quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: blah..blah..baaaa... besides, no other than Ironlion first put this up. He was saying it is an Muur, perhaps an Ethiopian (lol)
...
LMBAO
This one is a Congolese...
-------------------- Lionz Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
yes to the retarded the back of a person's head must be Congolese
yes no doubt it's a match
yes the Romans were a bunch of nice African looking guys who came in helped govern Egypt and North Africa
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by 'Calabooz': So this forum is basically kept alive by a troll? lol
^^^ this is a example of a troll accusing other people of trolling. I have many legitimates posts on articles that come out or books about Egypt. This is a good thread about a book frorm 1951 the covers a topic much talked about on Egyptsearch and a book which may have nevrer been mentioned before on the site. Then some asshole comes in with a useless remark having nothing to do with the topic and calls name trying to start a conflict. That is by defintion trolling.
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: blah..blah..baaaa... besides, no other than Ironlion first put this up. He was saying it is an Muur, perhaps an Ethiopian (lol)
...
LMBAO
This one is a Congolese...
So what ethnicity do you give this Lion above? Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
You can't speculate just by looking at the back of a person's head. The people in this Pompeii porn are probably made up, not real or important people with names. The men seem to be of the same feature type as the women. So did the artist make up a couple of them to be African men? It might be possible but it would have to be supported by Roman text record to be a convincing possibility that Roman woman women were mingling with the Africans.
but if you look at similar anonymous dark skinned men in these Pompeii brothel ads they often seem to have similar features to the women and sometimes with big full beards which is not impossilbe but is uncharacteristc of many Africans. The man has some kind of hat or head gear on, a diamond shape at the top and some kind of tasel hanging down the back of his neck. There were African subjects in the empire but Southern Europeans and Middle Easterners are known to be darker than Central and Northern Europeans like the Minoan fisheramn below.
Minoan Fisherman
And if you look at all the Roman emperors at best a few are quadroon or mulatto. The Romans imperialists occupied Egypt and North Africa to collect taxes and extract resources and they were a bunch of decadent colonizing muthfvckers.
Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
There was no racial problem in the ancient world. There was national and tribal problem. The Egyptian, Hebrew and Phoenician were blacks. Greek and Roman civilizations were multiracial mulato, black and white civilizations created by black and ruled by a black and mulato elite.
Black African people outside Africa had a tradition of changing their physical appearance by selective breeding and mixing with fixe albino people.
quote:Originally posted by mena7: There was no racial problem in the ancient world. There was national and tribal problem. The Egyptian, Hebrew and Phoenician were blacks. Greek and Roman civilizations were multiracial mulato, black and white civilizations created by black and ruled by a black and mulato elite.
Black African people outside Africa had a tradition of changing their physical appearance by selective breeding and mixing with fixe albino people.
Brilliant! Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by 'Calabooz': So this forum is basically kept alive by a troll? lol
^^^ this is a example of a troll accusing other people of trolling. I have many legitimates posts on articles that come out or books about Egypt. This is a good thread about a book frorm 1951 the covers a topic much talked about on Egyptsearch and a book which may have nevrer been mentioned before on the site. Then some asshole comes in with a useless remark having nothing to do with the topic and calls name trying to start a conflict. That is by defintion trolling.
sorry lioness, you are, and forever will be, a troll in my mind first and foremost. You always brought the lulz though Good thread
Posts: 46 | From: Los Angeles | Registered: Oct 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
IronLion, I love how you tear down the lioness, with each post/ images the images is becoming "clearer", destruction is getting harsher, and vivid. There is absolutely noway to give this a spin, a twist and or a turn, but the lioness keeps trying.
I just luv it. LOL.
quote: ".. it appears that Europeans are about two-thirds Asians and one-third African."
--Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza (2001). Genes, peoples and languages. FARRAR STRAUS AND GIROUX Publishers
quote:Historically, a mixture of West and East African ancestry is plausible, since African gene flow into West Eurasia is documented from both West Africa during Roman times [34] and from East Africa during migrations from Egypt [7].
--Priya Moorjani et al.(2011) The History of African Gene Flow into Southern Europeans, Levantines, and Jews
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Good fresh reference Patrol. Their data indicates that African tropical types were well in place to initiate the cultro-tech expansion in Europe circa 45-30k..
"Archaeological and genetic evidence indicate that anatomically modern humans arrived in Europe from an African source at least 45,000 years ago, following the initial dispersal out of Africa. However, it is known that Southern Europeans and Levantines (people from modern day Palestine, Israel, Syria and Jordan) have also inherited genetic material of African origin due to subsequent migrations. One line of evidence comes from Y-chromosome and mitochondrial DNA analyses. These have identified haplogroups that are characteristic of sub-Saharan Africans in Southern Europeans and Levantines but not in Northern Europeans. Auton et al. presented nuclear genome-based evidence for sharing of sub-Saharan African ancestry in some West Eurasians, by identifying a North-South gradient of haplotype sharing between Europeans and sub- Saharan Africans, with the highest proportion of haplotype sharing observed in south/southwestern Europe."
--Moorjani et al. (2011) The History of African Gene Flow into Southern Europeans, Levantines, and Jews. PLoS Genet 7(4)
Race Relations in Ancient Egypt: Greek, Egyptian, Hebrew, Roman
Simon Davis, Methuen, 1951 176 pages
^Curiously they do not deal with "Nubian" relations, which is a big thing for Eurocentrics, in keeping with their "Racial" model Of the Nile Valley peoples. Since M. Lefkowitz's 1990s surge Eurocentrics also play a game of "plausible denial" of their own "race model, while still maintaining it in various guises- such as the very frequent pale Egyptians depicted in Natl Geog paintings and videos. They airly "deny" or dismiss "race" on one hand, but on the other, keep the mass propaganda game going. But the ancient Nubians and Egyptians are the closest people ethnically. You would hardly know that though from the barrage of material produced for popular consumption.
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic