posted
Britain was never a Frankish Kingdom, and never part of the Holy Roman Empire. So, it is not surprising that they never adopted Euro currency and never joined the Schengen Treaty. The EU project is an attempt return to HRE after experimenting with the nation-state economic model.
France (West Francia) and Germany(East Francia) are the center of gravity of Charlemagne's EU.
The following is a list of modern countries that are fully or partly situated on the territory of the Frankish Empire at its height, immediately prior to the treaty of Verdun in 843.
Completely incorporated into the Empire: Andorra Austria Belgium Metropolitan France Guernsey Jersey Liechtenstein Luxembourg Monaco The Netherlands San Marino Slovenia Switzerland Vatican City Partially incorporated into the Empire: Bosnia and Herzegovina Croatia Czech Republic Germany Hungary Italy Poland Serbia Slovakia Spain
Posts: 384 | Registered: May 2012
| IP: Logged |
Europe is going to be in shambles because now they won't have a united economic bloc to compete with other rising countries in Asia and africa and Latin America!
They have really shot themselves in the foot here! The whole EU was later turned into a Nazi brain child project, but now the likelihood of Europe ever rising to match other non-European economic blocs is pretty much low!
Not to mention they won't succeed fully now w/ their nuclear radiation plan!
The whole idea of the EU was to turn Europe into a United States of Europe, because Europe was **** and their economy was in shambles after the world wars, and close to abysmal. It was to give Europe a chance to recover and catapult themselves out of their mediocrity.
I explained this via the European Nazi military economic recovery plan, which the refugee crisis was created in order for it to take into effect.
Now though, it looks like Europe blew it's chance at that!
Posts: 1558 | From: US | Registered: Sep 2015
| IP: Logged |
When things go south they lash out at each other ....especially France and Germany.
Part of the EU project was to tie them together so their would be no more wars.......
Posts: 2818 | From: new york | Registered: Apr 2014
| IP: Logged |
posted
That's why i said "good news for us", they won't temporary fight each other because there are too many MENA muslims squatting in Europe right now....
Posts: 1558 | From: US | Registered: Sep 2015
| IP: Logged |
posted
That is my biggest fear. When these bipolar xenophobic Europeans start fighting amongst themselves. The whole world will feel the fall out.
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: That is my biggest fear. When these bipolar xenophobic Europeans start fighting amongst themselves. The whole world will feel the fall out.
It's better to move out of countries that are run by Europeans
Posts: 42940 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
If they want to bomb each other into oblivion it will be sad. But posing a risk to our species, the rest of humanity, is where we don't want to go.
Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
No the whole world is not going to feel anything, there are too many MENA muslims right now; and China and the rest of the non-European world are just going to sit back and watch the fireworks, because they are and/either too far away and/or removed from that region to be affected really anyway....
Posts: 1558 | From: US | Registered: Sep 2015
| IP: Logged |
posted
According to the Word Bank and other sources the UK has the 5th largest economy. I only looked it up “after ‘BREXIT. So of course my follow-up question is how come? Why would the UK have the 5th largest economy in the world? They have virtually no naturally resources. Then it hit me. They OWN the companies that mine the resources around the world. And own the banks that finance these companies.
I remember reading back in the early 90’s when the racialist Americans were burning Japanese cars and crying foul at SONY that a report came over the largest investor in the US was not Japan but….you guessed it. Britain!
So, yes, all those down-wind will smell it.
Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
'Why would the UK have the 5th largest economy in the world? They have virtually no naturally resources'
size of economy has little or nothing to do with having natural resources.
Japan has no resources and neither does Hong Kong.
In the case of Britain, It has everything to do with having excellent rule of law which therefore attracts global investment and having a productive population.
Posts: 2818 | From: new york | Registered: Apr 2014
| IP: Logged |
quote:size of economy has little or nothing to do with having natural resources.
Wrong. Saudi Arabia runs a GDP of $750 Billion with an indigenous population of some 20 million--the rest are imported workers to do the work for the lazy Saudis.
The vast portion of that GDP comes from selling oil. I really have no idea what those Arabs manufacture beyond prayer rugs, worry beads, qur'ans and those uniforms for males and females.
Posts: 5492 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Britain is in Europe, but not of Europe as they say.
They have always perceived themselves to be different
Wrong again. Britain was invaded and settled a number of times from Europe.
There was the Roman invasion and Brittania became Roman colony. In fact, Londinium(now London) was the name of a Roman fort. Amusingly enough the Romans thought that the best slaves came from Britain because they were meek and dumb(cf. Cicero).
Then Britain was invaded and settled by Germanic peoples--Jutes, Saxons and Angles(giving us the name England).
