...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
OT: To Study Islamic History...is to Study Black History
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bettyboo: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by MindoverMatter718: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Bettyboo: [qb] The so-called first migration was not your "human beings" it was literally some pre-human like creatures. The human being supposedly evolved in the new places that these first "pre-human" like creatures settled according to your science and folklore. [/qb][/QUOTE]Wrong, humans evolved in one place, and that is Sub Saharan East Africa, you talk sh*t out of your ass, with absolutely no knowledge on the subject. You shouldn't even be posting in this section, seriously!! When humans left Africa, they were humans, they weren't pre-human like creatures. Anatomically modern humans were around in Africa for 140ky before a group of East Africans even left Africa to populate the world. Try reading, and then make some real accusations about real facts, not made up distorted nonsense, you dimwitted troll!! [QUOTE] http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070718140829.htm New Research Proves Single Origin Of Humans In Africa ScienceDaily (July 19, 2007) — New research published in the journal Nature (19 July) has proved the single origin of humans theory by combining studies of global genetic variations in humans with skull measurements across the world. [b]The research, at the University of Cambridge and funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), represents a final blow for supporters of a multiple origins of humans theory.[/b] Competing theories on the origins of anatomically modern humans claim that either humans originated from a single point in Africa and migrated across the world, or different populations independently evolved from homo erectus to home sapiens in different areas. [b]The Cambridge researchers studied genetic diversity of human populations around the world and measurements of over 6,000 skulls from across the globe in academic collections. Their research knocks down one of the last arguments in favour of multiple origins. The new findings show that a loss in genetic diversity the further a population is from Africa is mirrored by a loss in variation in physical attributes.[/b] [b]Lead researcher, Dr Andrea Manica from the University's Department of Zoology, explained: "The origin of anatomically modern humans has been the focus of much heated debate. Our genetic research shows the further modern humans have migrated from Africa the more genetic diversity has been lost within a population. [/b] [b] "However, some have used skull data to argue that modern humans originated in multiple spots around the world. We have combined our genetic data with new measurements of a large sample of skulls to show definitively that modern humans originated from a single area in Sub-saharan Africa."[/b] [b]The research team found that genetic diversity decreased in populations the further away from Africa they were - a result of 'bottlenecks' or events that temporarily reduced populations during human migration.[/b] [b]They then studied an exceptionally large sample of human skulls. Taking a set of measurements across all the skulls the team showed that not only was variation highest amongst the sample from south eastern Africa but that it did decrease at the same rate as the genetic data the further the skull was away from Africa. To ensure the validity of their single origin evidence the researchers attempted to use their data to find non-African origins for modern humans. Research Dr Francois Balloux explains: "To test the alternative theory for the origin of modern humans we tried to find an additional, non-African origin. We found this just did not work. Our findings show that humans originated in a single area in Sub-Saharan Africa."[/b] [/QUOTE][/qb][/QUOTE]You dumb fvck! And who are you? I don't remember talking to you. So another stupid theory. They can prove that modern humans come from a single population from 'sub-sahara' "Africa" based on SKULLS! :eek: HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa! One minute the skull theory is racist and the next minute it is legitimate. These fvcking scientists don't know what to believe. If you don't know, there are a lot of theories out there and they all have their own story. Besides the skull theory, and originating in 'sub-sahara' "Africa", the article is pretty convincing. Fvck off you stupid, emotional, fvck. So I guess the theories before the homo sapiens is no longer is use. Why did this stupid article use the term "modern" human anyway. And who the fvck said The Cambridge Researchers have the final answer. And by the way, I don't believe in multiple 'origins' so this thesis you posted just rolled off my back - you dumb fvck. And how did humans 'evolve' in one place and what or whom did they 'evolve' from. I'm quite stupid when it comes to science so please explain to me the 'origination' and the 'evolution' of these "modern" humans. Oh, by the way, some will argue that the Arabian Peninsula is "East Africa". [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3