by the Blacks. This is evident in the relationship between Greek, and the two major lingua francas of Central asia and South Asia: Tocharian and Sanskrit.
It is important to remember that the relationship between Indo-European and Indo-Aryan language, especially Sanskrit is via the Greek language. Greek influenced other European languages because it was recognized as a language of culture and civilization by the Romans.
It was in Pakistan that the Greek language was probably incorporated into Sanskrit. Many of the rules for Sanskrit were codified by Panini, who was born in Salatura, in Northwest Pakistan. Panini’s grammar contains 4000 rules.
When Panini wrote his grammar of Sanskrit, it was spoken by the elites in the area. Greek was also popular when Panini wrote the Sanskrit grammar. The Greeks were called Yunani or Yavana. Thus we learn from Agrawala (1953) that the Yavanani lipi (edict) was well known in Gandahara, and even Panini mentions the Yavana in his grammar . The term Yauna meant Ionian (Woodcock, 1966).
The history of Greeks in the area is quite interesting. When Alexander entered the HinduKush region in 327 B.C., Greek settlements were already in the area. By 180 BC, as the Mauryas fell into decline, the Greek Kings of Bactria took control of Western Punjab and Gandhara up to the Indus River. Under King Menander (d.130 B.C.) the Greeks had their capital at Taxila. The center of Greek culture in the area was Charsadda near Peshawar (Woodcock,1966).
Many Greek terms were probably already incorporated in the Prakrits of Northern India-Pakistan and Central Asia. Here the Greeks minted their coins with Kharoshthi, Brahmi and Greek inscriptions.
Greek was used for commercial purposes and served as a patrician lingua franca of the Kabul valley and of Gandhara. During the rule of Pushyamitra many Greeks settled in India. Due to the long history of Greeks in India, Ashoka had some of his edicts written in Greek and Aramaic bilinguals. In 44 A.D., Appolonius of Tyana when he visited Taxila found that merchants and kings learned Greek “as a matter of course” (Rahman, 2004; Woodcock,1966).
Given the popularity of Greek in the region it is not surprising that Sanskrit would show such a strong relationship to the Indic languages, since it was spoken throughout the area of a couple of hundred years. Commenting on the Greek rulers of India, Kulke and Rothermund (1998), said that “They are referred to as ‘Indo-Greeks’, and there were about forty such kings and rulers who controlled large areas of northwestern India and Afghanistan….They appear as Yavanas in stray references in Indian literature, and there are few but important references in European sources. In these distant outposts, the representatives of the Hellenic policy survived the defeat of their Western compatriots at the hands of the Parthians for more than a century” (p.70). The greatest of the Indo-Greek rulers was Menander, who is mentioned in the famous Milindapanho text. The Shakas adopted many elements of Indo-Greek culture which they perpetuated in India for over 100 years (Rahman, 2004).
It is impossible to argue for a genetic relationship between Vedic and Greek languages based on the fact that speakers of these languages formerly lived in intimate contact in historical times. Secondly, we know the Dravidians were in Greece before the Indo-Europeans enter the country. These non-I-E speakers were called Pelasgians. As a result, Anna Morpurgo Davies, The linguistic evidence:Is there any?, in Gerald Cadogan, The End of the early Bronze Age in the Agean (pp.93-123), says that only 40% of Greek is of Indo-European etymology (p.105). Since only 40% of the Greek terms are of I-E origin, many of the Greek terms that agree with the Indic languages may be from the 60% of the Greek lexical items that came from non-I-E speakers which as noted by Lahovary in Dravidian origins and the West, were people who spoke either Dravidian languages, or other languages from Africa, genetically related to the Dravidian group.
In conclusion, as a result of the Greek influence in Bactria and India-Pakistan , Indians and Bactrians had to acquire "Greek Culture" to enhance their position and opportunity in North India and Bactria during Greek rule. Greek rule placed prestige on status elements introduced into the region by the Greeks, especially the Greek language. Status acquired by Bactrians and Indian-Pakistanis was thus centered around acquisition of Greek language and Greek culture. This supported by the evidence that Indian elites used Greek in business and government (Rahman, 2004). This would have inturn added pressure on the Bactrians to incorporate Greek terms into a Bactrian lingua franca (i.e., Tocharian).
Given the fact that Greek administrators in Bactria and Northern India-Pakistan ,refused to fully integrate Bactrians and Indians into the ruling elite, unless they were “well versed in Greek culture and language) led to subsequent generations of native Bactrians and Indian-Pakistanis to progressively incorporate more Greek terms into their native language. This would explain why Tocharian has many features that relate to certain IE etymologies and Panini’s Sanskrit grammar, present many terms that are associated with the Greeks, but illustrates little affinity to Indo-Iranian languages which are geographically and temporally closer to Tocharian.
