...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Genomic Ancestry of North Africans Supports Back-to-Africa Migrations Brenna M. Henn
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] To those that can follow the discussion. The authors are using frequency to suggest that H originated in the NE/AP(Upstream H*51%). Ignoring the also large 48% H* in central North Africa. In addition, they use frequency to suggest that H1(the first mutation ) originated in Iberia again ignoring the high percentage of H1 in Central North Africa., There is a reason why BOTH oldest branch of H (ie H* and H1), combined, is higher in Central North Africa and NOT in either the NE/AP or Iberia. Ignore that coalescence calculation BS. Coalescence calculation is very subjective and very inaccurate. Coalescence age is based upon several different ASSUMPTIONS. That is why, depending on the author, you read AMH left Africa 40,000-125,000ya. That is a 85,000y difference. I don't know about you but 85,000y margin of inaccuracy is NOT very reliable ie story telling . The only scientific reliable parameters, so far are, Frequency, and, Resolution(degree of variation). Frequency, is why they first concluded that Basque were the earliest Europeans which modern Europeans descended from. Resolution(new technology), changed their mind, Basque are in fact YOUNGER than modern Europeans. However, they occupied Iberia AHEAD of modern Europeanst!!! Ain't that a bitch! Migration pattern is really fascinating and good story telling. Similarly for Cruiciani and R-V88 thing. Resolution(think magnifying glass) determined that R-V88 is older in central Africa than North Africa. Thus leading the authors to conclude R-V88 is central African in origin and is NOT due to back-migration. Which Clyde and I alluded to years ago. We finally have the proof. Don't be surprise if others try to use coalescene age to prove otherwise in the future. Resolution helped determine the many sub-clades of R1b. This is why ISOGG is always updating. European R1b1b(7ya) is now R1b1a2a*. *= there are many more down-stream clades. To Sage's Point. Keep in mind - Haplo-group does not mean race. Because there is no such thing. They are not really related. So I respectfully disagree with Dana - Tunisians look how they look due to their geographical location(higher UV latitude and being Saharan) - that is how nature best created them to survive, no admixture needed. Notice they are NOT Scandinavians. Now, since they inhabit the African continent and are indigenous they will show up in CODIS(STR) as African, just as all other Africans(paper cited) It all makes sense. But we try to apply our own modern prejudices to these people. They are African even if we eyeball them as European looking. The genes don't lie. So you see, what is under the skin/genes/(STR) is more important. The Henn et al DATA correlates with Comas et al DATA. There is some BS in both but overall they agree. What some here are not getting is the [b]objective[/b] of these research, which I cited and bolded earlier. Bottom line is they are trying to prove there are African speciifc hg-H sub-clades and European specific hg-H sub-clades and that their White European women did not migrate to Africa leaving their white men behind. You know , in search of black dick. LOL! Man! Modern day politics and prejudices are driving our research! This is the first paper I have seen that compares mtDNA H and its SUBCLADES over the THREE continents. If anyone have similar papers please post? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3