posted
"THE THREE GREAT RACES AND THEIR MERGERS: The three great races are the Mongul, the White, and African. Until near 2300 BC, they were completely isolated from each other" http://www.beforebc.de/index2.html
- Mike can you explain?
So if "whites" were fully isolated before "Black" contact - that means "white" folk now are indigenous somewhere - can you explain where that landmass is?
Posts: 873 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
Mike says white people are Dravidian albinos
Clyde says the Dravidans were Kushites
Therefore white people are Kushites. They are indigenous to Sudan
These white and black kushites later went into India. The whites were a minority.
Africans still give birth to albinos to this day
So the white Kushites later broke away and formed their own own tribe and honed their miltary skills
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Come on Mikey boy, why don't you answer Faheem's question and provide linguistic & DNA proof along with other proof. Come on Mike educate us poor uneducated crackas about our history, tell us where we come from, what language we spoke, etc.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: Come on Mikey boy, why don't you answer Faheem's question and provide linguistic & DNA proof along with other proof. Come on Mike educate us poor uneducated crackas about our history, tell us where we come from, what language we spoke, etc.
Doxie, it's not that you crackas are uneducated, it's that you're liars, and delusional people who refuse to face the truth.
The latest study stupidly headlined as "Ancient Europeans mysteriously vanished 4,500 years ago" clearly states that you people didn't enter Europe until about 2000 B.C. This is not new information, it has been known for years. Yet there is untold studies and articles claiming that you Albinos are native to Europe. You yourself in your delusion repeat it as if it was a religious chant.
As to your language: You speak English, which is an "Indo-European" language. "Indo-European" means that the language you speak is a combination of the languages that the Black Europeans spoke combined with the languages that you Albinos spoke in India. BTW, modern English is only a few hundred years old.
As to your genetic roots: Well, you know that you "CAN'T" be European, so what's left?
Damn sure can't be West Asian, that's where many of the original Black Europeans came from.
Damn sure can't be American!
Damn sure can't be East Asian!
What's left:
South Asian (India):
And Central Asia.
This Wiki on the: Genetics and archaeogenetics of South Asia (India), explains it.
I wonder if this admitting of the truth by just about every Albino scientist of note (there were 59 of them), represents an attempt to cleanse themselves of their former lies?
If so, does it foretell a time when Albinos will admit the genocides and other atrocities they committed against their former Black rulers?Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: [qb] Come on Mikey boy, why don't you answer Faheem's question and provide linguistic & DNA proof along with other proof. Come on Mike educate us poor uneducated crackas about our history, tell us where we come from, what language we spoke, etc.
Doxie, it's not that you crackas are uneducated, it's that you're liars, and delusional people who refuse to face the truth.
The latest study stupidly headlined as "Ancient Europeans mysteriously vanished 4,500 years ago" clearly states that you people didn't enter Europe until about 2000 B.C.
Mike interestsing
Blacks were killed off around 2500 BC.
around 4000 years earlier than your previous genocide theory
That means that the blacks you see in European paintings are Africans who came in AD into a land that had been taken over by whites a few thousand years earlier
Ancient Europeans Mysteriously Vanished 4,500 LiveScience
Also funny that the previous black residents were themselves colonizers from Turkey who only reached Germany 7500 years ago (killing off much earlier white natives of 35K + years ago) to be replaced by " you people " i.e. Iberian white folk, 2500 BC
don't take my word for it, here's the quote: ______________________________________________
" The new study also confirms that people sweeping out from Turkey colonized Europe, likely as a part of the agricultural revolution, reaching Germany about 7,500 years ago."
"about 5,000 to 4,000 years ago, the genetic profile changes radically, suggesting that some mysterious event led to a huge turnover in the population that made up Europe.
The Bell Beaker culture, which emerged from the Iberian Peninsula around 2800 B.C."
____________________________________________
connect the dots, albino Kushite Iberians were the culprit i.e. "Indo Europeans"
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: Mike interestsing
Blacks were killed off around 2500 BC.
around 4000 years earlier than your previous genocide theory
That means that the blacks you see in European paintings are Africans who came in AD into a land that had been taken over by whites a few thousand years earlier
Ancient Europeans Mysteriously Vanished 4,500 LiveScience
Also funny that the previous black residents were themselves colonizers from Turkey who only reached Germany 7500 years ago (killing off much earlier white natives of 35K + years ago) to be replaced by " you people " i.e. Iberian white folk, 2500 BC
don't take my word for it, here's the quote: ______________________________________________
" The new study also confirms that people sweeping out from Turkey colonized Europe, likely as a part of the agricultural revolution, reaching Germany about 7,500 years ago."
"about 5,000 to 4,000 years ago, the genetic profile changes radically, suggesting that some mysterious event led to a huge turnover in the population that made up Europe.
The Bell Beaker culture, which emerged from the Iberian Peninsula around 2800 B.C."
____________________________________________
connect the dots, albino Kushite Iberians were the culprit i.e. "Indo Europeans"
He,he,he:
Trying to confuse the Negroes eh lioness?
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hopefully everyone understands that Ancient Europeans didn't Mysteriously Vanish 4,500 years ago: that's just an attention getting headline. And certainly Blacks weren't killed off around 2500 B.C, that's just lioness being a degenerate as usual.
What did happen 4000 years ago is the demographics of Europe started to change as the first Albinos from Central Asia reached Eastern Europe.
Likely it was the Blacks in Ukraine, like those at the Kostenki Sites, Russia, who the Albinos first encountered.
By about 3,000-3,500 years ago (1,000 - 1,500 B.C.) The Albinos had reached Southern Europe and the Mediterranean Islands.
This is the first historical evidence we have of them, because they caused a great many European Blacks to flee Europe and the Mediterranean Islands.
This event is called the Exodus of "the Sea People".
At this point I was going to give a link to a Wiki on the Sea People and let it go at that. But then I read the Wiki:
Lying Wiki quote: "The Sea Peoples, or Peoples of the Sea, were a confederacy of seafaring raiders from Southern Europe, especially the Aegean Sea who sailed around the eastern Mediterranean and invaded Anatolia, Syria, Canaan, Cyprus, and Egypt toward the end of the Bronze Age."
Anthropologists have always known AND "labeled" the Sea People as people looking for a new home, because they carried their families and all their possessions with them. Note that Rameses III, after he had defeated them, allowed one group that was well known to Egyptians - the Cretans - to settle nearby in Canaan. They came to be known as the Philistines.
Raiders intend to return home.
What a bunch of dumb fuchs they allow at Wiki.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
By the time that Ramesses II died, he had apparently outlived twelve of his sons, so it was his 13th son, Merenptah who ascended the throne of Egypt. Merenptah was himself old by this time, probably nearly sixty years old, he ruled from 1213 until 1203 B.C. Early in Merneptah's reign, his troops had to suppress a revolt in Canaan by the cities of Ashqelon, Gezer, and Yenoam.
Merenptah, Egyptian Museum, Cairo
But Merneptah's greatest challenge came from the west. Libyans had penetrated the buffer territory west of the delta oases and were encroaching on Egyptian lands.
Merneptah also learned that some Sea Peoples: The Black original inhabitants of Southern Europe and the Mediterranean Islands, who had been displaced by Caucasian invaders and were now roving the Middle East in search of new homes, had joined and armed the Libyans, and with them, were conspiring to attack Memphis and Heliopolis, the great administrative and religious centers near the delta's apex. Among the Sea peoples were the Shardana, of Sardinia; the Akhaivasha, usually identified with the Achæans; the Shakalsha, who may have been Cretanized Sicilians; and the Tursha, perhaps the Turseni, who were represented in Etruria. They were defeated by Merneptah, but some settled in Libya and became mercenaries in the Egyptian army. Merenptah's victory is inscribed on his victory stele; also known as the Israel stele.
Ramesses III, was the second ruler of Egypt's 20th Dynasty. Ramesses father Setnakhte, may have been related to Ramesses II (Ramesses the great). But in any case, Ramesses III is considered to be the last of the great pharaohs. His reign was during a time of considerable turmoil throughout southern Europe and the Mediterranean Islands.
The sixty years since the reign of Mernenptah, had seen a constant flood of Caucasians from the Eurasian Plains of Asia. They had taken Mycenae and a great many cities in the other nations; and were ever increasing. This caused a great surge of displaced people from all over the region reeking havoc in search of new homes. This was also the time of the Trojan War. It is in the eight year of the reign of Ramesses III, (about 1160 B.C.) that the Sea People once again attack Egypt, but this time, their group includes displaced people from all the nations and Islands of Southern Europe and the Mediterranean.
After having stayed for a time in Anatolia, the Sea People apparently traveled over land to the Egyptian border. The Sea People had with them their women and children, together with their possessions piled high on ox-carts, it is clear that they were looking for a new home. They also employed a sea fleet that apparently stayed in contract with those on land. Ramesses dispatched squads of soldiers at once to the eastern Egyptian frontier at Djahy, (southern Canaan, perhaps the Egyptian garrison in the Gaza strip), with orders to stand firm at any cost until the main Egyptian army arrived.
Once deployed, the Egyptian army then had little trouble in slaying these enemies. However, there was still the sea fleet to consider, as the Sea Peoples fleet headed for the mouth of one of the eastern arms of the Nile, they were met by the Egyptian fleet. In a brilliant tactical maneuver, the Egyptian fleet worked the Sea Peoples' boats towards shore, where land based Egyptian archers were waiting to pour volley after volley of arrows into the enemy ships, while at the same time, Egyptian marine archers, standing on the decks of their ships, also fired in unison. Thus, Ramesses III defeats the Sea people and they are turned away.
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Hopefully everyone understands that Ancient Europeans didn't Mysteriously Vanish 4,500 years ago:
Mike you already dymsytified it:
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: when Albinos will admit the genocides and other atrocities they committed against their former Black rulers?
Mike what are you kidding us? Your whole world revolves a much more mysterious dispappeance of the blacks of Europe somewhere around the 16-17th century. You are the King of mysterious disappearances. A genocide is much more believable in an earlier period, capish? Don't you see? This is good for you. Now it doesn't make white people such geniuses at covering up a major genocide that would have only been 365 years ago. It happened 4500 years ago, problem solved. Mike, cause for celebration
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
Likely it was the Blacks in Ukraine, like those at the Kostenki Sites, Russia, who the Albinos first encountered.
The place that prehistoric people frorm the Ukraine came form before the Ukraine was Central Asia. hap M173
Mind you those Kostenkis you post are of much earlier periods aorund 25-35kya I think it was Got nothing to do with this much more recent period discussed in the article
quote:Originally posted by Mike111
What did happen 4000 years ago is the demographics of Europe started to change
yes as the article states people came from Iberia and went North into Central Europe. And the people that were already there had themselves come from Anatolia and had only been in Germany beginning 7500 years ago. Mike read the article you posted. None of this has to do with Sea people stop bullshyting they are talking about Central Europe. You are " Trying to confuse the Negroes" Iberian Bell Beakers came in 4500 years ago and replaced Anatolians (Turks!) who had settled there 7500 years ago.
None of this has anything to do with you.
Your ancestors came directly from Africa to the Americas.
Mike you're a goddamn African.
Like me
___________________________
maybe you shouldn't have posted this article it beats you up
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: Come on Mikey boy, why don't you answer Faheem's question and provide linguistic & DNA proof along with other proof. Come on Mike educate us poor uneducated crackas about our history, tell us where we come from, what language we spoke, etc.
Doxie, it's not that you crackas are uneducated, it's that you're liars, and delusional people who refuse to face the truth.
The latest study stupidly headlined as "Ancient Europeans mysteriously vanished 4,500 years ago" clearly states that you people didn't enter Europe until about 2000 B.C. This is not new information, it has been known for years. Yet there is untold studies and articles claiming that you Albinos are native to Europe. You yourself in your delusion repeat it as if it was a religious chant.
As to your language: You speak English, which is an "Indo-European" language. "Indo-European" means that the language you speak is a combination of the languages that the Black Europeans spoke combined with the languages that you Albinos spoke in India. BTW, modern English is only a few hundred years old.
As to your genetic roots: Well, you know that you "CAN'T" be European, so what's left?
Damn sure can't be West Asian, that's where many of the original Black Europeans came from.
Damn sure can't be American!
Damn sure can't be East Asian!
What's left:
South Asian (India):
And Central Asia.
This Wiki on the: Genetics and archaeogenetics of South Asia (India), explains it.
Proof Mike I demand proof, lying, History stealing Black racist swine. Again I asked for proof and once again your lying Black racist, kill the cracka Black butt doesn't provide the proof. We W bites are NOT Albinos, We did NOT come from Central Asia (the Turks however DID), we are NOT Dravidians, We did NOT come from India either. I will continue saying thus unt you show me proof, bonified DNA proof from a Non- Black racist source oh and no Anti-White black racist WINO enabler sources either & NO Jewish sources either. I also want that linguistics proof boy, even the Slavic languages have NO relationship to the Altaic or any other Central Asian languages or any Dravidian language, or Turkish either. Heck your lying Black racist butt can't even tell me what languages each White tribe spoke LOL.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
Doxies in what location were the first Euroepans in before they got to Europe and became known as Europeans?
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: None of this has to do with Sea people stop bullshyting they are talking about Central Europe. You are " Trying to confuse the Negroes" Iberian Bell Beakers came in 4500 years ago and replaced Anatolians (Turks!) who had settled there 7500 years ago.
Asur - That is an outright and purposeful lie - not an erroneous opinion. I believe that it violates every rule of use for the forum. Therefore I demand that lioness be banned from posting on the forum.
The area now called Turkey (derived from the Medieval Latin Turchia; i.e., "Land of the Turks") has been inhabited since the Paleolithic, including various Ancient Anatolian civilizations and Thracian peoples. The Seljuk Turks began migrating into the area in the 11th century, starting the process of Turkification, which was greatly accelerated by the Seljuk victory over the Byzantines at the Battle of Manzikert in 1071. The Seljuk Sultanate of Rûm ruled Anatolia until the Mongol invasion in 1243, upon which it disintegrated into several small Turkish beyliks. Starting from the late 13th century. In 1453, the Ottomans completed their conquest of the Byzantine Empire by capturing its capital, Constantinople. The Ottoman beylik united Anatolia and created an empire encompassing much of Southeastern Europe, Western Asia and North Africa. After the Ottoman Empire collapsed following its defeat in World War I, parts of it were occupied by the victorious Allies. A cadre of young military officers, led by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk and his colleagues, organized a successful resistance to the Allies; in 1923 they established the modern Republic of Turkey, with Atatürk as its first president.
posted
^lioness lying is becoming more blatant every day. I have no way of knowing, but my guess is that many of our "Less-informed" members believed that nonsense about Turkey. I clicked the "Report Post" icon and sent the e-mail to Asur, I encourage others to do the same when the creature lies. Ya that means that you will have to do it all the time - so what?
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
^^^ Mike is purposely " Trying to confuse the Negroes" and throw them off the path of knowing themselves. Trying to promote the lie that African Americans are primarily European rather than primarily African. This goes directly against Dr. Clyde Winter's teachings
The topic as stated in the first post is the time period is 2300 BC
Mike is trying to bamboozle the people with a bait and switch shell game. He needs to be banned.
He is trying to derail the thread now by switching to the 11th century AD
Please put and end to this
below actual quotes from the article extremely hypocritical Mike brought up.
The topic of the article is Central Europe and makes no mention of Sea People. Again Mike is purposely " Trying to confuse the Negroes" and needs to banned. He is certain to continue trying to derail and stray from the time period and locations being discussed. Stop him, His smoke and mirror three card monte-rabbit out of a hat game must be stopped
Ancient Europeans Mysteriously Vanished 4,500 LiveScience
" The new study also confirms that people sweeping out from Turkey colonized Europe, likely as a part of the agricultural revolution, reaching Germany about 7,500 years ago."
"about 5,000 to 4,000 years ago, the genetic profile changes radically, suggesting that some mysterious event led to a huge turnover in the population that made up Europe.
The Bell Beaker culture, which emerged from the Iberian Peninsula around 2800 B.C."
_______________________________________________
^^^^ On the other hand before banning we also have to thank Mike for corroborating Marc. Maybe Mike should complain to Livescience rather than trying to rule break, derail and obfuscate Egyptsearch threads. Now he's trying to back pedal but it's too late
.....Mysteriously Vanished
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: The lie is that they don't know what happened
. ]note: you know what's funny about this headline banner? It says "The Golden Age of African Civilization" and then lists Mesopotamia and China with a picture of Sargon. And further, Mesopotamia and China as recent as 2000 BC. and Egypt and Nubia are not even shown in the banner, double LOL Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: Doxies in what location were the first Euroepans in before they got to Europe and became known as Europeans?
Why Lioness we were in Africa & were Black according to all the Anti-White researchers who wish to rob us of our place as indigenous. Did you ever notice that on websites featuring all the indigenous people of the world, one race is always left out, WHITES. Why is that may I ask? Seriously though, according to OOA we went from Africa, through the ME, through CA where we split from the Asians And then on to EU while the Asians went onto Asia & the Americas. The Anti-White powers that be much like Mike have provided NO satisfactory evidence of this IMO. No DNA evidence No linguistics evidence. The cloth found on the Tarim Basin mummies was the same type with the same pattern, woven in same fashion as clothing found in ancient Celtic Scotland which shows a connection.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
You are similar to Mike in that respect . Mike also doesn't believe in evolution.
Of course you depart on the albino theory of his.
Mike believes that white people have ancestors who were black that go back hundreds of thousands of years. He think these former blacks depigmented very recently by way of albinism in only a few thousand ago becoming "white"
Therefore in Mike's scenario whites are much more similar to blacks than the evolutionary model which say they departed at a much earlier time
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: Lioness we were in Africa & were Black according to all the Anti-White researchers who wish to rob us of our place as indigenous. Did you ever notice that on websites featuring all the indigenous people of the world, one race is always left out, WHITES. Why is that may I ask?
Really Doxie, do these sites show people with diabetes or any other disease? That's what Albinism is you know - a disease.
posted
Mike, NONE of those above pictured people are White, they are merely Albinos of their racial group. An Albino Negro is still a Negro, an Albino Mongol (Asian) is still a Mongol, An Albino Amerindian is still an Amerindian, an Albino Arab is still an Arab, an Albino East Indian is still an East Indian, an Albino White person is still a White person what the heck don't you seem to get about that Black racist boy? White people are NOT Albinos, we do NOT have Albinism, we will NOT accept your Albinos or the Albinos of any other race as one of us as they are NOT.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: Mike, NONE of those above pictured people are White, they are merely Albinos of their racial group. An Albino Negro is still a Negro, an Albino Mongol (Asian) is still a Mongol, An Albino Amerindian is still an Amerindian, an Albino Arab is still an Arab, an Albino East Indian is still an East Indian, an Albino White person is still a White person
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: Mike, NONE of those above pictured people are White, they are merely Albinos of their racial group. An Albino Negro is still a Negro, an Albino Mongol (Asian) is still a Mongol, An Albino Amerindian is still an Amerindian, an Albino Arab is still an Arab, an Albino East Indian is still an East Indian, an Albino White person is still a White person what the heck don't you seem to get about that Black racist boy? White people are NOT Albinos, we do NOT have Albinism, we will NOT accept your Albinos or the Albinos of any other race as one of us as they are NOT.
you are using the term "White" to mean exactly European Thus "Black" would mean African
^^^ Thus this looks like a Black man is not really a Black man. He's from Papua New Guinea many times farther way from Africa than Europe
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Faheemdunkers: ^ Yea. It's strange Mike doesn't yet get it...
Race is more than skin deep.
Here's a Caucasoid ('white') albino, now compare his bone morphology to those posted above:
Damn Cass, you're getting stupider by the day. What, all Europeans have that particular bone structure??? If so, why is the U.S. child above doesn't have it???
BETTER YET, WHY IS IT THAT THESE INDIAN ALBINOS "DO" HAVE IT????? (Note the man in the front).
.
Cass, you Albinos are such stupid liars, when are you going to learn?Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
We are NOT Albinos at all Lioness. You are once again letting your Anti-White hatred show. Yes White= non Jewish people of wholly European descent.
Slavs= White Germanics= White S. Euro Meds= White Celtics= White Baltics= White
I'm sure that Faheem will inform me if I left any out Lol.
Mike if you have to ask that question then you are dumber than I thought. Btw, where's that proof I'm waiting on Mike, don't make me wait all day. My comment still stands about my people bring left out on each and every web site showing the indigenous people of the earth. Still have yet to have anyone tell me a good reason why.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: We are NOT Albinos at all Lioness. You are once again letting your Anti-White hatred show. Yes White= non Jewish people of wholly European descent.
Slavs= White Germanics= White S. Euro Meds= White Celtics= White Baltics= White
Sorry Doxie, I really don't believe that!
For instance, check out this Wiki:
A modern Celtic identity emerged in Western Europe following the identification of the native peoples of the Atlantic fringe as Celts by Edward Lhuyd in the 18th century. Lhuyd and others equated the Celts described by Greco-Roman writers with the ancestors of the pre-Roman peoples of France, Britain and Ireland. The Irish and ancient British languages were thus Celtic languages. The descendents of these languages were the Welsh, Gaelic (Irish, Manx and Scottish variants), Cornish and Breton languages. These peoples were therefore modern Celts. Attempts were made to link their distinctive cultures to those of the ancient Celtic peoples.
The concept of modern Celtic identity evolved during the course of the 19th-century into the Celtic Revival. By the late 19th century it often took the form of ethnic nationalism particularly within the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, where the Irish Home Rule Movement resulted in the secession of the Irish Free State in 1922. There were also significant Welsh, Scottish and Breton nationalist movements, giving rise to the concept of Celtic nations. After World War II, the focus of the Celticity movement shifted to linguistic revival and protectionism, e.g. with the foundation of the Celtic League in 1961, dedicated to preserving the surviving Celtic languages.
The Celtic revival also led to the emergence of musical and artistic styles identified as Celtic. Music typically drew on folk traditions within the Celtic nations. Art drew on decorative styles associated with the ancient Celts and with early medieval Celtic Christianity, along with folk-styles. Cultural events to promote "inter-Celtic" cultural exchange also emerged.
In the late 20th century a number of scholars criticised the idea of modern Celtic identity, sometimes also arguing that there never was a common Celtic culture, even in ancient times. Michael Chapman's 1992 book The Celts: The Construction of a Myth led to what the archaeologist Barry Cunliffe has called a "politically correct disdain for the use of 'Celt'" The extent to which a modern Celtic identity remains a useful concept continues to be debated.
These images are from the Celtic "Gundestrup cauldron", DO THESE LOOK LIKE WHITE PEOPLE???
As you can see, this "White" Celts thing is just another Albino fabrication by that lying Edward Lhuyd guy.
Doxie dear, when are you going top learn, everything that your fellow Albinos taught you has been a lie, why not trust in what I tell you?Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: We are NOT Albinos at all Lioness. You are once again letting your Anti-White hatred show. Yes White= non Jewish people of wholly European descent.
Slavs= White Germanics= White S. Euro Meds= White Celtics= White Baltics= White
I'm sure that Faheem will inform me if I left any out Lol.
Mike if you have to ask that question then you are dumber than I thought. Btw, where's that proof I'm waiting on Mike, don't make me wait all day. My comment still stands about my people bring left out on each and every web site showing the indigenous people of the earth. Still have yet to have anyone tell me a good reason why.
Even if we go into an albino hypotheical Mike gets it wrong.
anyway are Russians white 2/3 or more of the region is located in Asia
and is this guy Black Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
^But more importantly, just as we have found that the Albinos lied about the ethnicity of the Celts, might they have also lied about the ethnicity of the late medieval people of Russia?
As an example:
There is "NO WAY" that this guy is an Albino!
Tsar Fedor I (1557 - 1598)
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^But more importantly, just as we have found that the Albinos lied about the ethnicity of the Celts, might they have also lied about the ethnicity of the late medieval people of Russia?
As an example:
There is "NO WAY" that this guy is an Albino!
Tsar Fedor I (1557 - 1598)
of course not albinism is a rare birth defect defined by genetic markers and specifc non corrective eye problem
Is this an albino ?
Is he therefore a Black man?
No you fvcking idiot
Are you related to Tsar Fedor?
No idiot you are African and it is something you just have to deal with
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^But more importantly, just as we have found that the Albinos lied about the ethnicity of the Celts, might they have also lied about the ethnicity of the late medieval people of Russia?
As an example:
There is "NO WAY" that this guy is an Albino!
Tsar Fedor I (1557 - 1598)
Muurs!
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: As you well know, this man is a mulatto, or perhaps, a Quadroon.
You corrupt the meaning of these terms " mulatto" " Quadroon" to imply this man had recent ancestry where the parents looked different from one another. This man could have had parents both the same medium brown skin as he did going back thousands of years. So this guy is no more African than some light skinned German. They both may have some frian ancestry if you go back far enough. The difference is a light skinned German migrated further North
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
Jim Hercules, 1891. He was the dear Abyssinian Guard of the imperial family: "Tall, splendidly built, in their wide trousers and scarlet turbans they stood immobile as though they had been cast in bronze."
(He,he,he: - now where have I heard sh1t like this before???).
Grand Duchess Xenia
State Hermitage Museum
Portrait of S. S. Yakovleva
Ivan Vishnyakov
1699-1761
After 1756
Oil on canvas
90.5 x 72 cm
This is the young wife of Mikhail Yakovlev, son of the rich St. Petersburg merchant S. Y. Yakovlev, who commissioned one of the leading artists of the time to paint a pair of portraits of the young couple.
Empress Elizabeth Petrovna
State Hermitage Museum
Portrait of Elizabeth Petrovna on Horseback Accompanied by a Negro Servant.
Unknown painter of the second half of the 18th century
Oil on canvas
75.5 x 57.5 cm
This portrait was created after an original by Georg Christoph Grooth (1743). Elizabeth Petrovna is shown wearing the uniform of the Preobrazhensky Life-Guards Regiment with the Star and Band of the Order of St. Andrew.
posted
^Explanation of the Black men above from private site - NOT from the State Hermitage Museum (Russian national museum).
Quote: These men had formed part of the Russian Court since Peter the Great and were usually recruited by the Russian Ambassador to Abyssinia or presented as "human gifts" by the Ethiopian Emperor. They had access to education and some became influential persons.
He,he,he: It's an instinctive thing - when a Albino see a Black face where they don't want it, the create a Slave or servant story to explain it.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Lioness, Yes non-Jewish Russians of Euro descent in the Euro side of Russia are White, they are Slavs. Yes that man is Black IMO, however if Blacks as a whole don't want to accept the New Guineans or any other of their diaspora as Black it is their right to to decide, just as it is true White people's right to not accept Jews, Arabs, & Turks and any other predominately White mixed race people as White. I would accept Jews if they weren't so hell bent on destroying my people with their anti-White propaganda, Arabs I might accept if they gave up Islam, Turks NO.
Mike no one lied about the ethnicity of the Celts except you they were White people. Yes Mike those figures are of White people they have noses & lips no bigger than my own. No Mike I shall NOT believe anything you say for you are evil & must be destroyed. Lol Mike, Peter The Great looks in NO way Black, his nose bridge is as high as mine, his nose is no bigger or wider than my own, his lips are NO bigger than my own. He looks like any other SLAVIC Russian unless you now want to claim Slavs were Black Lol. Come off it Mike there was NO genocide of Blacks in Europe and you know it. Stop trying to steal what rightfully belongs to my people. Stop trying to deny my people of our history, our heritage, our identities, our homeland. I have even disproven your surname thing wrong too as my birth surname is Moore, my maternal great grand father's surname was Little. Now my mother has a natural light tan or what could be termed as swarthy, my cousin Kelly is olive skinned aka swarthy, looks like an Italian. Before you say it Mike NO there is NO Black blood in my family that I'm aware of except my cousin Amy's sons Damien & Trey & my cousin Kelly's oldest son Chance (Chance looks fully White, pale skinned paler than me, euro type nose, no prognathism, straight light brown hair which was curly & Blond as a child, blue eyes, etc). Anyhow you are the one who is lying trying to steal my people's history trying to rob my people of our history, our heritage, our identities, our homeland. Trying to turn us into A history less, heritageless, identity less, people. Leaving our children walking through this world knowing not who they are or where they come from, knowing not who their ancestors are, walking around historyless, heritageless, having no identity, no homeland to call their own because your evil Whitey hating Black racist butt robbed them of it.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
Raph swears he is Moore whenever he takes a tad too much cheap whiskey...
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: I would accept Jews if they weren't so hell bent on destroying my people with their anti-White propaganda, Arabs I might accept if they gave up Islam, Turks NO.
Katherine Russell Tsarnaev, wife of killed Boston Marathon bombing suspect Katherine Russell Before she married Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev
Katherine Russell Tsarnaev today. She converted to Islam after she married Tamerlan Tsarnaev. Said she had no knowledge of the bombing plan
Katherine Russell was a typical college student before she met Tamerlan Tsarnaev.
The daughter of an emergency room doctor, Katie, as she was called, grew up in a Christian household in North Kingstown, R.I., graduated at the top of her class at her high school in 2007, and said in her yearbook she wanted to go into the Peace Corps.
"The reason why I remember her is she was very nice and very smart," her North Kingstown High art teacher, Amos Trout Paine, tells the Associated Press. "She was ready to learn."
She is now known as the Boston Marathon bomber's widow.
Her husband, 26, and his younger brother, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, are suspected in the blasts that killed three people and injured hundreds. The subsequent manhunt for the perpetrators left a university policeman dead, Tamerlan killed, and Dzhokhar captured and charged.
Katie Russell, 24, now going by Katherine Tsarnaev, and her young daughter have retreated to Katherine's childhood home. She has not yet spoken with federal authorities, who want to question her about her husband's activities. But Tuesday she released a statement through her lawyers.
PHOTOS: Boston Marathon Bombing: Celebs Share Words of Hope
"The injuries and loss of life – to people who came to celebrate a race and a holiday – has caused profound distress and sorrow to Katie and her family. The reports of involvement by her husband and brother-in-law came as an absolute shock to them all," the statement read.
"She has spent a lot of time crying," says a family source. "As far as I know, Katie wasn't aware of what he was up to."
After high school, Katherine went to Suffolk University in Boston, a 90-minute drive north, and within a few years her friends and family were startled by a change in her behavior.
"She stopped seeing a lot of her friends and cut them off," says the family source. "She became very withdrawn and quiet. That took away a lot of what we knew of her."
PHOTOS: Tragedy in Boston: The Most Moving Photos from the Marathon Bombing
Katherine was at a nightclub when one of her girlfriends introduced her to Tsarnaev, then a student at Bunker Hill Community College, her lawyer, Amato DeLuca tells the Associated Press.
"They went out for a while, and then they stopped and then they went out again," DeLuca said.
Katherine converted to Islam. And on June 21, 2010, they married at a ceremony performed by Imam Taalib Mahdee, of Masjid al Qur'aan, in Boston's Dorchester area, according to the marriage certificate.
Suffolk University records show she dropped out that same year. The couple had a daughter – the exact date of birth is not known – and moved in with Tsarnaev's parents and his brother, according to DeLuca, who notes that Katherine rarely saw the brother because he was in the dorms at college.
After the birth of Zahara, Katherine worked long hours as a home health care aide. "She really loved the work," says the family source. "I think it was the one thing she could do separately from him." While she worked, Tamerlan would take care of their daughter.
Her attorney insists that she was not aware of her husband's alleged plans, and is devastated by the terrorist attack.
"As a mother, a sister, a daughter, a wife, Katie deeply mourns the pain and loss to innocent victims – students, law enforcement, families and our community. In the aftermath of this tragedy, she, her daughter and her family are trying to come to terms with these events," concludes the statement from DeLuca released Tuesday.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic