Yeah I also seen Truthcentric on page 10. How did they get his info? They were saying some F'ed up things about him.
Posts: 1135 | From: Top secret | Registered: Jun 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
Fox orders sexy ancient Egypt fantasy drama
Fox has given a series order to a hugely ambitious fantasy project set in ancient Egypt.
Titled Hieroglyph, the action-drama series “follows a notorious thief who is plucked from prison to serve the Pharoah, navigating palace intrigue, seductive concubines, criminal underbellies and even a few divine sorcerers.”
“We wanted to do a show about deceit, sex, intrigue in the court and fantastical goings-on – no better place to set that than ancient Egypt,” said Fox’s chairman of entertainment Kevin Reilly.
Fox has ordered 13 episode of the drama, which is produced by Peter Chernin and Katherine Pope, along with Travis Beacham (Pacific Rim, Clash of the Titans), who wrote the pilot script. “Travis Beacham has an inventive mind, and he has wrapped this all together in this intoxicating new drama,” Reilly said.
With the potentially expensive exotic backdrop and emphasis on sexy story elements, Hieroglyph sounds like the type of project that you would more likely see on a pay cable network more than a broadcast network. But broadcasters have grown weary seeing cable get all the buzzy dramas (and sometimes surprisingly large chunks of ratings, with shows like AMC’s The Walking Dead).
What do you think? We’re excited for this, though that title Hieroglyph is a bit of a mouthful. Game of Pyramids?
posted
Okay...Someone said Spike TV looked at RECENT DNA studies of King Tut. Are they talking about DNAtribes/JAMA study? Because that is much more RECENT than that bogus fails King Tut being Rb1..
I mean there any DNA studies that were done in King Tut that I do not know about? Because again King Tut being R1b has been publicly debunked.
Also any cast? Because once the cast is known, that will be the deciding factor if I even watch this show.
@Troll Patrol
Can't lie...She's banging.
Posts: 1135 | From: Top secret | Registered: Jun 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
Anybody who believes European television producers will put on a story about ancient Egypt with non European looking people is beyond help. After all of the years that Egyptsearch has persisted, even in its current vastly watered down state, it should be obvious that Europeans don't care about facts. European scientists will make up facts in order to suit their own theories. The whole history of Egyptology itself is about Europeans making up facts to suit their own agenda. When it comes to Egypt and Europeans science NEVER comes into the equation. It is ALWAYS propaganda and as long as Europeans dominate the field of Egyptology and the funding of it and the writing of the history it will always be this way.
For example, note that Nina Jablonski posted her own made up facts recently about the skin color of the ancient Egyptians. Now I said many years ago on this forum that European scientists cannot be trusted to tell the truth. A lot of people here thought otherwise. Well, the facts are clear now and as I said then, you cannot trust these people to tell the truth. They are liars and thieves and you cannot expect truth from liars and thieves.
quote: By Early Dynastic times, the societies of Egypt and Nubia were structured, and people could be identified by class. Pharaohs and their queens were worshipped as divine beings and surrounded by nobles, who in turn served by scribes. Peasants and serfs made up most of the rest of the population. They worked the lands owned by the pharaoh or the nobility on a sharecropping system. Because they could not be bought or sold, serfs were not slaves, but they were nonetheless bound to the land. Between seasons in the fields, they were drafted to build the massive pyramids and other monumental architecture throughout the Nile Valley. Slaves constituted a separate class of Egyptian and Nubian societies that included the captives of war. When fortresses fell after the successful sieges, people were captured, along with livestock, and enslaved by the victors. Siege warfare resulting in the taking of slaves within and between Egypt and Nubia was common from the late Predynastic period onward. Slaves were considered the property of the gods and the pharaoh: they could not be bought or sold privately. They were put to work as cooks, weavers, and field hands. Some joined the peasants as laborers on monumental constructions. Because most of them worked with serfs, they ended up marrying them and becoming sharecropping serfs themselves.
Slaves and peasants alike worked outside most of the time and would have been exposed to moderate to high levels of UVR on seasonal basis, depending on whether they were closer to the mouth of the Nile Delta in Lower Egypt or the confluence of the White and Blue Niles in Upper Nubia. Those with moderate levels of genetically determined pigmentation (primarily from Lower and Upper Egypt) would have tanned heavily and looked considerably darker than the pharaohs and nobility. More darkly pigmented peasants and serfs (mostly from Upper Nubia) would have become darker than those who were exposed to less UVR, but the difference between the outdoor workers and the privileged upper classes would have been less noticeable. The visual diversity of population centers increased as contacts became more common between Egypt and Nubia and then between Greater Egypt, Palestine and Libya.
Now you know for a fact that all ancient societies had servants, serfs and slaves. But do you notice that when talking about ancient Babylon, Sumer, Assyria, Rome or Greece the subject is almost never given emphasis, if ever mentioned at all, even though slavery and serfdom were more prevalent and more savage in those cultures than Egypt? However, WHENEVER Europeans talk about ancient KMT, the FIRST thing they mention is slaves and serfs. Now why is that? Propaganda. Because of course the slaves were the "dark people" and the "lighter skinned" pharaohs were on top. This same narrative is the hallmark of white supremacist discourse on ancient Egypt. And as usual, the scientists who support this will MAKE UP facts to support it. Nowhere in any ancient Egyptian art do you see the degrees of color based on indoor/outdoor activities that she mentions. Nowhere do you see pharaohs depicted in different complexions than those outdoors. So as you can tell, these are made up facts to support a white supremacist narrative. There is no evidence to support any of this. It is all made up "theory". But she presents it as absolute truth, with no evidence of any kind.
Note that historically those European scholars who dared tell the truth or more of the truth than most are labeled as outcasts. And those who don't want to be labeled as outcasts will toe the party line. A good example of this is Robert Bauval who now has a book about Imhotep being a black African.
I mean seriously, these people have made up and will continue to make up an imaginary vision of ancient Egypt as long as they have the power and wealth to do so. Their vision is what you call modern movies and TV shows along with their books and reconstructions. Those are the images that they worship as a way of "invoking" the KA of ancient entities that never existed. It is their way of bringing lies to life.
Now how on earth can anyone sit here and explain how a ancient white society would worship a jet black god with a big erect penis? Seriously. Can you imagine white folks or arabs doing this? Of course not and therefore don't expect any of this to show up in their FANTASY WORLD vision of ancient Egypt. No temples, with big black gods with black penises. Nope. No temples with big pictures of black folks. Nope. Just more made up stories with no historical basis in fact other than the name to link it to Egypt. Can you imagine doing a movie about ancient Rome without marble palaces and Temples? Of course not. But only in Egypt where they claim the Egyptians were obsessed with the gods can they make up such nonsense.
And of course the obvious implication of this diety is that the SEED of all humans came from Africa, which has now been confirmed by science. This statue and most of the statues and deities from Egypt reflected very ancient cosmological, biological and scientific truths that had long been known in Africa before Egypt even came along..... so obviously they don't want to show that.
And to put it into context as to why they cannot show this image or these deities in their proper context, see the following passage which basically inherits the same symbolism of "the seed" having to do with human lineages, genes, semen, genetics, history, power and the basis of authority over the land....
Genesis 12:7 "And the LORD appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land: and there builded he an altar unto the LORD, who appeared unto him."
Posts: 8898 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic