posted
BLACK MOORS Darker-skinned people who historically have been enslaved by the White Moors. Originally from sub-Saharan Africa, the Black Moors have taken on many aspects of the Arab culture of their masters. They speak Hassaniya, an Arabic dialect.
Posts: 507 | Registered: May 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
^^Dummy needs to go check out a proper library and leave the propaganda newspaper articles written by 23 year old recent journalism grads alone.
Hassaniya Arabs are recent immigrants into Mauritania and Morocco. They came in the 17th century.
There was a war, the Chouba war between the Muurs and the Hassiniya Arab in the 18th century and the immigrant Hassaniyas won that war, and imposed a foreign culture on Mauritania.
The French colonists arrived in the 19th century. They were those seeking to bury black history under a garbage of lies.
It was those despicable albinos who began calling the Hassaniyas the "white moors" to create confusion amongst the people, and leave them prey to tribal manipulations.
Albinos, there were no white moors.
The word Moor, comes from Maures which means Black.
No matter how your little malicious mind envies us, you can never be us.
We are the Moors of Mauritania, Morocco and Ethiopias, held bondage in the Americas.
Go to your library and check this out.
-------------------- Lionz Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Please explain how European Albinos can be indigenous to a land whose climate kills them?
Perhaps European Albinos are immune to natural selection due to being superseded by Abnormal mutations which sees them die horrible deaths at age 40-50. Is that what you are saying?
-------------------- Selenium gives real life and true reality Posts: 4693 | From: Saturn | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
You are speaking intelligently to unintelligent whites and black Anglo Saxons, why bother?
These whites in Mauritania are of two types.
1. Is the arabs you have spoken about, this is true enough.
2. The MILLIONS of whites that were enslaved in Africa, many of them were brought into Mauritania and mixed in, so now you have white looking, mulattos and then of course the pure black Mauritanians who are indigenous to the area.
To understand how all this played out, one needs to understand history. Africans (BLACK Africans) went into Europe around 700 A.D.. Sister Dana has talked about this a number of times. We are discussing here groups like Sinhaja etc. Anyway, these people being Africans and accustomed to slavery and keeping concubines, started sending back white slaves to Africa. These whites are going into all parts of North Africa and parts of West Africa. We know for sure they were going as far south as Mali. Dr. Keita talked about some Fula groups having European DNA in them. From which I would then assume that some of these slaves probably made it into parts of Senegal too. As that was the Fula/Fulbe population he was talking about, if I remember right. We also have Fulbe in Sierra Leone, which I would assume probably also had some of this going on. I would even venture to assume that this may explain why some Igbo look the way they do (Igbo are in Nigeria). Here is the video in question with Dr. Keita: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wpRzeMgdXk Here is a video where this Anglo Arab talks about “Arabs” enslaving whites by the “thousands”. He is a little off, being that Arabs were not in control of ANY of the areas in question he shows on his map. These are all black African controlled areas. Anyway here is the video:
Next read the book Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast and Italy, 1500-1800 (Early Modern History) by Robert C. Davis
Keep in mind when reading this book that Turks were not the originators of this trade nor did they have any real say-so or power in this trade. They just purchased what Africans had on sale. Wanted to clarify this because I think this book tries to make the Turks seem as if they had all the power and others were just doing their bidding and that’s a lie.
Africans (Black Africans) were enslaving whites by the MILLIONS. We Africans tend to forget that before Europeans ever took an African as a slave, we were enslaving them in large numbers. One town in Ireland called Baltimore was completely emptied of its entire people at one point. Only two people from that town ever made it back to Europe. They had been in captivity for fifteen years, IF I remember right. They (the two Irishmen who made it back to Europe) said they only had water and bread every day.
It is under these circumstances that these whites and Mulattos have come to North and parts of Western Africa and they are relatively new arrivals at that.
It is also under these conditions that whites start a war against us, capture our lands and enslave our people. We Africans really can’t complain too much considering we did it first. Its our turn to pay the piper for now. It would be in the best interest of whites to tell the truth though; because things are cyclical. By trying to erase our history Africans now have a bitter dislike for whites and it won’t take much convincing to turn around and do the same thing again to Europeans. Maybe not in our life time but it could happen. It would be better to tell the truth 100%, let it all out. Now we will be on equal footing, and can understand that we have all made mistakes and we need to move forward as one human family. Otherwise the future could have some terrible consequences.
Posts: 1296 | From: the planet | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Crush Black Lies: BLACK MOORS Darker-skinned people who historically have been enslaved by the White Moors. Originally from sub-Saharan Africa, the Black Moors have taken on many aspects of the Arab culture of their masters. They speak Hassaniya, an Arabic dialect.
1. Is the arabs you have spoken about, this is true enough.
2. The MILLIONS of whites that were enslaved in Africa, many of them were brought into Mauritania and mixed in, so now you have white looking, mulattos and then of course the pure black Mauritanians who are indigenous to the area.
Here is a video where this Anglo Arab talks about “Arabs” enslaving whites by the “thousands”. He is a little off, being that Arabs were not in control of ANY of the areas in question he shows on his map. These are all black African controlled areas.
After the Arabs conqured North Africa and people converted to their Mecca based religion what areas did the Arabs control?
quote:Originally posted by typeZeiss:
Next read the book Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast and Italy, 1500-1800 (Early Modern History) by Robert C. Davis
Keep in mind when reading this book that Turks were not the originators of this trade nor did they have any real say-so or power in this trade. They just purchased what Africans had on sale. Wanted to clarify this because I think this book tries to make the Turks seem as if they had all the power and others were just doing their bidding and that’s a lie.
what is your proof that it is a lie?
quote:Originally posted by typeZeiss: Africans (Black Africans) were enslaving whites by the MILLIONS.
It is under these circumstances that these whites and Mulattos have come to North and parts of Western Africa and they are relatively new arrivals at that.
Of the slavery that still exists in Mauritania and recently in other parts of North Africa as well it is common that the masters are lighter skinned than the slaves. How did this come about in light of the Moorish history you are speaking of?
Posts: 42933 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
You are speaking intelligently to unintelligent whites and black Anglo Saxons, why bother?
These whites in Mauritania are of two types.
1. Is the arabs you have spoken about, this is true enough.
2. The MILLIONS of whites that were enslaved in Africa, many of them were brought into Mauritania and mixed in, so now you have white looking, mulattos and then of course the pure black Mauritanians who are indigenous to the area.
To understand how all this played out, one needs to understand history. Africans (BLACK Africans) went into Europe around 700 A.D.. Sister Dana has talked about this a number of times. We are discussing here groups like Sinhaja etc. Anyway, these people being Africans and accustomed to slavery and keeping concubines, started sending back white slaves to Africa. These whites are going into all parts of North Africa and parts of West Africa. We know for sure they were going as far south as Mali. Dr. Keita talked about some Fula groups having European DNA in them. From which I would then assume that some of these slaves probably made it into parts of Senegal too. As that was the Fula/Fulbe population he was talking about, if I remember right. We also have Fulbe in Sierra Leone, which I would assume probably also had some of this going on. I would even venture to assume that this may explain why some Igbo look the way they do (Igbo are in Nigeria). Here is the video in question with Dr. Keita: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wpRzeMgdXk Here is a video where this Anglo Arab talks about “Arabs” enslaving whites by the “thousands”. He is a little off, being that Arabs were not in control of ANY of the areas in question he shows on his map. These are all black African controlled areas. Anyway here is the video:
Next read the book Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast and Italy, 1500-1800 (Early Modern History) by Robert C. Davis
Keep in mind when reading this book that Turks were not the originators of this trade nor did they have any real say-so or power in this trade. They just purchased what Africans had on sale. Wanted to clarify this because I think this book tries to make the Turks seem as if they had all the power and others were just doing their bidding and that’s a lie.
Africans (Black Africans) were enslaving whites by the MILLIONS. We Africans tend to forget that before Europeans ever took an African as a slave, we were enslaving them in large numbers. One town in Ireland called Baltimore was completely emptied of its entire people at one point. Only two people from that town ever made it back to Europe. They had been in captivity for fifteen years, IF I remember right. They (the two Irishmen who made it back to Europe) said they only had water and bread every day.
It is under these circumstances that these whites and Mulattos have come to North and parts of Western Africa and they are relatively new arrivals at that.
It is also under these conditions that whites start a war against us, capture our lands and enslave our people. We Africans really can’t complain too much considering we did it first. Its our turn to pay the piper for now. It would be in the best interest of whites to tell the truth though; because things are cyclical. By trying to erase our history Africans now have a bitter dislike for whites and it won’t take much convincing to turn around and do the same thing again to Europeans. Maybe not in our life time but it could happen. It would be better to tell the truth 100%, let it all out. Now we will be on equal footing, and can understand that we have all made mistakes and we need to move forward as one human family. Otherwise the future could have some terrible consequences.
Yes, it is clear that Whites did not originate in Northern Africa but were forcibly brought into the region for slavery or by way of plot to eventually grow in number, interbreed before infiltrating and usurping rule. Even today, these native Europeans burn in the African sun. Obviously, these Albino slaves were/are deployed as house slaves since they are limited in working outdoors where sun exposure deceases their life expectancy. This explains why there are White moors. They came as slaves.
Posts: 4693 | From: Saturn | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
You are speaking intelligently to unintelligent whites and black Anglo Saxons, why bother?
These whites in Mauritania are of two types.
1. Is the arabs you have spoken about, this is true enough.
2. The MILLIONS of whites that were enslaved in Africa, many of them were brought into Mauritania and mixed in, so now you have white looking, mulattos and then of course the pure black Mauritanians who are indigenous to the area.
To understand how all this played out, one needs to understand history. Africans (BLACK Africans) went into Europe around 700 A.D.. Sister Dana has talked about this a number of times. We are discussing here groups like Sinhaja etc. Anyway, these people being Africans and accustomed to slavery and keeping concubines, started sending back white slaves to Africa. These whites are going into all parts of North Africa and parts of West Africa. We know for sure they were going as far south as Mali. Dr. Keita talked about some Fula groups having European DNA in them. From which I would then assume that some of these slaves probably made it into parts of Senegal too. As that was the Fula/Fulbe population he was talking about, if I remember right. We also have Fulbe in Sierra Leone, which I would assume probably also had some of this going on. I would even venture to assume that this may explain why some Igbo look the way they do (Igbo are in Nigeria). Here is the video in question with Dr. Keita: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wpRzeMgdXk Here is a video where this Anglo Arab talks about “Arabs” enslaving whites by the “thousands”. He is a little off, being that Arabs were not in control of ANY of the areas in question he shows on his map. These are all black African controlled areas. Anyway here is the video:
Next read the book Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast and Italy, 1500-1800 (Early Modern History) by Robert C. Davis
Keep in mind when reading this book that Turks were not the originators of this trade nor did they have any real say-so or power in this trade. They just purchased what Africans had on sale. Wanted to clarify this because I think this book tries to make the Turks seem as if they had all the power and others were just doing their bidding and that’s a lie.
Africans (Black Africans) were enslaving whites by the MILLIONS. We Africans tend to forget that before Europeans ever took an African as a slave, we were enslaving them in large numbers. One town in Ireland called Baltimore was completely emptied of its entire people at one point. Only two people from that town ever made it back to Europe. They had been in captivity for fifteen years, IF I remember right. They (the two Irishmen who made it back to Europe) said they only had water and bread every day.
It is under these circumstances that these whites and Mulattos have come to North and parts of Western Africa and they are relatively new arrivals at that.
It is also under these conditions that whites start a war against us, capture our lands and enslave our people. We Africans really can’t complain too much considering we did it first. Its our turn to pay the piper for now. It would be in the best interest of whites to tell the truth though; because things are cyclical. By trying to erase our history Africans now have a bitter dislike for whites and it won’t take much convincing to turn around and do the same thing again to Europeans. Maybe not in our life time but it could happen. It would be better to tell the truth 100%, let it all out. Now we will be on equal footing, and can understand that we have all made mistakes and we need to move forward as one human family. Otherwise the future could have some terrible consequences.
Yes, it is clear that Whites did not originate in Northern Africa but were forcibly brought into the region for slavery or by way of plot to eventually grow in number, interbreed before infiltrating and usurping rule. Even today, these native Europeans burn in the African sun. Obviously, these Albino slaves were/are deployed as house slaves since they are limited in working outdoors where sun exposure deceases their life expectancy. This explains why there are White moors. They came as slaves.
They did work outside. Get the Book Muslim Masters Christian Slaves. There are accounts of whites building walls, rowing boats and doing a ton of other physical labors. Remember they were serfs back in Europe and the worked from noon up till sun down, wasn't like they didn't do manual labor in their own countries.
There is also accounts from a white man from America being captured and enslaved in Mauritania and he talks about his ordeal. I THink I already posted a video about him. They treated this whites like animals.
Posts: 1296 | From: the planet | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
I find this funny - yet crazy at the same time - Chris Brown and his friends dressed up like Bin Laden and friends - now what's interesting is that these are African Americans ...
Why do they look Eastern or North Africa?
I guess its funny what difference clothing makes in appearance ...
Posts: 951 | From: where rules end and freedom begins | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
1. Is the arabs you have spoken about, this is true enough.
2. The MILLIONS of whites that were enslaved in Africa, many of them were brought into Mauritania and mixed in, so now you have white looking, mulattos and then of course the pure black Mauritanians who are indigenous to the area.
Here is a video where this Anglo Arab talks about “Arabs” enslaving whites by the “thousands”. He is a little off, being that Arabs were not in control of ANY of the areas in question he shows on his map. These are all black African controlled areas.
After the Arabs conqured North Africa and people converted to their Mecca based religion what areas did the Arabs control?
quote:Originally posted by typeZeiss:
Next read the book Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast and Italy, 1500-1800 (Early Modern History) by Robert C. Davis
Keep in mind when reading this book that Turks were not the originators of this trade nor did they have any real say-so or power in this trade. They just purchased what Africans had on sale. Wanted to clarify this because I think this book tries to make the Turks seem as if they had all the power and others were just doing their bidding and that’s a lie.
what is your proof that it is a lie?
quote:Originally posted by typeZeiss: Africans (Black Africans) were enslaving whites by the MILLIONS.
It is under these circumstances that these whites and Mulattos have come to North and parts of Western Africa and they are relatively new arrivals at that.
Of the slavery that still exists in Mauritania and recently in other parts of North Africa as well it is common that the masters are lighter skinned than the slaves. How did this come about in light of the Moorish history you are speaking of?
Ummm...When black people take slaves and mix with them I wonder what they are going to look like - Neanderdull. Let's try and think before we speak now, O.K? .
Posts: 4226 | From: New Jersey, USA | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by typeZeiss: Dana why not clear out your inbox hmm?
Oh OK I cleaned out most of the sent ones. I thought that would do it. Sorry. I'll do it in the next 25 seconds. Hold on.
Posts: 4226 | From: New Jersey, USA | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
.
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
Sorry. I'll do it in the next 25 seconds. Hold on.
Printer-friendly view of this topic