Some researchers might dispute the influence of the Greek language on Sanskrit because Panini’s grammar was suppose to have been written around 400 B.C. This date for the grammar might be too early, because Rahman (2004) and Agrawala (1953) maintains that Greek was spoken in Gandahara in Panini’s time.
The influence of colonial Greeks in Central Asia would explain why the most important evidence of an I-E relationship with Sanskrit. The historical connections between the so-called Indo-European languages probably respect an areal linguistic relationship—not genetic relationship.
Here I discuss in detail the relationship between Greek and Sanskrit
posted
^A wonderful and eye-opening explanation Clyde, thank you. It made me hit myself in the head and go "Of course". Even I, sometimes forget how far-ranging Greek language and culture was. Then I had to hit myself again, because I had just been working on the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine), which was of course, Greek also.
The Byzantine Empire (or Byzantium) was the Roman Empire during Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, centred on the capital of Constantinople. The state is also referred to as the Eastern Roman Empire, primarily in the context of Late Antiquity, and especially while the Western Roman Empire was still maintained in Italy. Both "Byzantine Empire" and "Eastern Roman Empire" are historiographical terms applied in later centuries: throughout its existence the state was known simply as the Roman Empire and was the direct continuation of the Roman State, maintaining Roman state traditions. Byzantium is today distinguished from ancient Rome proper insofar as it was oriented towards Greek culture, characterised by Orthodox Christianity rather than Roman polytheism, and was predominantly Greek-speaking rather than Latin-speaking.
But I wonder, with the Turks being the last and most recent Albino arrivals from Asia. Shouldn't the Turkish language tell us something about what the original languages of the Albinos was like?
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Boy nothing is sacred to you White people hating, Black racist, Black supremacist, Afro-nuts. Now not only do you want steal Whites history, our heritage, our identities, our homeland, no you want to steal our languages too. Its true that you want us Whites to have absolutely nothing. No history, no heritage, no identity, no homeland, not even a language. Pathetic White people hating, racist POSs are what you Clyde, Mikey boy, & the rest of your ilk are.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
Just finishing up - People of Lerna- L. Angel.
This is a revealing book. If a newbie want to understand who the pre-Greeks were there is a very simple objective way to investigate this. We know white people have a superior talent when it comes to BS and lies.
To really investigate who the early Greeks were there are two ways to do this.
1. Analyze, geneticaly, the remains of Greeks from different periods.
2. Analyze, morphlogically, the remains of Greeks from different periods.
According to L. Angels the skeletal remains of the pre-Greeks were Africans(Eurafricans-similar to the people of lower Egypt). This is in-line with what Dr. Winters is saying above.
also, according to Malstrom and many other geneticists now analzying European remains from the neolithic period and beyond - it is clear modern Europeans genetic and phenotypic makeup is NEW to Europe.
Now I am beginning question the authencity of "Caucasian" artifacts from the classical Greek and Roman period.
It takes a really fugked up mind to falsify evidence then soon after forget it is fake.... teaching their young it is real.
Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Still getting my head around the lingiustic thing but the genetics and morpholgy is pretty straight forward
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: Just finishing up - People of Lerna- L. Angel.
This is a revealing book. If a newbie want to understand who the pre-Greeks were there is a very simple objective way to investigate this. We know white people have a superior talent when it comes to BS and lies.
To really investigate who the early Greeks were there are two ways to do this.
1. Analyze, geneticaly, the remains of Greeks from different periods.
2. Analyze, morphlogically, the remains of Greeks from different periods.
According to L. Angels the skeletal remains of the pre-Greeks were Africans(Eurafricans-similar to the people of lower Egypt). This is in-line with what Dr. Winters is saying above.
also, according to Malstrom and many other geneticists now analzying European remains from the neolithic period and beyond - it is clear modern Europeans genetic and phenotypic makeup is NEW to Europe.
Now I am beginning question the authencity of "Caucasian" artifacts from the classical Greek and Roman period.
It takes a really fugked up mind to falsify evidence then soon after forget it is fake.... teaching their young it is real.
You are posting complete nonsense. Angel's study (1945) on Neolithic crania from Greece concludes that they are like modern Greeks: Mediterranid with ''Alpine tendancies'' (p. 256). This is overwelmingly what Greeks are today.
Neolithic Ancestors of the Greeks, Lawrence Angel, American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 49, No. 3, Jul - Sep., 1945.
Posts: 1575 | From: - | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: Boy nothing is sacred to you White people hating, Black racist, Black supremacist, Afro-nuts. Now not only do you want steal Whites history, our heritage, our identities, our homeland, no you want to steal our languages too. Its true that you want us Whites to have absolutely nothing. No history, no heritage, no identity, no homeland, not even a language. Pathetic White people hating, racist POSs are what you Clyde, Mikey boy, & the rest of your ilk are.
They type all this hatred against 'whites' out, however i then research these people (like Narmerthoth) to discover in their spare time they are jerking off over white women. As i already showed, i found naked blonde (and brunette) white females all over Narmarthoths photobucket account. So much for ''black pride'' eh? Posts: 1575 | From: - | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
LOL, Cass you are so right. Any Black man with any amount of pride would be having nothing but pics of Black women on their page I would think, after all Black women were made for Black men.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: LOL, Cass you are so right. Any Black man with any amount of pride would be having nothing but pics of Black women on their page I would think, after all Black women were made for Black men.
Negroid males statistically have the least interest in their own females. The anthropologist Peter Frost has written several papers covering why. It boils down to the complete lack of sexual dimorphism or physical diversity in Negroids. The females never ended up feminine, but masculine in appearance. This is why from a close distance it is hard to tell the difference between a black female and male.
Posts: 1575 | From: - | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
Cass quote: You are posting complete nonsense. Angel's study (1945) on Neolithic crania from Greece concludes that they are like modern Greeks: Mediterranid with ''Alpine tendancies'' (p. 256). This is overwelmingly what Greeks are today.
Neolithic Ancestors of the Greeks, Lawrence Angel, American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 49, No. 3, Jul - Sep., 1945.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
TruthAndRights - Please do not post any pictures of beautiful, curvy, Black women.
We all need to just drink-in the true nature of so many Albinos. When stressed with the exposing of their lies, look what their weak minds turn to, even stupider lies. But please note, they will ALWAYS respond with a lie.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
have you noticed that I keep you nusy right where I want you to be busy you filthy pig?? LOL I own you!
As you have figured out, this entire board consists of ONE sick degenerate that has created ficticious names to talk to itself in. There is NOONE on this site that can be trusted but me. The only links on this site that can be trusted are the ones that I provide for you! Here is a link that you can use as a resource and can be trusted! http://www.raceandhistory.com/
When you have finished reading this post check out this site to learn the truth about history and ALL civilzations. Do NOT be fooled by the real history link that the filthy monkey created using the race and history link as a guide. This is the ONLY site that can be trusted http://www.raceandhistory.com/
Isnt it funny how this one little link destroys all of the charts, graphs and pics that the filthy monkey lies to us with? You now understand why the filthy monkey continues to spam the board with photos of modern day populations that had absolutely NOTHING to do with ancient Egypt
The next time one of these degenerates tries to tell you a lie just refer the moonkey to the latest DNA analysis on the ancient Egyptians, and then tell the faggot to crawl back in its cave!
The pig just keeps showing us why these crackers should not exist! They have genetically recessive genes and ion 50 years they will be the minority in BRITAIN!! THAT ALONE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT THEY WILL EVENTUALLY DIE OUT LIKE THE UNATURAL ABOMINATIONS THAT THEY ARE!
Look at the low IQ monkey with its charts and pictures LOL tHE dna analysis does not matter to this monkey, because it lives in a world of fantasy! lol
Folks, the monkey performs at my commend. I am this monkeys master!But then again all one needs to do is take a cursury look at this monkeys youtube page to understand the tenuous grip on reality that this monkey has! LOL http://www.youtube.com/user/phoenician7
When the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians what does a low IQ monkey do???
The low IQ monkey shows pictures and charts and munbles on and on about haplogroups while completely ignoring what the DNA analysis of the ancient Egyptians actually says LOL
the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians. Thats what the DNA says, thats what the science says. This monkey in all of its fake names is very pathetic isnt it?
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: TruthAndRights - Please do not post any pictures of beautiful, curvy, Black women.
We all need to just drink-in the true nature of so many Albinos. When stressed with the exposing of their lies, look what their weak minds turn to, even stupider lies. But please note, they will ALWAYS respond with a lie.
Mikey boy White people hating, Black racist, Black Supremacist, history stealing, lying POS. What's the matter mad because you can not steal what rightfully belongs to us Whites unimpeded? Mad because we will not allow you to steal our history, our heritage, our identities, our homeland. Well tough cookies. Of course there is beauty in all races nobody is saying there isn't.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
THIS IS A NEAT LITTLE TRICk!!! I CAN USE YOU TO RIDICULE AND IMPORVERISH YOU, WHILE ENRICHING MYSELF AT THE SAME TIME! YOU ARE OWNED MONKEY!
As you have figured out, this entire board consists of ONE sick degenerate that has created ficticious names to talk to itself in. There is NOONE on this site that can be trusted but me. The only links on this site that can be trusted are the ones that I provide for you! Here is a link that you can use as a resource and can be trusted! http://www.raceandhistory.com/
When you have finished reading this post check out this site to learn the truth about history and ALL civilzations. Do NOT be fooled by the real history link that the filthy monkey created using the race and history link as a guide. This is the ONLY site that can be trusted http://www.raceandhistory.com/
Isnt it funny how this one little link destroys all of the charts, graphs and pics that the filthy monkey lies to us with? You now understand why the filthy monkey continues to spam the board with photos of modern day populations that had absolutely NOTHING to do with ancient Egypt
The next time one of these degenerates tries to tell you a lie just refer the moonkey to the latest DNA analysis on the ancient Egyptians, and then tell the faggot to crawl back in its cave!
The pig just keeps showing us why these crackers should not exist! They have genetically recessive genes and ion 50 years they will be the minority in BRITAIN!! THAT ALONE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT THEY WILL EVENTUALLY DIE OUT LIKE THE UNATURAL ABOMINATIONS THAT THEY ARE!
Look at the low IQ monkey with its charts and pictures LOL tHE dna analysis does not matter to this monkey, because it lives in a world of fantasy! lol
Folks, the monkey performs at my commend. I am this monkeys master!But then again all one needs to do is take a cursury look at this monkeys youtube page to understand the tenuous grip on reality that this monkey has! LOL http://www.youtube.com/user/phoenician7
When the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians what does a low IQ monkey do???
The low IQ monkey shows pictures and charts and munbles on and on about haplogroups while completely ignoring what the DNA analysis of the ancient Egyptians actually says LOL
the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians. Thats what the DNA says, thats what the science says. This monkey in all of its fake names is very pathetic isnt it?
posted
YOU STILL HAVE NOT FIGURED OUT HOW I USE YOUR INSANITY AGAINST YOU? AND NOT JUST FOR KICKS EITHER! IF YOU ONLY KNEW HOW MUCH DAMAGE YOU HAVE BEEN TO YOUR OWN AGENDA! YOU ARE TOO STUPID AND UNEDUCATED TO UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH! HAHAHAHA!
As you have figured out, this entire board consists of ONE sick degenerate that has created ficticious names to talk to itself in. There is NOONE on this site that can be trusted but me. The only links on this site that can be trusted are the ones that I provide for you! Here is a link that you can use as a resource and can be trusted! http://www.raceandhistory.com/
When you have finished reading this post check out this site to learn the truth about history and ALL civilzations. Do NOT be fooled by the real history link that the filthy monkey created using the race and history link as a guide. This is the ONLY site that can be trusted http://www.raceandhistory.com/
Isnt it funny how this one little link destroys all of the charts, graphs and pics that the filthy monkey lies to us with? You now understand why the filthy monkey continues to spam the board with photos of modern day populations that had absolutely NOTHING to do with ancient Egypt
The next time one of these degenerates tries to tell you a lie just refer the moonkey to the latest DNA analysis on the ancient Egyptians, and then tell the faggot to crawl back in its cave!
The pig just keeps showing us why these crackers should not exist! They have genetically recessive genes and ion 50 years they will be the minority in BRITAIN!! THAT ALONE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT THEY WILL EVENTUALLY DIE OUT LIKE THE UNATURAL ABOMINATIONS THAT THEY ARE!
Look at the low IQ monkey with its charts and pictures LOL tHE dna analysis does not matter to this monkey, because it lives in a world of fantasy! lol
Folks, the monkey performs at my commend. I am this monkeys master!But then again all one needs to do is take a cursury look at this monkeys youtube page to understand the tenuous grip on reality that this monkey has! LOL http://www.youtube.com/user/phoenician7
When the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians what does a low IQ monkey do???
The low IQ monkey shows pictures and charts and munbles on and on about haplogroups while completely ignoring what the DNA analysis of the ancient Egyptians actually says LOL
the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians. Thats what the DNA says, thats what the science says. This monkey in all of its fake names is very pathetic isnt it?
posted
ITS THE FIRST THING YOU HAVE GOTTEN RIGHT! I AM A CRACKER HATER! AND THATS WHY I TELL NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH ABOUT THEM
As you have figured out, this entire board consists of ONE sick degenerate that has created ficticious names to talk to itself in. There is NOONE on this site that can be trusted but me. The only links on this site that can be trusted are the ones that I provide for you! Here is a link that you can use as a resource and can be trusted! http://www.raceandhistory.com/
When you have finished reading this post check out this site to learn the truth about history and ALL civilzations. Do NOT be fooled by the real history link that the filthy monkey created using the race and history link as a guide. This is the ONLY site that can be trusted http://www.raceandhistory.com/
Isnt it funny how this one little link destroys all of the charts, graphs and pics that the filthy monkey lies to us with? You now understand why the filthy monkey continues to spam the board with photos of modern day populations that had absolutely NOTHING to do with ancient Egypt
The next time one of these degenerates tries to tell you a lie just refer the moonkey to the latest DNA analysis on the ancient Egyptians, and then tell the faggot to crawl back in its cave!
