posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by MissNoor:
must be all that oil of olay and avon products......

---

Please, no advertising for products here!

Posts: 30135 | From: The owner of this website killed ES....... | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                         

quote:

---

Originally posted by Last Knight:
I know that female sexual tourism does exist. Yet, there is a vague part to me. as I used to be a Psycho-sexologist years ago, I know that a woman with sound personality traits will be only interested in sexual practices that is a part of an intimate encounter or love. Does this change lately? Ladies, can u get me an answer?

---

Posts: 3168 | From: If you don't like it, don't look or read it! | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mme. Godiva:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Last Knight:
I know that female sexual tourism does exist. Yet, there is a vague part to me. as I used to be a Psycho-sexologist years ago, I know that a woman with sound personality traits will be only interested in sexual practices that is a part of an intimate encounter or love. Does this change lately? Ladies, can u get me an answer?

---

What a minute, in order to be a sexologist in Egypt is there some sort of certificate you cut out of a cornflakes box?

---

Posts: 1879 | From: Going to Graceland | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Last Knight:
I meant that to me the matter of paying for sex is disgusting whether for male or female. Yet, historically it has been a common male behavior all-time, for female, with exception of some figures (3 or 4 known women e.g. Cleopatra) having the sexual drive without prior emotional drive toward the partner is quite uncommon or atypical behavior of a woman. It is not a matter of ethics, usually an average woman will not enjoy sex with a man she has no feeling toward him… it is a matter of psychology pattern. You got me?

You Godiva, here you are my list of certificates:
1- Bachelor of medicine and surgery.
2- Psychio-sexology PC from University of Groningen- Netherlands
3- Professional Certificate of Management. Edinburgh Business School
4- Professional Certificate in Marketing- Chartered Institute of Marketing
5- MBA- Marketing Major- Central Michigan University


But I did not practice in Egypt. Well … what about you … hah??

---

Posts: 13440 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Last Knight:
I meant that to me the matter of paying for sex is disgusting whether for male or female. Yet, historically it has been a common male behavior all-time, for female, with exception of some figures (3 or 4 known women e.g. Cleopatra) having the sexual drive without prior emotional drive toward the partner is quite uncommon or atypical behavior of a woman. It is not a matter of ethics, usually an average woman will not enjoy sex with a man she has no feeling toward him… it is a matter of psychology pattern. You got me?

You Godiva, here you are my list of certificates:
1- Bachelor of medicine and surgery.
2- Psychio-sexology PC from University of Groningen- Netherlands
3- Professional Certificate of Management. Edinburgh Business School
4- Professional Certificate in Marketing- Chartered Institute of Marketing
5- MBA- Marketing Major- Central Michigan University


But I did not practice in Egypt. Well … what about you … hah??

---

Interesting list. Very impressive.
How come you call everyone "Dear" then ???

P.S.
This place is awesome. It's like a honeypot for psychos

Posts: 743 | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                         

quote:

---

Originally posted by Last Knight:
I meant that to me the matter of paying for sex is disgusting whether for male or female. Yet, historically it has been a common male behavior all-time, for female, with exception of some figures (3 or 4 known women e.g. Cleopatra) having the sexual drive without prior emotional drive toward the partner is quite uncommon or atypical behavior of a woman. It is not a matter of ethics, usually an average woman will not enjoy sex with a man she has no feeling toward him… it is a matter of psychology pattern. You got me?

You Godiva, here you are my list of certificates:
1- Bachelor of medicine and surgery.
2- Psychio-sexology PC from University of Groningen- Netherlands
3- Professional Certificate of Management. Edinburgh Business School
4- Professional Certificate in Marketing- Chartered Institute of Marketing
5- MBA- Marketing Major- Central Michigan University


But I did not practice in Egypt. Well … what about you … hah??

---

Posts: 3168 | From: If you don't like it, don't look or read it! | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                         

quote:

---

Originally posted by Cosmogirl:
I respectfully disagree, I think "love" based sex has been going on since the first time one ape snorgled up against the other and said, "wow, a furry ass is great!, I LOVE a furry ass." and the other ape was thinking , "gee who will snorgle me with all this hair on my ass?" To posit that sex for love wasn't happening in the US until the 1950's is just ridiculous.


Marriage for love is another topic altogether, but sexuality and marriage are beasts of a different stripe.

---

Posts: 3168 | From: If you don't like it, don't look or read it! | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                         

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mme. Godiva:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Cosmogirl:
I respectfully disagree, I think "love" based sex has been going on since the first time one ape snorgled up against the other and said, "wow, a furry ass is great!, I LOVE a furry ass." and the other ape was thinking , "gee who will snorgle me with all this hair on my ass?" To posit that sex for love wasn't happening in the US until the 1950's is just ridiculous.


Marriage for love is another topic altogether, but sexuality and marriage are beasts of a different stripe.

---

If you studied feminist history and philogy you'd understand that women in the ancient world were expected to stay virgins till marriage and completely faithful after that.

Sexual pursuits didn't become a female past-time until after the Edwardian age.

Even look at Hindu philosophy, Shintuism and Confuscianism; all three point to pursuit of sexual pleasure a male past time and the female a passive instrument of male virility.

But again you can always turn to 20th century romance novels to re-write history.

Yet the pre-Agriculture societies did promote female empowerment through sexual prowness of females, but thats about 20,000 years ago.
come to MAMA

---

Posts: 88 | From: HEAVEN | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                         

quote:

---

Originally posted by Cosmogirl:
LOL. Where on earth are you studying Feminist History? Time to gve a bad evaluation to your teacher because you seem to have a very male dominated position of all things relational, all the way to the misogynistic views of sexuality. Goddess culture, Matriarchial society, all of it pre-dated the emergence of organized religion, and it was the creation of a male god-head that began the sublimation of the feminine power. The Catholic Inquisition alone was enough to redifine which gender had power, and that was a conswquense of the shift in deity from feminine to masculine. Sexual prowess had nothing to do with anything, but the ability to trace heritage matrilinerally was important at the time.

Sexual pusuits as a pasttime in Edwardian times? It was a period of time in which women became empowered to be MORE than sexual vessels, and the suffragetes were on the front line of re-defining what it meant to be a woman. Politics and social reform were the order of the day in Edwardian times, NOT sexual pursuits.

Being expected to remain a virgin, and remaining one are two different things, and again you present a male centric view of what was expected of women. I dare say that virginity wasn't the salient point for marriages, nor was chastity central, but fiscal and social compatibility.

I won't even address the points in Far Eastern philosophy that negate your wild claim of women as sexual vessels.

Suggested reading for the day: "Women who Run with the Wolves" by Clarissa Pinkola Estes. "The tales here, from various cultures, are not necessarily about wolves; instead, they illuminate fresh perspectives on relationships, self-image, even addiction. An African tale of twins who baffle a man represents the dual nature of woman; from the Middle East, a story about a threadbare but secretly magic carpet shows society's failure to look beyond appearances. Three brief, ribald stories advocate a playful, open sexuality; other examples suggest ways to deal with anger and jealousy. At times, Estes's commentary--in which she urges readers to draw upon and enjoy their Wild Woman aspects--is hyperbolic, but overall her widely researched study offers usable advice for modern women."

Do you hate women as much as you come across? You imply that women who visit Egypt are sexual predators, and that you are offended by them... why? Why do you care at all what other people are doing with their time and bodies? I think your point of view is off and that you blanket wash other women with your self appointed peity and place yourself as some sick example of what is right when in fact you have issues the same as just about anyone else. Now you are moving to attack the position of ALL WOMEN over the ENTIRE SPAN OF RECORDED HISTORY with regard to sexual pleasure and position. No matter what you read, you are unqualified simply by being so isolated in your lifestyle to comment on the virtues of other society or the function of sex in any type of region and religion. I reccommend reading web articles on sexuality that aren't written by Pakistani muslims.

And you betcha I studied Feminist History, and the feminist perspective in literature, as well as a semester in Womens Studies (in addition to Theology) so my point of view is informed and eduacted. I will not however, engage in a pithy "who's smarter" game with you, because we both know the answer to that, and it doesn't flatter you.

---

Good lord I didn't bother to read this, but....

I have a neighbor who is a Phd candidate for English or writting or something. She claims from her research any piece of writting that has so many descriptives or adjective like your writting above points to mania and all around bad taste.

Kinda like the Gov. Arnold book thats out now.

Posts: 3168 | From: If you don't like it, don't look or read it! | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Cosmogirl:
LOL. Where on earth are you studying Feminist History? Time to gve a bad evaluation to your teacher because you seem to have a very male dominated position of all things relational, all the way to the misogynistic views of sexuality. Goddess culture, Matriarchial society, all of it pre-dated the emergence of organized religion, and it was the creation of a male god-head that began the sublimation of the feminine power. The Catholic Inquisition alone was enough to redifine which gender had power, and that was a conswquense of the shift in deity from feminine to masculine. Sexual prowess had nothing to do with anything, but the ability to trace heritage matrilinerally was important at the time.

Sexual pusuits as a pasttime in Edwardian times? It was a period of time in which women became empowered to be MORE than sexual vessels, and the suffragetes were on the front line of re-defining what it meant to be a woman. Politics and social reform were the order of the day in Edwardian times, NOT sexual pursuits.

Being expected to remain a virgin, and remaining one are two different things, and again you present a male centric view of what was expected of women. I dare say that virginity wasn't the salient point for marriages, nor was chastity central, but fiscal and social compatibility.

I won't even address the points in Far Eastern philosophy that negate your wild claim of women as sexual vessels.

Suggested reading for the day: "Women who Run with the Wolves" by Clarissa Pinkola Estes. "The tales here, from various cultures, are not necessarily about wolves; instead, they illuminate fresh perspectives on relationships, self-image, even addiction. An African tale of twins who baffle a man represents the dual nature of woman; from the Middle East, a story about a threadbare but secretly magic carpet shows society's failure to look beyond appearances. Three brief, ribald stories advocate a playful, open sexuality; other examples suggest ways to deal with anger and jealousy. At times, Estes's commentary--in which she urges readers to draw upon and enjoy their Wild Woman aspects--is hyperbolic, but overall her widely researched study offers usable advice for modern women."

Do you hate women as much as you come across? You imply that women who visit Egypt are sexual predators, and that you are offended by them... why? Why do you care at all what other people are doing with their time and bodies? I think your point of view is off and that you blanket wash other women with your self appointed peity and place yourself as some sick example of what is right when in fact you have issues the same as just about anyone else. Now you are moving to attack the position of ALL WOMEN over the ENTIRE SPAN OF RECORDED HISTORY with regard to sexual pleasure and position. No matter what you read, you are unqualified simply by being so isolated in your lifestyle to comment on the virtues of other society or the function of sex in any type of region and religion. I reccommend reading web articles on sexuality that aren't written by Pakistani muslims.

And you betcha I studied Feminist History, and the feminist perspective in literature, as well as a semester in Womens Studies (in addition to Theology) so my point of view is informed and eduacted. I will not however, engage in a pithy "who's smarter" game with you, because we both know the answer to that, and it doesn't flatter you.

---

cosmo, I made you brownies

Posts: 13440 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Last Knight:
Cosmogirl, i am raising my hat for the knowlegable participation. Thank you

---

she always does it, just a shame those that need it dont read it

Posts: 15090 | From: http://www.egyptalk.com/forum/ | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Cosmogirl:
Now you want to play; My neighbor is smarter than you are?

"I have a neighbor who is a Phd candidate for English or writting or something."

Because it is obvious that you aren't involved in improving your "writting". I find your small denials, "I am not reading ALL that" to be hilarious given your impulse to spam the board with overlong and unrelateable articles.

---

quote:

---

An equilateral triangle has angles of pi/3 each, but that's only in a Pythagorean plane. The prevalence of J-Y Haplotype in Egypt indicates significant admixture from Arabs. Insects are a very significant factor in the pollination of plants. A circle has no corners. The Aryan invasion theory remains controversial. It was pretty annoying when adult swim showed "Saved by the bell" who needs the 80's. That 80's show wasn't impressive. That seventies show was a hell of a lot of fun. Sadat's internal policy deteriorated in the late 70's. When the Shah left Iran he went to Aswan as a guest of Sadat. The first cataract is magestically beautifull. Kush ended at the first cataract. Cushitic languages are spoken in the horn of Africa.
This ^^^^^^ is you writing a post Sonomod.

---

Posts: 8756 | From: Tax-Free Zone | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged |