...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Berbers are primarily not African ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: My guess based on archaeology is maybe 2500 BCE for Euro input to coastal N Afrs. [/QUOTE]That is what I am usually talking about. Other people try to put it much later, typezeiss, pure silliness As today, over 90% of the Magheb population is coastal. It's not like in this time period, 2500 BC - 664 AD there was this big mass of Black people living all over the desert and these little "pockets" of Euros living along the coast. As today those inland areas of the Mahgreb were largley unpopulated and more so before the spread of the camel. And even during the Islamic conquests there are Arabs entering the region some Syrians in the army, types the Egyptians would call "Asiatics" The green period is another story but there is no evidence of continuity between the green period and the post hunter gather popualtions that came later. Swenet even thinks the Now, going back 12,000kya Brenna Henn et al hypothosized an earlier migration from Eurasia into the Maghreb. Several articles in recent years support this as a possibility. I'm not sure about it. Going back to the Iberomaurusian and capsian hunter gatherers of the wet period and the variety of differing skull types there as well as tool kit it's hard to tell if they are all indigenous African [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3