...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Was Roman Empire White?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by IronLion: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness: [qb] Iron let me explain the history of Rome to you http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Etruria_the_Etruscans_2.htm Moving ahead to perhaps 1100 B.C. It is at about this time, that people from the Eurasian plains called "the Latin's" later known as the Romans - migrate in. These Latins may have accompanied the Hellenes into Greece, and then continued on into Italy. The nature of the early contact between the two peoples, is unknown. But, the later relationship is well known to be one of violence. Soon after the invasion of Whites from Eurasia began, a coalition of the original Black inhabitants of Italy, Greece and the Aegean area, formed a conglomeration called the "Sea People". They boarded ships with all of their belongings and fled the area. But those that stayed behind, still had to deal with the White newcomers. In time, the Romans had learned how to built cities, now there is great competition for power and territory. Wars rage, but the Etruscan cities fight alone, and the Romans can simply attack and annex each individual city; divide and conquer was the order of the day. This disunity is further illustrated by the fact that the Romans concluded treaties with individual Etruscan city/states, rather than the whole. As Caucasians kept coming in, Rome soon became a large city, similar to the powerful cities of southern Etruria, and it had also become predominately Caucasian. Accordingly, it was a Caucasian uprising that drove the Etruscans from Rome in 509 B.C. -Mike111, realhistoryww.com [/qb][/QUOTE]And actually, the latins were the minority in the confederacy that became the Roman Empire. And who said the latins were caucasians? Or you meant to say that latin is an "indo-european" language? Latin language was used, in Rome but the inhabitants of Latium -the land and the original cradle of Latin language, were a minor partner in the whole scheme. I can provide you a 1000 sources ask if you care... :D [/qb][/QUOTE]I'm shocked the above quote was taken verbatim from Mike's site realhistoryww.com: clearly somebody's right and somebody's wrong. Mike says after 509 BC there was a Caucasian uprising and Rome became "predominately Caucasian". We'll get to the bottom of this. Mike may have to revise his site to reflect your new Rome was not predominantly Caucasian prior to 476 AD findings. Iron I was wondering in the BC period of Rome to the first few AD centuries were there any Caucasians at all, emperors and such? If so how did they get there? I thought you said they were all Moorish and negro latins? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3