...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Genomic Ancestry of North Africans Supports Back-to-Africa Migrations Brenna M. Henn
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Then in that case, you have been refuted. Case closed.[/QUOTE]Let me guess? Because you say so? That's not how it works snot nosed brat. Cite the evidence, right here, right now along with your sources. Where is the evidence that: 1) diversity in E-M78 in modern Berbers precludes genetic drift 2) that Berber mtDNA lineages evince large effective population sizes [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: the loci are THE variables of chromosomes. If not the loci, what then is variable on a designated chromosome?[/QUOTE]Stop snorting, son. You were told that haplogroups themselves are variables, when they are the focal point of a study. You were told that this is what makes haplogroup assigment an uni-variate exercise, unlike genome -wide analysis, which is multi-variate per definition. The only counterargument your mentally challenged ass could muster up was the irrelevant no-brainer and straw man that Y chromosome and mtDNA have polymorphic sites. The peanut you call your brain simply cannot compute the basic fact that the variability of these polymorphic sites in the human genome doesn't have anything to do with multi-variate and uni-variate [b]analysis[/b]. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Nobody but another complete idiot will understand what you are even saying here.[/QUOTE]No, YOU don't understand what I'm saying, because you're a retarded bum who doesn't even know what a variable is. You're simply too stupid to understand that the impossibility of yielding more than one uniparental haplogroup from one mtDNA sequence or Y Chromosome precludes haplogroup analysis from being multi-variate analysis. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: You must have stopped taking your meds in the nut house, as you are still making up your own "realities".[/QUOTE]Wait, wait. Let me guess... because YOU say so? Face it, Explorer, our past discussions have progressively revealed that you're about as knowledgeable in these matters as brainless jellyfish are. You don't even know what a multi variate and univariate analysis are, for Christ's sake. And here I am, thinking your absolute low was when you made up a story about what PCA is. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: You are indeed stumped to find even a half-way logical explanation for why some supposed European "transplants" would speak not only a language phylum that is obviously entirely unique to Africa, but also entirely unique to Tamazight speakers.[/QUOTE]You stupid bum. Despite your fanatic make believe efforts, neither their language nor their levels of E-M81 is going to make them more biologically allied with other E-M35 carrying Afrasan speakers than the ~10% their genome says they factually are. Explain this, brainless bum: [QUOTE] Originally posted by Swenet: While you're at it, if drift isn't at work here, explain the discrepancy between the extreme rarity of ancestral clades in between E-M81 and E-M35, even though the former only emerged ~5.6kya from the said predecessors.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE] Originally posted by Swenet: Then demonstrate that the paternal East African component brought there by Neolithic proto-Berber speakers (e.g., manifested as E-M81 in Y Chromosomal analysis) re-emerges as East African affiliated ancestry when other ancestry informative markers are consulted[/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3