posted
The Albino people, in their neurotic fear of those not like them, most probably caused by pass suffering at the hands of Blacks - whether real or imagined. Have suffered a type of mass Neurosis, in which they have created a “Fantasy” past; (especially in Europe) were they are the native Europeans (they are actually Central Asians), and the world was solely populated (especially Europe) by Albinos just like them, (Whites are actually the least numerous of the three races – by far). Albinos were the creators of all of the world’s great civilizations, and all of the great hero’s in history were Albinos. Accordingly they have created an official “Revision” of history to reflect their neurotic “Fantasy”. It is simply called “History” by Albinos and laughingly “HIStory” by everyone else.
Dealing with Blacks in art, and what they have done with Blacks in art (that which survives), is to declare those Blacks pictured in art as either Slaves, Servants, the Mythical St. Maurice, or the Biblical Magi. As an indication of just how convoluted this Albino nonsense is: The Magi were the Priests of the Persian religion of Zoroastrianism, yet they claim that the Persians were Albinos just like them. Who but a true neurotic could envision something like that: a White society with a Black priesthood!
Newer versions of their fantasy gives a name to the Black “Wiseman” of their Whitenized Jesus fantasy: they call him Balthazar, and in this version he is an Arabian scholar. This nimbly gets around the ancient Persians being Blacks; but it conflicts with their current efforts to establish the Turks and Turk Mulattoes of Arabia and elsewhere, as true Arabs.
We have no explanation as to why they willingly include Blacks in their bogus Whitenized Christian artwork. Perhaps that is their one lucid acknowledgement of the great profusion of Blacks there is in the world.
Another tactic the Albinos use to falsify the true meaning of Black artwork is to give it false and often derogatory titles.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Mike come off it you stupid Anti-White, White people hating, Black racist, Black supremacist, jack-ass, ass clown. White people are NOT Albinos nor are we Central Asians you stupid ass Black racist POS goon. Stop trying to steal our history, our heritage, our identities, our homeland. We have a right to what is ours. You have NO right to try to rob us of what is ours just because you hate us. We ARE the true native people of Europe whether you want to admit it or not.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
Mike is quite in love with art made by white Europeans
and thinks about white people all day long
I think if he ever lived in an all black neighborhood he'd be a fish out of water, it would take years to adjust
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
The earliest known example of a black king may be represented in a wall painting of about 1360 in the Emmaus monastery in Prague. It is certain that by the beginning of the 15th century some European artists had begun to depict one of the kings as black rather than white. The Magi had become representatives of the three continents of the Old World - Europe, Asia and Africa (America only became known to Europeans in 1492). The Magi can also represent the three ages of life - youth, maturity and old age.
The black Magus was instantly recognisable by his black skin but he was also often distinguished from the others by his flamboyant dress. Instead of a crown, artists sometimes gave him a turban, white bandeau and earring. This reflects the influence of heraldic moors' head devices, or the jewellery and clothing worn by African domestic slaves and servants in wealthy European households. The 'Africanness' of the king was sometimes further emphasised by the fact that he carried an oliphant, a decorative horn carved from ivory.
Although the appearance of the black king may have been partly inspired by real Africans living in Europe, his look was mainly a mixture of European ideas of the exotic. The black king gave artists an opportunity to depict a lavishly dressed figure in a religious scene, a role that probably ensured his continued popularity in European art.
The African king is usually depicted as the beardless, youthful king furthest from the Virgin and Child, sometimes being shown the way by the middle king, Melchior. His position and age reflected European notions of Africa as the youngest of the three civilisations in their search for Christianity.
The black king also symbolised the idea that Christianity appealed to all humanity, even the most foreign and remote people. The blackness of his skin showed that he was from a distant land, although even there people had accepted the truth of Christ's message.
Although the black king was fairly common in Northern European art by the end of the 15th century, it was less frequent in Florentine Renaissance art. Central Italian artists were among the last to adopt the image, though black attendants are sometimes included in the retinue of three white Magi.
in the Roman Catacombs, where more than 20 representations occur, the number of gift-bearing Magi varied from three to six. [
^^^ this is I think around 3rd century, earliest known image of the magi Is the dark figure supposed to be an African or a swarthy middle Eastern person, not sure. The item is crude and in very poor condition
_________________________________
The Adoration of the Magi (fresco), French School, (12th century) / Church of St. Martin, Vic, Berry, France / Peter Willi / The Bridgeman Art Library
Mike of you are going to convert the pagans you need to include an African in the imagery,
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Are you saying that European Albinos derive from Neanderthals?
modern Europeans are estimated to be 1-4% Neanderthal. Oceanans can be as much as 5% Denisovan which was a similar species to Neanderthal. You can see from the map a lot of the Neanderthal sites are clustering in Central Europe
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
Many are hidden in museums and collections pariculares.
Whites have access to these arts long.
They know the truth. They know the truth.
black jesus, black mary, black kings, coat arms ... The whites Scientists know the truth. There is big stuff. It is proven that scientists white lie shamelessly.
Posts: 2922 | From: World Empire of the Black People | Registered: Jul 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
Neanderthal originated in Africa and then migrated into Eurasia. This makes Neanderthal an African.
This article is attempting to propagate the idea that Neanderthal is the ProtoAsian/European type. For researchers to maintain that everyone has Neanderthal genes but Africans is a Joke.
It is pure mythology. If the Neanderthal originated in Africa, and many remained there how could they have avoided mating with other Africans when they would have looked the same as other Africans.
How and when did the Neanderthal become diverse racially when they were originally African and were replaced by other Africans.
Let's look at the evolution of homo sapiens.
The Eves were also African
The Aurignacian people who replaced the Neanderthal looked like this
Below is the ancestor of Neanderthals
,
. Here is a picture of Neanderthal man
.
As you can see, there is little difference between the African ancestor of Neanderthals, and the Neanderthals themselves.
Here we have Cro-Magnon or Aurignacian man
None of these homonids look like Asians or Europeans. Think for a minute.
Europeans
Asians
If Neanderthal was clearly an African, like the people who replaced them, "How can Neanderthal have evolved into Europeans and Asians, who clearly do not look African?"
.
-------------------- C. A. Winters Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
Neanderthals were dark skined or negroid in appearence [/QB]
why are you saying they were dark skinned when there is no way of knowing that? There are many reconstructions, it's arbitrary picking one and saying this is how they looked
But the more important point if the Neanderthals were "black" modern Africans have very little to no Neanderthal ancestry.
Modern Europeans have 1-4% Neanderthal ancestry, not the similar Homo rhodesiensis (Rhodesian man) not the similar Denisovan
Modern Africans do not show Homo rhodesiensis (Rhodesian man) ancestry despite the fact that the skull was found in Africa. And it is similar but can be distinguised from the cold adapted Neanderthals found in Europe
Europeans an an estimated 1-4% Neanderthal. That is a very low percentage yet it is enough to show a link to the the regions were the Neanderthal sites are.
Modern Africans do not show this DNA link to Europe.
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
"How can Neanderthal have evolved into Europeans and Asians, who clearly do not look African?"
because the Neanderthal did not evolve into Europeans and Asians it was merely a very small of admixture which can be detected in trace amounts and has been constantly diminishing over time. Africans had little to no mixture with these other species even though it's possible one of these other species may have lived at the same time in Africa as homo sapiens
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: But the more important point if the Neanderthals were "black" modern Africans have very little to no Neanderthal ancestry.
LOL. Europeans love to lie.
Neanderthals evolved in Africa. They had African features. The attempt to make them white is a European myth to legitimize their origin in Europe. As Mike has proven, Europeans are not native to Europe. .
Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
Neanderthals evolved in Africa. They had African features.
suppose that is true.
They are a different species. But Neanderthals did not evolve into Europeans or Africans. They merely mixed with some of the Europeans and it's detected in their DNA in very samll amount.
But they didn't mix with the Africans and is not found in their DNA (except in some cases much much tinier amounts)
Modern Europeans evolved in Europe out of African looking types over time transforming in features When the ice age came in Europe they migrated out and then later came back in when it warmed up again,
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
Scientists have reconstructed the whole genetic code, or genome, of a group of ancient humans called Denisovans. They interbred with our species and the DNA results suggest they had dark hair, eyes, and skin, the journal Science reports.
In 2010, scientists from the Max Planck Institute in Germany announced the new human group based on DNA evidence from a finger bone fossil found in Denisova Cave in the Altai Mountains, Siberia.
That first DNA was obtained from mitochondria, tiny power structures in each human cell that contain their own DNA. Now, many of the same team have used a new approach and have sequenced chromosomal DNA (the DNA of the cell nucleus which contains most genes) from the same finger bone fossil.
'They were able to reconstruct the whole genome to a quality matching that obtained for living humans,' says Professor Chris Stringer, human origins expert at the Natural History Museum.
'The higher quality genome not only provides greater confidence about previous conclusions, but also adds many details about the Denisovans, and how modern humans may have differed from them,' adds Stringer.
Above Homo heidelbergensis, the ancient human species that may be the ancestor of the mystery Denisovan human.
'The research confirms that the Denisovans were related to the Neanderthals, and that many present-day Australasians have Denisovan DNA from an ancient interbreeding event.'
Some theories place Denisovans, along with Neanderthals and modern humans, as the descendents of the ancient human Homo heidelbergensis who lived about 500,000 years ago.
Potential biological differences By comparing the genomes of Denisovans, apes, Neanderthals and different modern human populations, the team could identify DNA segments unique to these different groups.
This may help shed light on potential biological differences between modern humans and the Neanderthal and Denisovan populations they replaced, Stringer says.
For example, in modern humans, unique segments were associated with brain function and nervous system development, as well as diseases affecting the skin and eyes.
'Perhaps some of the skin and eye-related ones reflect resistance to diseases in the African homeland of modern humans, but the brain-related ones hint at possible enhancements in brain structure and function in our species.'
Two Neanderthal interbreeding events?
Skull of a Neanderthal, Homo neanderthalensis The Denisovan genome also reveals more clues about Denisovan and Neanderthal interbreeding with modern humans. Until now, evidence suggested that after modern humans dispersed from Africa about 60,000 years ago, there was a single interbreeding event with Neanderthals.
'Previous research suggested that all recent populations originating from outside of Africa had received about the same amount of Neanderthal input, implying a single early hybridisation event somewhere like the Middle East,' says Stringer.
However, the results of this study show that the Neanderthal genetic input to modern human populations outside of Africa varies. 'This suggests that, overall, Europeans have less Neanderthal DNA (about 1%) than populations to the east (1.7%),' explains Stringer.
'This might imply changes in the proportions after interbreeding took place, or that there was more than one interbreeding event.'
Denisovan interbreeding confirmation The team found that the Denisovan genetic input in Australasian populations averaged about 3%. 'This supports the idea that Denisovans must have been present in south east Asia, where the hypothesised interbreeding with the ancestors of present-day Australasians occurred, as well as in Siberia,' says Stringer.
Low genetic diversity Our genes often come in different variants, such as those for skin colour or eye colour and a large population will generally hold more variation than a small population. But, the Denisovan DNA results showed very low diversity, much less than a single modern human would show, says Stringer.
'This is surprising because the previous mitochondrial DNA research had suggested relatively high diversity, and interbreeding with the ancestors of Australasians (who are thought to have passed through southern Asia rather than Siberia) implied that the Denisovans were widespread in Asia, also leading to the expectation of a large and diverse population.'
'The surprisingly low genetic diversity of the Denisovans may indicate, as with Neanderthals to the west, that the core territory of the Denisovans was well to the south, and that they only expanded to regions like the Altai during brief warm intervals, and in small numbers.'
Other physical features Apart from the genetic evidence of a dark complexion, Stringer says we need to find out more about what the Denisovans looked like physically. 'This will require the recovery of ancient DNA from more complete fossils, perhaps in Denisova Cave itself, or from specimens in regions like China,’ he says.
'The genome does not tell us how big their brains or brow ridges were, if they had chins, or how tall and robust they were. Hence we need to have Denisovan DNA from more complete fossils to link the genome to morphology'.
Function of shared DNA Stringer says that further research should also help explain what function, if any, the Denisovan and Neanderthal DNA has in the modern humans that hold it.
More interbreeding Finally, there is an issue that perhaps cannot be addressed properly until higher quality reconstructions of Neanderthal genomes also become available, says Stringer. If modern humans interbred successfully with both Neanderthals and Denisovans, did Neanderthals and Denisovans interbreed?
Stringer thinks this is likely. 'It seems highly probable that they did, given that they co-existed in Eurasia for hundreds of millennia, and Denisova cave itself has evidence of Neanderthal DNA in a fossil foot bone.'
Stringer concludes, 'Recognition of such interbreeding will inevitably complicate the untangling of the relationships between these ancient groups of humans, and their contributions to people today.'
Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
Clyde doesn't understand that it doesn't matter if the Neanderthals looked as dark as Miles Davis, their ancestry is found mixed into modern Europeans 1-4%
Clyde doesn't understand that it doesn't matter if the Neanderthals looked as dark as Miles Davis, their ancestry is found mixed into modern Europeans 1-4%
But not Africans
Regardless if it's true or not: Would you mind telling me what you "Think" that means?
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
Clyde doesn't understand that it doesn't matter if the Neanderthals looked as dark as Miles Davis, their ancestry is found mixed into modern Europeans 1-4%
But not Africans
Regardless if it's true or not: Would you mind telling me what you "Think" that means?
It means the dna identified from Neanderthal remains found in many European sites has been identified in modern Europeans. but not in Africans
People left Northern and Central Europe during the ice age. Then they came back
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Do all white Europeans have some Neanderthal Dna,or the study just means average or most?
Posts: 2560 | From: Somewhere | Registered: May 2012
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: Clyde doesn't understand that it doesn't matter if the Neanderthals looked as dark as Miles Davis, their ancestry is found mixed into modern Europeans 1-4%
But not Africans
Regardless if it's true or not: Would you mind telling me what you "Think" that means?
It means the dna identified from Neanderthal remains found in many European sites has been identified in modern Europeans. but not in Africans
People left Northern and Central Europe during the ice age. Then they came back
Idiot, Ass-hole, lying Albinos, they never quit.
QUOTE:
The draft sequence of the Neanderthal genome, published in the journal Science in 2010, provided the first compelling genetic evidence that Neanderthals and H. sapiens had more in common than just an ancestor in Africa hundreds of thousands of years ago.
The researchers, under the direction of Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, found that 2.5 percent of the genome of an average human living outside Africa today is made up of Neanderthal DNA. The average modern African has none.
SO THESE PEOPLE "ALL" HAVE NEANDERTHAL DNA! (edit)
posted
No Mike it is you & your Anti-White, White people hating, Kill Whitey, history stealing, lying, no heart having, non feeling,heartless, Black racist, Black supremacist ilk who are constantly grasping at straws. Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to deny my people of any history? Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to deny my people of our heritage? Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to strip my people of our identities? Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to deny my people of our homeland? Is it not you and your ilk who are trying to strip my people of our pride? Is it not you & your ilk who deny that my people are even human in Clyde's case, I wish someone would take the initiative to save his posts & send them to his employer with a complaint as he along with all you other Black racists have NO business teaching let alone teaching White youth or being anywhere near White youth.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: No Mike it is you & your Anti-White, White people hating, Kill Whitey, history stealing, lying, no heart having, non feeling,heartless, Black racist, Black supremacist ilk who are constantly grasping at straws. Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to deny my people of any history? Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to deny my people of our heritage? Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to strip my people of our identities? Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to deny my people of our homeland? Is it not you and your ilk who are trying to strip my people of our pride? Is it not you & your ilk who deny that my people are even human in Clyde's case, I wish someone would take the initiative to save his posts & send them to his employer with a complaint as he along with all you other Black racists have NO business teaching let alone teaching White youth or being anywhere near White youth.
You are sick. I have never said whites were not human beings
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: No Mike it is you & your Anti-White, White people hating, Kill Whitey, history stealing, lying, no heart having, non feeling,heartless, Black racist, Black supremacist ilk who are constantly grasping at straws. Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to deny my people of any history? Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to deny my people of our heritage? Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to strip my people of our identities? Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to deny my people of our homeland? Is it not you and your ilk who are trying to strip my people of our pride? Is it not you & your ilk who deny that my people are even human in Clyde's case, I wish someone would take the initiative to save his posts & send them to his employer with a complaint as he along with all you other Black racists have NO business teaching let alone teaching White youth or being anywhere near White youth.
You are sick. I have never said whites were not human beings
.
Typical of Albinos, they can't stand the truth, so they make up lies to destroy the truth messengers.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: No Mike it is you & your Anti-White, White people hating, Kill Whitey, history stealing, lying, no heart having, non feeling,heartless, Black racist, Black supremacist ilk who are constantly grasping at straws. Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to deny my people of any history? Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to deny my people of our heritage? Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to strip my people of our identities? Is it not you & your ilk who are trying to deny my people of our homeland? Is it not you and your ilk who are trying to strip my people of our pride? Is it not you & your ilk who deny that my people are even human in Clyde's case, I wish someone would take the initiative to save his posts & send them to his employer with a complaint as he along with all you other Black racists have NO business teaching let alone teaching White youth or being anywhere near White youth.
I assume everyone took note of the threat to income in Doxie's diatribe. That's how the Albinos leverage their power over us to stifle our truth telling.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Clyde was it not you who has posted numerous times that Whites originally looked like snakes, I do believe that WAS you. Sorry but anything that looks like a reptile can NOT ever be human, therefore you DID say that Whites were not human.
Mike you Black racist jackass, you wouldn't know truth if it came up a bit you on the backside. Yep I do believe that just like every White like Paula Dean is ruined for past or present racist remarks, Blacks like you & Clyde should also get the same treatment when you make racist statements. You know nothing of truth, all you know is hatred. You are not trying to teach the truth neither is Clyde or any of your other pseudo scholars, you are trying to teach Black supremacy & stealing that which belongs to others in the process. Did I say I was going to send that info on? Nope I didn't, I simply said someone should.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
The genetic contribution of Africans to the European and West Eurasian genepool would of necessity, lower the contributions made by Neanderthals in the past admixture events just as people of mostly West Eurasian ancestry with significant African ancestry generally will have lower Neanderthal ancestry detectable by these tests.
comparing Europeans and East Asians is irrelevant. We are talking about a very small amount of admixture 1-4 %.
The point is Europeans have this and Africans generally don't except some very small amounts Maasai probably due to back migration.
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
Idiot, Ass-hole, lying Albinos, they never quit.
QUOTE:
The draft sequence of the Neanderthal genome, published in the journal Science in 2010, provided the first compelling genetic evidence that Neanderthals and H. sapiens had more in common than just an ancestor in Africa hundreds of thousands of years ago.
The researchers, under the direction of Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, found that 2.5 percent of the genome of an average human living outside Africa today is made up of Neanderthal DNA. The average modern African has none.
Mike the perpetual fool say "Idiot, Ass-hole, lying Albinos, they never quit." then he goes quoting white people to make arguments, hypocritical
As per Oceanic people, that is a different case, the Denisova hominin, a topic Mike is ignorant of
Denisova hominins , are Paleolithic-era members of a species of human or subspecies of Homo sapiens. In March 2010, scientists announced the discovery of a finger bone fragment of a juvenile female who lived about 41,000 years ago, found in the remote Denisova Cave in the Altai Mountains in Siberia, a cave which has also been inhabited by Neanderthals and modern humans. Two teeth and a toe bone belonging to different members of the same population have since been reported.
Analysis of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of the finger bone showed it to be genetically distinct from the mtDNAs of Neanderthals and modern humans
ubsequent study of the nuclear genome from this specimen suggests that this group shares a common origin with Neanderthals, that they ranged from Siberia to Southeast Asia, and that they lived among and interbred with the ancestors of some present-day modern humans, with up to 6% of the DNA of Melanesians and Australian Aborigines deriving from Denisovans
A team of scientists led by Johannes Krause and Swedish biologist Svante Pääbo from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, sequenced mtDNA extracted from the fragment.
Analysis of genomes of modern humans show that they mated with at least two groups of ancient humans: Neanderthals (more similar to those found in the Caucasus than those from the Altai region)[7] and Denisovans.[10][11][13] Approximately 4% of the DNA of non-African modern humans is shared with Neanderthals, suggesting interbreeding.[11] Tests comparing the Denisova hominin genome with those of six modern humans – a ǃKung from South Africa, a Nigerian, a Frenchman, a Papua New Guinean, a Bougainville Islander and a Han Chinese – showed that between 4% and 6% of the genome of Melanesians (represented by the Papua New Guinean and Bougainville Islander) derives from a Denisovan population. This DNA was possibly introduced during the early migration to Melanesia.
Melanesians may not be the only modern-day descendants of Denisovans. David Reich of Harvard University, in collaboration with Mark Stoneking of the Planck Institute team, found genetic evidence that Denisovan ancestry is shared by Melanesians, Australian Aborigines, and smaller scattered groups of people in Southeast Asia, such as the Mamanwa, a Negrito people in the Philippines. However, not all Negritos were found to possess Denisovan genes; Onge Andaman Islanders and Malaysian Jehai, for example, were found to have no significant Denisovan inheritance. These data place the interbreeding event in mainland Southeast Asia, and suggest that Denisovans once ranged widely over eastern Asia
Neanderthal sites
There aren't any Neanderthal sites in East Asia. The Denisova site is in Siberia
Look at this map. There are numeous Neanderthal sites in Europe you can't escape the origin of that. Europeans have this DNA and according to thsi recent article East Asians have it. With the exception of Maasai Africans don't have it.
Having said this those same Europeans went through and evolution which started as them looking like Africans.
But many people on Egyptsearch secretly don't believe in evolution. They think eveything looked the same today as the begining of time. The idea of gradual transformations over thousands of years messes up their racial theories.
The most Eastern Neanderthal sites on this map is Shanidar Cave in Kurdistan Region, Iraq. People leaving Africa in the OOA may have mixed with Neanderthals there before splitting to West and East and later some going into Europe others East Asia
But the fact remains there is a density of Neanderthal sites in Central Europe
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: Clyde was it not you who has posted numerous times that Whites originally looked like snakes, I do believe that WAS you. Sorry but anything that looks like a reptile can NOT ever be human, therefore you DID say that Whites were not human.
That's a lie, Clyde never posted any such thing.
As I always say, Albinos are liars AND delusional.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: Mike you Black racist jackass, you wouldn't know truth if it came up a bit you on the backside. Yep I do believe that just like every White like Paula Dean is ruined for past or present racist remarks, Blacks like you & Clyde should also get the same treatment when you make racist statements. You know nothing of truth, all you know is hatred. You are not trying to teach the truth neither is Clyde or any of your other pseudo scholars, you are trying to teach Black supremacy & stealing that which belongs to others in the process. Did I say I was going to send that info on? Nope I didn't, I simply said someone should.
I have said many times that I love White people. What greater love than trying to teach you the truth about yourselves.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: Clyde was it not you who has posted numerous times that Whites originally looked like snakes, I do believe that WAS you. Sorry but anything that looks like a reptile can NOT ever be human, therefore you DID say that Whites were not human.
That's a lie, Clyde never posted any such thing.
As I always say, Albinos are liars AND delusional.
.
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
These cave drawings suggest that while the Proto-Europeans lived in the caves they resembled serpents.
This serpent like appearence declined once they left the caves and began mating with African Blacks after tectonic changes opened the cave entrances and europeans began to move into the Black lands.
Mike, stop lying and claiming other people are lying
posted
Thanks Lioness, I had been trying to get that exact post but for some reason I couldn't find it.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: Having said this those same Europeans went through and evolution which started as them looking like Africans.
But many people on Egyptsearch secretly don't believe in evolution. They think eveything looked the same today as the begining of time. The idea of gradual transformations over thousands of years messes up their racial theories.
He,he,he,he,he:
Still won't admit that you are simply derived from Dravidian Albinos eh???
Okay, I show all kinds of evidence, including DNA analysis, which shows that you people are Central Asians - by way of India.
So now YOU should show how you are European Negroes, like this one:
(The first European according to BBC2 series)
.
Who turned White.
.
Please don't leave out a thing, I want to enjoy this. I bet Doxie will enjoy it too.
BTW Doxie, if lioness fails, you have to go back.Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
Through a new analytical method, IBM and the Genographic Project find new evidence to support a southern route of human migration from Africa via the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait in Arabia before any movement heading north, and suggest a special role for south Asia in the “out of Africa” expansion of modern humans. Courtesy of National Geographic Maps.
Mike's right according to this relativively recernt OOA map published in 2011.
According to it people first left Africa at about the point of Ethiopia (Djibouti) into the Arabian penisula at Yemen.
From there along South Iran and Pakistan into India. Then there is a branch going up North into Central Asia then Russia and Europe.
another branch to Southern India and then to East and South Asia
another branch to the Middle East and back into North Africa.
So Mike's right the ancestors of the first Europeans were Central Asians and before that people of India.
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
Through a new analytical method, IBM and the Genographic Project find new evidence to support a southern route of human migration from Africa via the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait in Arabia before any movement heading north, and suggest a special role for south Asia in the “out of Africa” expansion of modern humans. Courtesy of National Geographic Maps.
I made that map years ago: See, you don't have to wait for the White man to TELL you. If you clear your mind of his programmed nonsense, and try real hard, you too can figure things out for yourself.Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Do you remember laughing at the map that I created several years ago showing the same thing????
I guess I get the last laugh.
He,he,he,he,he:
^^^^you made a fake map, so what?
another National Geographic Map that you added text and orange and yellow lines to, in other words a lie
Also an apology to Doxies is in order you said Clyde didn't say that and she was a liar but you turned out to be the liar
_________________________________________
Out of Africa, which way? L. Pagani et al. 2013
While the African origin of all modern human populations is well-established, the dynamics of the diaspora that led anatomically modern humans to colonize the lands outside Africa are still under debate. Understanding the demographic parameters as well as the route (or routes) followed by the ancestors of all non-Africans could help to refine our understanding of the selection processes that occurred subsequently, as well as shedding light on a landmark process in our evolutionary history. Of the three possible gateways out of Africa (via Morocco across the Gibraltar strait, via Egypt through the Suez isthmus or via the Horn of Africa across Bab el Mandeb strait) only the latter two are supported by paleoclimatic and archaeological evidence. Furthermore, recent studies (Pagani et al. 2012) showed that, although the modern Ethiopian populations might be good candidates for the descendants of the source population of such a migration, modern Egyptians could be an even better candidate. Unfortunately, however, only a few Egyptian samples have been genotyped and, as yet, none have been fully sequenced. Here, we have generated 125 Ethiopian and 100 Egyptian whole genome sequences (Illumina HiSeq, 8x average depth). The genomes were partitioned using PCAdmix (Brisbin et al. 2012) to account for the confounding effects of recent introgression from neighboring non-African populations. To explore the genetic legacy of migration routes out of Africa, and in particular to test whether the observed genetic data support one route over another, the African components of Egyptians and Ethiopians were then compared to a panel of available non-African populations from the 1000 Genomes Project (1000 Genomes Project Consortium, 2012). The high resolution provided by whole genome sequencing allows us to shed new light on the paths followed by our ancestors as they left Africa, as well as refining the current knowledge of the demographic history of the populations analyzed. ___________________________________________________________
GRIMALDI MAN
"Grimaldi Man" is comprised of two particular skeletons. a woman and a boy, "Caves of Grimaldi" near Ventimiglia in Italy.
They are believed to be between 47,000 and 41,000 years old. The cave held Aurignacian artifacts and reindeer remains in the upper layers, while the lower layers exhibited a more tropical fauna with Merck's rhinoceros, hippopotamus and straight-tusked elephant. The lowermost horizon held Mousterian tools, associated with Neanderthals. The Grimaldi skeletons were found in the lower Aurignacian layer in June 1901, by the Canon de Villeneuve. The two skeletons appeared markedly different from the Cro-Magnon skeletons found higher in the cave and in other caves around Balzi Rossi, and was named "Grimaldi man" in honour of the Prince.
The Grimaldi skeletons were very different from the finds that had been unearthed in Europe until then. Unlike the robust Neanderthals, the Grimaldi skeletons were slender and gracile, even more so than the Cro-Magnon finds from the same cave system. The Grimaldi people were small. While an adult Cro-Magnon generally stood over 170 cm tall (large males could reach 190 cm), neither of the two skeletons stood over 160 cm. The boy was smallest at a mere 155 cm.
as Mike properly notes on his map Grimaldi...NOT Cro-Magnon
The skulls of the two had rather tall braincases, unlike the long, low skulls found in Neanderthals and to a lesser extent in Cro-Magnons. The faces had wide nasal openings and lacked the rectangular orbitae and broad face so characteristic of Cro-Magnons.These traits, combined with what de Villeneuve interpreted as prognathism led the discoverers to the conclusion that the Grimaldi man had been of a "negroid" type. Some traits did not fit the picture though. The nasal bones gave a high nasal bridge, like that of Cro-Magnons and modern Europeans and very unlike more tropical groups. The two rises of the frontal bone in the forehead was separate rather than forming a single median rise, another "European" trait. The cranial capacity was also quite large for their size. Brain size correlate strongly with total muscle mass in humans, indicating the two would have been well muscled in life, rather than having the slender build usually seen in tropical people
____________________________________________
So Mike Grimaldi were the Negroes according to you. They are comprised of two skeletons. If the Cro Magnons wern't negroid, there you have it, Europeans of today tens of thousands of years before recorded hstory living in Europe. Mike you proved it right there when you said "NOT Cromagnon" .
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: So Mike Grimaldi were the Negroes according to you. They are comprised of two skeletons. If the Cro Magnons wern't negroid, there you have it, Europeans of today tens of thousands of years before recorded hstory living in Europe. Mike you proved it right there when you said "NOT Cromagnon".
Damn you're stupid.
I'll make it REAL simple for you:
Modern Man (Us Black People - the Grimaldi): entered Europe circa 45,000 ya.
Cro-Magnon (the hybrid of Modern Man and Neanderthal - from the levant) enter Europe circa 35,000 ya.
Look it up, THEN say something stupid!
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Damn you're stupid.
I'll make it REAL simple for you:
Modern Man (Us Black People - the Grimaldi): entered Europe circa 45,000 ya.
Cro-Magnon (the hybrid of Modern Man and Neanderthal - from the levant) enter Europe circa 35,000 ya.
Look it up, THEN say something stupid! [/QB]
You say Grimaldi man = us black people
and you say
"Cro-Magnon (the hybrid of Modern Man and Neanderthal - from the levant) enter Europe circa 35,000 ya"
So Mike, 35,000 years ago, which is far before civilization, writing and recorded history Cro Magnons were living in Europe.
So you have placed white people, modern Europeans who in their DNA show this link to Neaderthals living in Europe 35,000 years ago.
That's not your usual, there were no white people in Europe until 1,200 years ago claim.
Now you're saying they were there tens of thousands of years before that
Doxies are you listening to this?
In other words according to Mike, two of "Us Black People - the Grimaldi" lived in Italy 45,000 ago in a cave. Therefore Mike owns all of Europe
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: now look at the European reconstructions from 25kya or less
The whole point of my learning how to analyze a Skull, was so that I could laugh at the machinations of lying ass-hole Albinos like you, as they try to falsify what ancient Blacks looked like.
According to National Geographic this is what Neanderthal looked like.
George Church genetics professor at Harvard Medical School, thinks they looked like this.
You people are pathetic, you are albinos, none of the original humanoids looked like you because the mutation which causes Albinism probably didn't appear yet.Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Mike , blithering idiot, there are reconstuctions of Europeans of 25kya who had some admixture with Neanderthals
and there are the Neanderthal reconstructions
retard, these are two different things
__________________________________________
There are many Neanderthal sites in Europe. Modern Europeans have 1-4% Neanderthal DNA Most Africans/African Americans have none, and a small amount found in Maasai is though due to back migration. That means you aint European capishe?
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: Mike , blithering idiot, there are reconstuctions of Europeans of 25kya who had some admixture with Neanderthals
Oh, you mean like THESE????
How can you tell if one of these Black men have the 1-4% Neanderthal?Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic