In numerous erotic images from ancient Rome depicting the sex scenes, if you would observe very carefully, you will notice Muurish so-called Black men having sex and dominating so-called white women.
Inter-racial sex between Muurish men and so-called white women has been an ongoing thing since Year 0, Anno Domini. Its been on for over 2000 years now, look at Southern Italy, Greece, France, Germany and Spain. All those brunnets…
Look again at the scenes above from ancient Rome.
However, rather very curiously, you hardly ever see any scenes depicting sex between so-called white men and black women.
Why?
That was in ancient Rome. Before the Muurs fell…
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
In numerous erotic images from ancient Rome depicting the sex scenes, if you would observe very carefully, you will notice Muurish so-called Black men having sex and dominating so-called white women.
Inter-racial sex between Muurish men and so-called white women has been an ongoing thing since Year 0, Anno Domini. Its been on for over 2000 years now, look at Southern Italy, Greece, France, Germany and Spain. All those brunnets…
Look again at the scenes above from ancient Rome.
However, rather very curiously, you hardly ever see any scenes depicting sex between so-called white men and black women.
Why?
That was in ancient Rome. Before the Muurs fell…
Muurz to come Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: show us a picture of an ancient Roman Muur woman
Sure
Princess Anastazia the sister of Emperor Constantine
Now show me one Roman art where a so-called white boy is fuching a muurish woman...
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Black African created Etruscan, Roman, Minoan and Greek civilization. The proof is in the culture and language of those civilization that are similar to West African civilization.
The black African race of Italy and Greece became mulato because the black Roman and Greek had sex and children with white women.
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
quote:Originally posted by IronLion:
Why she wrap she titties up? That face what needs wrap up. Not even with a bag or for the flag. Must be a fetish ****.
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
My research here is to see if someone can discover for me just one instance in the ancient world where a pink ass albino man is fuching a chocolate brown Muurish woman.
You see millions of painting where Muurish dark chocolate brown Romans are fuching white gyals.
But none the other way round?
What does this signify?
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
A Quick History of the Origin of Rome: IronLion
Rome was originally a plantation colony of Carthaginian black Lords owned largely by Baarka family and the Nigrinus family of Carthage.
It is true that the governors, freemen and the slaves of Rome rebelled against Carthage and won its independence in the two famous Punic wars. Which is why you find so many North African Roman Emperors, and high officials in Roman empire.
Free Romans were divided into Patricans and Freemen and Plebians. There was a huge concentration of Muurish people in the Patrician class as well as freemen.
The latins were mostly plebians they could pass for paler skin Pakistanis or Indians; You still see some today…
Thus you see that Roman was a collection of black and browns the Muurs, brunnettes, and Nigritaes.
The so-called whites, aka the pink-reds goths and slavics came in later over the course of the one thousand years of Rome’s existence
The were the slaves, the preregrines, the harlots, and the plebians of Rome
When they increased sufficiently in number they took over the empire.
posted
Ironlion, interesting thread. ^ unfortunately the above repetitive picture spam by this delusional one is messing up the thread.
quote:Southern Europeans More African Than Thought
Southern Europeans get a significant portion of their genetic ancestry from North Africa, new research suggests.
The findings are perhaps not surprising, given that the Romans occupied North Africa and set up extensive trade routes in the region, and the Moors, a North African people, ruled a medieval territory called El-Andalus on the Iberian Peninsula.
But the findings, published today (June 3) in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, suggest the impact of these connections went beyond culture and architecture, and may explain why Southern Europeans have more genetic diversity than their northern counterparts.
"The higher level of genetic variation in Southern Europeans reflects gene flow from North Africa during historical times. We're talking about the last 2,000 years, really from the Middle Ages during which there was occupation in Spain," said study co-author Carlos Bustamante, a geneticist at Stanford University.
More diverse
Past studies had shown that Southern Europeans such as Spaniards, Greeks and Italians had more genetic variability than people from Northern Europe; other studies showed they had a small percentage of what looked like sub-Saharan ancestry. [The 10 Things That Make Humans Unique]
Some argued that this genetic diversity came from the Moorish occupation of the Iberian Peninsula in southwestern Europe or the Roman contact with North African civilizations such as Carthage around 2,000 years ago.
But because researchers didn't have DNA samples from people in North Africa, the link was difficult to prove.
Substantial mixing
To untangle European ancestry, Bustamante and his colleagues compared existing DNA samples of 2,099 individuals from 43 different populations in Europe and Africa. Crucially, they included new genetic samples from North Africa and Spain.
The team found that for Southwestern Europeans (those from Italy, Spain and Greece), between 4 and 20 percent of their genomes came from North Africa, compared to less than 2 percent in Southeastern Europe.
The study also found that the apparent sub-Saharan ancestry in these populations was actually the result of North African lineage.
Many contacts
The findings suggest contacts between the two continents left traces in the genetics of people of the Iberian Peninsula.
"Studies such as this are key to improving our understanding of the impact of historical events and migration patterns in recent human history," Graham Coop, a population geneticist at the University of California, Davis, who was not involved in the study, wrote in an email. "There had been evidence of this contribution before, but the magnitude of the genome-wide contribution had been underestimated, in part due to the lack of dense sampling of Northern African populations."
Though the findings are fascinating, the study researchers weren't able to resolve how much of this North African genetic component emerged during Roman times versus during the more modern Moorish occupation, said Priya Moorjani, a geneticist from Harvard University, who was not involved in the study.
"It would be really exciting to look at all these events, but with modern DNA it can be quite hard to do that."
Instead, looking at ancient DNA from fossil skeletons of Romans and Moors could help to answer those more detailed questions, Moorjani said.
quote:Originally posted by Ironlion Inter-racial sex
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: Ironlion, interesting thread. ^ unfortunately the above repetitive picture spam by this delusional one is messing up the thread.
you really think this is a black man of a different race the woman, go ahead I dare you to claim that
now that is true delusion
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: [QB] Ironlion, interesting thread. ^ unfortunately the above repetitive picture spam by this delusional one is messing up the thread.
[QUOTE] Southern Europeans More African Than Thought
Southern Europeans get a significant portion of their genetic ancestry from North Africa, new research suggests.
who do you think those people I posted are?
yes, that's right, Southern Europeans !
(in other words according to you and Iron, black, I mean Muur)
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
^The person above is delusional, for posting inirrelivant pictures of individuals in a reparative modus. Even this, the delusional one can't understand.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: ^The person above is delusional, for posting inirrelivant pictures of individuals in a reparative modus. Even this, the delusional one can't understand.
Sorry no more postings of Southern Europeans, photos break the illusion when they're paintings you can go into flights of fancy with the snow bunnies. riffing on the one drop rule
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: Ironlion, interesting thread. ^ unfortunately the above repetitive picture spam by this delusional one is messing up the thread.
quote:Southern Europeans More African Than Thought
Southern Europeans get a significant portion of their genetic ancestry from North Africa, new research suggests.
The findings are perhaps not surprising, given that the Romans occupied North Africa and set up extensive trade routes in the region, and the Moors, a North African people, ruled a medieval territory called El-Andalus on the Iberian Peninsula.
But the findings, published today (June 3) in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, suggest the impact of these connections went beyond culture and architecture, and may explain why Southern Europeans have more genetic diversity than their northern counterparts.
"The higher level of genetic variation in Southern Europeans reflects gene flow from North Africa during historical times. We're talking about the last 2,000 years, really from the Middle Ages during which there was occupation in Spain," said study co-author Carlos Bustamante, a geneticist at Stanford University.
More diverse
Past studies had shown that Southern Europeans such as Spaniards, Greeks and Italians had more genetic variability than people from Northern Europe; other studies showed they had a small percentage of what looked like sub-Saharan ancestry. [The 10 Things That Make Humans Unique]
Some argued that this genetic diversity came from the Moorish occupation of the Iberian Peninsula in southwestern Europe or the Roman contact with North African civilizations such as Carthage around 2,000 years ago.
But because researchers didn't have DNA samples from people in North Africa, the link was difficult to prove.
Substantial mixing
To untangle European ancestry, Bustamante and his colleagues compared existing DNA samples of 2,099 individuals from 43 different populations in Europe and Africa. Crucially, they included new genetic samples from North Africa and Spain.
The team found that for Southwestern Europeans (those from Italy, Spain and Greece), between 4 and 20 percent of their genomes came from North Africa, compared to less than 2 percent in Southeastern Europe.
The study also found that the apparent sub-Saharan ancestry in these populations was actually the result of North African lineage.
Many contacts
The findings suggest contacts between the two continents left traces in the genetics of people of the Iberian Peninsula.
"Studies such as this are key to improving our understanding of the impact of historical events and migration patterns in recent human history," Graham Coop, a population geneticist at the University of California, Davis, who was not involved in the study, wrote in an email. "There had been evidence of this contribution before, but the magnitude of the genome-wide contribution had been underestimated, in part due to the lack of dense sampling of Northern African populations."
Though the findings are fascinating, the study researchers weren't able to resolve how much of this North African genetic component emerged during Roman times versus during the more modern Moorish occupation, said Priya Moorjani, a geneticist from Harvard University, who was not involved in the study.
"It would be really exciting to look at all these events, but with modern DNA it can be quite hard to do that."
Instead, looking at ancient DNA from fossil skeletons of Romans and Moors could help to answer those more detailed questions, Moorjani said.
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: ^The person above is delusional, for posting inirrelivant pictures of individuals in a reparative modus. Even this, the delusional one can't understand.
Sorry no more postings of Southern Europeans, photos break the illusion when they're paintings you can go into flights of fancy with the snow bunnies. riffing on the one drop rule
Lionese, are your eyes working better now?
Is the myopia gone sweetie?
Muur Romano-muurz setting it pon albino gyals like you!
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote: Spintria (Ancient Roman coins with sex scenes) were used in ancient Rome to request and pay for different “services” in brothels and from prostitutes on the street. Since there were a lot of foreigners coming to the city that did not speak the language and most of the prostitutes were slaves captured from other places the coins made the transactions easy and efficient. One side of these coins showed what the buyer wanted and the other showed the amount of money to be paid for the act.
posted
Lion, it is striking that the males in many of the pics you present are so dark colored. I am not convinced they are of wholly African descent, but it seems that the darker skin for the Romans seemed to signify greater sexual potency in men.
Assorted "biodiversity" authors also seem to obsess about the sexual potency of dark men- whether we call them Murrs, Africans or whatever and they point out that the Romans depicted Africans with larger penises in their art:
"The genitalia of black Africans were also deemed noteworthy to the Greek and Roman artists. Within the same art piece, black males are depicted with penises larger than those of white figures, and in others are shown as being erect." --Vincent Sarich, Frank Miele. 2005. Race: The Reality of Human Differences. pg 41
Racist "Biodiversity" author JP Rushton reached similar conclusions and conducted what appeared to be desperate "self-assessment" to compare himself with those of darker power and potency.
Rushton is obviously much taken with the "salience of... buttocks and breasts" (pp. 167, 231) as measures of sexuality, although there is a dearth of objectively collected data.
More telling is his evident fascination with the "Negroid" penis as an index of "potency" and libido. In his earlier publications on these matters, his information came from "self-assessment." --FROM: Review: Racialism and Racist Agendas Author(s): C. Loring Brace Reviewed work(s):Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective by J. Philippe Rushton Source: American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 98, No. 1 (Mar., 1996), pp. 176-177
Some Psychologists have also noted a persistent strain of white expectancy or anxiety over "darker" potency. The Romans may also have pumped up this feeling of darker power to emphasize the "barbaric" nature of foreigners, but nevertheless the "dark power" meme can be seen, and even appears in the writings of Adolf Hitler.
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [QB] Lion, it is striking that the males in many of the pics you present are so dark colored. I am not convinced they are of wholly African descent, but it seems that the darker skin for the Romans seemed to signify greater sexual potency in men.
You think these people are of different ancestry? You think that the ancestral counterpart of the light skinned woman is not the man in this picture, that her father or brother would not have a similar skin tone?
Ironlion is trying to pretend this is black hsitory
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [QB] Lion, it is striking that the males in many of the pics you present are so dark colored. I am not convinced they are of wholly African descent, but it seems that the darker skin for the Romans seemed to signify greater sexual potency in men.
You think these people are of different ancestry? You think that the ancestral counterpart of the light skinned woman is not the man in this picture, that her father or brother would not have a similar skin tone?
.......
Ironlion is trying to pretend this is black hsitory
Well this looks black and white to me:
Muurz!
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ironlion Inter-racial sex
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: [qb] Ironlion, interesting thread. ^ unfortunately the above repetitive picture spam by this delusional one is messing up the thread.
you really think this is a black man of a different race the woman, go ahead I dare you to claim that
baa..baa..baa...
Google for Eriterian (men) Muurs
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
The image of West African black, Nile Valley black and Moors black are missing from the Roman wall paintings. The majority of the image are of mulato. In the renaissance era the white European started to erased and destroyed the image of the European blacks founder of the Graeco Roman civilization. They also turned the black image of Mary and Jesus in Church into white image.
After erasing black from European history and world history the white Euro started the African slave trade. African people need to write a new world history book.
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: Lionese, you were abused and raped by your elementary school teachers who told you white lies like Santa Claus and Emperor Nero being Nordics.
Nero in Latin is a word for black.
Emperor Nero the Black Emperor. Here is his statue, the real one:
Muurz!
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yes I discovered a month ago on the back of an ink cartridge that the word Nero means black in Italian. The Roman Emperor was called Nero maybe because he was deeply black.
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: Lionese, you were abused and raped by your elementary school teachers who told you white lies like Santa Claus and Emperor Nero being Nordics.
Nero in Latin is a word for black.
Emperor Nero the Black Emperor. Here is his statue, the real one:
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: Lionese, you were abused and raped by your elementary school teachers who told you white lies like Santa Claus and Emperor Nero being Nordics.
Nero in Latin is a word for black.
Emperor Nero the Black Emperor. Here is his statue, the real one:
Muurz!
The word for "black" in Latin is NOT "nero" it is nigrum.
Posts: 833 | From: Austin, TX | Registered: Jan 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: Lionese, you were abused and raped by your elementary school teachers who told you white lies like Santa Claus and Emperor Nero being Nordics.
Nero in Latin is a word for black.
Emperor Nero the Black Emperor. Here is his statue, the real one:
Muurz!
The word for "black" in Latin is NOT "nero" it is nigrum.
Ignorance is death.
Here click on this link - Translate Nero to English...:
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic