Or how to convince the truly stupid that your DEFECT makes you "Superior".
The term "Caucasian race" was coined by the German philosopher Christoph Meiners in his The Outline of History of Mankind (1785). Meiners' term was given wider circulation in the 1790s by Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, a German professor of medicine and member of the British Royal Society, who is considered one of the founders of the discipline of anthropology.
Meiners's treatise was widely read in the German intellectual circles of its day, despite muted criticism of its scholarship. Meiners proposed a taxonomy of human beings which involved only two races (Rassen): Caucasians and Mongolians. He considered Caucasians to be more physically attractive than Mongolians, notably because they had paler skin; Caucasians were also more sensitive and more morally virtuous than Mongolians. Later he would make similar distinctions within the Caucasian group, concluding that the Germans were the most attractive and virtuous people on earth.
The name "Caucasian" derived from the Southern Caucasus region (or what is now the country of Georgia), because he considered the people of this region to be the archetype for the grouping.
Meiners's classification was not grounded on any scientific criteria, and it was Blumenbach who gave it scientific credibility and a wider audience, by grounding it in the new quantitative method of craniology. Blumenbach did not credit Meiners with his taxonomy, however, claiming to have developed it himself - although his justification clearly points to Meiners's aesthetic viewpoint:
Caucasian variety—I have taken the name of this variety from Mount Caucasus, both because its neighborhood, and especially its southern slope, produces the most beautiful race of men, I mean the Georgian; and because all physiological reasons converge to this, that in that region, if anywhere, it seems we ought with the greatest probability to place the autochthones (original members) of mankind.
In his earlier racial typology, Meiners put forth that Caucasians had the "whitest, most blooming and most delicate skin". Europeans with darker skin he considered "dirty whites," admixed with Mongolian. Such views were typical of early scientific attempts at racial classification, where skin pigmentation was regarded as the main difference between races. This view was shared by the French naturalist Julien-Joseph Virey, who believed that the Caucasians were only the palest-skinned Europeans.
In various editions of On the Natural Variety of Mankind, Blumenbach expanded on Meiners's popular idea and defined five human races based on color, using popular racial terms of his day, justified with scientific terminology, cranial measurements, and facial features. He established caucasian as the "white race," as well as Mongoloid as the "yellow race," Malayan/"brown race," Ethiopian/"black race," American/"red race." In the 3rd edition of his On the Natural Variety of Mankind, Blumenbach moved skin tone to second tier importance after noticing that poorer European people (such as peasants) whom he observed generally worked outside, often became darker skinned ("browner") through sun exposure. He also noticed that darker skin of an "olive-tinge" was a natural feature of some European populations closer to the Mediterranean Sea. Alongside the anthropologist Georges Cuvier, Blumenbach classified the Caucasian race by cranial measurements and bone morphology in addition to skin pigmentation, and thus considered more than just the palest Europeans ("white, cheeks rosy") as archetypes for the Caucasian race.
There was never any scholarly consensus on the delineation between the Caucasian race, including the populations of Europe, and the Mongoloid one, including the populations of East Asia. Thus, Carleton S. Coon (1939) and Franco Bragagna (2013) included the populations native to all of Central and Northern Asia under the Caucasian label. However, the many scientists maintained racial categorizations of color established by Meiners's and Blumenbach's works, along with many other early steps of anthropology, well into the late 19th and mid-to-late 20th centuries, increasingly used to justify political policies, such as segregation and immigration restrictions, and other opinions based in prejudice. Such as Thomas Henry Huxley (1870) who classified all populations of Asian nations as Mongoloid, and Lothrop Stoddard (1920) who classified the populations of the Middle East, North Africa, and the Horn of Africa, as well as those of Central Asia and South Asia, as "brown", and counted as "white" only the European peoples. Physical anthropology
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
"White people" and modern racial hierarchies
The term "white race" or "white people" entered the major European languages in the later 17th century, originating with the racialization of slavery at the time, in the context of the Atlantic slave trade and the enslavement of native peoples in the Spanish Empire. While first a social category, it has repeatedly been ascribed to strains of blood, ancestry, and physical traits, and was eventually made into a subject of scientific research, which culminated in scientific racism, before being widely repudiated by the scientific community. According to historian Irene Silverblatt, "Race thinking … made social categories into racial truths." Bruce David Baum, citing the work of Ruth Frankenberg, states, "the history of modern racist domination has been bound up with the history of how European peoples defined themselves (and sometimes some other peoples) as members of a superior 'white race.'Alastair Bonnett argues that 'white identity', as it is presently conceived, is an American project, reflecting American interpretations of race and history.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
The Eastern Black Sea region was home to the well-developed bronze age culture, known as the Colchian culture. In at least some parts of Colchis, the process of urbanization seems to have been well advanced by the end of the second millennium B.C, centuries before Greek settlement. The Colchian Late Bronze Age (15th to 8th Centurys B.C.) saw the development of significant skill in the smelting and casting of metals, that began long before this skill was mastered in Europe. Sophisticated farming implements were made, and the fertile, well-watered lowlands with their mild climate, promoted the growth of progressive agricultural techniques.
According to Greek mythology, Colchis was a fabulously wealthy land situated on the mysterious periphery of the heroic world. Here in the sacred grove of the war god Ares, King Aeëtes hung the Golden Fleece until it was seized by Jason and the Argonauts. Colchis was also the land where the mythological Prometheus was punished by being chained to a mountain while an eagle ate at his liver, for revealing to humanity the secret of fire. The Amazons also were said to be from Colchis. The main mythical characters from Colchis are Aeëtes, Medea, Absyrtus, Chalciope, Circe, Eidyia, Pasiphaë.
The Histories of Herodotus
Book 1 - CLIO
[1.1] According to the Persians best informed in history, the Phoenicians began to quarrel. This people, who had formerly dwelt on the shores of the Erythraean Sea (the Erythraean sea, near the spot where the Tigris flows into it - making it the Persian Gulf, NOT the Red Sea), having migrated to the Mediterranean and settled in the parts which they now inhabit, began at once, they say, to adventure on long voyages, freighting their vessels with the wares of Egypt and Assyria. They landed at many places on the coast, and among the rest at Argos, which was then preeminent above all the states included now under the common name of Hellas.
[1.2] At a later period, certain Greeks, with whose name they are unacquainted, but who would probably be Cretans, made a landing at Tyre, on the Phoenician coast, and bore off the king's daughter, Europe. In this they only retaliated; but afterwards the Greeks, they say, were guilty of a second violence. They manned a ship of war, and sailed to Aea, a city of Colchis, on the river Phasis; from whence, after despatching the rest of the business on which they had come, they carried off Medea, the daughter of the king of the land. The monarch sent a herald into Greece to demand reparation of the wrong, and the restitution of his child; but the Greeks made answer that, having received no reparation of the wrong done them in the seizure of Io the Argive, they should give none in this instance.
Book 1 - CLIO
[2.104] There can be no doubt that the Colchians are an Egyptian race. Before I heard any mention of the fact from others, I had remarked it myself. After the thought had struck me, I made inquiries on the subject both in Colchis and in Egypt, and I found that the Colchians had a more distinct recollection of the Egyptians, than the Egyptians had of them. Still the Egyptians said that they believed the Colchians to be descended from the army of Sesostris. My own conjectures were founded, first, on the fact that they are black-skinned and have woolly hair, which certainly amounts to but little, since several other nations are so too; but further and more especially, on the circumstance that the Colchians, the Egyptians, and the Ethiopians, are the only nations who have practised circumcision from the earliest times.
In about 730 B.C, Colchis was overrun by the White Kurgan tribes called Cimmerians and Scythians.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
Black Abkhazians are a small group in Abkhazia of who used to live mainly in the Abkhazian settlement Adzyubzha at the mouth of the Kodori River and the surrounding villages of Abkhazia (Chlou, Pokvesh, Agdarra, Merkulov, etc.) on the eastern coast of the Black Sea.
Hypotheses
The ethnic origin of the Black Abkhazians — and how Blacks arrived in Abkhazia — is still a matter of dispute among experts. Some Historians believe that the settlement in a number of villages in Abkhazia (then part of the Ottoman Empire) is likely to have happened in the 17th century. According to one version, a few hundred slaves were bought and brought by Shervashidze princes (Chachba) to work on the citrus plantations. (Which is of course, the typical Albino historical nonsense, in answer to Blacks being outside of Africa).
According to another theory, Abkhazians of African descent are the descendants of the Colchians, the inhabitants of the ancient kingdom of Colchis in present-day western Georgia. However, the question of the likelihood of at least some continuity between the ancient Colchians and current Abkhazians of African descent is not known, because there is no available, reliable evidence of the existence of an African population in historic Kolkhi. They may also derive from the Egyptian Copts or Ethiopian Jews.
Abkhazian writer Dmitry Gulia in the book "History of Abkhazia" compared the place names of Abkhazia and the corresponding names in Ethiopia and claimed that some of the geographical names are identical: Bagadi – Bagadi, Gunma – Gunma, Tabakur – Dabakur, etc.
posted
In 1927, the Russian writer Maxim Gorky, together with the Abkhaz writer Samson Chanba visited the village of Adzyubzha and met elderly Africans there. Based on his visit and comparison of his observations with the published data, he felt that the Ethiopian version of the origin of the Abkhazians of African descent is true.
Today Abkhazia's status is disputed. It considers itself to be an independent state, but this is recognized by only a few other countries. The Georgian government and most of the world's other states consider Abkhazia de jure a part of Georgia's territory. In Georgia's official subdivision it is an autonomous republic, whose government sits in exile in Tbilisi.
Tbilisi, formerly known as Tiflis, is the capital and the largest city of Georgia, lying on the banks of the Mtkvari River with a population of roughly 1.5 million inhabitants. Founded in the 5th century by the monarch of Georgia's ancient precursor Kingdom of Iberia, Tbilisi has served, with various intervals, as Georgia's capital for more than a thousand years. Under the Russian rule, the city was the seat of the Tsar's viceroy and has served, from 1801 to 1917, as the Imperial capital of the entire Caucasus, including Georgia's current neighbors.
Located on the southeastern edge of Europe, Tbilisi's proximity to lucrative east-west trade routes often made the city a point of contention between various rival empires throughout history and the city's location to this day ensures its position as an important transit route for global energy and trade projects. Tbilisi's varied history is reflected in its architecture, which is a mix of medieval, classical, and Soviet structures. Historically, Tbilisi has been home to people of diverse cultural, ethnic, and religious backgrounds, though it is overwhelmingly Eastern Orthodox Christian.
Of course Blacks were the original Russians, and there are still some surviving today. Though the only ones that are documented, are the Abkhazian/Abkhasian people. That because the mulatto Abkhasian Dmitri Gulia (1874-1960), believing Herodotus's account, asserted that his peoples heritage stemmed from Egyptian king Sesostris. He published a book called, History of Abkhazia, which purports to show that the black Colchian people of Southern Russia, were really an Abyssinian people of Egypt. He attempted to prove this by putting together a vast array of Abkhazian words that matched that of ancient Egypt's. He also chronicles family names, names of rivers and mountains, anems of pre-Christian deities, and more.
As you can clearly see, you people are not really Caucasians after all. Though many of you are severely under-pigmented or Un-pigmented, thus White. So why not go with the correct descriptive term? As you read above, the people who originally came up with this nonsense were very proud of "Pale, White" skin. Another word for White skin is "Albino" I say go with it!
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Nope Mike, we are NOT Albinos as we do NOT suffer from Albinism sorry. As I said before you Black racist, Whitey haters will do anything to prevent White children from knowing/learning their own history, as you want them to think that they have no history, no heritage, no identity, no homeland. You don't want them knowing who they are, who their ancestors were, where they come from, etc due to your extreme hatred for them. At least we never hid the fact that Blacks were from Africa from you, you however are trying to remove all identity from White children. Still waiting on that proof in the other thread Mike, put up or shut up punk.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Black Abkhazians
.
Black Abkhazians are a small group in Abkhazia of who used to live mainly in the Abkhazian settlement Adzyubzha at the mouth of the Kodori River and the surrounding villages of Abkhazia (Chlou, Pokvesh, Agdarra, Merkulov, etc.) on the eastern coast of the Black Sea.
Hypotheses
The ethnic origin of the Black Abkhazians — and how Blacks arrived in Abkhazia — is still a matter of dispute among experts. Some Historians believe that the settlement in a number of villages in Abkhazia (then part of the Ottoman Empire) is likely to have happened in the 17th century. According to one version, a few hundred slaves were bought and brought by Shervashidze princes (Chachba) to work on the citrus plantations. (Which is of course, the typical Albino historical nonsense, in answer to Blacks being outside of Africa).
According to another theory, Abkhazians of African descent are the descendants of the Colchians, the inhabitants of the ancient kingdom of Colchis in present-day western Georgia. However, the question of the likelihood of at least some continuity between the ancient Colchians and current Abkhazians of African descent is not known, because there is no available, reliable evidence of the existence of an African population in historic Kolkhi. They may also derive from the Egyptian Copts or Ethiopian Jews.
Abkhazian writer Dmitry Gulia in the book "History of Abkhazia" compared the place names of Abkhazia and the corresponding names in Ethiopia and claimed that some of the geographical names are identical: Bagadi – Bagadi, Gunma – Gunma, Tabakur – Dabakur, etc.
Simple Awesome Mike.
Posts: 9651 | From: Reace and Love City. | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
^Doxie dear, surely you must know in your heart that we were benevolent Lords, and treated you well. It was your own wickedness that caused you to murder us, usurp us, and cast us to the corners of the Earth as Slaves.
When normalcy is restored, your children will be taught the proper things.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: THE "REAL" CAUCASIANS!
The original Russians
Notice the drastic difference in appearance between the two men, both found in Russia.
The reason for this is that there is 8,000 years between them. You can see the evolution of the features, The man from 34,000 resembles an Austrailian, his nose has a beak like look and there is a wider interval between his mouth and nose are similar to modern Aboriginal Australians moreso than Africans.
And the man from 26,000 years ago, looking very different , with thinner lipes and a relatively much smaller different type of nose, could pass for a modern Russian wrestler. This is after admixture with Neanderthals which is believed to have ended wehn they died out 30,000 years ago
Cranium of a male from Cro-Magnon. Plaster cast.
Cranium of a male from Cro-Magnon. Plaster cast.
here is another of the reconstructions created by the same artist M.M. Gerasimov>
Man from Murzak-Koba. Sculptural reconstruction by M.M. Gerasimov. Plaster.
^^^ This is much later 7000-5000 BC
This reflects the different types of skulls found in different time periods in Europe.
There wasn't much development in Europe untill the invasion of the Dravidian albinos
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: THE "REAL" CAUCASIANS!
The original Russians
Notice the drastic difference in appearance between the two men, both found in Russia.
The reason for this is that there is 8,000 years between them. You can see the evolution of the features, The man from 34,000 resembles an Austrailian, his nose has a beak like look and there is a wider interval between his mouth and nose are similar to modern Aboriginal Australians moreso than Africans.
And the man from 26,000 years ago, looking very different , with thinner lipes and a relatively much smaller different type of nose, could pass for a modern Russian wrestler. This is after admixture with Neanderthals which is believed to have ended wehn they died out 30,000 years ago
Cranium of a male from Cro-Magnon. Plaster cast.
Cranium of a male from Cro-Magnon. Plaster cast.
here is another of the reconstructions created by the same artist M.M. Gerasimov>
Man from Murzak-Koba. Sculptural reconstruction by M.M. Gerasimov. Plaster.
^^^ This is much later 7000-5000 BC
This reflects the different types of skulls found in different time periods in Europe.
There wasn't much development in Europe untill the invasion of the Dravidian albinos
Sure,
quote:Today, most paleoanthropologists agree that the Cro-Magnons came from Africa (5).
quote:"Molecular biology has traced the ancestry of the Cro-Magnons deep into tropical Africa, into the territory of the hypothetical African Eve"...
--Cro-Magnon:How the Ice Age Gave Birth to the First Modern Humans, By Brian Fagan,pg 89 (2010).
quote: If this analysis shows nothing else, it demonstrates that the oft-repeated European feeling that the Cro-Magnons are “us” (47) is more a product of anthropological folklore than the result of the metric data available from the skeletal remains.
--C. Loring Brace(2006) The questionable contribution of the Neolithic and the Bronze Age to European craniofacial form
--B. Lewis et al. 2008. Understanding Humans: Introduction to Physical Anthropology and Archaeology. p 297
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Based on the above, Europe's original AMHs were not "white" people, and any ancient "backflow" would be by people ALREADY looking "black." Furthermore it appears that today's "white" Europeans are not a primary race at all but a "mixed" breed, part Asian, part African, per some conservative mainstream scholars like Cavalli-Sforza.
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [QB] Based on the above, Europe's original AMHs were not "white" people, and any ancient "backflow" would be by people ALREADY looking "black." Furthermore it appears that today's "white" Europeans are not a primary race at all but a "mixed" breed, part Asian, part African, per some conservative mainstream scholars like Cavalli-Sforza.
posted
Too bad the pics are obviously photoshopped huh Clyde ROTFLMBO? We all know how you Whitey hating Afronut Black racist, Black supremacists love to photoshop pics.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^Doxie dear, surely you must know in your heart that we were benevolent Lords, and treated you well. It was your own wickedness that caused you to murder us, usurp us, and cast us to the corners of the Earth as Slaves.
When normalcy is restored, your children will be taught the proper things.
You mean you will teach them to hate themselves, teach them they are inferior, have no value, have no history, no ancestors, no heritage, no identity, no right to exist, no homeland to call their own. Not as long as there are White people like me to teach White children/youth the truth. You and your ilk will NOT get within 10ft of my children (when/if I ever have any) as you & your ilk have NO business teaching any White child/youth (or anywhere NEAR a White child for that matter) & infecting them with your Anti-White,Black racist, Black supremacist Afro-Nut drivel, seeking to remove from them all sense of self. Oh btw, what exactly are these proper things you speak of oh Whitey killer?
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
^Doxie, please remember that your children are our children too - only minus skin pigmentation. As always, we will be, as we once were, your benevolent Lords.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: Nope Mike, we are NOT Albinos as we do NOT suffer from Albinism sorry. As I said before you Black racist, Whitey haters will do anything to prevent White children from knowing/learning their own history, as you want them to think that they have no history, no heritage, no identity, no homeland. You don't want them knowing who they are, who their ancestors were, where they come from, etc due to your extreme hatred for them. At least we never hid the fact that Blacks were from Africa from you, you however are trying to remove all identity from White children. Still waiting on that proof in the other thread Mike, put up or shut up punk.
At the very least you could appreciate what mike111 has just written:sterling,well sourced research you'd be hard pressed to find anywhere else. Btw,your tone and content remind of the Zionists 'explaining' their misdeeds in this film-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt3d3Fmouh4
Israhell in earth.
Posts: 433 | From: nairobi | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic