posted
The Description of the Negro and Brown skin people of Scotland 16th century
I have found written records from Roman writers and writers from the 15-18th century Europe describing the descendants of the Scots or Highlanders of Britain and Scotland.
These books are purposely hidden from the public in order to keep history lost so that the white race can rule without any questions and to keep other Nations specially blacks from learning their TRUE history.
200 yrs ago the population of to Britain was comprised of hundreds of various ABORIGINAL TRIBES that had different physical characteristics.
First we will look at a book called Description of the Western Islands of Scotland (CIRCA 1695) by Martin Martin Gent written by a descendant of the Scots from the Island of Skye named Martin Martin
Martin Martin was a Scottish writer best known for his work A Description of the Western Islands of Scotland (1703; second edition 1716). This book is particularly noted for its information on the St Kilda archipelago. A native of Bealach, near Duntulm, Skye, his work has some authenticity thanks to the fact that he was raised in Gaeldom.
Description of the Western Islands of Scotland INTRODUCTION. BY DONALD J. MACLEOD
Evidence from archaeology, language and tradition shows an original very widely spread race in the Highlands, and Scotland generally, prior to the advent of Picts, Gaels and Norsemen. These pre-Celts have left their remains in barrows and megalithic monuments, weapons and utensils, and it is not difficult to this day, in some of the remoter parts, to recognise by headmark, people possessing their physical characteristics ----- slight build, swarthy complexion, comely features.-------------THE WESTERN ISLANDS Of Scotland (CIRCA 1695) By Martin Martin, Gent - INTRODUCTION BY DONALD J. MACLEOD
The Complexion of the Islanders of The Isle of Skye:
The inhabitants of this isle are generally well proportioned, and their complexion is for the most part black. They are not obliged to art in forming their bodies, for nature never fails to act her part bountifully to them; and perhaps there is no part of the habitable globe where so few bodily imperfections are to be seen, nor any children that go more early----------------Description of the Western Islands of Scotland, p. 194
The Complexion of the Islanders of The Isle of Arran
The inhabitants of this island are composed of several tribes. The most ancient family among them is by the natives reckoned to be MacLouis, which in the ancient language signifies the son of Lewis. They own themselves to be descended of French parentage. Their surname in English is Fullerton, and their title Kirk-Mitchell, the place of their residence. If tradition be true, this little family is said to be of 700 years standing.---------------------------Description of the Western Islands of Scotland Martin Martin p 223
The inhabitants of this isle are well proportioned, generally brown, and some of a black complexion. They enjoy a good state of health, and have a genius for all callings or employments, though they have but few mechanics. They wear the same habit with those of the nearest isles, and are very civil. They all speak the Irish language, yet the English tongue prevails on the east side, and ordinarily the ministers preach in it, and in Irish on the west side. Their ordinary asseveration is by Nale, for I did not hear any oath in the island.------------Description of the Western Islands of Scotland Martin Martin p 224
The Complexion of the Islanders of The Isle of GIGHA
The inhabitants are all Protestants, and speak the Irish tongue generally, there being but few that speak English; they are grave and reserved in their conversation; they are accustomed not to bury on Friday; they are fair or brown in complexion, and use the same habit, diet, etc., that is made use of in the adjacent continent and isles.-----------------------Description of the Western Islands of Scotland by Martin Martin p 230
The Complexion of the Islanders of The Isle of JURA and Scarba:
The natives here are very well proportioned, being generally black of complexion and free from bodily imperfections. They speak the Irish language, and wear the plaid, bonnet, etc., as other islanders.----------------Description of the Western Islands of Scotland by Martin Martin p 239
I will talk about the slavery these people endured next topic slavery of the people of scotland
Posts: 111 | Registered: Sep 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
The Description of the Negro and Brown skin people of Scotland 16th century continued
The Complexion of the Islanders of ISLE OF COLONSAY
The cattle bred here are cows, horses, and sheep, all of a low size. The inhabitants are generally well proportioned, and of a black complexion; they speak only the Irish tongue, and use the habit, diet etc., that is used in the Western Isles: they are all Protestants, and observe the festivals of Christmas, Easter, and Good Friday; but the women only observe the festival of the nativity of the blessed Virgin.-----------Description of the Western Islands of Scotland by Martin Martin p 248
The Island of Pygmies Lewis
The Island of Pygmies or, as the natives call it, the Island of Little Men, is but of small extent. There has been many small bones dug out of the ground here, resembling those of human kind more than any other. This gave ground to a tradition which the natives have of a very low-statured people living once here, called Lusbirdan, i.e., pygmies.
The other fort is called Dun-Evan: the natives have a tradition among them, of a very little generation of people, that lived once here, called Lusbirdan, the same with pygmies. This isle is the Duke of Argyll’s property. ----Description of the Western Islands of Scotland by Martin Martin p 248
Dean Monro, who, in his pastoral capacity, visited Lewis about 1549. I shall quote his description in full, in modern English:
161. "At the north point of Lewis," he says, "there is a little isle called the Pigmies Isle, with a little kirk in it of their own handiwork. —Within this kirk the ancients of that country of the Lewis say that the said pigmies have been buried there. Many men of different countries have delved deeply the floor of the little kirk, and I myself among the rest, and have found in it, deep under the earth, certain bones and round heads of wonderful little size, alleged to be the bones of the said pigmies; which may be likely, according to sundry histories that we read of the pigmies; but I leave this far to the ancients of Lewis."-----------Dean Monro 1549
posted
LOL, Let me guess more Whitey hating, Black racist, Black supremacist nonsense written by Whitey hating Black racist Black supremacists.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
^Doxie dear, as you can see, I am no longer the only one researching this subject. The quality and quantity of data will surely increase because we now have more eyes searching for our true history. Consequently now would probably be a good time for you to reconsider calling yourself a Celtic Warrioress.
As I have told you many times, Celts were Black people, and since you have said that you don't much care for Blacks, perhaps now would be a good time to go to "CentralAsianGirl" or something appropriate like that.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
No Mike the Celts were NOT Black you stupid Whitey hating, Black racist, Black supremacist, moron. Nope will not go to CentralAsianGirl because I'm NOT Central Asian. Again I ask you and your ilk (Xyyboy, Nontruthhitman,Clyde, Mena7, Habsburg, Kdolo,Jantavanta, Narmer, TrollPatrol) Mike. Why do you hate White children? Why do you want to harm them Mike? Why do you want to rob White children of their future & their past?
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
They put up Truth Hitman's research on Rasta Livewire and here is a response to that thread:
Posted by Kaleb B
The following is taken directly from the Dictionary of National Biography (63 volumes).
1. Countess of Dunbar (Scotland), Agnes, Countess of Dunbar and March (1312-1369). Known from her swarthy complexion as Black Agnes. Is celebrated for her spirited defense of Dunbar Castle in January 1337-38. The countess was the daughter of Randolph, earl of Moray and Isabel, the only daughter of Sir John Stewart of Bonkyl, and through her father, grand niece to Robert Bruce. She married Patrick Dunbar, Tenth earl of Dunbar and March.
2. Duke of Hamilton (Scotland), 4th Duke James Douglas (1658-1712), the eldest son of Lord William Douglas, created Earl of Selkirk and Duke of Hamilton for life by his marriage with Anne, daughter of James, first Duke of Hamilton, and Duchess of Hamilton in her own right. Mackey describes him as of middle stature, well made, of a Black coarse complexion.
3. Earl of Middleton, (Scotland) Charles, 2nd Earl of Middleton and titular Earl of Monmouth (1640 – 1719), secretary of state to James II, born about 1640, was eldest son of John, 1st earl of Middleton, by his wife Grizel, daughter of Sir James Durham of Pitkerrow, and widow first of Sir Alexander Fotherlingham of Ballindrone, and secondly of Sir Gilbert Ramsay of Balmain. Mackey describes Middleton as a Black man, of a middle stature, with a sanguine complexion, and one of the pleasantest companions in the world. He also states he was one of the politest gentlemen in Europe.
4. Lord Thomas Fairfax, 1st Lord of Cameron (Scotland). The best portrait of Fairfax is a miniature by HoaInitii. In complexion he was so dark that he was nicknamed “Black Tool”.
5. Earl of Perth, (Scotland) James Drummond, 4th Earl and 1st Titular Duke of Perth (1648-1716), was elder son of James, 3rd Earl, prisoner at the battle of Philiphaugh, 13 Sept. 1645, who died 2 June 1675. His mother, who died 9 Jan. 1656 was Lady Anne Gordon, eldest daughter of George, 2nd Marquis of Huntly. He is described as very proud, of middle stature, with a quick look and brown complexion.
6. Sir William Douglas, (died 1392) Lord of Nithsdale (Scotland), was illegitimate son of Archibald, 3rd Earl of Douglas himself the illegitimate son of the Good Sir James. For comeliness and bravery he was a worthy descendant of such ancestors, and the historians of the period describe him as inheriting several of the personal features of his grandfather, being large-boned, of great strength, tall and erect, bearing himself with a majestic mien, yet courteous andaffable, and in company even hearty and merry. He inherited the swarthy complexion of the Good Sir James, and was also called the Black Douglas.
7. Bishop Horsley, Samuel (1733-1801) – Son of John Horsley, principal of Edinburgh University. Description of him at the age of 17; his eyes and his complexion dark as a raven.
posted
Mike Europe is NOT your land, if you want your land which is AFRICA nothing is stopping you from going to it you White people hating, wanna kill Whitey, wanna harm White children, no heart having, theiving, evil, Black racist, Black supremacist. Again Mike I ask, why do you hate White children? Why do you want to rob White children of their future & their past?
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Mike Europe is NOT your land, if you want your land which is AFRICA nothing is stopping you from going to it you White people hating, wanna kill Whitey, wanna harm White children, no heart having, theiving, evil, Black racist, Black supremacist. Again Mike I ask, why do you hate White children? Why do you want to rob White children of their future & their past?
You degenerate Albinos exterminate Europe's original settlers, the Blacks: and sell the survivors into Slavery in the Americas. Take their history and call it your own, and then have the fuching nerve to complain about Blacks wanting their land and history back??? You are truly sick people - aside from your genetic defects.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Mike Europe is NOT your land & European history is NOT yours, if you want your land which is AFRICA nothing is stopping you from going to it, your history is also there IN AFRICA go find it. You are the ones who are trying to take land & history that is not yours, you White people hating, wanna kill Whitey, wanna harm White children, no heart having, thieving, evil, Black racist, Black supremacist. Again Mike I ask, why do you hate White children? Why do you want to rob White children of their future & their past?
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
^You know Doxie your constant reply is interesting: We now know from revealed history what really happened in Europe:
Your Albino People ended Black Rule by Exterminating Black People and Expelling the Survivors into Slavery. You then took their lands and their History and called it your own.
And after all of that, you still expect us to wish you well! Why? Well because you are really "Good" people of course.
This reminds me of the recent war in Gaza, where the Israeli mowed down Palestinian men, women, and children with abandon: and were surprised when the world demanded that they stop because what they were doing was Bad.
Clearly you Albinos have some sort of moral blinders when it comes to your self-interest.
(You of course understand that I take no position in that conflict because it is about Albinos and their Mulattoes fighting over stolen Black lands).
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Mike come off it you Whitey hating, Black racist, Black supremacist, heartless, evil, son of satan goon. Europe is NOT now nor has it ever been yours. European history is NOT nor has it ever been yours. You have no dang proof of anything that you state. No land was stolen from you AFRICA is still right there waiting for you Mike, go there, visit, discover your history instead of trying to rob others of their's. Why don't you just admit Mike, you simply do not want Whites to know who we are, where we come from, who our ancestors are, you don't want us to have any pride as a people, you want us to think we are inferior non-humans, you want us to forget who we are, you want us to think we have no history, no heritage, no identity, that we have no where on earth we belong, you do not want us to have self determination or knowledge of Self. You want to harm White children by robbing them of their pride & knowledge of self. You want White children to think that they have nothing to be proud of as White children, that their ancestors did nothing, built nothing, accomplished nothing. You want to rob White children of their future & their past.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
Europeans as a people are younger than we thought, a new study suggests.
DNA recovered from ancient skeletons reveals that the genetic makeup of modern Europe was established around 4,500 B.C. in the mid-Neolithic—or 6,500 years ago—and not by the first farmers who arrived in the area around 7,500 years ago or by earlier hunter-gatherer groups. (Read about Europe's oldest known town.)
"The genetics show that something around that point caused the genetic signatures of previous populations to disappear," said Alan Cooper, director of the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA at the University of Adelaide, where the research was performed.
"However, we don't know what happened or why, and [the mid-Neolithic] has not been previously identified as [a time] of major change," he said.
Furthermore, the origins of the mid-Neolithic populations that did form the basis of modern Europe are also unknown.
"This population moves in around 4,000 to 5,000 [B.C.], but where it came from remains a mystery, as we can't see anything like it in the areas surrounding Europe," Cooper said.
The surprising findings are part of a new study, published in this week's issue of the journal Nature Communications, that provides the first detailed genetic history of modern Europe.
The study shows that "relatively recent migrations seem to have had a significant genetic impact on the population of Central Europe," said study co-author Spencer Wells, who leads National Geographic's Genographic Project. (Read about Europe's "Wild Men" in National Geographic magazine.)
Genetic Signature
In the study, Cooper and his colleagues extracted mitochondrial DNA—which children inherit only from their mothers—from the teeth and bones of 39 skeletons found in central Germany. The skeletons ranged in age from about 7,500 to 2,500 years old.
The team focused on a group of closely related mitochondrial lineages—mutations in mitochondrial DNA that are similar to one another—known as haplogroup H, which is carried by up to 45 percent of modern Europeans.
Cooper and his colleagues focused on haplogroup H because previous studies have indicated the mutations might have been present in Europeans' genetic makeup for several thousand years.
It's unclear how this haplogroup became dominant in Europe. Some scientists have proposed that it spread across the continent following a population boom after the end of the last ice age about 12,000 years ago.
But the new data paint a different picture of the genetic foundation of modern Europe: Rather than a single or a few migration events, Europe was occupied several times, in waves, by different groups, from different directions and at different times.
The first modern humans to reach Europe arrived from Africa 35,000 to 40,000 years ago. By about 30,000 years ago, they were widespread throughout the area while their close cousins, the Neanderthals, disappeared. Hardly any of these early hunter-gatherers carried the H haplogroup in their DNA.
About 7,500 years ago during the early Neolithic period, another wave of humans expanded into Europe, this time from the Middle East. They carried in their genes a variant of the H haplogroup, and in their minds knowledge of how to grow and raise crops. (Related: "Egypt's Earliest Farming Village Found.")
Archeologists call these first Central European farmers the linear pottery culture (LBK)—so named because their pottery often had linear decorations.
The genetic evidence shows that the appearance of the LBK farmers and their unique H haplogroups coincided with a dramatic reduction of the U haplogroup—the dominant haplogroup among the hunter-gatherers living in Europe at that time.
Farmers Move In
The findings settle a longstanding debate among archaeologists, said Wells, who is also a National Geographic explorer-in-residence.
Archaeology alone can't determine whether cultural movements—such as a new style of pottery or, in this case, farming—were accompanied by the movements of people, Wells said in an email.
"In this study we show that changes in the European archaeological record are accompanied by genetic changes, suggesting that cultural shifts were accompanied by the migration of people and their DNA."
The LBK group and its descendants were very successful and spread quickly across Europe. "They became the first pan-European culture, if you like," Cooper said.
Given their success, it would be natural to assume that members of the LBK culture were significant genetic ancestors of many modern Europeans.
But the team's genetic analysis revealed a surprise: About 6,500 years ago in the mid-Neolithic, the LBK culture was itself displaced. Their haplogroup H types suddenly became very rare, and they were subsequently replaced by populations bearing a different set of haplogroup H variations.
Mysterious Turnover
The details of this "genetic turnover" event are murky. Scientists don't know what prompted it, or even where the new colonizers came from.
"The extent or nature of this genetic turnover are not clear, and we don't know how widespread it is," Cooper said.
If this turnover were widespread, it could have been prompted by climate change or disease, he said.
"All we know is that the descendants of the LBK farmers disappeared from Central Europe about 4,500 [B.C.], clearing the way for the rise of populations from elsewhere, with their own unique H signatures."
Peter Bogucki, an archeologist at Princeton University who has studied early farming societies in Europe, called the finding "really interesting" and noted the timing of the genetic turnover is curious.
"At the end of the fifth millennium—[about] 4,000 B.C.—there are a lot of changes in the archeological record," said Bogucki, who was not involved in the study.
For example, the long houses that LBK farmers and their descendants favored became less common. Also, the settlement patterns of people living in Central Europe began changing, as did their stone tools.
"There are major transformations during this time that haven't really been all that well explained in interior Central Europe," Bogucki said.
"It looks like the whole system of agricultural settlement that got established with the LBK ran its course through the fifth millennium and something caused people to change."
Of Unknown Origins
Bogucki agrees that climate change might have been a trigger for the change in Europe's genetic makeup, but he thinks it was only a factor and not the sole cause.
One thing that is clear from the genetic data is that nearly half of modern Europeans can trace their origins back to this mysterious group.
"About [4,500 B.C.], you start seeing a diversity and composition of genetic signatures that are beginning to look like modern [Central] Europe," Cooper said. "This composition is then modified by subsequent cultures moving in, but it's the first point at which you see something like the modern European genetic makeup in place."
Whatever prompted the replacement of genetic signatures from the first pan-European culture, Cooper is clearly intrigued. "Something major happened," he said in a statement, "and the hunt is now on to find out what that was."
Correction: The original version of this article stated that the genetic makeup of modern Europeans emerged 4,500 years ago. The text has been updated to reflect the correct timing as 4,500 B.C., or 6,500 years ago.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
Hell, if I knew NG could do it, I would have posted this a long time ago.
BTW - It is surprising that they would publish that material, it's almost accurate: And as we know, NG is one of the prime sources for Bogus Albino history.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
No Mike you have not. Europe is not and has never been yours, European history is NOT yours. Your land and history is in Africa deal with it. Do you really think I believe what some lying, anti-White scientists say? Nope I don't just like I don't believe a word your Whitey hating lying butt says. You have NO proof of any of your statements. Why don't you just admit Mike, you simply do not want Whites to know who we are, where we come from, who our ancestors are, you don't want us to have any pride as a people, you want us to think we are inferior non-humans, you want us to forget who we are, you want us to think we have no history, no heritage, no identity, that we have no where on earth we belong, you do not want us to have self determination or knowledge of Self. You want to harm White children by robbing them of their pride & knowledge of self. You want White children to think that they have nothing to be proud of as White children, that their ancestors did nothing, built nothing, accomplished nothing. You want to rob White children of their future & their past.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic