...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Why do blacks hate Mathilda's Anthropology Blog?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by yql718: [QB] [b] Just a few of Mathilda's cockroach lies: [QUOTE] "the genes Ethiopians and Egytpiasn share are really only the Eurasian ones." [/QUOTE][b]Ethiopians share Paternal Markers A-M13, B-B60, E-M35, E-M2, E-V6, E-M78 as well as maternal markers L0,L1,L2, and L3 with Egyptians. All undoubtedly African. Got the facts? Good![/b] lol. Good point. [QUOTE] the depcition of Egyptians on tomb walls is very different to black Africans [/QUOTE][b]The Brown and Black figures on the wall ARE "Black Africans." Brown skinned populations are all across the globe. Brown skinned in India=Indian. Brown skinned in Africa = Black person aka Negro - Case closed[/b] And actually, light brown to light yellow skin is part of the African range of skin coloring. The San (Bushman) peoples have yellowish light skin and are among Africa's oldest populations. Medium brown skin and narrow noses is also routine in Sub-Saharan Africa. [QUOTE] Caucasoid can have a very dark skin tone. Indians and modern Egyptians for example. [/QUOTE][b]"Very Dark Skin" in the African context = Black. There is NO NEED to look to India when you have "Black" Indigenous Africans RIGHT IN THE NILE VALLEY.[/b] And there is no need to look for "Caucasoids" or "race mixes" to explain light or brown skin in Africa. [QUOTE] FMJ, black Americans can have as much as 90% European ancestry in them, that's why some of these look like homies from the hood.. [/QUOTE][b]Huh?[/b] lol.. more of her brilliant "scholarship"... [b]Mathilda on skin color:[/b] [QUOTE] No, they are tan/brown mainly. A minority are white, and another minority are black. [/QUOTE][b]But in a different post says[/b] [QUOTE] "Modern Egyptians are very tan to dark brown" [/QUOTE][b]In any case, "Very Tan" to "Dark Brown" while in Africa = Black. All tones seen on walls can be duplicated amongst Blacks of South Africa, Rwanda or Liberia.[/b] lol.. typical.. eventually her lies begin to contradict one another.. And in any case, as already seen on ES, the definition of "black people" or "negro" includes peoples with brown skin. [IMG]http://africanamericanculturalcenterpalmcoast.org/historyafrican/blackdefinition.jpg[/IMG] So the attempt to isolate black skin from brown skin is not only bogus but hypocritical as well. Few can credibly say that nut brown Italians are a "different race" from lily-white pale Swedes from northern Europe. With racists though, a different, hypocritical double standard is used when it comes to Africa.. [QUOTE] West Africans have zero biological and cultural connections to Egypt. [/QUOTE][b]Grand Cockroach Lie! The "Typical West African Y marker" usually indicative of "Bantu" ancestry was seen in the Nile Valley itself. In Upper Egypt and Lower Nubia it was sampled more than All Non-African lineages combined. Y-chromosome (IV) E-M2: (1.2%) Lower Egypt, (27.3%)Upper Egypt (39.1%)Lower Nubia/Nile Valley." I cant even BEGAN to address the similarities with Language in other Afro Asiatic speakers that live in West Africa. Or even the NON A.A. languages such as Wolof that have significant connection to Ancient Egyptian as demonstrated by Diop. Again you FAIL[/b] Her pathetic attempt to cast the true negro model on 'West Africans' versus Egyptians is a dismal failure, as well as sheer hypocrisy. Few people go about saying that Swedes have no relationship with other Europeans such as Greeks. In Africa however, she applies a different, hypocritical standard. It falls flat in any case, because the Sahara is the main engine that peopled Egypt and the Nile Valley and contributed a massive number of cultural and biological influences. Keita, (1990, 1992, 1993, 1997, 2004), Wilkinson (1999), Wendorf (1999) all show the importance of the Sahara. The Sahara has also played a major role in the peopling of West Africa and its development. Indeed, the Sahara, was once a fertile greenbelt that stretched across one-third of the continent and shaped West African population origins as it shaped other regions. See {Archaeology and Language II: Archaeological Data and Linguistic Hypotheses, By Roger Blench, Matthew Spriggs, 1998) So the artificial 'West African' versus 'Egyptian' claim is bogus and hypocritical. It is the Sahara that shaped both regions. As Explorer notes on his blog: [i]Dynastic Egypt is the outgrowth of proto-dynastic Saharan social and Sahelian complexes, which in turn derived from sub-Saharan Africa. As for the possibility of some level of migration from the Nile Valley to western Sahara or west Africa after the Dynastic Egyptian social apparatus had already been put in place, some researchers do not rule it out, as exemplified by Rosa et al., in the course of their analysis of Guinea Bissau samples. In terms of the peopling of west Africa, it is complex, as is the case elsewhere in Africa. I have already laid out scenarios of this peopling extensively in past postings here, both from the Y chromosome and mtDNA standpoints, along with tangible archaeological indicators. The desertification of the Sahara acted as a pump, in the sense that it pressured people therein to seek refuge in both sub-Saharan west Africa through to sub-Saharan east Africa. Preponderance of evidence suggests that like the PN2 [E1a1b/E3b] carriers, PN2-E3a/E1a1a carriers originated in the vicinity of sub-Saharan east Africa, and went onto people west Africa, where they'd join earlier Saharan dwellers. West Africa would be the point of expansion though, for E3a bearers, amongst others. So yes, like those that sprang up in the Nile Valley, west African social complexes adopted, or rather, inherited Saharan and sub-Saharan traditions; neither can be separated from those origins. [/i] [QUOTE] Ahh, no. The overall come out at 40% Caucasoid. The E3b1 they carry has about half Eurasian ancestry to its name [/QUOTE][b]E3ba1 is a Y-Chromosome marker. It is passed from father to son and does NOT RECOMBINE. How can something that does not be change be half of something else? Her statement is contrary to the ideas of "UNI" Parental genetic markers.[/b] lol... [QUOTE] But modern Egyptians still cluster closer to Europeans. E Y chr are African but they aren't specific to black Africans. The North Aferican population has been mainly Eurasian derived but with a lot of African Y chr for about 12k. [/QUOTE][b]Cockroach cant even lie straight. I have yet to read ONE study where Modern Egyptians cluster closest to Europeans. Furthermore how can a population "mainly derive from Eurasian" but carry African Lineages? She also repeats cockroach lie #1[/b] Mathilda aka Europa aka ScruffyPair = EPIC FAIL! [IMG]http://www.blogavante.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/dead-cockroach.jpg[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE] lol.... and of course limb proportion studies place Egyptians, both ancient and modern closer to darker-skinned, tropically adapted peoples than white Europeans. She can't even lie straight... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3