...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Genomic Ancestry of North Africans Supports Back-to-Africa Migrations Brenna M. Henn
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] Everyone can see you're a filthy coward. You're desperately looking for material to fill up your post, to make it seem to the outside world that you're not in your usual role; on the victim end of a severe thrashing. The contents of your posts have all the trappings of a thrashed bum, who is in denial of having been routed: 1) You reply to segments of my post that aren't even contentions, whenever you're not in denial, knocking down strawmen or lying through your filthy ass teeth that is. 2) You're not even debating, you're just substituting what you KNOW you can't do (refute what I'm saying), with pathetic bantering little b!tch-like, comments. 3) You reply selectively and the content of your posts progressively lose volume and relevance to the subject matter at hand. Here, below, the demented pig went on record uttering the patently stupid claim that the difference between univariate and multivariate analysis lies in the variability of genetic material. :eek: Not only that, note the contradiction in terms. The filthy dumbass pig says an ''uniparental marker'', which essentially means 'single parent inherited [b]marker[/b]', is not a single category used to classify individuals (univariate analysis): [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: To the chump above (swenet), [qb]uniparental markers are not univariate entities.[/qb] They span multiple loci, some more variable than others, as any other segment of the human genome. [/QUOTE]The demented pig even went as far as fabricating that uni/multivariate analysis is restricted to cranio-facial analysis, even though it's THE way of scientifically studying subjects and their taxonomic relationships with other subjects. The filthy pig is even ignorant of the most basic and rudimentary processes of science, from Principal Component analysis to uni/multivariate analysis: [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: [b]This is not cranio-morphometric analysis[/b] where individual features are examined for their variability.[/QUOTE][IMG]http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/crying-laughter-smiley-emoticon.gif[/IMG] It'll be a cold day in hell before you'll refute any of the below, and your bummy demented ass knows it. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: That's what it sounds like to you, no doubt; the equivalent of a flat-earther in the field of genetics who thinks the difference between uni-variate and multi-variate analysis lies in how inherently polymorphic something is, rather than the amount of chosen categories that researchers decide to sort individuals or objects into. Mentally imbalanced bum, educate yourself: [i]Multivariate statistics is a form of statistics encompassing [b]the simultaneous observation and analysis of more than one outcome variable.[/b] The application of multivariate statistics is multivariate analysis.[/i] [i]Univariate analysis is the simplest form of quantitative (statistical) analysis.[1] The analysis is carried out with the description of a single variable [b]in terms of the applicable unit of analysis.[1][/b] For example, [b]if the variable "age" was the subject of the analysis, the researcher would look at how many subjects fall into given age attribute categories.[/b][/i][/QUOTE] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: Cite the evidence, right here, right now along with your sources. Where is the evidence that: 1) diversity in E-M78 in modern Berbers precludes genetic drift[/QUOTE]You failed epically. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: Cite the evidence, right here, right now along with your sources. Where is the evidence that: 2) that Berber mtDNA lineages evince large effective population sizes[/QUOTE]You failed here too. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: While you're at it, if drift isn't at work here, explain the discrepancy between the extreme rarity of ancestral clades in between E-M81 and E-M35, even though the former only emerged ~5.6kya from the said predecessors.[/QUOTE]Here, you failed more than four times in a row. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: Then demonstrate that the paternal East African component brought there by Neolithic proto-Berber speakers (e.g., manifested as E-M81 in Y Chromosomal analysis) re-emerges as East African affiliated ancestry when other ancestry informative markers are consulted[/QUOTE]Same here: you failed more than four times in a row. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3