The pig just keeps showing us why these crackers should not exist! They have genetically recessive genes and ion 50 years they will be the minority in BRITAIN!! THAT ALONE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT THEY WILL EVENTUALLY DIE OUT LIKE THE UNATURAL ABOMINATIONS THAT THEY ARE!
Look at the low IQ monkey with its charts and pictures LOL tHE dna analysis does not matter to this monkey, because it lives in a world of fantasy! lol
Folks, the monkey performs at my commend. I am this monkeys master!But then again all one needs to do is take a cursury look at this monkeys youtube page to understand the tenuous grip on reality that this monkey has! LOL http://www.youtube.com/user/phoenician7
When the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians what does a low IQ monkey do???
The low IQ monkey shows pictures and charts and munbles on and on about haplogroups while completely ignoring what the DNA analysis of the ancient Egyptians actually says LOL
the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians. Thats what the DNA says, thats what the science says. This monkey in all of its fake names is very pathetic isnt it?
Dolichocephalism is not a diagnostic trait or exclusive to Negroids. Some Caucasoids are dolichocephalic, while Australoids also are.
You are the dumbest person on this forum, you probably don't even know what dolicocephalism is. However please continue posting, we all need a good laugh once in a while... Posts: 1575 | From: - | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
As most of you have already figured out, this entire board consists of ONE sick degenerate that has created ficticious names to talk to itself in. There is NOONE on this site that can be trusted but me. The only links on this site that can be trusted are the ones that I provide for you! Here is a link that you can use as a resource and can be trusted! http://www.raceandhistory.com/
When you have finished reading this post check out this site to learn the truth about history and ALL civilzations. Do NOT be fooled by the real history link that the filthy monkey created using the race and history link as a guide. This is the ONLY site that can be trusted http://www.raceandhistory.com/
Isnt it funny how this one little link destroys all of the charts, graphs and pics that the filthy monkey lies to us with? You now understand why the filthy monkey continues to spam the board with photos of modern day populations that had absolutely NOTHING to do with ancient Egypt
The next time one of these degenerates tries to tell you a lie just refer the moonkey to the latest DNA analysis on the ancient Egyptians, and then tell the faggot to crawl back in its cave!
The pig just keeps showing us why these crackers should not exist! They have genetically recessive genes and ion 50 years they will be the minority in BRITAIN!! THAT ALONE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT THEY WILL EVENTUALLY DIE OUT LIKE THE UNATURAL ABOMINATIONS THAT THEY ARE!
Look at the low IQ monkey with its charts and pictures LOL tHE dna analysis does not matter to this monkey, because it lives in a world of fantasy! lol
Folks, the monkey performs at my commend. I am this monkeys master!But then again all one needs to do is take a cursury look at this monkeys youtube page to understand the tenuous grip on reality that this monkey has! LOL http://www.youtube.com/user/phoenician7
When the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians what does a low IQ monkey do???
The low IQ monkey shows pictures and charts and munbles on and on about haplogroups while completely ignoring what the DNA analysis of the ancient Egyptians actually says LOL
the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians. Thats what the DNA says, thats what the science says. This monkey in all of its fake names is very pathetic isnt it?
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: Just finishing up - People of Lerna- L. Angel.
This is a revealing book. If a newbie want to understand who the pre-Greeks were there is a very simple objective way to investigate this. We know white people have a superior talent when it comes to BS and lies.
To really investigate who the early Greeks were there are two ways to do this.
1. Analyze, geneticaly, the remains of Greeks from different periods.
2. Analyze, morphlogically, the remains of Greeks from different periods.
According to L. Angels the skeletal remains of the pre-Greeks were Africans(Eurafricans-similar to the people of lower Egypt). This is in-line with what Dr. Winters is saying above.
also, according to Malstrom and many other geneticists now analzying European remains from the neolithic period and beyond - it is clear modern Europeans genetic and phenotypic makeup is NEW to Europe.
Now I am beginning question the authencity of "Caucasian" artifacts from the classical Greek and Roman period.
It takes a really fugked up mind to falsify evidence then soon after forget it is fake.... teaching their young it is real.
xyyman - I hope you are mindful that our purpose here is to "SHARE" information.
I hope and expect that there will be quotes and scanned excerpts from the book forthcoming.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
As most of you have already figured out, this entire board consists of ONE sick degenerate that has created ficticious names to talk to itself in. There is NOONE on this site that can be trusted but me. The only links on this site that can be trusted are the ones that I provide for you! Here is a link that you can use as a resource and can be trusted! http://www.raceandhistory.com/
When you have finished reading this post check out this site to learn the truth about history and ALL civilzations. Do NOT be fooled by the real history link that the filthy monkey created using the race and history link as a guide. This is the ONLY site that can be trusted http://www.raceandhistory.com/
Isnt it funny how this one little link destroys all of the charts, graphs and pics that the filthy monkey lies to us with? You now understand why the filthy monkey continues to spam the board with photos of modern day populations that had absolutely NOTHING to do with ancient Egypt
The next time one of these degenerates tries to tell you a lie just refer the moonkey to the latest DNA analysis on the ancient Egyptians, and then tell the faggot to crawl back in its cave!
The pig just keeps showing us why these crackers should not exist! They have genetically recessive genes and ion 50 years they will be the minority in BRITAIN!! THAT ALONE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT THEY WILL EVENTUALLY DIE OUT LIKE THE UNATURAL ABOMINATIONS THAT THEY ARE!
Look at the low IQ monkey with its charts and pictures LOL tHE dna analysis does not matter to this monkey, because it lives in a world of fantasy! lol
Folks, the monkey performs at my commend. I am this monkeys master!But then again all one needs to do is take a cursury look at this monkeys youtube page to understand the tenuous grip on reality that this monkey has! LOL http://www.youtube.com/user/phoenician7
When the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians what does a low IQ monkey do???
The low IQ monkey shows pictures and charts and munbles on and on about haplogroups while completely ignoring what the DNA analysis of the ancient Egyptians actually says LOL
the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians. Thats what the DNA says, thats what the science says. This monkey in all of its fake names is very pathetic isnt it?
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Battywashologist: Negroid males statistically have the least interest in their own females. The anthropologist Peter Frost has written several papers covering why. It boils down to the complete lack of sexual dimorphism or physical diversity in Negroids. The females never ended up feminine, but masculine in appearance. This is why from a close distance it is hard to tell the difference between a black female and male.
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: Any Black man with any amount of pride would be having nothing but pics of Black women on their page I would think,
I have no idea what is on that gentleman's page and I don't care, but generally speaking: Indeed.
after all Black women were made for Black men.
Most definitely, without question.
Of course there is beauty in all races nobody is saying there isn't.
DHDoxies, you might want to read several of Anglo_Battywashologist's aka cah-sh*t-he-rides' posts again, because he clearly...wait you're right...'nobody' is saying it
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: TruthAndRights - Please do not post any pictures of beautiful, curvy, Black women.
We all need to just drink-in the true nature of so many Albinos. When stressed with the exposing of their lies, look what their weak minds turn to, even stupider lies. But please note, they will ALWAYS respond with a lie.
Just couldn't help yourself, could you.
The thread "WAS" on serious subject matter you know.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: TruthAndRights - Please do not post any pictures of beautiful, curvy, Black women.
We all need to just drink-in the true nature of so many Albinos. When stressed with the exposing of their lies, look what their weak minds turn to, even stupider lies. But please note, they will ALWAYS respond with a lie.
Just couldn't help yourself, could you.
The thread "WAS" on serious subject matter you know.
I posted pictures of Black Men/Black Women Couples in Love...in response to Anglo_Battywashologist's nonsense somebody 'round here has to promote and/or defend Black Love and/or Black Unity....Black Love and Black Unity are serious subject matters to some people....and I will defend it vehemently....
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Google Books had a good thing going until they got sued for scanning and publishing these books. So unfortunately I am doing this the old fashioned way. Reading a hard copy, and not e-books, pdf etc on a tablet or computer. But I will reference the sections, pages etc.
L. Angel more or less concluded like G. Sergi and many others that modern Europeans are invaders. Who either wiped out or admixed with the “negroid” people of Europe. He came to this conclusion through really simple science. Like, examining the skeletal remains of the inhabitants from pre-Neolithic thru Roman period.
Modern geneticist are now coming to the same conclusion by performing genetic analysis of skeletal remains from the same period. Pre-Neolithic thru Roman. Barbujani(?) is leader in this field. Malstrom is another.
What better way to tell who the people of historical Europe were. . . .simple . .. test the remains from the different period.. And for those who are not keeping up in the field. The Refugium Theory has now been debunked. See ISOGG. Modern Europeans did NOT spread out from Iberia(Basque) after the LGM.
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
As most of you have already figured out, this entire board consists of ONE sick degenerate that has created ficticious names to talk to itself in. There is NOONE on this site that can be trusted but me. The only links on this site that can be trusted are the ones that I provide for you! Here is a link that you can use as a resource and can be trusted! http://www.raceandhistory.com/
When you have finished reading this post check out this site to learn the truth about history and ALL civilzations. Do NOT be fooled by the real history link that the filthy monkey created using the race and history link as a guide. This is the ONLY site that can be trusted http://www.raceandhistory.com/
Isnt it funny how this one little link destroys all of the charts, graphs and pics that the filthy monkey lies to us with? You now understand why the filthy monkey continues to spam the board with photos of modern day populations that had absolutely NOTHING to do with ancient Egypt
The next time one of these degenerates tries to tell you a lie just refer the moonkey to the latest DNA analysis on the ancient Egyptians, and then tell the faggot to crawl back in its cave!
The pig just keeps showing us why these crackers should not exist! They have genetically recessive genes and ion 50 years they will be the minority in BRITAIN!! THAT ALONE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT THEY WILL EVENTUALLY DIE OUT LIKE THE UNATURAL ABOMINATIONS THAT THEY ARE!
Look at the low IQ monkey with its charts and pictures LOL tHE dna analysis does not matter to this monkey, because it lives in a world of fantasy! lol
Folks, the monkey performs at my commend. I am this monkeys master!But then again all one needs to do is take a cursury look at this monkeys youtube page to understand the tenuous grip on reality that this monkey has! LOL http://www.youtube.com/user/phoenician7
When the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians what does a low IQ monkey do???
The low IQ monkey shows pictures and charts and munbles on and on about haplogroups while completely ignoring what the DNA analysis of the ancient Egyptians actually says LOL
the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians. Thats what the DNA says, thats what the science says. This monkey in all of its fake names is very pathetic isnt it?
posted
As most of you have already figured out, this entire board consists of ONE sick degenerate that has created ficticious names to talk to itself in. There is NOONE on this site that can be trusted but me. The only links on this site that can be trusted are the ones that I provide for you! Here is a link that you can use as a resource and can be trusted! http://www.raceandhistory.com/
When you have finished reading this post check out this site to learn the truth about history and ALL civilzations. Do NOT be fooled by the real history link that the filthy monkey created using the race and history link as a guide. This is the ONLY site that can be trusted http://www.raceandhistory.com/
Isnt it funny how this one little link destroys all of the charts, graphs and pics that the filthy monkey lies to us with? You now understand why the filthy monkey continues to spam the board with photos of modern day populations that had absolutely NOTHING to do with ancient Egypt
The next time one of these degenerates tries to tell you a lie just refer the moonkey to the latest DNA analysis on the ancient Egyptians, and then tell the faggot to crawl back in its cave!
The pig just keeps showing us why these crackers should not exist! They have genetically recessive genes and ion 50 years they will be the minority in BRITAIN!! THAT ALONE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT THEY WILL EVENTUALLY DIE OUT LIKE THE UNATURAL ABOMINATIONS THAT THEY ARE!
Look at the low IQ monkey with its charts and pictures LOL tHE dna analysis does not matter to this monkey, because it lives in a world of fantasy! lol
Folks, the monkey performs at my commend. I am this monkeys master!But then again all one needs to do is take a cursury look at this monkeys youtube page to understand the tenuous grip on reality that this monkey has! LOL http://www.youtube.com/user/phoenician7
When the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians what does a low IQ monkey do???
The low IQ monkey shows pictures and charts and munbles on and on about haplogroups while completely ignoring what the DNA analysis of the ancient Egyptians actually says LOL
the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians. Thats what the DNA says, thats what the science says. This monkey in all of its fake names is very pathetic isnt it?
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: Google Books had a good thing going until they got sued for scanning and publishing these books. So unfortunately I am doing this the old fashioned way. Reading a hard copy, and not e-books, pdf etc on a tablet or computer. But I will reference the sections, pages etc.
L. Angel more or less concluded like G. Sergi and many others that modern Europeans are invaders. Who either wiped out or admixed with the “negroid” people of Europe. He came to this conclusion through really simple science. Like, examining the skeletal remains of the inhabitants from pre-Neolithic thru Roman period.
Modern geneticist are now coming to the same conclusion by performing genetic analysis of skeletal remains from the same period. Pre-Neolithic thru Roman. Barbujani(?) is leader in this field. Malstrom is another.
What better way to tell who the people of historical Europe were. . . .simple . .. test the remains from the different period.. And for those who are not keeping up in the field. The Refugium Theory has now been debunked. See ISOGG. Modern Europeans did NOT spread out from Iberia(Basque) after the LGM.
xyyman - It's an expensive book - $156.00 new on Amazon. So we all look forward to you excerpts.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
As most of you have already figured out, this entire board consists of ONE sick degenerate that has created ficticious names to talk to itself in. There is NOONE on this site that can be trusted but me. The only links on this site that can be trusted are the ones that I provide for you! Here is a link that you can use as a resource and can be trusted! http://www.raceandhistory.com/
When you have finished reading this post check out this site to learn the truth about history and ALL civilzations. Do NOT be fooled by the real history link that the filthy monkey created using the race and history link as a guide. This is the ONLY site that can be trusted http://www.raceandhistory.com/
Isnt it funny how this one little link destroys all of the charts, graphs and pics that the filthy monkey lies to us with? You now understand why the filthy monkey continues to spam the board with photos of modern day populations that had absolutely NOTHING to do with ancient Egypt
The next time one of these degenerates tries to tell you a lie just refer the moonkey to the latest DNA analysis on the ancient Egyptians, and then tell the faggot to crawl back in its cave!
The pig just keeps showing us why these crackers should not exist! They have genetically recessive genes and ion 50 years they will be the minority in BRITAIN!! THAT ALONE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT THEY WILL EVENTUALLY DIE OUT LIKE THE UNATURAL ABOMINATIONS THAT THEY ARE!
Look at the low IQ monkey with its charts and pictures LOL tHE dna analysis does not matter to this monkey, because it lives in a world of fantasy! lol
Folks, the monkey performs at my commend. I am this monkeys master!But then again all one needs to do is take a cursury look at this monkeys youtube page to understand the tenuous grip on reality that this monkey has! LOL http://www.youtube.com/user/phoenician7
When the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians what does a low IQ monkey do???
The low IQ monkey shows pictures and charts and munbles on and on about haplogroups while completely ignoring what the DNA analysis of the ancient Egyptians actually says LOL
the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians. Thats what the DNA says, thats what the science says. This monkey in all of its fake names is very pathetic isnt it?
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: Google Books had a good thing going until they got sued for scanning and publishing these books. So unfortunately I am doing this the old fashioned way. Reading a hard copy, and not e-books, pdf etc on a tablet or computer. But I will reference the sections, pages etc.
L. Angel more or less concluded like G. Sergi and many others that modern Europeans are invaders. Who either wiped out or admixed with the “negroid” people of Europe. He came to this conclusion through really simple science. Like, examining the skeletal remains of the inhabitants from pre-Neolithic thru Roman period.
Modern geneticist are now coming to the same conclusion by performing genetic analysis of skeletal remains from the same period. Pre-Neolithic thru Roman. Barbujani(?) is leader in this field. Malstrom is another.
What better way to tell who the people of historical Europe were. . . .simple . .. test the remains from the different period.. And for those who are not keeping up in the field. The Refugium Theory has now been debunked. See ISOGG. Modern Europeans did NOT spread out from Iberia(Basque) after the LGM.
xyyman - It's an expensive book - $156.00 new on Amazon. So we all look forward to you excerpts.
If one really wants the book, one doesn't have to buy it new:
1 new from $156.00 24 used from $3.71 2 collectible from $24.00
Hope this helps folks who are interested in buying the book....I've never had a problem with any used book I've ordered via Amazon...matter of fact, I bought my used author-signed hardback copy of Black Britannia A History of Blacks in Britain by Edward Scobie via Amazon...yea, it's nice to buy new and all, but buying used in many instances is not a bad thing atall...
boy what an impulsive non-thinking act-first negro I am
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
As most of you have already figured out, this entire board consists of ONE sick degenerate that has created ficticious names to talk to itself in. There is NOONE on this site that can be trusted but me. The only links on this site that can be trusted are the ones that I provide for you! Here is a link that you can use as a resource and can be trusted! http://www.raceandhistory.com/
When you have finished reading this post check out this site to learn the truth about history and ALL civilzations. Do NOT be fooled by the real history link that the filthy monkey created using the race and history link as a guide. This is the ONLY site that can be trusted http://www.raceandhistory.com/
Isnt it funny how this one little link destroys all of the charts, graphs and pics that the filthy monkey lies to us with? You now understand why the filthy monkey continues to spam the board with photos of modern day populations that had absolutely NOTHING to do with ancient Egypt
The next time one of these degenerates tries to tell you a lie just refer the moonkey to the latest DNA analysis on the ancient Egyptians, and then tell the faggot to crawl back in its cave!
The pig just keeps showing us why these crackers should not exist! They have genetically recessive genes and ion 50 years they will be the minority in BRITAIN!! THAT ALONE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT THEY WILL EVENTUALLY DIE OUT LIKE THE UNATURAL ABOMINATIONS THAT THEY ARE!
Look at the low IQ monkey with its charts and pictures LOL tHE dna analysis does not matter to this monkey, because it lives in a world of fantasy! lol
Folks, the monkey performs at my commend. I am this monkeys master!But then again all one needs to do is take a cursury look at this monkeys youtube page to understand the tenuous grip on reality that this monkey has! LOL http://www.youtube.com/user/phoenician7
When the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians what does a low IQ monkey do???
The low IQ monkey shows pictures and charts and munbles on and on about haplogroups while completely ignoring what the DNA analysis of the ancient Egyptians actually says LOL
the DNA analysis irrefutably shows that the modern day populations of South Africa, West Africa anmd central Africa are the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians. Thats what the DNA says, thats what the science says. This monkey in all of its fake names is very pathetic isnt it?
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
you're right...'nobody' is saying it 
Printer-friendly view of this topic