posted
Caucasians and Asians are more evolved than the negroe thats for sure, the great civilizations were in euroasia and to lesser extent in the americas caucasian africa up the sahara...the sub-sharans never invented the wheel.....i think humans never interbreed with the neandthertal because they wouldnt be that smart if they did, or its just that minor that it doesnt affect them
Posts: 109 | Registered: Mar 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
@ OP- yuh still ah try...lol...sad...amazing how much stupid can fit into one's person...and how vividly it's been portrayed via text all deh bout di place yah.
==============
***sigh*** smh...Yuh can only do so much fi fight gainst eediatness enuh... Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
tbh i think the negroe is less evolved in civilization but not individually, because there are lots of smart blacks like obama, and i dont really care if blacks have civilization or not, they are just humans as anyone else and they should live how they want to live, if they want to be hunters and gatherers like iin africa they should do it.
Posts: 109 | Registered: Mar 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: Yup I fullystand why they band your ass BlackTiger.
mi dun tell yuh fram long time...CHUPPPPPPPPPPPPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
mi did ah sight it fram far....and mi did try fe tell unu fram di get-go.... Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Neanderthals did mate with homosapien, 4% genetic contribution. This has been proven, Blacktiger. And this percentage seems to have put the Caucasian and Asian at an evolutionary advantage over the pure homosapien (Negro).
quote:Originally posted by BlackTiger: Caucasians and Asians are more evolved than the negroe thats for sure, the great civilizations were in euroasia and to lesser extent in the americas caucasian africa up the sahara...the sub-sharans never invented the wheel.....i think humans never interbreed with the neandthertal because they wouldnt be that smart if they did, or its just that minor that it doesnt affect them
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^It sure took you idiots long enough to figure out where this boy was coming from.
chat bout Mike111? I tried to tell them from the first rass thread...
quote: African 0.00% Asian 0.41% European 99.59%
The bwoy posted his genetic results I've copied above, and appears (I could be wrong) to want someone to tell him he's not 'white'.....I am wondering if Cassiterides (sp?) will do so, since the bwoy is so desperately trying to be something other than 'white', while disparaging Black People in the process....
he makes Paul Mooney run thru my mind-
"Everybody wanna be a n*gga, but don't nobody wanna be a n*gga"
smh...
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
it depends on how you define white, if its caucasian/caucasoid than im white but if its people of wholly european origin with fair pigmentation than im not white.
Posts: 109 | Registered: Mar 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
Can we ignore the fact that Whites and Asians rank the highest in IQ, have contributed the most to advance technology and so happen to share the Neanderthal ancestry?
quote:Originally posted by BlackTiger: it depends on how you define white, if its caucasian/caucasoid than im white but if its people of wholly european origin with fair pigmentation than im not white.
You are trying tooooo hard.
Why don't you want to be 'white'? Do your new 'white' associates and/or your new Self-hating Kneegrow fanboy on this forum know how you feel:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Do Africans and Afro-Americans think Im "white"? hmmmm
Rate Member posted 06 June, 2011 10:51 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ah Donno do you think you are white? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posts: 4447 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009 | IP: Logged |
BlackTiger
Member Member # 18649
Rate Member posted 06 June, 2011 10:51 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think im not -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posts: 100 | Registered: Mar 2011 | IP: Logged |
Brada-Anansi
Member Member # 16371
Rate Member posted 06 June, 2011 10:57 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OK then ur not. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posts: 4447 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009 | IP: Logged |
BlackTiger
Member Member # 18649
Rate Member posted 06 June, 2011 10:58 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yeah but im interested to hear if blacks when they see me on the street would treat me like a "white boy"...if they would say "oh look its a white boy"..or would call me a "cracka" or smth -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posts: 100 | Registered: Mar 2011 | IP: Logged |
-Just Call Me Jari-
Member Member # 14451
Rate Member posted 06 June, 2011 11:04 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nope you would prob. be seen as hispanic or "Mexican"(as they are known down here) but you dont look "white" IMO -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posts: 5457 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007 | IP: Logged |
BlackTiger
Member Member # 18649
Rate Member posted 06 June, 2011 11:06 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [/i]ok. thanks bro. i guess thats slightly "better" than white[/i]
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
@confirming truth: can you explain how the less evolved neandherthal put caucasians and asians on advantage....i watched documentary about neandhertal and he was not able to create art, first art appears with homo sapiens, the neandthertal also had bigger forehad and looked closer to a gorilla
@truthandrights: i really dont care if im white or not, i gave you fair description of white and if and how im white or not white...i know what i amj.what i wanted to know is if BLACKS WOULD PERCEIVE ME as white and would call me a white boy...."thats why i said its slightly better to be hispanic than white - of course from a black perspective" because i know blacks dont like whites, but probably they dont like anyone else
Posts: 109 | Registered: Mar 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
It's interesting to see how these people utilize geographical land mass and taxons in such a political fashion to isolate Africoids to a political zone in any state of affairs i.e Sub Sahara, True Negro, The invention of the wheel, True black Nubian of the Nile et al while this exercise is essentially not in operation for Mongoloids and Caucasians.
A clear example of this ideological process at work is BlackTiger who appealed to this political zone of Sub Sahara in effect via the mention of the development of the wheel, irrespective of the fact that even if we neglect the development of the wheel, these political zones they regard as primitive still comprise of historical and contemporaneous indigenous developments and complexes invalidating many aspects of their religion.
Posts: 535 | From: From the Darkest of the Abyss | Registered: Apr 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Even as new discoveries are destroying OOA, Afrocentrists desperately hold on to the theory, why?
Posts: 1340 | Registered: Apr 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
why does it matter if humans are OOA or not? i really dont see a relevance, even if all humans are OOA they still seperated eatch other by mutation and selection
Posts: 109 | Registered: Mar 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Confirming Truth: Can we ignore the fact that Whites and Asians rank the highest in IQ, have contributed the most to advance technology and so happen to share the Neanderthal ancestry?
How does your IQ charts explain the preponderance of African immigrants surpassing Asians and Caucasians in various levels of academia?
How does your IQ charts explain the successful black African civilizations in antiquity and its contribution to future technology?
Posts: 535 | From: From the Darkest of the Abyss | Registered: Apr 2010
| IP: Logged |
they seem to have larger heads but if they have larger brains? and does this mean more intelligence?
truthandrights: i try to be neutral and adressing all points....im interested in science not supremacist (of any colour)
Posts: 109 | Registered: Mar 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Confirming Truth: ^What is your source to African immigrants surpassing Asians and Caucasians in Academia?
Here are some excerpts:
"There are only about 880,000 African immigrants residing in the U.S., but they are a highly educated group, with census figures showing that they are more likely to have a college degree (43.8 percent do) than Asian-Americans (42.5 percent) or the U.S. population as a whole (23.1 percent)."
"In the UK, 1988, the Commission for Racial Equality conducted an investigation on the admissions practices of St. George's, and other medical colleges, who set aside a certain number of places for minority students. This informal quota system reflected the percentage of minorities in the general population. However, minority students with Chinese, Indian, or black African heritage had higher academic qualifications for university admission than did whites (Blacks in Britain from the West Indies had lower academic credentials than did whites). In fact, blacks with African origins over the age of 30 had the highest educational qualifications of any ethnic group in the British Isles. Thus, the evidence pointed to the fact that minority quotas for University admissions were actually working against students from these ethnic groups who were on average more qualified for higher education than their white peers (Cross, 1994; Also see, Dustmann, Theodoropoulos, 2006)."
Perhaps this explain why the Ancient Egyptians were superior over the other Africans, because even their African ancestry likely included Neanderthal DNA. Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
This research is cross-sectional in design, I presume. Correct?
quote:Originally posted by Sahel (Siptah):
quote:Originally posted by Confirming Truth: ^What is your source to African immigrants surpassing Asians and Caucasians in Academia?
Here are some excerpts:
"There are only about 880,000 African immigrants residing in the U.S., but they are a highly educated group, with census figures showing that they are more likely to have a college degree (43.8 percent do) than Asian-Americans (42.5 percent) or the U.S. population as a whole (23.1 percent)."
"In the UK, 1988, the Commission for Racial Equality conducted an investigation on the admissions practices of St. George's, and other medical colleges, who set aside a certain number of places for minority students. This informal quota system reflected the percentage of minorities in the general population. However, minority students with Chinese, Indian, or black African heritage had higher academic qualifications for university admission than did whites (Blacks in Britain from the West Indies had lower academic credentials than did whites). In fact, blacks with African origins over the age of 30 had the highest educational qualifications of any ethnic group in the British Isles. Thus, the evidence pointed to the fact that minority quotas for University admissions were actually working against students from these ethnic groups who were on average more qualified for higher education than their white peers (Cross, 1994; Also see, Dustmann, Theodoropoulos, 2006)."
posted
One cannot ignore the obvious correlation between Neanderthal ancestry and high culture. I mean, geez! it is time to let go the politically correct stance. Perhaps if we were not so PC, we could come up with social and genome programs to bring the inferior races up to speed.
Perhaps this explain why the Ancient Egyptians were superior over the other Africans, because even their African ancestry likely included Neanderthal DNA.
quote:"Africans have the highest educational attainment rates of any immigrant group in the United States, with higher levels of completion than the stereotyped Asian American model minority. Estimates indicate that a significant percentage of black students at elite universities are African or the children of African immigrants, a notable example of this is Barack Obama."
Assuming they have these Neanderthal genes and Neanderthal genes is what constitutes civilization and evolution, explain why those Dynastic Egyptians are more what you call "superior" and "civilized" than the people of Eurasia giving their lesser amount of Neanderthal genes in comparison to the populations of Eurasia and higher amount of Neanderthal genes.
Posts: 535 | From: From the Darkest of the Abyss | Registered: Apr 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Black Tiger, You are a comedian--intentionally or maybe not. Just a lot of LOLs from this quarter.
Look, Neanderthal DNA is also found among the New Guineans and perhaps other Melanesians.
If the Neanderthals were cognitively superior to incoming tropical blacks from Africa, how come they were displaced after being in Europe for over 300,000 years.
Asians do not have the highest IQs. 1) The average IQ of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh is 81. African Americans are 91(see Flynn and Dickens(2006). The IQ of South East Asians--Thailand, Cambodia, Philippines, Vietnam, Burma, etc.--is approx. 88. China clocks in at baout 95-100. In fact, only Korea and Japan in East Asia score above 100. All these countries make up more than 90% of the population of Asia.
The average IQ of Central Americans(hybrids of European and Indigenous) is about 83. In Europe, Ireland scores 95, Greece 96 and Israel 94. Iran and Iraq are the locations where there were the important civilisations of Persia and Mesopotamia. Their IQs are respectively 84 and 86.
So you are hopelessly wrong on all scores.
Of course, one must recognise that Africans nurtured the whole human race for approximately 80% of the time of its existence, so in that regard non-African humanity must be grateful for this nurturing process from the paleolithic all the way up to the mesolithic.
Posts: 5492 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Confirming Truth: This research is cross-sectional in design, I presume. Correct?
quote:Originally posted by Sahel (Siptah):
quote:Originally posted by Confirming Truth: ^What is your source to African immigrants surpassing Asians and Caucasians in Academia?
Here are some excerpts:
"There are only about 880,000 African immigrants residing in the U.S., but they are a highly educated group, with census figures showing that they are more likely to have a college degree (43.8 percent do) than Asian-Americans (42.5 percent) or the U.S. population as a whole (23.1 percent)."
"In the UK, 1988, the Commission for Racial Equality conducted an investigation on the admissions practices of St. George's, and other medical colleges, who set aside a certain number of places for minority students. This informal quota system reflected the percentage of minorities in the general population. However, minority students with Chinese, Indian, or black African heritage had higher academic qualifications for university admission than did whites (Blacks in Britain from the West Indies had lower academic credentials than did whites). In fact, blacks with African origins over the age of 30 had the highest educational qualifications of any ethnic group in the British Isles. Thus, the evidence pointed to the fact that minority quotas for University admissions were actually working against students from these ethnic groups who were on average more qualified for higher education than their white peers (Cross, 1994; Also see, Dustmann, Theodoropoulos, 2006)."
This is a red herring. You asked for sources and i provided them. How does your comment on cross-sectional studies negate the studies conducted by the many sociologists proving Black African immigrants to be the most educated group, academically speaking?
Posts: 535 | From: From the Darkest of the Abyss | Registered: Apr 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:"Africans have the highest educational attainment rates of any immigrant group in the United States, with higher levels of completion than the stereotyped Asian American model minority. Estimates indicate that a significant percentage of black students at elite universities are African or the children of African immigrants, a notable example of this is Barack Obama."
quote:Originally posted by Confirming Truth: One cannot ignore the obvious correlation between Neanderthal ancestry and high culture. I mean, geez! it is time to let go the politically correct stance. Perhaps if we were not so PC, we could come up with social and genome programs to bring the inferior races up to speed.
Perhaps this explain why the Ancient Egyptians were superior over the other Africans, because even their African ancestry likely included Neanderthal DNA.
Where is the correlation between Neanderthals and their high cultural civilization contemporaneous to their existence on this planet?
Posts: 535 | From: From the Darkest of the Abyss | Registered: Apr 2010
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
Go here...go there...no, go here...now go there...turn around...let's go over there...now go in circles....this is fun...now go back there...take me wherever I say...go over there...go there...no, go right here...now go right there in that yellow wet spot. See me smiling...I'm having so much fun...are you having fun too..now go there, I want to go here, go on, smell it, taste it, turn around, spin for me, now faster, slow down, right here...now, I am tired, but I'll see you tomorrow. Ad infinitum
*A hint at racist thinking: The racists are not here to learn anything that a *nigger or nigger lover* could teach them. They despise you for not despising yourself.
All reasonable people, please regain discipline, and ignore the fomenters. Responding directly to their posts, insinuations, only encourages more participation.
A casual visitor to Egyptsearch.
Posts: 96 | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by BlackTiger: Caucasians and Asians are more evolved than the negroe thats for sure, the great civilizations were in euroasia and to lesser extent in the americas caucasian africa up the sahara...the sub-sharans never invented the wheel.....i think humans never interbreed with the neandthertal because they wouldnt be that smart if they did, or its just that minor that it doesnt affect them
quote:Originally posted by BlackTiger: ...the sub-sharans never invented the wheel.....
Neither did your people. Also images of the Wheel have been found all over West Africa and in the Nile Valley.
At least Educate yourself before trying to speak as an authority on a subject you are clueless about.
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Lets see things that Africans invented Humans The taming of Fire Astrology Astronomy Cooking Tools of all kinds The bow Spear clothing Art God concepts mining Jewelry Trade medicine make-up mathematics music time keeping writing megalithic structures A house that's not a cave. Civilization King and Queenships laws ya know I ain't got all day but u get the drift.
Posts: 6546 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
...the sub-sharans never invented the wheel..
^^lol... the "wheel" was used in tropical Africa, as represented by southern Egypt which is bisected by the tropical zone, long before it was in Europe, documented as early as the 4th and 5th Dynasties (Shaw 2000). Europeans never invented the wheel either, or for that matter many of the fundamental technologies at all. Most of the fundamental technologies that built Europe were developed by outside peoples, from the domestication of key plants and animals, to metalworking, to writing. European alphabets for example derive from Near Eastern peoples, which in turn derived the key elements of those alphabets from ancient Egypt (Sacks 2003).
Also images of the Wheel have been found all over West Africa and in the Nile Valley.
^^Yeap, the bogus "sub Saharan" concept is designed to de-Africanize numerous peoples. But a key concept is tropical Africa. The tropical zone bisects southern Egypt and ancient Egyptians, even in the north as most of the limb proportion studies show, group with fellow tropical Africans, even African Americans.
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Also... wheels for transport were in place- documented as early as the 6th dynasty for specific area work such as sieges. As the writers point out below, they would have been impractical trying to haul 5-10 ton blocks across soft desert sand or Nile mud, but wheels were in use routinely for applications where practical early on. There was no need for Mesopotamian "role models." The tropical peoples of Egypt were practical, and used the most practical means at hand.
------------------------------------- "Much earlier forerunners are shown in tomb paintings of the late Old Kingdom and the 11th Dynasty showing siege towers with wheels; depictions of movable siege towers exist from the 6th Dynasty onwards.) This indicates that the wheel was used in the transport if heavy loads more frequently than assumed.. The use of wheeled equipment in building is not yet attested to but may have been fairly common. The soft surface of the desert sand and the mid of the cultivation may have been a serious obstacle for heavy carriages but not so much for sledges."
--The encyclopaedia of ancient Egyptian architecture By Dieter Arnold. 2002. p 195 -------------------------- "In all probability wheels would have been of little practical use, for the building blocks used were far too large and too heavy to be carried on a wooden-wheeled cart. The relative scarcity of wood in ancient Egypt would have made the building of such carts difficult and overcoming the practical and technical difficulties of building carts to carry and move great weights would have probably proved impossible.
Wheels would have been, in any event, a far from practical method of transport on either agricultural land or the desert where they would have become quickly bogged down in either mud or sand."
--R. Partridge. (1996) Transport in ancient Egypt. p76
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by BlackTiger: ...the sub-sharans never invented the wheel.....
Neither did your people. Also images of the Wheel have been found all over West Africa and in the Nile Valley.
At least Educate yourself before trying to speak as an authority on a subject you are clueless about.
where's an image of the wheel being used in West Africa? I have not heard of this as per the time period
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [ "Much earlier forerunners are shown in tomb paintings of the late Old Kingdom and the 11th Dynasty showing siege towers with wheels; depictions of movable siege towers exist from the 6th Dynasty onwards.) "
--The encyclopaedia of ancient Egyptian architecture By Dieter Arnold. 2002. p 195 --------------------------
can someone please post a seige tower with wheels on it from AE prior to 12th dynasty, thanks
Posts: 42933 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by BlackTiger: Caucasians and Asians are more evolved than the negroe thats for sure, the great civilizations were in euroasia and to lesser extent in the americas caucasian africa up the sahara...the sub-sharans never invented the wheel.....i think humans never interbreed with the neandthertal because they wouldnt be that smart if they did, or its just that minor that it doesnt affect them
posted
^This thread is senseless since the authors of the study already stated that traces of neanderthal DNA were scattered indiscriminately across the genome and thus, would pose no evolutionary advantage (nothing to be selected for, it is all non-coding junk DNA). In addition, it applies to all non-Africans, not just Caucasians, not to mention that Homo-sapiens wiped the Neanderthal out (whatever advantage Neanderthals had over humans therefore, is not evident given their abrupt and pathetic extinction in the face of homo-sapien incursions).
Guys, can you not see that this is just a Eurocentric ruse?! Let it go.
Posts: 4021 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
chat bout Mike111? I tried to tell them from the first rass thread...![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
backtracking yet again...lolol...
Printer-friendly view of this topic