posted
I recently posted a message concerning Nexus magazine and Egyptian Underground cities. I was a little surprised by the responses. Ausar the labyrr however you spell it was mentioned alongside Herodotus but there were other underground structures discussed too. No indication of being confused. In any case you could have just typed Nexus into the Net and seen for yourself. And Osiris(there`s two of you)the fact that I mentioned "questionable" in relation to some Nexus articles means that I am aware of it`s status. In spite of that I still thought the article was worth looking at. I would have thought this was easy to infer from the way the posting was written. Ultimately if a reputable newspaper`s article concerning an archaeological discovery is reproduced in a magazine the reputation of the magazine is pretty irrelevant since newspaper articles are verifiable. Hermst
ausar Member # 1797
posted
Hermst,I have no objection in discussing alternative theories. I noticed that nobody responded to the post except Osiris so this would tell you that not very many people know about the phenomenon that you speak of. I am not up to date on Nexus magazine nor carry a subscrition to the magazine. You could post more details about the underground structure. The one I am most familar with was the most supposed labyrinth found by Lepsisus early in the 1800's. The other one I am not familar with.
posted