...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
ot: - Black Africa
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by nur23_you55ouf: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by rasol: [QB] [QUOTE]Color is not distinct from any other form of identity.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]It clearly is, by the simple fact that a black man obviously implies an appearance along the lines of dark skin[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]Color is phenotype. Phenotype is political and subjective.[/QUOTE]How does the said fact, change daily interpretation of the term "black" as a reference to skin color? It implies dark skin because it is interpreted as dark skin the minute it enters the ear of an individual. Once again, It's subjectivity doesn't change that. [QUOTE]Asian is geography, which is political and subjective.[/QUOTE]Of couse it is, however as i said before an asian man, has no hint of phenotype dawned upon him, let alone the point you make that it's subjective one. It's the actual term my statements question, not necessarily the meaning/subjectivity the said term carries by defention. [QUOTE]Your position is effectively6 that phenotype is invalid as an identity reference but geography is somehow valid.[/QUOTE]Incorrect, my position is actually the complete opposite... [QUOTE]But since both are subjective and political you have failed to explain how so. [/QUOTE]see above. [QUOTE]So yes your argument is still ridiculous.[/QUOTE]As far as i'm concerned, my "arguement" remains nitpicked rather than questioned, as you apprently misinterpreted my previous statements. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3