...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Berbers are primarily not African ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by KING: Maybe I am wrong Lioness but Trollpatrol is trying to show you to read that the skeleton you keep posting has its teeth removed like some cultures in the Sudan etc. [/QB][/QUOTE]He ripped it off from Tukuler. So the assumption is that Iberomaurusians were of the same stock as Sudanese? What about the fact that Sudanese are very tropically adapted and Iberomaurusians have limb rations like Alaskans as shown by Trenton Holliday one of the most prominent paleoanthropologists in the world. You cannot determine ancestry by a cultural tradition alone, and use it as a cause for exteme denial. Could that be political And it was also practiced in ancient Israel The Iberomaurusians were settled in Africa for 10,000 years. Do you think this tooth removal tradition therefore had to be a black African thing only? And once a foreign population is in a new region they are called "indigenous" or "natve" at that point, example, "Native Americans" - Asians who came form Siberia across the bearing strait Consider the mentality, people who post tons of DNA and physiocal anthropolgy data, then when they don't like the results throw it away [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3