...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Berbers are primarily not African ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by KING: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Amun-Ra The Ultimate: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by KING: What you written is nothing but True Zeiss. You see it around you with certain self hating Indians claiming anything other then there blackness. "No I am brown" I laugh at this because if it was the USA they would of went through the same things that happened to the Blacks and Latinos during the civil rights. Brainwashing is rife with Indians probably the most brainwashed people on this earth next to the white berbers. The good thing about Indians though is there are many who are trying to break the cycle of selfhate and you gotta commend them for trying because TRUTH IS that Indians shockingly ARE BLACK. Yeah lioness and her retarded Tut looks Indian was the dumbest thing I have read but it shows the Mentality of these people [/qb][/QUOTE]Black Indians are not related to Africans in any significant way. They don't share significant DNA or historic link with black African people like Yoruba, Wolof, Dinka, Zulu, etc. At least not more than European people for example. It's not about semantic. If we call black Indians populations, the A group and Sub-Saharan African populations the B group. We would see only limited DNA linkage between the A and B group and thus limited historical linkage. Black Indians never cluster with African people on autosomal genetic studies. Same thing with Berbers. If we call them the A group and Sub-Saharan Africans the B group. Then we would see limited DNA linkage between the A group and the B group thus limited historical linkage. Although Berber populations, even Berber with pale skin, are much closer to African than black Indians populations (due to higher level of admixture since they are geographically closer). Obviously all those things have repercussion in the medical field since some diseases affect more some group of people who are genetically related than others. But it also have repercussion in the historic/archaeological field. To know for example what part of the culture is related to shared origin (like archaeological assemblage, artifact like headrests,languages, etc) or to something else. Or simply to follow population movements along the years. I just want to repeat that it's not about semantic or politic. Any citizen of an African country including Europeans, Arabs, Berbers or people of any origin have full ownership right on the continent. It's about tracing the true history of people and their linkage to one another. [/QB][/QUOTE]Listen man. I said INDIANS ARE BLACK. They are. Could careless about there affiliation to Africans. These people ARE BLACK: Africans, Indians, Fijians, Melanesian, Australian Aborigines, Malaysians, Original Hawaiians, Original Polynesians, Original Filipinos, Original Thais,. Don't like it TOO Bad. Its Truth. Genes are genes son. ALL THESE PEOPLE WOULD OF SAT AT THE BACK OF THE BUS IN USA CUNTRY. Image is something that people are still stuck on. True people try to change that, sadly those who want to change that get shouted down and mocked by people who hang onto there color because aside from that, they see no value in there lifes. Berbers get a wake up call when they go to France, Let me ask you this. Are Africans and Berbers owners of Europe's continent? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3