...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
ot: - Black Africa
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rasol: [QB] [QUOTE]rasol Asian is geography, which is political and subjective.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]nur: Of couse it is, however as i said before an asian man, has no hint of phenotype dawned upon him[/QUOTE]rasol: Asia is not a reference to phenotype, it is a reference to Geography. [QUOTE]nur: let alone the point you make that it's subjective one.[/QUOTE]Gosh, you don't seem to understand even a single sentence. The point is that geographic reference is as subjective and political as phenotypic reference. If you disagree then explain why? At least show some signs of comprehension and address the point properly. [QUOTE] It's the actual term my statements question, not necessarily the meaning/subjectivity the said term carries by defention.[/QUOTE]This is simply gibberish, meanwhile my question goes unanswered. [QUOTE]Incorrect, my position is actually the complete opposite...[/QUOTE]Opposite of what? Coherence? Then yes, we agree. Meanwhile, unanswered questions - [QUOTE] * What makes East Asia a perfect ethnic reference? * If East Asia is not and -ethnic- construct, then what is the basis for comparing it to Black African? * What is the -purely geographic- basis for separating East Asia from Asia? * If the term is so perfect, why do so many Asians then reject the term -East- Asian? * Specifically how is East Asian as a geography any less political or subjective than Black African? * If it is not less poltical, or less subjective, then how can it be perfect while Black African is [bad]?[/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3