posted
The Albinos have no history, their ascension was quite recent, no doubt accelerated by the "So-called" (by them), Religious wars of the "Thirty Years" Wars, which were actually "Race Wars", as well as the British "Civil Wars" which were also "Race Wars": All of which culminating in the Killing of most of Europe’s Black Royalty, and the Expulsion into servitude and Slavery, to the Americas (the Caribbean and the North American Colonies), for most of the rest. At this time we cannot say why MOST, but not ALL, were expelled.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Over the years, we have often mused over what it will be like when the Albinos can no longer maintain their lies, and have to tell the truth about what happened. One thing we were always certain of, was that it will be devastating for Albino youth to learn that everything they were taught relating to race was a lie, and that they were indeed just Albinos, who with murder and mayhem, were able to seize Black Europe, and from there, conquer the world.
(Keep in mind that the Home of the Albinos - Central Asia - was totally EMPTIED of them by the Mongols by 600 A.D. So Albinos had a huge numerical advantage to Blacks by the current era. Apparently the British seem to have been thinking along with us, and have decided to lessen the shock with some early leaked truth. But note how some still want to cling to the lies, they want to muddy the waters by mentioning Romans, as if Romans were the first people in the Islands, instead of the second to last. And even those who want to tell the truth, are very hesitant.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
As we have said many times, and repeated many times, the Albinos have created industry out of creating FAKE Statues, Paintings, Coins etc: depicting themselves (Albinos) in place of the "REAL" people of earlier times, who were Black people.Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Whats with the excerpts? Is that some classic albino whining in about the article via commentary?
Posts: 310 | From: US | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |
posted
^The British are the strangest Degenerates and scapegoaters.
On the one hand they are the worst:
The British Museum manages to lie through it's teeth, and say that Ramesses II was responsible for shaving the Noses and Lips of ancient Egyptian Statues to make them look White, instead of modern Albinos like THEM!
From the British Museum - Quote: Royal statues in Egypt were sometimes usurped (taken over) by later rulers. The normal procedure was simply to re-carve their name over the old one, but in some cases the physical features were also altered. Ramesses II (1279-1213 BC) seems to have altered a number of statues of Amenhotep III in this way, presumably because he wished to represent his ideal image in a certain form. Ramesses seems to have concentrated on changing the characteristic thick lips of the older statuary to thinner ones. In other cases he took to reducing the plump stomach areas of Amenhotep's statues to make them closer to his ideal of the physical shape of the king. . .
.
Ha,ha,ha,ha:
Ya Sure - Ramses II was long dead when this happened!Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^The British are the strangest Degenerates and scapegoaters. On the one hand they are the worst:
. Their Slavery was the most degenerate, and the most DEADLY!
See Barbados and Jamaica History.
But on the other hand.....
The most beautiful Christian Hymn "Amazing Grace" , was written by a British clergyman and former Captain of a Slave ship, who was seeking redemption.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: As we have said many times, and repeated many times, the Albinos have created industry out of creating FAKE Statues, Paintings, Coins etc: depicting themselves (Albinos) in place of the "REAL" people of earlier times, who were Black people.
Posted in other thread but applies here -
NOTES ON THE AUTHENTIC PORTRAITS OF MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS (pages 5-6)
Until the Stuart Exhibition in 1889 the various Exhibitions in which the portraits of Mary Stuart had been collected together had only served to make confusion worse confounded. Ladies with black, brown, or red hair, with black, brown, or blue eyes, with aquiline noses or r&roussds, tall or short, thin or plump, all appeared in numbers, asserting themselves to represent the Queen of Scotland. Of all this medley but the merest fragment could really claim to have any authenticity. The interest in historical portraiture is of comparatively recent awakening.
The dilettante enthusiasm aroused by Horace Walpole and his friends, and other antiquaries of the same inclinations, had brought what was at first a mere collector's caprice into a fashionable craze. Portraits of historical personages were sought for high and low. Family history, county history, heraldry and genealogy, all became a necessary adjunct to the libraries of the noble and the rich. Where portraits were not forthcoming, there was ever, as now, a horde of needy copyists ready to supply them. Shakespeares, Miltons, Elizabeths, Raleighs, Nell Gwynns, began to bloom in every broker's window. Every Cavalier family found itself mysteriously possessed of important portraits of Charles I. and Henrietta Maria, bestowed either by them or their son upon the family hero for services rendered during the Civil Wars. For similar reasons Cromwell lowered from every parlour wall among Puritans and Nonconformists. Every family in Scotland, which could produce or invent the slightest excuse, revealed some portrait of the ill-fated Mary, Queen of Scots, which for various mysterious reasons had up to that time remained unnoticed. Most of these were endowed with apparently unimpeachable pedigrees. In all these matters the critical faculty was conspicuous by its absence, being replaced, adequately in the owner's opinion, by enthusiasm.
Thing about this is that it was apparently so bad that they aren't 100% certain on the paintings they claim are authentic of Mary, the subject of the very book. On Mike's website there is a sketch of her in a white morning garnment. If I remember the passage, they reported on it first in france but there it was described as "defaced".
-Actually found description In Van der Doort's catalogue of King's collection of Limings. "No. 14. Item a defaced picture of Queen Mary of Scotland in her white morning habit. given to the King by the Lord Marquiss of Hamilton";
Posts: 310 | From: US | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |
posted
That is the problem with these researchers, they use the fact of black Roman soldiers from Africa to conceal the fact that there were Blacks living here before the arrival of the Romans came,regardless of whether they were Africans or not.
The puzzling part if it was just a few Black soldiers who were remained or were left behind when the Romans left, how did Europe maintain a visibly Black nobility well into the 20th century?
-------------------- The Habsburg Agenda - Defending Western Christian civilization Posts: 890 | From: London | Registered: Apr 2014
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^The British are the strangest Degenerates and scapegoaters. On the one hand they are the worst:
. Their Slavery was the most degenerate, and the most DEADLY!
See Barbados and Jamaica History.
But on the other hand.....
The most beautiful Christian Hymn "Amazing Grace" , was written by a British clergyman and former Captain of a Slave ship, who was seeking redemption.
' Really interesting other hand. Whenever I think of slavery I also think of this - the world is unfair, the work is unjust. Yet time is just. Time is fair. In due time what goes around comes around.
it was created by Blacks, and has been around for thousands of years.
All (civilized) Black history, indicates Slavery as servitude, not abuse: with no attempt to stigmatiz any particular type of people as low quality, particularly suited to Slavery.
Not surprisingly, that type of behavior only came into being when the defective Dravidian Albinos, late of Europe, ascended to world power.
Clearly this was retribution and vengeance upon Blacks for perceived slights during earlier times when Blacks ruled.
Please note that Dalits (untouchables) are dark Indians, formerly the most prized complexion.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic