...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Denial of African influence in Greece
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rasol: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Mike111: Rasol; you are an amazement to me. It’s uncanny how you manage to sound authoritative while talking, what amounts to, just so much Stuff.[/QUOTE]Actually I only asked specific questions trying to understand what aspect of African Influence in Greece you are disputing. The content free ad homina beginning of your reply suggests that you're not sure, what you mean and are trying to divert me by getting personal. Uhm, that won't work. Only care about answers to my questions. [QUOTE] In this case, that original objective would be proving that the original civilizations of southern Europeans were Black.[/QUOTE]Really? Whose objective is that? If we quote from the title, the 'objective' would be to show African influence in Greece. But, let's help you out by substituting 'Black' influence. The question remains..... exactly what are you disputing? [QUOTE]I fail to understand your confusion[/QUOTE]Correction: You fail to answer my question. [QUOTE]Quote: Example from CL Brace: "terms like caucasoid, negroid and mongoloid are worse than usless".[/QUOTE] [QUOTE] The fact is, I don’t give a sh*t what Mr. Brace thinks about that or anything else.[/QUOTE]Well, that's certainly a scholarly approach. ;) [QUOTE]The fact is, White people created a RACE based world, people like me are only playing the game by their rules[/QUOTE]Would that define -> slave? [QUOTE] [b]Definition:[/b] The Neolithic Revolution was the first agricultural revolution—the transition from nomadic hunting and gathering communities and bands, to agriculture and settlement. [b]Quote: If so then this would imply that 'caucasians' played no role in the Neolithic revolution which spread FROM Southern Europe to the North prior to 1,200 BC.[/b] [b]Before the Neolithic revolution, considered in ws.t discourse to be the birth of 'civilisation', eurassians are only stone age, often cave dwelling, hunter gatherers.[/b] [/QUOTE] [QUOTE]I think by definition Cro-Magnons (the only non-Black Humanoids there at the time), are “Cave Men”.[/QUOTE]Oh really? [i]Thought Posted: African Exodus The Origins of Modern Humanity By Christopher Stringer and Robin McKie Owl Books Page 162 "Nor does the picture get any clearer when we move on to the Cro-Magnons, the presumed ancestors of Modern Europeans. Some were more like present-day Australians or Africans, judged by objective anatomical categorizations, as is the case with some early modern skulls from the Upper Cave at Zhoukoudian in China[/i] [QUOTE] As far as is known, Cave men did not engage in agriculture.[/QUOTE]Ok? [QUOTE] [b]Quote: So you are saying 'non-caucasians' [whatever that means] brought 'civilisation' to Europe (?)[/b] No: I am NOT saying that: I think it more likely that they CREATED civilization in Europe.[/QUOTE]So the 'non caucasians' were civilised prior to migrating to Europe, or no? [QUOTE] [b]Quote: Is is possible that these 'non caucasians' also introduced African paternity and autosomes such as Benin HBS along with civiliation.... to Europe?[/b] In my own mind, anyone attempting to make the case either way, (with the science we now have), is a fool. Here is why: We know with certainty, that Blacks inhabited the Eastern Plains, (as a result of the second great migration).[/QUOTE]Eastern plains of what? When? Certainty? Why? [QUOTE] This accounts for the difference in complexion between Caucasians and MOST Mongols (some are quite pale).[/QUOTE]^ According to whom? Is there any source for any of these statements you make? [QUOTE]There was no physical barrier separating Blacks and Caucasians, so who knows what happened.[/QUOTE]^Non-sequitur, and nonsensical. [QUOTE] Caucasians and Blacks were again thrown together as Caucasians migrated into Southern Europe.[/QUOTE]Where do think the ancestors of whits lived during Europes Ice ages when Northern Europe was uninhabited? [QUOTE] Finally: a large part of the Roman contingent occupying Britain was Black, (this from British T.V.).[/QUOTE]Yes there were Black in Rome, and some would have occupied Britain. I don't see the relevance though to the topic. [QUOTE] Plus, the untold other occasions when they were thrown together, makes it impossible to say when or how genes were exchanged.[/QUOTE]This makes no sense whatsoever. Please think about what you are saying. - You are claiming that Blacks and whites were mixed together in Europe. - You are documenting that fact in terms of specific historical events [Rome's occupation of Britain]. You then turn around and claim it is -impossible to know when or how- Blacks and whites in Europe were mixed together, even though you just [supposedly] documented such. Coherence Mike....co-her-ence! [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3