...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Why Brainwashed Blacks attack Afrocentric Scholars who Study Egypt
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: These people are teaching in Schools and College the "Theory of Evolution", as if it is a fact. A theory is a hypothesis. . [/QUOTE]Now you have it right Clyde. The are teaching what they call "Theory of Evolution" but you are not teaching " The theory that the Fuegians and Khosians carry M174" You say "The Fuegians and Khosians carry the M174 gene" and don't have the word theory or hypothesis in the sentence But much more importantly if the Europeans were not not teach something properly that is not an excuse for you to do it. As an Afrocentric you should not be doing something wrong they are doing you should do things the right way by not informing your viewers "Over time I may be proven correct." So please edit the video to say " I theorize that the Fuegians and Khosians carry M174" thank you [/qb][/QUOTE]Stop making stuff up. I taught Elementary and High School Science for over 20 years. You just teach Evolution. It is never stayed in the science book this is a theory. [/qb][/QUOTE]But much more importantly if the Europeans are not not teaching something properly that is not an excuse for you to do it. As an Afrocentric you should not be doing something Eurocentric way you should do things the right way by informing your viewers stating you are proposing a theory or hypothesis and "Over time I may be proven correct." So please edit the video to say " I theorize that the Fuegians and Khosians carry M174" thank you [/qb][/QUOTE]No I will not edit the video. I made a hypothesis and I stand by it. You can disagree with it but I will not retract it. Over time I may be proven correct. Researchers apply whatever haplogroup they which to aDNA because of the association of genes to various haplogroups. Looking at ancient DNA to determine ancient population origins can be misleading. Let’s look at dna of Ust-ishim and Clovis-Anzick man as it compares to modern populations. [IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YuX5vxo9qJE/VGz2Uy0496I/AAAAAAAAe-g/j28Lxrnp9jI/s1600/MatchesLiving.PNG[/IMG] Although it is clear that Ust-ishim was T2b3, the popular press claims he belonged to the haplogroup U clade. Look at the cousins of Ust-ishim it is these modern people who belong to the U clade that are his cousins. See: http://www.fi.id.au/2014/11/ust-ishim-ancient-dna-has-matches-with.html Look at the Clovis-Anzick DNA matches to modern people. [IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--1hyVfuePOM/VB7TFJsObiI/AAAAAAAAeCQ/g0MyxyQ9roM/s1600/F999912.JPG[/IMG] If you look closely you can see how they match many Non-Native Americans. See http://www.fi.id.au/2014/09/clovis-anzick-1-dna-match-living-people.html What does this mean? It means that researchers may only be giving us results that match their expectations of how the data should look. IN relation to Anzick man Felix Immanuel noted that: [QUOTE] Just a quick recap, I processed the raw data for Clovis-Anzick-1 and uploaded into GEDMatch and to my surprise, there are matches as near as 3rd to 4th cousins.[b] Now, that's a real problem because, the matches are to a DNA sample older than 12500 years. This is practically impossible and very mysterious.[/img] I will investigate step-by-step and see what are all the possibilities and failure points, which could solve the problem. But before that, we need to be absolutely sure that these matches are indeed valid. From the matches, I requested for phased kit and I indeed got one - Thanks to Mario Diaz and Veronica. See: http://www.fi.id.au/search/label/Anzick [/QUOTE][/b]He added that [QUOTE] Clearly, an IBD segment of 5 cM above 500 SNPs with total IBD segments around 10+ cM cannot be 12500 years old. This is a fact and can be verified using known relationships in families and DNA companies are using these benchmarks all along for showing genetic matches.[b] This fact is more than enough to conclude that the Clovis-Anzick-1 sample is not actually ancient. My best guess is, the infant boy's sample is just from the last century and it was wrongly labeled as 12500 years old or the sample got contaminated.[/b] See: http://www.fi.id.au/search/label/Anzick [/QUOTE]As you can see the DNA is not always a clear marker of actual ancient events or relationships between populations and individuals. As a result, there is no need to redo my video, overtime my Fuegian-Khoisan matches may be proven correct. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3