Then there was the famous Battle of Hastings in 1066--which began the Norman conquest of Britain. That was when King Harold killed by an arrow in his eye.
Yet, the British Royal family is of recent Germanic ancestry.
But because Britain is an island, its peoples tend to be more insular than the land-locked European countries.
This insularity has been reinforced by Britain fighting off invaders from Europe. The Spanish Armada bent on invading England was defeated in 1588 by Admirals Howard and Francis Drake. Then the famous Battle of Britain when Britain under Churchill withstood Hitler's invading Luftwaffe.
Britain signed on to Brexit because they saw that too many Muslim refugees were heading for their shores because of the extensive free benefits that the refugees were getting. That explains the refugee settlement in Calais, France--home to many refugees seeking to enter Britain.
Posts: 5492 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
But because Britain is an island, its peoples tend to be more insular than the land-locked European countries.
.....i.e. they have always perceived themselves as 'different' from the continentals.....
Posts: 2818 | From: new york | Registered: Apr 2014
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: According to the Word Bank and other sources the UK has the 5th largest economy. I only looked it up “after ‘BREXIT. So of course my follow-up question is how come? Why would the UK have the 5th largest economy in the world? They have virtually no naturally resources. Then it hit me. They OWN the companies that mine the resources around the world. And own the banks that finance these companies.
I remember reading back in the early 90’s when the racialist Americans were burning Japanese cars and crying foul at SONY that a report came over the largest investor in the US was not Japan but….you guessed it. Britain!
So, yes, all those down-wind will smell it.
Colonization, neocolonialism and imperialism. Most (west) European countries with this history, virtually have no naturally resources. Of course "colonization" is no longer being practiced, but imperialism still is.
Posts: 22244 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
On 11 May 1953, it’s true that Churchill did say:
"Where do we stand? We are not members of the European Defence Community, nor do we intend to be merged in a Federal European system. We feel we have a special relation to both. This can be expressed by prepositions, by the preposition "with" but not "of"—we are with them, but not of them. We have our own Commonwealth and Empire."
Posts: 2818 | From: new york | Registered: Apr 2014
| IP: Logged |
quote:Britain is in Europe, but not of Europe as they say.
They have always perceived themselves to be different
Wrong again. Britain was invaded and settled a number of times from Europe.
There was the Roman invasion and Brittania became Roman colony. In fact, Londinium(now London) was the name of a Roman fort. Amusingly enough the Romans thought that the best slaves came from Britain because they were meek and dumb(cf. Cicero).
Then Britain was invaded and settled by Germanic peoples--Jutes, Saxons and Angles(giving us the name England).
Then there was the famous Battle of Hastings in 1066--which began the Norman conquest of Britain. That was when King Harold killed by an arrow in his eye.
Yet, the British Royal family is of recent Germanic ancestry.
But because Britain is an island, its peoples tend to be more insular than the land-locked European countries.
This insularity has been reinforced by Britain fighting off invaders from Europe. The Spanish Armada bent on invading England was defeated in 1588 by Admirals Howard and Francis Drake. Then the famous Battle of Britain when Britain under Churchill withstood Hitler's invading Luftwaffe.
Britain signed on to Brexit because they saw that too many Muslim refugees were heading for their shores because of the extensive free benefits that the refugees were getting. That explains the refugee settlement in Calais, France--home to many refugees seeking to enter Britain.
You forgot to mention the Vikings, who deported several enslaved European tribes into the British Isles.
Posts: 22244 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
My conspiracy theory view on the Brexit is that it is the 13 Illuminati Banking and Roy El families dividing their cake. They are separating a good country from a badly manage organization or they are separating a good business from a badly run conglomerate corporation.
The Anglo Saxon world that include the UK, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand are the most productive and technologically advance countries in the world. The most powerful banking system in the world is from the UK and the USA. The EU badly manage by bureaucrats is a mixture of countries with strong economies like Germany, France, country with average economy like Italy and countries with bad economies like Greece, Spain, Portugal. The EU will survive as a slow economic growing organization while Brexit UK will become a faster growing economy.
The British Illuminati families like the Rothschild, Windsor and Kennedy probably also wanted to reduce the influence of the Papal families and the Pope on Great Britain and the Anglo Saxon world.
Posts: 5374 | From: sepedat/sirius | Registered: Jul 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
'The British Illuminati families like the Rothschild, Windsor and Kennedy probably also wanted to reduce the influence of the Papal families and the Pope on Great Britain and the Anglo Saxon world.'
quote:Britain is in Europe, but not of Europe as they say.
They have always perceived themselves to be different
Wrong again. Britain was invaded and settled a number of times from Europe.
There was the Roman invasion and Brittania became Roman colony. In fact, Londinium(now London) was the name of a Roman fort. Amusingly enough the Romans thought that the best slaves came from Britain because they were meek and dumb(cf. Cicero).
Then Britain was invaded and settled by Germanic peoples--Jutes, Saxons and Angles(giving us the name England).
Then there was the famous Battle of Hastings in 1066--which began the Norman conquest of Britain. That was when King Harold killed by an arrow in his eye.
Yet, the British Royal family is of recent Germanic ancestry.
But because Britain is an island, its peoples tend to be more insular than the land-locked European countries.
This insularity has been reinforced by Britain fighting off invaders from Europe. The Spanish Armada bent on invading England was defeated in 1588 by Admirals Howard and Francis Drake. Then the famous Battle of Britain when Britain under Churchill withstood Hitler's invading Luftwaffe.
Britain signed on to Brexit because they saw that too many Muslim refugees were heading for their shores because of the extensive free benefits that the refugees were getting. That explains the refugee settlement in Calais, France--home to many refugees seeking to enter Britain.
The family also has recent Arab and Slavic and Greek admixture; a DNA study was done a while back and they found that they had "Arab" DNA from the British monarch's having relatives marry w/ Arabian royalty and monarchs.....
Posts: 1558 | From: US | Registered: Sep 2015
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by mena7: Yes Kodlo but Queen Elizabeth II of the Windsor family supported Brexit.
The EU was a project, FULLY SUPPORTED BY THE ILLUMINATI RUN USA, TO CREATE A UNITED STATES OF EUROPE, THROUGH TAX PAYER'S MONEY FROM BOTH AMERICANS AND EUROPEANS!
It follows and joins w/ the Illuminati plan of single world government. So Queen Elizabeth II opinions and desires did not reflect THE MAJORITY OPINION OF THE ILLUMINATI...
Posts: 1558 | From: US | Registered: Sep 2015
| IP: Logged |
posted
MOM. Source? "Arab" ancestry in the Royal family?
I saw a documentary a few days ago about EII She looked admixed with African when she was younger. Darker complexion and curly black hair and full lips. She looks so different as she got older. I will like to see that study.
quote:Originally posted by Mindovermatter:
quote:Originally posted by lamin:
quote:Britain is in Europe, but not of Europe as they say.
They have always perceived themselves to be different
Wrong again. Britain was invaded and settled a number of times from Europe.
There was the Roman invasion and Brittania became Roman colony. In fact, Londinium(now London) was the name of a Roman fort. Amusingly enough the Romans thought that the best slaves came from Britain because they were meek and dumb(cf. Cicero).
Then Britain was invaded and settled by Germanic peoples--Jutes, Saxons and Angles(giving us the name England).
Then there was the famous Battle of Hastings in 1066--which began the Norman conquest of Britain. That was when King Harold killed by an arrow in his eye.
Yet, the British Royal family is of recent Germanic ancestry.
But because Britain is an island, its peoples tend to be more insular than the land-locked European countries.
This insularity has been reinforced by Britain fighting off invaders from Europe. The Spanish Armada bent on invading England was defeated in 1588 by Admirals Howard and Francis Drake. Then the famous Battle of Britain when Britain under Churchill withstood Hitler's invading Luftwaffe.
Britain signed on to Brexit because they saw that too many Muslim refugees were heading for their shores because of the extensive free benefits that the refugees were getting. That explains the refugee settlement in Calais, France--home to many refugees seeking to enter Britain.
The family also has recent Arab and Slavic and Greek admixture; a DNA study was done a while back and they found that they had "Arab" DNA from the British monarch's having relatives marry w/ Arabian royalty and monarchs.....
Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
What about the Vikings sending other Whites to Britain, they were the same dang people. That's a bit different than all of Europe being invaded by Blacks & other non-Whites.
Glad to hear Lizzie supported Brexit,she might actually care about her natural subjects after all.
Now lets see Marie Le Pen get in and see Frexit,lets see the German people hang beserkel Merkel & see Gerexit, let's see Nethexit,Swexit,Itexit,Grexit,Spexit,ect and Europes borders closed & all non-Whites deported and the EU destroyed, to hell with the Anti-White leftist libtards wanting open borders for their agenda.Let them go live in Africa or Asia,ect if they love their non-White pets so much. Real Europeans care not for their DIE-versity or their multi-CULT-uralisim. There's nothing the invaders can give that benefits the real European people.
Xy-YT-hater,
Whitey hater please Lizzie II has never looked the least bit Black.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol,
What about the Vikings sending other Whites to Britain, they were the same dang people. That's a bit different than all of Europe being invaded by Blacks & other non-Whites.
Glad to hear Lizzie supported Brexit,she might actually care about her natural subjects after all.
Now lets see Marie Le Pen get in and see Frexit,lets see the German people hang beserkel Merkel & see Gerexit, let's see Nethexit,Swexit,Itexit,Grexit,Spexit,ect and Europes borders closed & all non-Whites deported and the EU destroyed, to hell with the Anti-White leftist libtards wanting open borders for their agenda.Let them go live in Africa or Asia,ect if they love their non-White pets so much. Real Europeans care not for their DIE-versity or their multi-CULT-uralisim. There's nothing the invaders can give that benefits the real European people.
Xy-YT-hater,
Whitey hater please Lizzie II has never looked the least bit Black.
I have no idea what you are ranting about now. But Vikings were major enslavers. They took European tribes into enslavement and to British Isles.
Posts: 22244 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Indeed. Some ignoramuses here fail to realize that the Vikings ravaged and looted Europe in various eras, and were at one time the biggest slave traders in Europe, including selling nice white chilluns to the Muslim East. So much for white Nordic "role models" who are "the same dang people."
^^Noble Nordic "role models" sell off their own European people to Persian merchants in this National Geographic artist's reconstruction..
The ancient reputation of Vikings as bloodthirsty raiders on cold northern seas has undergone a radical change in recent decades. A kinder, gentler, and more fashionable Viking emerged. (See “Did Vikings Get a Bum Rap?”)
But our view of the Norse may be about to alter course again as scholars turn their gaze to a segment of Viking society that has long remained in the shadows.
Archaeologists are using recent finds and analyses of previous discoveries—from iron collars in Ireland to possible plantation houses in Sweden—to illuminate the role of slavery in creating and maintaining the Viking way of life.
“This was a slave economy,” said Neil Price, an archaeologist at Sweden’s Uppsala University who spoke at a recent meeting that brought together archaeologists who study slavery and colonization. “Slavery has received hardly any attention in the past 30 years, but now we have opportunities using archaeological tools to change this.” Picture of a Swedish site called Sanda Enlarge
Small houses surround a great hall at a Viking site in Sweden called Sanda. Some archaeologists believe this may have been a Viking plantation with slaves as the labor force.
Scandinavian slavery still echoes in the English language today. The expression “to be held in thrall,” meaning to be under someone’s power, traces back to the Old Norse term for a slave: thrall.
Slavery in the region long predates the Vikings. There is evidence of vast economic disparity as early as the first century A.D., with some people living with animals in barns while others live nearby in large, prosperous homes. In 2009, archaeologist Frands Herschend at Uppsala detailed a burnt structure from this early era in which people and animals were immolated. The human bodies were left in the ruins rather than retrieved for burial.
Ancient chronicles long mentioned that people, as well as precious objects, were a target of the Viking raids that began in 793 A.D. at the Scottish monastery of Lindisfarne. The Annals of Ulster record “a great booty of women” taken in a raid near Dublin in 821 A.D., while the same account contends that 3,000 people were captured in a single attack a century later.
Ibn Hawqal, an Arab geographer, described a Viking slave trade in 977 A.D. that extended across the Mediterranean from Spain to Egypt. Others recorded that slaves from northern Europe were funneled from Scandinavia through Russia to Byzantium and Baghdad. -------------------------------------------------------------
^^Kinder, gentler "conservative" Nordic "role models" at work..
Slaves or thralls were amongst the most important commodities traded by the Vikings. They acquired slaves primarily on their expeditions to Eastern Europe and the British Isles. They could also obtain Viking slaves at home, as crimes like murder and thievery were punished with slavery. For example, a woman who stole could be punished by being forced to become her victim’s slave.
Slave trading also existed before the Viking period, but with the numerous territories that the Vikings conquered and their extensive trading networks, slavery could now operate within a system and bring them great wealth. Written sources and legal texts in particular inform us about the slave trade, but the slaves themselves have left few traces behind. However, a few archaeological discoveries have been helpful in this respect, such as burials in which slaves were forced to follow their owners in death. Slave trading
Written sources tell us that the Vikings sold slaves at trading centres, such as Hedeby, and Bolghar on the Volga. Here slaves were traded and exchanged for other products. The buyers might be Viking farmers, who could use slaves in the household, as well as for the hardest and most unpleasant work in the fields. Significant numbers of slaves probably also provided a proportion of the manpower for the great building projects of the Viking Age.
The Vikings were not the only ones who traded in slaves. Slaves were also traded in Western Europe, but here it was not common practice to sell fellow countrymen. The Church was against Christians being forced into slavery by “the heathen” Vikings. One account describes how a monk was so shocked at seeing Christian slaves for sale in Hedeby in 870, that he sold all his possessions and personally bought the slaves their freedom.
Therefore, the Slavic peoples of Eastern Europe were for a long period an obvious target for European and Nordic slave traders. It is from this area that the term “slave” originates.
Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ The problem is of course again, media outlets like Hollywood movies.
Posts: 22244 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
lol, or the dullards who can only repeat "Stormfront" boilerplate..
Meanwhile, various "Brexit" leaders are taking a low profile as if they don't know what to do next. And the same people who wanted to remain are those who will be negotiating an "exit."
eading Brexit campaigner Boris Johnson, the former mayor of London, falls into the former category.
After arguing for months that the country needed to “take back control” of its immigration system, he barely mentioned the issue in an op-ed in Monday’s Daily Telegraph. Instead, he emphasized the need to forge “a new and better relationship with the EU — based on free trade and partnership.”
Johnson, who is considered a leading candidate to succeed Cameron as prime minister, has been conspicuously quiet since the result was announced Friday. Many of his fellow pro-Brexit leaders have also gone to ground. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
I heard one report that the pro-exit Politician are now back-peddling. They promised their supporters free-healthcare and all this good stuff expecting support but not enough to win. Now they are caught up with the mess they created. Lol!
Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: lol, or the dullards who can only repeat "Stormfront" boilerplate..
Doxie is from Kentucky, a little racist town called Madisonville. So, no surprise there. From what I understand, that region has a strong racist history.
quote: As of the census[9] of 2000, there were 19,307 people, 8,077 households, and 5,330 families residing in the city. The population density was 1,085.0 people per square mile (418.8/km²). There were 8,889 housing units at an average density of 499.5 per square mile (192.8/km²). The racial makeup of the city was 86.21% White, 11.24% Black or African American, 0.18% Native American, 0.51% Asian, 0.03% Pacific Islander, 0.63% from other races, and 1.20% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 1.34% of the population.
posted
The Facts on the Vikings not written in the history books. -- Not even the Vikings were White!!! - more lies about European History
============ Linea Melchior et al -------------- We have obtained mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence results on subjects from an early Christian cemetery . n the present work we had the opportunity to obtain samples for aDNA analysis from ten Viking Age [22] subjects that at the time of sampling were untouched by humans for 1,000 years
The subjects in the present study are from a non-Christian burial site, Galgedil (AD 700–1100) in the island of Funen (Figs. 1 and 2), which contains at least 59 inhumations and two cremation burials (site excavated in 1988, 1999–2002 and 2005). We obtained samples for aDNA analysis for the present study during the last excavation from subjects who were C14 dated to about AD 1,000 (Kirsten Prangsgaard, personal communication) The exhumation of ten subjects was performed in a way as to prevent contamination with modern human DNA. To test the overall reliability of the laboratory procedures used a tooth from an Inuit skull from a burial site in Greenland was used as a control. We have assessed mtDNA variation in ten Viking subjects from Galgedil, ca. AD 1,000, in the northern part of Funen, Denmark. All subjects were untouched by humans at the time of sampling and additional precautions were taken to minimize the risk of prelaboratory contamination. mtDNA was extracted independently from two teeth, PCR amplified, cloned and sequenced. Results….
Rare mtDNA haplogroups ..however, it is noted that ***five of the ten*** subjects harbour mtDNA haplotypes which have either NOT been observed or are infrequent in modern Scandinavians (Table 1). In particular the observation of haplotype X2c is interesting (subject G7). Haplogroup X is itself rare (0.9% in Scandinavians [51]) but has a very wide geographic range, and X2c is a rare subgroup of X accounting for only 5% of 175 Hg X samples surveyed in 2003 [52]. …but X2a has not been detected in Europe and the present observation of X2c amongst the Vikings does not support this proposal. Among present day Scandinavians Hg I constitutes ,2% [55,56], however, we have previously observed a markedly higher frequency (10–20%) of Hg I in Danish Iron Age and Viking Age population samples (Table S3) [16,21]. With the observation of Hg I for subject G6 this trend is also seen for the Viking population sample from Galgedil. Interestingly, Hg I shows a low frequency (1 out of 114 subjects) among other ancient populations in Italy, Spain, Great Britain, and early central European farmers 11,12,43,57].
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: The Facts on the Vikings not written in the history books. -- Not even the Vikings were White!!! - more lies about European History
We have obtained mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence results on subjects from an early Christian cemetery . n the present work we had the opportunity to obtain samples for aDNA analysis from ten Viking Age [22] subjects that at the time of sampling were untouched by humans for 1,000 years
I am not sure how to interpret this, but Vikings did invade North Africa. They too did bring slaves from Northern Europe, Sammie people (Nordics) into Northwest Africa.
The history says that North Africans were captured and taken as slaves as well. This may explain, what you've posted on the genetic part.
quote: Vikings raided North Africa in 861AD, taking slaves back to the north. The slaves become known as blue men, in reference to their dark skins.
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: Meanwhile, various "Brexit" leaders are taking a low profile as if they don't know what to do next. And the same people who wanted to remain are those who will be negotiating an "exit.
Doxie jumped for joy. East Europeans who always have been hated there and have a long winded history of enslavement, are now under persecution there. Meaning physical attacks. Doxie really doesn't grasp the bigger picture. Typical white supremacist in delusional fantasies.
'My family doesn't feel safe here any more': eastern Europeans on Brexit
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: Whoops!! on their part. lol!
I heard one report that the pro-exit Politician are now back-peddling. They promised their supporters free-healthcare and all this good stuff expecting support but not enough to win. Now they are caught up with the mess they created. Lol!
. America must be truly blessed!
Where else are the people given an opportunity to see where their stupidity can lead them (Trumpism) before they do it.
All societies laud the fairness and wisdom of the Proletariat (working people).
But that's just feel-good bullsh1t for the masses. Remember when Doxies people were haranguing Obama about American "Exceptionalism": can't remember if he finally said it or not.
They wanted to be told that they were "Special".
The average citizen of any country knows nothing about anything, except for the immediate things of his existence. Really - would you want the guy swilling beer at the local pub, to be making decisions about YOUR future?
Trumpism and Brexit are examples of where soulless demagogues thirsting for power, stir-up the Proletariat by appealing to their prejudices with nonsense claims.
Then once the deed is done, they find themselves incompetent and completely incapable of governing.
Working class Albinos - leave the decision making to people who really know something.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: Meanwhile, various "Brexit" leaders are taking a low profile as if they don't know what to do next. And the same people who wanted to remain are those who will be negotiating an "exit.
Doxie jumped for joy. East Europeans who always have been hated there and have a long winded history of enslavement, are now under persecution there. Meaning physical attacks. Doxie really doesn't grasp the bigger picture. Typical white supremacist in delusional fantasies.
'My family doesn't feel safe here any more': eastern Europeans on Brexit
Interesting link, though some of these Eastern Europeans, including Russians, are if anything among the most racist people in Europe. All I saw in article was some graffiti and some random anti-Polish comments. What they punk asses complaining about? Compare to black folk actually being attacked in Eastern Europe. The black student below advises AGAINST travel to Slovakia for example. Almost looks like a brother would have to be strapped to travel in certain parts. Interestingly, he advises Black Americans playing UP your Americanism, so you are not confused with an African- who are treated much worse.
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: The Facts on the Vikings not written in the history books. -- Not even the Vikings were White!!! - more lies about European History
============ Linea Melchior et al -------------- We have obtained mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence results on subjects from an early Christian cemetery . n the present work we had the opportunity to obtain samples for aDNA analysis from ten Viking Age [22] subjects that at the time of sampling were untouched by humans for 1,000 years
The subjects in the present study are from a non-Christian burial site, Galgedil (AD 700–1100) in the island of Funen (Figs. 1 and 2), which contains at least 59 inhumations and two cremation burials (site excavated in 1988, 1999–2002 and 2005). We obtained samples for aDNA analysis for the present study during the last excavation from subjects who were C14 dated to about AD 1,000 (Kirsten Prangsgaard, personal communication) The exhumation of ten subjects was performed in a way as to prevent contamination with modern human DNA. To test the overall reliability of the laboratory procedures used a tooth from an Inuit skull from a burial site in Greenland was used as a control. We have assessed mtDNA variation in ten Viking subjects from Galgedil, ca. AD 1,000, in the northern part of Funen, Denmark. All subjects were untouched by humans at the time of sampling and additional precautions were taken to minimize the risk of prelaboratory contamination. mtDNA was extracted independently from two teeth, PCR amplified, cloned and sequenced. Results….
Rare mtDNA haplogroups ..however, it is noted that ***five of the ten*** subjects harbour mtDNA haplotypes which have either NOT been observed or are infrequent in modern Scandinavians (Table 1). In particular the observation of haplotype X2c is interesting (subject G7). Haplogroup X is itself rare (0.9% in Scandinavians [51]) but has a very wide geographic range, and X2c is a rare subgroup of X accounting for only 5% of 175 Hg X samples surveyed in 2003 [52]. …but X2a has not been detected in Europe and the present observation of X2c amongst the Vikings does not support this proposal. Among present day Scandinavians Hg I constitutes ,2% [55,56], however, we have previously observed a markedly higher frequency (10–20%) of Hg I in Danish Iron Age and Viking Age population samples (Table S3) [16,21]. With the observation of Hg I for subject G6 this trend is also seen for the Viking population sample from Galgedil. Interestingly, Hg I shows a low frequency (1 out of 114 subjects) among other ancient populations in Italy, Spain, Great Britain, and early central European farmers 11,12,43,57].
Page 76 The Norsemen in Kiev in 1018, despite their unquestioned Swedish origin, were described by Thietmar of Merseburg ( Prince-Bishop of Merseburg Germany, 1009–1018 ) as being for the most part Danes. The Irish annalists were a lesson to all with their division of Norse invaders into White Foreigners, Norwegians (Finn-gaill), and Black Foreigners, Danes (Dubh-gaill), but it was a lesson no one heeded; nor do we know why they distinguished them by colour.
Page 77 The Welsh chroniclers, for example, made no such clear distinction. The Danes coming in by way of England and the Norwegians coming in by way of Ireland were pretty well all black: Black Gentiles (y Kenedloed Duon), Black Norsemen (y Normanyeit Duon), Black Host, Pagans, Devils and the like.
I also found an interesting page about slavery in early Western Europe:
quote: During the AD800s, the Picts constituted about 90% of the population of northern Scotland, (the Scots only about 10%). However they were constantly harried The Pict Empire, before its demise.
Alba, then Scotland, maintained the trappings of Empire even after large sections in the west and north were seized by the Norse Vikings. and were under heavy pressure by Norse in the north, Scots in the south-west, and by Germanic tribes of Angles in the south. In battle after battle, they succeeded in repulsing all antagonists.
This land was defended many times after Rome's departure. The Picts fought invasions by the Irish-Gaelic Scots in the west, the Welsh Britons in the southwest, and German Saxons in the southeast, and the sea borne Norse and Danish Vikings in the north, northwest, and northeast.
They sometimes lost great battles and huge chunks of land, only to regain them later through perseverance in the vicious warfare of the dark ages.
In the 7th century, Scots pushed their frontier far north, and a victorious Gaelic army came within a half-day march of the Pict capital of Inverness before it was crushed. In the south, the Saxons marched their Teutonic armies north and held Pict lands for 30 years before they were butchered and sent fleeing south by an avenging Pict army.Pictic warrior painted for battle
However, in AD837, the Picts suffered their most devastating military defeat - by the Norsemen. They lost their King and most of their leaders. This one event marked the beginning of the end of Pict domination of Alban.
Their western and northern territories, including their island empire of the Hebridies, Orkneys, Shetland, and Faroes gone, they lost control of their own people and fell into a long period of civil wars and anarchy, and became fatally infiltrated by the Scots.
As in a dying fire, they flickered back to life briefly through the 11 year rule of the last Pictish King of Alba, Grig the Great, Conqueror of all Alba, Hibernia (Ireland), Anglia (Lothian), and Northumbria. But by AD1000, their culture was gone, replaced through assimilation by the Scots, much of it through inter-marriage, from slave raids by the Vikings, and the rest through a state-sponsored genocide, much similar to the fate later designated for the Clan Gregor.
Historical records of that time tell of large Viking centres in Ireland such as Dublin and Belfast, that owed their existence to the trade in vast numbers of Pict slaves taken from Scotland, who, due to their white skin, knowledge of Latin, and their long history of Christianization, were in great demand by the Romans.
Derided inaccurately by many historians as "aboriginals", they established a hierarchal society, an island Empire, defeated the best Roman Legions, and sent them scurrying south behind "Hadrian's Wall", fought off successive invaders from all corners of their country, and traded extensively with mainland Europe.
Thus a sad end came to a magnificent people (and their beloved ponies) on the fringe of north-western Europe, a people who had become a shining light of Christianity, sent missionaries into a hostile northern Europe for 500 years, and helped prepare the groundwork for the Lutheran reformation.
Slavery was a fact of life and crucial to the early European economy back then it seems......
Posts: 1558 | From: US | Registered: Sep 2015
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova:
quote:Originally posted by Ish Gebor:
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: Meanwhile, various "Brexit" leaders are taking a low profile as if they don't know what to do next. And the same people who wanted to remain are those who will be negotiating an "exit.
Doxie jumped for joy. East Europeans who always have been hated there and have a long winded history of enslavement, are now under persecution there. Meaning physical attacks. Doxie really doesn't grasp the bigger picture. Typical white supremacist in delusional fantasies.
'My family doesn't feel safe here any more': eastern Europeans on Brexit
Interesting link, though some of these Eastern Europeans, including Russians, are if anything among the most racist people in Europe. All I saw in article was some graffiti and some random anti-Polish comments. What they punk asses complaining about? Compare to black folk actually being attacked in Eastern Europe. The black student below advises AGAINST travel to Slovakia for example. Almost looks like a brother would have to be strapped to travel in certain parts. Interestingly, he advises Black Americans playing UP your Americanism, so you are not confused with an African- who are treated much worse.
You do have a point there, and yes I know about that. Though my East European experiences are not negative, but very positive. Nor did I hear negative experiences from people I know. But there is resentment in some cases, such as you posted.
This is a relatively old article. There even older articles about this, on this.
"The UK xenophobia turns against Eastern Europeans Portraying Eastern Europeans as criminals and barbarians is nothing but hate speech and discrimination."
quote:Increasing fears surrounding migration in the UK are rarely far from society's surface, and re-materialised in the public debate a few months ago, after a "No Eastern Europeans" sign was placed at the entrance of a fishery in Warwickshire.
posted
I never heard of the terms, thanks for posting this knowledge. I see, there is a lot written on it.
quote: Terminology
The Irish knew the Vikings as Gaill ("Gentiles" or foreigners), Lochlann ("lakemen"), Normanni ("north-men") and Danes, regardless of where they may have originated in Scandinavia. At the beginning of Viking attacks upon Ireland, the new invaders were known simply as Gaill, however in time the Irish annalists began to distinguish between two types of Vikings: the Finn-Gaill ("white foreigners") and Dubh-Gaill ("black foreigners").
quote: Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online. Dubgaill and Finngaill, or Dubgenti and Finngenti, are Middle Irish terms used to denote different rival groups of Vikings in Ireland and Britain. Literally, Dub-/Finngaill is translated as "dark and fair foreigners" or "black and white foreigners", and similarly, Dub-/Finngenti as "dark/black" and "fair/white heathens". Similar terms are found in Welsh chronicles, probably derived from Gaelic usage. The first known use of these terms in the chronicles is from 851, when it is noted that "The Dubhghoill arrived in Ath Cliath, and made a great slaughter of the Finnghoill". The terms appear, with various spellings, in entries in Irish annals from the ninth and tenth century, and are also used and interpreted in later historiography.
posted
'The history says that North Africans were captured and taken as slaves as well. This may explain, what you've posted on the genetic part.
quote: Vikings raided North Africa in 861AD, taking slaves back to the north. The slaves become known as blue men, in reference to their dark skins. --Wolf Cry by Julia Golding'
Wake up dude.
Posts: 2818 | From: new york | Registered: Apr 2014
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by kdolo: 'The history says that North Africans were captured and taken as slaves as well. This may explain, what you've posted on the genetic part.
quote: Vikings raided North Africa in 861AD, taking slaves back to the north. The slaves become known as blue men, in reference to their dark skins. --Wolf Cry by Julia Golding'
Wake up dude.
LOL Have you ever been to North Africa, East or West? Better, have you ever traveled abroad?
Posts: 22244 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by jantavanta: Britain was never a Frankish Kingdom, and never part of the Holy Roman Empire. So, it is not surprising that they never adopted Euro currency and never joined the Schengen Treaty. The EU project is an attempt return to HRE after experimenting with the nation-state economic model.
France (West Francia) and Germany(East Francia) are the center of gravity of Charlemagne's EU.
The following is a list of modern countries that are fully or partly situated on the territory of the Frankish Empire at its height, immediately prior to the treaty of Verdun in 843.
Completely incorporated into the Empire: Andorra Austria Belgium Metropolitan France Guernsey Jersey Liechtenstein Luxembourg Monaco The Netherlands San Marino Slovenia Switzerland Vatican City Partially incorporated into the Empire: Bosnia and Herzegovina Croatia Czech Republic Germany Hungary Italy Poland Serbia Slovakia Spain
posted
No because there was various Black Vikings who were raiding and attacking places like Ireland on their own and even served as bodyguard's, of the Varangian Byzantine guard (images of Black looking Varangian guard people have been posted here before).
And since Black people were the first to settle Europe before White Eurasians, it's likely there actually WERE BLACK VIKINGS!
Posts: 1558 | From: US | Registered: Sep 2015
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic