posted
Nothing new here. Brazil had a "whitening" policy from the 1960s. White men were encouraged to mate with black females to dilute the black presence in Brazil.
Africans were brought to the Americas to do a job. That job was to provide the labor inputs for the development of the Americas according to the Capitalist model developed by the European settlers.
After slavery was abolished, the issue was "what to do with the blacks"?
In the U.S.. Presidents Jefferson and Lincoln recommended shipping them out, but the eventual solution was to segregate them. The current U.S. policy is to dilute the African genetic base in the context of the very racist one drop rule according to which someone who is 1/32 black is considered black.
Argentina decided to have them killed off or bred out--but in general, the solution was to isolate and segregate them.
Brazil is merely updating an old policy.
Posts: 5492 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
After being able to observe at first hand how many native born quadroons look no different from "white" Portuguese, Spanish and so described oliveskinned people from the Mediterranean, they know now that the "whiteness" game is up.
So what to do - get blond haired sperm from Europe, an inanity which ignores the fact that even quadroons and octoroons can also exhibit also blond hair and blue eyes.
-------------------- The Habsburg Agenda - Defending Western Christian civilization Posts: 890 | From: London | Registered: Apr 2014
| IP: Logged |
“The current U.S. policy is to dilute the African genetic base in the context of the very racist one drop rule according to which someone who is 1/32 black is considered black.”
Isn’t that the opposite? They are increasing the AFRAM population there by reducing their(whites) numbers? The objected is to “alienating” Africans nit dilute , increase or decrease. 1/32 black means they are INCREASING the black population not reducing it. Essentially it is the same as Brazil. Mulattoes are considered white while in the US they are black.
Sorry I have an affinity to ...logic
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Mulatto are considered black in the US? Explain then why on the US census there is an "other race" category you can select.
Mariah Carey (biracial).
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: I always call out nonsense..sorry Lamin.
“The current U.S. policy is to dilute the African genetic base in the context of the very racist one drop rule according to which someone who is 1/32 black is considered black.”
Isn’t that the opposite? They are increasing the AFRAM population there by reducing their(whites) numbers? The objected is to “alienating” Africans nit dilute , increase or decrease. 1/32 black means they are INCREASING the black population not reducing it. Essentially it is the same as Brazil. Mulattoes are considered white while in the US they are black.
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Black Crystal you obviously don't live in the states.
"Other" is any group that doesn't fit the already listed groups like Arabs for example. Many Biracials check the Black option.
Posts: 1891 | From: NY | Registered: Sep 2014
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ Thank you. You can be 99% white but have 1% black ..then you are considered black. They are not diluting blacks they are decreasing white numbers. WHy? To keep "whites" as an privileged or to remain an exclusive club...
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Elite Diasporan: Black Crystal you obviously don't live in the states.
"Other" is any group that doesn't fit the already listed groups like Arabs for example. Many Biracials check the Black option.
I am not disputing that many biracials check black as race. But by your own admission, many also don't check off black. So you're going to ignore how the other biracials self-identify?
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: ^ Thank you. You can be 99% white but have 1% black ..then you are considered black. They are not diluting blacks they are decreasing white numbers. WHy? To keep "whites" as an privileged or to remain an exclusive club...
What you say absolutely makes no sense when the census allows them to check "other" and record what they self-identify as. Perhaps it's you and those who think like you who consider them black but there are many others who think otherwise. My question to you is what makes yours correct?
quote:Originally posted by Elite Diasporan: Black Crystal you obviously don't live in the states.
"Other" is any group that doesn't fit the already listed groups like Arabs for example. Many Biracials check the Black option.
I am not disputing that many biracials check black as race. But by your own admission, many also don't check off black. So you're going to ignore how the other biracials self-identify?
You questioned if biracials are considered Black in the USA and then brought up the "other" category. That category has no relevancy when it comes to the social racial climate of the USA. I'm not ignoring anything and biracials are not just Black/White mix. But fact is the majority of Americans consider mulatto Black. Yeah, there are a good amount that will just claim biracial but a majority of them check Black. Why? Because they are safer under the Black community than by themselves. By themselves they are a tiny minority(probably even less than Asians) and completely vulnerable to White Supremacy in the USA. Plus many mulattos are raised in Black communities. Like rapper J Cole for example or Alicia Keys.
The USA is a totally different animal compared to countries like Brazil, South Africa or UK when it comes to Biracials. Because 1 the one drop rule and 2 the Biracials in the states do not out number blacks like they do in Brazil. Also biracials never helped oppress Blacks in the states in like say Haiti.
Posts: 1891 | From: NY | Registered: Sep 2014
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: ^ Thank you. You can be 99% white but have 1% black ..then you are considered black. They are not diluting blacks they are decreasing white numbers. WHy? To keep "whites" as an privileged or to remain an exclusive club...
The one drop rule was invented to separate Whites from Blacks and other non-Whites in America. It was to keep them as pure as possible. But with the coming of DNA studies, White-Americans are slowly throwing away the idea of the one drop rule and slowly accepting the Brazilian/Latin American ideology of race purification. At least the upper elite Whites.
Posts: 1891 | From: NY | Registered: Sep 2014
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: ^ Thank you. You can be 99% white but have 1% black ..then you are considered black. They are not diluting blacks they are decreasing white numbers. WHy? To keep "whites" as an privileged or to remain an exclusive club...
The one drop rule was invented to separate Whites from Blacks and other non-Whites in America. It was to keep them as pure as possible. But with the coming of DNA studies, White-Americans are slowly throwing away the idea of the one drop rule and slowly accepting the Brazilian/Latin American ideology of race purification. At least the upper elite Whites.
are you referring to the Latin American idea that the more white blood in you the more white you are?
quote:Originally posted by Elite Diasporan: Black Crystal you obviously don't live in the states.
"Other" is any group that doesn't fit the already listed groups like Arabs for example. Many Biracials check the Black option.
I am not disputing that many biracials check black as race. But by your own admission, many also don't check off black. So you're going to ignore how the other biracials self-identify?
You questioned if biracials are considered Black in the USA and then brought up the "other" category. That category has no relevancy when it comes to the social racial climate of the USA. I'm not ignoring anything and biracials are not just Black/White mix. But fact is the majority of Americans consider mulatto Black. Yeah, there are a good amount that will just claim biracial but a majority of them check Black. Why? Because they are safer under the Black community than by themselves. By themselves they are a tiny minority(probably even less than Asians) and completely vulnerable to White Supremacy in the USA. Plus many mulattos are raised in Black communities. Like rapper J Cole for example or Alicia Keys.
The USA is a totally different animal compared to countries like Brazil, South Africa or UK when it comes to Biracials. Because 1 the one drop rule and 2 the Biracials in the states do not out number blacks like they do in Brazil. Also biracials never helped oppress Blacks in the states in like say Haiti.
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: ^ Thank you. You can be 99% white but have 1% black ..then you are considered black. They are not diluting blacks they are decreasing white numbers. WHy? To keep "whites" as an privileged or to remain an exclusive club...
The one drop rule was invented to separate Whites from Blacks and other non-Whites in America. It was to keep them as pure as possible. But with the coming of DNA studies, White-Americans are slowly throwing away the idea of the one drop rule and slowly accepting the Brazilian/Latin American ideology of race purification. At least the upper elite Whites.
are you referring to the Latin American idea that the more white blood in you the more white you are?
In a way yes. The White American elites want to use biracials as a buffer since their numbers are dropping. This is why so many interracial material have been promoted.
Posts: 1891 | From: NY | Registered: Sep 2014
| IP: Logged |
posted
" This is why so many interracial material have been promoted.”
There is definitely an uptick in biracial promotion. A tremendous upswing over the last 5 years to the point it is getting surreal. If white people are promoting it. Blacks aren’t going to benefit from it. Something is up!
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Something IS up. Now I while I prefer to date Black women I have dated interracial for some to time. However, the way they are FORCING IT, something is indeed fishy.
Posts: 1891 | From: NY | Registered: Sep 2014
| IP: Logged |
posted
Are y'all speaking of IR relationship overall or only with white folks? Because I noticed video of people who travel or live in a foreign country whose shtick is to get a feel of the people with questions and when they asked these people about other ethnic groups they go for whites if not their own first.
Posts: 1123 | From: New York | Registered: Feb 2016
| IP: Logged |
posted
A slick game has always been played with U.S. blacks on the black/white imbroglio.
This slick game generates a suspicion that in the U.S. there has been historically a patently subconscious phobia about the generic African phenotype.
This subconscious phobia allows the dominant white society to pass off--using the historic terms--quadroons and octoroons as "black". For the white mind, the quadroon and octoroon phenotype is what is tolerable as "black". It is for this reason that the so-called blacks who advance the most in white society are mainly in the quadroon/octoroon range.
There are those who argue that were Barack Obama's mother black he would never have been supported as he was. There are those who argue that were Beyonce the color of Mary Blige she would not have become the famous song Diva as she is now.
Posts: 5492 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
The "Casta" system in the Spanish and Portuguese colonies is very different from the racial systems of the Anglo American colonies. The Casta system has many different categories of "race" and "caste" based on mixture. Because of that most of the "Latin" colonies have more populations of varied amounts of mixture who do not feel the need to identify solely as black.
Meanwhile in Anglo American colonies, there are only two choices: white or black. Thats it. Whites have the privileges and resources and blacks don't. Period.
That said, there is a racial "caste" system at work in the Anglo American colonies where they use immigration, fake "diversity" concepts and neo-liberal agendas. How can you promote diversity in a colony built on explicit racism and genocide? So in America there is going to be a racial hierarchy of populations based on immigration from other places formerly colonized or under Anglo rule. Most of these people are just flunkies who don't mind putting up with some racism as long as they get their cut of the stolen loot. And all these other groups will have a higher status than blacks. So what you see in Jamaica and Trinidad or South Africa will become the norm in America as well. Europeans on top, Asians (Indians, Chinese and other Asians), various mixed populations, native tribes and blacks on the absolute bottom.
Posts: 8890 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
What about this notion Whites will become a minority in two decades. Do you agree with it?
quote:Originally posted by Doug M: The "Casta" system in the Spanish and Portuguese colonies is very different from the racial systems of the Anglo American colonies. The Casta system has many different categories of "race" and "caste" based on mixture. Because of that most of the "Latin" colonies have more populations of varied amounts of mixture who do not feel the need to identify solely as black.
Meanwhile in Anglo American colonies, there are only two choices: white or black. Thats it. Whites have the privileges and resources and blacks don't. Period.
That said, there is a racial "caste" system at work in the Anglo American colonies where they use immigration, fake "diversity" concepts and neo-liberal agendas. How can you promote diversity in a colony built on explicit racism and genocide? So in America there is going to be a racial hierarchy of populations based on immigration from other places formerly colonized or under Anglo rule. Most of these people are just flunkies who don't mind putting up with some racism as long as they get their cut of the stolen loot. And all these other groups will have a higher status than blacks. So what you see in Jamaica and Trinidad or South Africa will become the norm in America as well. Europeans on top, Asians (Indians, Chinese and other Asians), various mixed populations, native tribes and blacks on the absolute bottom.
quote:Originally posted by Black Crystal: What about this notion Whites will become a minority in two decades. Do you agree with it?
quote:Originally posted by Doug M: The "Casta" system in the Spanish and Portuguese colonies is very different from the racial systems of the Anglo American colonies. The Casta system has many different categories of "race" and "caste" based on mixture. Because of that most of the "Latin" colonies have more populations of varied amounts of mixture who do not feel the need to identify solely as black.
Meanwhile in Anglo American colonies, there are only two choices: white or black. Thats it. Whites have the privileges and resources and blacks don't. Period.
That said, there is a racial "caste" system at work in the Anglo American colonies where they use immigration, fake "diversity" concepts and neo-liberal agendas. How can you promote diversity in a colony built on explicit racism and genocide? So in America there is going to be a racial hierarchy of populations based on immigration from other places formerly colonized or under Anglo rule. Most of these people are just flunkies who don't mind putting up with some racism as long as they get their cut of the stolen loot. And all these other groups will have a higher status than blacks. So what you see in Jamaica and Trinidad or South Africa will become the norm in America as well. Europeans on top, Asians (Indians, Chinese and other Asians), various mixed populations, native tribes and blacks on the absolute bottom.
Europeans have always been a minority on the planet and they were only the majority in America as a result of selective immigration laws, Jim Crow and miscegenation laws. After blacks fought for Civil Rights in the 60s, America opened up the flood gates to dilute the black "minority" status in the United States and create buffer groups in between Europeans and Africans. So yes, as a result of that, there will be less Anglo Europeans numerically in the United States, but those folks will still hold the wealth and power. Meanwhile all the rest of the various groups at levels below that will be fighting to maintain their place in the social and economic pyramid beneath them which of course implies keeping black folks at the very bottom. For example, Asians claiming "Affirmitive Action" is holding them back from elite colleges, not white Racism since whites run those colleges and those colleges were built and financed off slavery and racism. Saying "Affirmative Action" is the problem is basically blaming black people for the problem when black people did not create Affirmative Action, did not ask for "Affirmative Action" and do not control the implementation of it either. Africans getting their human rights is not "Affirmative Action".
Posts: 8890 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Are White Hispanics socially distinct from Anglo Whites?
quote:Originally posted by Doug M:
quote:Originally posted by Black Crystal: What about this notion Whites will become a minority in two decades. Do you agree with it?
quote:Originally posted by Doug M: The "Casta" system in the Spanish and Portuguese colonies is very different from the racial systems of the Anglo American colonies. The Casta system has many different categories of "race" and "caste" based on mixture. Because of that most of the "Latin" colonies have more populations of varied amounts of mixture who do not feel the need to identify solely as black.
Meanwhile in Anglo American colonies, there are only two choices: white or black. Thats it. Whites have the privileges and resources and blacks don't. Period.
That said, there is a racial "caste" system at work in the Anglo American colonies where they use immigration, fake "diversity" concepts and neo-liberal agendas. How can you promote diversity in a colony built on explicit racism and genocide? So in America there is going to be a racial hierarchy of populations based on immigration from other places formerly colonized or under Anglo rule. Most of these people are just flunkies who don't mind putting up with some racism as long as they get their cut of the stolen loot. And all these other groups will have a higher status than blacks. So what you see in Jamaica and Trinidad or South Africa will become the norm in America as well. Europeans on top, Asians (Indians, Chinese and other Asians), various mixed populations, native tribes and blacks on the absolute bottom.
Europeans have always been a minority on the planet and they were only the majority in America as a result of selective immigration laws, Jim Crow and miscegenation laws. After blacks fought for Civil Rights in the 60s, America opened up the flood gates to dilute the black "minority" status in the United States and create buffer groups in between Europeans and Africans. So yes, as a result of that, there will be less Anglo Europeans numerically in the United States, but those folks will still hold the wealth and power. Meanwhile all the rest of the various groups at levels below that will be fighting to maintain their place in the social and economic pyramid beneath them which of course implies keeping black folks at the very bottom. For example, Asians claiming "Affirmitive Action" is holding them back from elite colleges, not white Racism since whites run those colleges and those colleges were built and financed off slavery and racism. Saying "Affirmative Action" is the problem is basically blaming black people for the problem when black people did not create Affirmative Action, did not ask for "Affirmative Action" and do not control the implementation of it either. Africans getting their human rights is not "Affirmative Action".
This is an overblown story originating in the Wall Street Journal
Demand for American Sperm Is Skyrocketing in Brazil Explosive growth spurred by more wealthy single women and lesbian couples turning to U.S. donors The racial makeup of Brazil contrasts starkly with the country’s sperm imports from overwhelmingly white U.S. donors.
By Samantha Pearson March 22, 2018 11:14 a.m.
excerpts:
quote: While Anvisa data isn’t yet available for 2017, officials and sperm-bank directors said semen imports continued to grow last year, putting the total increase since 2011 at more than 3,000%.
Wow, shiploads of sperm coming whitening the country by 3000%, this is like a new genocide It's "explosive growth". They can't even control this trend it's like a major epidemic.
quote:
Brazil also stands out globally for being one of the fastest-growing markets for imported semen over recent years, Ms. Ottey said. More than 500 tubes of foreign semen frozen in liquid nitrogen arrived at Brazilian airports last year, up from 16 in 2011.
So here is the context minus the greatly exaggerated hype a mere 500 tubes a year of sperm imported in a country of about 210 million
far far below 1%
that is the context of this story, something regarding much less than 1% of the country
quote:
Imports are rising in part because many Brazilians simply don’t trust the national product. Unlike in the U.S., it is illegal to pay men to donate their sperm here, so domestic stocks are low and information about Brazilian donors sparse.
In 2016, heterosexual couples bought 41% of Brazil’s imported sperm, single women purchased 38% and lesbian couples bought 21%, but demand is growing fastest among the latter two groups. Eduardo Motta, a director at the Huntington fertility clinic in São Paulo, said his well-off patients often insist on blue-eyed donors because they see that characteristic as a surefire way to get a donor that “doesn’t put in jeopardy the color of the skin.” White heterosexual couples consider this important, he said, when an infertile husband plans to pass the child off as his own.
Money is also a factor setting parameters for the DNA import boom. Carefully categorized and genetically vetted sperm from U.S. providers has to be procured from Brazilian fertility clinics at a cost of some $1,500 a vial, often as part of an in vitro fertilization procedure that costs roughly $7,000 an attempt. Whites are more likely able to afford that in a country where about 80% of the richest 1% are white, according to Brazil’s statistics agency.
So it's mainly a small fraction of the multi millions of white people with a high proportion being same sex couples acquiring imported sperm and the silly writing here " Imports are rising in part because many Brazilians simply don’t trust the national product" as if this has anything to do with the average Brazilian. "Many Brazilians"
So first we have the very hyped headline
quote: Demand for American Sperm Is Skyrocketing in Brazil The racial makeup of Brazil contrasts starkly with the country’s sperm imports from overwhelmingly white U.S. donors
it's "skyrocketing" must be a huge trend affecting Brazil, it's skyrocketing. You go into a supermarket and they have blond white male sperm on sale next to the milk
And the details of the Wall Street Journal article are behind a pay wall.
So everybody on the internet is just reading a snippet not the full article and while there is plenty of racism in Brazil this story without context circulates all over the internet like it's some big racist program to make Brazil whiter and then you get the spinoff video and other articles
I read the whole article with various charts and percentages and they don't even tell you the percentage of the buyers of this sperm who are white. So you have "500 tubes of foreign semen frozen in liquid nitrogen arrived at Brazilian airports last year" probably bought by over 90% white people and this is newsworthy? This number, 500 is so small it doesn't even matter who these wealthy people are buying the sperm. This is why we need to look at what the raw data is and put these things in context and not trust media hype to sell news
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
This is an overblown story originating in the Wall Street Journal
Demand for American Sperm Is Skyrocketing in Brazil Explosive growth spurred by more wealthy single women and lesbian couples turning to U.S. donors The racial makeup of Brazil contrasts starkly with the country’s sperm imports from overwhelmingly white U.S. donors.
By Samantha Pearson March 22, 2018 11:14 a.m.
excerpts:
quote: While Anvisa data isn’t yet available for 2017, officials and sperm-bank directors said semen imports continued to grow last year, putting the total increase since 2011 at more than 3,000%.
Wow shiploads of sperm coming whitening the country by 3000%, this is like a new genocide It's "explosive growth". They can't even control this trend it's like a major epidemic. They probably have the para military police forcing poor black women to be impregnated by this white aryan blue eyed sperm
quote:
Brazil also stands out globally for being one of the fastest-growing markets for imported semen over recent years, Ms. Ottey said. More than 500 tubes of foreign semen frozen in liquid nitrogen arrived at Brazilian airports last year, up from 16 in 2011.
So here is the context, 500 tubes a year in a country of about 210 million
far far below 1%
that is the context of this story, something regarding much less than 1% of the country
quote:
Imports are rising in part because many Brazilians simply don’t trust the national product. Unlike in the U.S., it is illegal to pay men to donate their sperm here, so domestic stocks are low and information about Brazilian donors sparse.
In 2016, heterosexual couples bought 41% of Brazil’s imported sperm, single women purchased 38% and lesbian couples bought 21%, but demand is growing fastest among the latter two groups. Eduardo Motta, a director at the Huntington fertility clinic in São Paulo, said his well-off patients often insist on blue-eyed donors because they see that characteristic as a surefire way to get a donor that “doesn’t put in jeopardy the color of the skin.” White heterosexual couples consider this important, he said, when an infertile husband plans to pass the child off as his own.
Money is also a factor setting parameters for the DNA import boom. Carefully categorized and genetically vetted sperm from U.S. providers has to be procured from Brazilian fertility clinics at a cost of some $1,500 a vial, often as part of an in vitro fertilization procedure that costs roughly $7,000 an attempt. Whites are more likely able to afford that in a country where about 80% of the richest 1% are white, according to Brazil’s statistics agency.
So it's mainly a small fraction of the multi millions of white people with a high proportion being same sex couples acquiring imported sperm and the silly writing here " Imports are rising in part because many Brazilians simply don’t trust the national product" as if this has anything to do with the average Brazilian. "Many Brazilians"
So first we have the very hyped headline
quote: Demand for American Sperm Is Skyrocketing in Brazil The racial makeup of Brazil contrasts starkly with the country’s sperm imports from overwhelmingly white U.S. donors
it's "skyrocketing" must be a huge trend affecting Brazil, it's skyrocketing. You go into a supermarket and they have blond white male sperm on sale next to the milk
And the details of the Wall Street Journal article are behind a pay wall.
So everybody on the internet is just reading a snippet not the full article and while there is plenty of racism in Brazil this story without context circulates all over the internet like it's some big racist program to make Brazil whiter and then you get the spinoff video and other articles
I read the whole article with various charts and percentages and they don't even tell you the percentage of the buyers of this sperm who are white. So you have "500 tubes of foreign semen frozen in liquid nitrogen arrived at Brazilian airports last year" probably bought by over 90% white people and this is newsworthy?
quote:Originally posted by Black Crystal: Are White Hispanics socially distinct from Anglo Whites?
quote:Originally posted by Doug M:
quote:Originally posted by Black Crystal: What about this notion Whites will become a minority in two decades. Do you agree with it?
quote:Originally posted by Doug M: The "Casta" system in the Spanish and Portuguese colonies is very different from the racial systems of the Anglo American colonies. The Casta system has many different categories of "race" and "caste" based on mixture. Because of that most of the "Latin" colonies have more populations of varied amounts of mixture who do not feel the need to identify solely as black.
Meanwhile in Anglo American colonies, there are only two choices: white or black. Thats it. Whites have the privileges and resources and blacks don't. Period.
That said, there is a racial "caste" system at work in the Anglo American colonies where they use immigration, fake "diversity" concepts and neo-liberal agendas. How can you promote diversity in a colony built on explicit racism and genocide? So in America there is going to be a racial hierarchy of populations based on immigration from other places formerly colonized or under Anglo rule. Most of these people are just flunkies who don't mind putting up with some racism as long as they get their cut of the stolen loot. And all these other groups will have a higher status than blacks. So what you see in Jamaica and Trinidad or South Africa will become the norm in America as well. Europeans on top, Asians (Indians, Chinese and other Asians), various mixed populations, native tribes and blacks on the absolute bottom.
Europeans have always been a minority on the planet and they were only the majority in America as a result of selective immigration laws, Jim Crow and miscegenation laws. After blacks fought for Civil Rights in the 60s, America opened up the flood gates to dilute the black "minority" status in the United States and create buffer groups in between Europeans and Africans. So yes, as a result of that, there will be less Anglo Europeans numerically in the United States, but those folks will still hold the wealth and power. Meanwhile all the rest of the various groups at levels below that will be fighting to maintain their place in the social and economic pyramid beneath them which of course implies keeping black folks at the very bottom. For example, Asians claiming "Affirmitive Action" is holding them back from elite colleges, not white Racism since whites run those colleges and those colleges were built and financed off slavery and racism. Saying "Affirmative Action" is the problem is basically blaming black people for the problem when black people did not create Affirmative Action, did not ask for "Affirmative Action" and do not control the implementation of it either. Africans getting their human rights is not "Affirmative Action".
Spanish conquistadors and settlers are Europeans just like Anglo colonists and settlers. The rivalry between Spain and Anglo countries is very old. In the Americas, the issue is more of a distinction between societies with a "casta" system which allowed "mixed race" populations to co-exist with the settler and colonial classes and the Anglo colonies where non European populations were strictly controlled and regulated. Part of what is happening in Latin America today is these colonies are purging many of their unwanted peasants and the Anglos are simply using them as a social, economic and political buffer class. But this is in no way salvation for these peasants as much of the strife and conflict in Latin America starts with Anglo American policies in Latin America to begin with. For example, MS13 started in America, as a result of immigration of populations from El Salvador fleeing violence funded and supported by the United States. In the United States they operated as an ethic militia staging attacks against Africans and in El Salvador they terrorize native Salvadorans.
The sperm donorship program is just another part of the ethnic cleansing that is going on in Latin America to purge the remaining Non European bloodlines from these colonies. So for all intents and purposes it is a modern genocide and the "liberal" groups in America are just providing cover for that genocide with their fake sympathies for illegal immigrants.
Posts: 8890 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Doug M: and the "liberal" groups in America are just providing cover for that genocide with their fake sympathies for illegal immigrants.
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
quote:Originally posted by Black Crystal: Are White Hispanics socially distinct from Anglo Whites?
Depends. The Spanish&Portuguese in NYC are upwardly mobile and non-distinct socially from Anglos. In fact just as many Ashkenazim prefer S&P ritual to their own.
Same is about true in Philly. Notice their website is announcing a Ladino Komunita event. Don't expect stereotype mestizo Hispanic culture. And yeah that's me holding a Torah scroll.
In the south S&P totally acculturated to Anglo society since old slavery days.
The non-Spaniard Hispanic white is out the loop of white society unless you count Italians, technically more Latin than any Iberian descended Americans.
The more a Hispanic white's personal culture is Spaniard than Latino, the more socially indistinct they are from Anglos far as I can make out. I dated a white blond slightly crinkle haired Spaniard American. Nothing Latina about her. One Mexican socialized non-Anglo, though she had classic Iberian features. One 'classic' retained her culture but being in a multinational corporation by necessity moved in Anglo circles in a way I never could. . Class ethos may be the deciding factor.
The sperm donorship program is just another part of the ethnic cleansing that is going on in Latin America to purge the remaining Non European bloodlines from these colonies. So for all intents and purposes it is a modern genocide
ridiculous exaggeration, read my last post
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote: Once abolition took hold in Brazil, planters and others who had previously owned slaves had to look elsewhere for their labor. This stimulated a remarkable surge in immigration, especially from the southern European countries Portugal, Spain, and Italy. These immigrants were skilled at a variety of crafts; they spoke Portuguese or a language that was similar enough to allow them to communicate; they were perceived as racially superior to the vast population of unemployed Afro-Brazilians; and as foreigners in desperate need of work they were seen as easy to control.
Immigration, which grew throughout the late nineteenth century as coffee planters began to prefer free labor to slavery, spiked with slavery?s legislative abolition in the late 1880?s, before falling again. As the country finally moved towards industrialization at the turn of the twentieth century, local and urban labor was more commonly used and the number of immigrants fell. The demographics of immigration changed as well. Despite its original purpose of increasing the European population of Brazil, the immigrant population in the twentieth century included large numbers of Asian and Middle Eastern immigrants, complicating the country?s racial identity.
quote: Last week, Brazil’s fashion capital São Paulo hosted the 42nd edition of São Paulo Fashion Week. Considered by most to be South America’s premier fashion week, it’s widely praised for being a globally-acclaimed platform to both regional newcomers as well as established brands. Nonetheless, each season the same question arises, which depicts the overall state of Brazil’s emerging fashion industry: where are the black models?
The country has successfully launched the careers of industry favourites such as Gisele Bündchen, Isabeli Fontana, Alessandra Ambrosio, Adriana Lima, Raquel Zimmermann, Ana Beatriz Barros, Fernanda Tavares, plus Caroline Trentini. And those aren’t even all of them. When it comes to their darker-skinned fellow Brazilians however, the few which have been pushed by local mother agents and subsequently achieved international star status, can be counted on less than one hand: that is, Emanuela De Paula, Lais Ribeiro and Gracie Carvalho.
The black population has increased to 70% within recent years.
As already seen in the video here and as many here already have stated, it’s another attempt to whiten the country as much as possible. A typical white supremacy move like they did during the early 1900. White supremacy is all about domination, control and power!
quote:
5 Nations That Imported Europeans to Whiten The Population
After the trans-Atlantic slave trade was officially abolished toward the end of the 19th century, many whites felt threatened and feared free Blacks would become a menacing element in society. The elites spent a great dealing of time mulling over how best to solve the so-called Negro problem. A popular solution that emerged during this period was the ideology of racial whitening or “whitening.”
Supporters of the “whitening” ideology believed that if a “superior” white population was encouraged to mix with an “inferior” Black population, Blacks would advance culturally, genetically or even disappear totally, within several generations. Some also believed that an influx of immigrants from Europe would be necessary to successfully carry out the process.
Although both ideologies were driven by racism and White supremacy, whitening was in contrast to some countries that opted for segregation rather than miscegenation, ultimately outlawing the mixing of the races. This, however, was just a different means to the same end as these nations also imported more Europeans while slaughtering and oppressing the Black population.
Here are 5 of the several counties that adopted a whitening policy and what happened as a result. [...]
The black population has increased to 70% within recent years.
As already seen in the video here and as many here already have stated, it’s another attempt to whiten the country as much as possible. A typical white supremacy move like they did during the early 1900. White supremacy is all about domination, control and power!
quote:
So 500 white people, around 40% gay, buy sperm from America
This is an attempt to whiten Brazil?
Have you thought this through?
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
The black population has increased to 70% within recent years.
As already seen in the video here and as many here already have stated, it’s another attempt to whiten the country as much as possible. A typical white supremacy move like they did during the early 1900. White supremacy is all about domination, control and power!
quote:
So 500 white people, around 40% gay, buy sperm from America
This is an attempt to whiten Brazil?
Have you thought this through?
I am not interested in gays.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
That doesn't matter last year 500 people in Brazil bought sperm, that fact that around 40% were gay shows you the reason that they bought the sperm in many of the cases, lesbians who would have to have it to produce a child.
subtitle of the article:
"Explosive growth spurred by more wealthy single women and lesbian couples turning to U.S. donors"
Would anybody expect the first choice of somebody wanting a baby to be a baby that looked like they were from a different ethnic group?
So we have a number of people so small, 500, l that to hype this as an attempt to whiten Brazil is ridiculous.
Look at any group of 500 people in a country that are doing some kind of behavior. Does that then merit an article that that is a trend of any significance n the country? No
If a white woman bought white sperm you couldn't fault her. That would be natural for them to want the bay to resemble them. The article also points out if it was a white couple with an infertile man then if they bought white sperm they could pretend the baby was from the man
Only if a person of color bought white sperm might you question it. Would it be an organized plan that they were buying white sperm? No, it would be their choice as an individual
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Population control (Eugenics) always has been a thing for westerners. They always have trolled hard on this. The anxiety in trying to control black and brown people is mind boggling.
quote: Eugenics in Brazil: In the early 20th century, elites believed racial improvement was only possible with a project favoring predominance of the white race
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic