...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Berbers are primarily not African ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by [b]the lioness,[/b]: [QUOTE]Originally posted by [b]xyyman[/b]: Give up European white women coming to Africa. It never happened!!!! [/QUOTE]Do you realize no Y DNA from the Taforalt has been presented? It may or may not have also been Eurasian to some extent. The M81 or other E is form analysis of modern berbers and M81 is thought to be only 5600 years old ! Also as far as the mtDNA is concerned look to history, raids, rape and pillage, Invaders come in. They kill/chase away the men and then rape the women and take them as slaves or wives So forgot your silly scenarios where a caravan of women only strolls in. There are other more sober explanations [/QUOTE]. Leave it to you to take "Amazons" seriously. My take is H1'3 developed autochthonously throughout Alboran concurrently ultimately deriving from some Levant/Iraq parent H. But that's just my guess work since all the puzzle pieces don't fit. But please tell us your "sober explanations" of which nrY may have existed in Maurusian. The possible nrY's of Maurusians can be deduced from which nrY is old enough and noted to be in or near the Maghreb. This can be assessed fromliving populations as ancient nrY is still not replicable afaik. Of course the result will only be hypothetical. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3