...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Genomic Ancestry of North Africans Supports Back-to-Africa Migrations Brenna M. Henn
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: Let me guess? Because you say so? That's not how it works snot nosed brat.[/QUOTE]If you had a brain you would not have to guess how you were refuted, chump. [QUOTE] Cite the evidence, right here, right now along with your sources. Where is the evidence that: 1) diversity in E-M78 in modern Berbers precludes genetic drift 2) that Berber mtDNA lineages evince large effective population sizes[/QUOTE]fuckhead, diversity of E-M78 chromosomes, along with E-M81, does not preclude genetic drift, but it does weaken your theory that Maghrebi populations' paternal gene pool is lopsidedly "African", because of genetic drift. E-M81 for example, a dominant marker in most Tamazight populations, requires the same ancestral clade as E-M78: E-M35! That's all that is warranted to explain E-M81 in Tamazight populations. And "guess" what? Upstream E-M35 clades are very rare in Europe. The diversity of E-M78, supplemented by that of E-M81, in coastal northwestern Africa eliminates the need of attainment just by "genetic drift" secondary to a foreign introduction, as that diversity would not have been possible without the presence of E-M35 upstream clades. Genetic drift only has a profound effect in a population of fairly small size. That does not mean genetic drift ceases to occur; just that its impact is not so dramatic towards homogenization. Now, because you are such an idiot, I have to explain this to you. For the same reason, the fairly diverse maternal gene pool of Maghrebi populations is not reflective of a population that suddenly blossomed out of a small group that underwent intense genetic drift action. PS: Counter to your thinking-through-the-asshole, U6 and M1 just by themselves hardly constitute a "diverse" gene pool, and especially, when they generally make small portions of a gene pool. [QUOTE] Stop snorting, son. You were told that haplogroups themselves are variables, when they are the focal point of a study.[/QUOTE]Stop rambling through your ass. Stuff coming out of that shithole makes even less sense than the black smelly waste that comes outta there; henceforth, I couldn't give a hoot about what you "tell" me. [QUOTE]You were told that this is what makes haplogroup assigment an uni-variate exercise, unlike genome -wide analysis, which is multi-variate per definition. The only counterargument your mentally challenged ass could muster up was the irrelevant no-brainer and straw man that Y chromosome and mtDNA have polymorphic sites. The peanut you call your brain simply cannot compute the basic fact that the variability of these polymorphic sites in the human genome doesn't have anything to do with multi-variate and uni-variate [b]analysis[/b].[/QUOTE]The only thing the hogwash above communicates about your thick fuckhead, is that you don't know the difference between a "marker" and "variability". Serving as a "marker" does not render either Y-DNA (or any other nuclear DNA for that matter) or mtDNA "univariable". Stop using your fat ass as a tool for thinking! [QUOTE] You're simply too stupid to understand that the impossibility of yielding more than one uniparental haplogroup from one mtDNA sequence or Y Chromosome precludes haplogroup analysis from being multi-variate analysis.[/QUOTE]You have it twisted. I'd be certifiably stupid only if I actually understood your stupid talk. [QUOTE]Wait, wait. Let me guess...[/QUOTE]Let me save you the trouble of "guessing" numbnut: The notion about univariate vs. multivariate applying to just cranial study was concocted only in your thinking-retardant skull. It has absolutely nothing to do with what was said in the real world. [QUOTE]You stupid bum. Despite your fanatic make believe efforts, neither their language nor their levels of E-M81 is going to make them more biologically allied with other E-M35 carrying Afrasan speakers than the ~10% their genome says they factually are.[/QUOTE]Still unable to forge a reason to wish away the Tamazight language phylum. You are too dirt stupid to even come up with a [b]dumb[/b] reason to explain it away. LOL [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3